ライフサイエンスコーパス: invalid

1 d when samples were accidentally damaged or 'invalid'.

2 and selectivity would be at least partially invalid.

3 ition information was either inaccessible or invalid.

4 es; if included, the mechanism is seen to be invalid.

5 ic structure and averaged-effect solvent are invalid.

6 ween neural activity and synapse strength is invalid.

7 er-pulping efficiency in trees are therefore invalid.

8 g an increasing rate of introductions may be invalid.

9 HX analysis of RNase A urea denaturation is invalid.

10 ical techniques that assume independence are invalid.

11 ually will prove to be synonyms or otherwise invalid.

12 d be used because the adjusted odds ratio is invalid.

13 to support assertions that these trials are invalid.

14 d in this paper proves that hypothesis to be invalid.

15 tion of statistical energy redistribution is invalid.

16 tanding situations where the assumptions are invalid.

17 uence intermediates were found to be clearly invalid.

18 history based upon mitochondrial DNA may be invalid.

19 f fetal viability, our initial hypothesis is invalid.

20 ion of Cl- permeability of the SV channel is invalid.

21 that 52% of these structures were chemically invalid.

22 dence interval coverage and hypothesis tests invalid.

23 the analysis of power spectral densities is invalid.

24 tines into AI, indicating this assumption is invalid.

25 the assertion that our original analysis is invalid.

26 t-invariant point-spread functions are often invalid.

27 ms, especially the Orton rearrangement, were invalid.

28 g cues, each of which was valid, neutral, or invalid.

29 o be incorrectly coded for the results to be invalid.

30 ) as the sole primary product is shown to be invalid.

31 locity distribution, rendering the PRW model invalid.

32 simplifying assumptions that are frequently invalid.

33 odels, whereas the traditional joint test is invalid.

34 0 based on the porin structure would also be invalid.

35 rmal humans, we show that this assumption is invalid.

36 that several recently proposed subtypes are invalid.

37 Here we show that such arguments are invalid.

38 ons they draw from their data are considered invalid.

39 similarities to human bacteria is generally invalid.

40 hey are either underpowered or theoretically invalid.

41 6 [95% CI, 6.8-16.3] percentage points), and invalid (200 of 229 participants [87.3%] vs 252 of 326 p

42 However, the invalid 2D architecture of fabric limits the application

43 d, are considered automatically withdrawn or invalid 5 years after publication or once an update has

44 ntrations where both the BHA and the QEA are invalid and allows us to define precisely the conditions

45 When the cue was invalid and diminished covert attention, the covert-atte

46 a predetermined cutoff value are considered invalid and discarded.

47 e, we show that this assumption is generally invalid and investigate the consequences of lipid abunda

48 awn is that the Seng et al. study is largely invalid and should be retracted from the literature.

49 1 positive, 214 negative, 4 indeterminate, 1 invalid, and 2 specimen-rejected results.

50 terion for identifying the type I isozyme is invalid, and conclusions based on thermal inactivation a

51 recognition evidence by presenting valid or invalid anticipatory cues (e.g., "likely old") before re

52 Invalids are present in the crystallization medium and s

53 This may prove invalid, as has already been realized for other isotope

54 Their conclusion is invalid, as they compare efficiencies in completely diff

55 taminating ATPase activity will result in an invalid assay.

56 ze from a lower limiting current owing to an invalid assumption of inlaid disk geometry.

57 Without this invalid assumption, the constraints of carrier path cycl

58 e at low resolution (e.g., 40 kb bin) but is invalid at high resolution (e.g., 5 or 10 kb bins) becau

59 ies, such as doping and implantation, become invalid at the nanoscale.

60 on discrimination task, with either valid or invalid attention cueing, across a range of stimulus con

61 ntends that the neural coding metaphor is an invalid basis for theories of what the brain does.

62 But their argument is invalid because it fails to distinguish the different be

63 However, this assumption usually is invalid, because each lifetime is not necessarily associ

64 This conclusion is invalid, because they substantially misinterpret the emi

65 One invalid BinaxNOW result was identified.

66 Eyes were excluded for invalid biometry, lack of refractive data at the specifi

67 invalid records, and births with missing or invalid birth characteristics.

68 nvalid than valid bundles, and half of these invalid bundles occur systematically across research gro

69 erimentally not only that this assumption is invalid, but also that over a broad range of temperature

70 annot influence grain prices are shown to be invalid by direct analysis of price-setting practices of

71 n sample lysates that were false-negative or invalid by MTB Ultima were frozen, thawed, and re-tested

72 hc2-negative vaginal samples were repeatedly invalid by the cobas test due to beta-globin control fai

73 After those with missing covariates or invalid calorie intake (n = 23), diabetes (n = 59), and

74 mes included the percentage of patients with invalid cell phone numbers (wrong number or nontextable)

75 prevalence of and potential risk factors for invalid Cepheid GeneXpert enterovirus assay (GXEA) resul

76 ly are not observed, increased the number of invalid claims for cues.

77 fic progress, lead to false consensus around invalid claims, and undermine the credibility of ML-base

78 ults suggest that the principal cause of the invalid cluster inferences is spatial autocorrelation fu

79 resulted in P600 effects, with syntactically invalid code generating more positive deflections in the

80 9139 were excluded because of readmission or invalid coding.

81 ing care received prior to death can lead to invalid conclusions about the quality or type of care pr

82 g assays, false-positive results can lead to invalid conclusions.

83 cts methodologic weaknesses in studies using invalid controls, unblinded transesophageal echocardiogr

84 for the four experimental conditions (valid/invalid cue condition x target/distractor-stimulated).

85 n task, particularly in the most challenging invalid cue condition; this difference also was maintain

86 n errors and reaction time (RT) of valid and invalid cue trials and intra-individual variability of R

87 cue reliability (i.e., the ratio of valid to invalid cue trials), we varied the incentive to retain n

88 ared with when the cue misdirects attention (invalid cue) away from the location of the subsequent ta

89 e target (valid cue) or non-target stimulus (invalid cue, equally likely).

90 After a peripheral valid, neutral, or invalid cue, two cortically magnified gratings were pres

91 valid (cue and target at same location) and invalid (cue and target at opposing locations) cues in t

92 in the valid-cue condition and costs in the invalid-cue condition compared with the neutral conditio

93 n tracked the validity of the memory cueing (invalid cueing > valid cueing) and no retrieval success-

94 ar gyrus (SMG; AG) regions both demonstrated invalid cueing amplitude elevations, each region differe

95 Invalid cueing enhanced forward connections from visual

96 The invalid cueing response occurred even for correctly iden

97 ion to a spatial cue and reorientation-after invalid cueing-are mediated by two distinct networks in

98 nting and the bottom-up (forward) effects of invalid cueing.

99 ove judgments about that target, relative to invalid cues [5, 6].

100 After a low unilateral dose of muscimol, invalid cues impaired detection of contralateral targets

101 at reorienting attention to the target after invalid cues requires a phasic response, dependent on th

102 lowed valid cues than those after neutral or invalid cues.

103 After excluding invalid data, the number of final participants was 29,24

104 Exclusions included records with missing or invalid datasets, patients who had previously undergone

105 15.5% of reports (n=685 094) had missing or invalid date data provided by the manufacturer.

106 s across different timescales will result in invalid date estimates.

107 bined the available data from valid days and invalid days to impute missing values.

108 ethods ignore the available information from invalid days.

109 t takes into account the data available from invalid days.

110 0 [95% CI, 7.2-30.9] percentage points), and invalid (difference, 8.0 [95% CI, 0.8-15.4] percentage p

111 egraded the valid, complete activator DNA to invalid DNA fragments which can't trigger the trans-clea

112 ll type composition at each spot can lead to invalid downstream analysis, which is a critical issue r

113 as the late-stage therapeutic vaccination is invalid due to tumor-induced dysfunction of CD8+ T cells

114 , excluding lactating females and those with invalid energy intake (EI)].

115 foods and dietary supplements may result in invalid estimations of vitamin D intake distributions of

116 simple solvolytic correlation methods may be invalid even for comparisons of similar type substrates,

117 analysis and illustrate that the QSS may be invalid even if k-2<<k2.

118 et, provided inaccurate normalization and an invalid experimental result.

119 ign rule for this device has led to numerous invalid fabrications.

120 ompute time attributed to file corruption or invalid file paths, and significantly improve the qualit

121 ith multi-line sequences, whilst identifying invalid files.

122 classical, empirical models with assumptions invalid for 2D COF polymerization.

123 de and period, and may be unreliable or even invalid for analysis of nonstationary BP and BFV signals

124 be conservative for voxelwise inference and invalid for clusterwise inference.

125 but the coupling constants thus obtained are invalid for data-storage applications, where the more di

126 and suggest that this assumption may become invalid for humans as well.

127 However, this assumption is often invalid for microscale objects, since the motion of thes

128 The Clarity result was invalid for one sample.

129 the INR to standardize prothrombin times is invalid for some patients with lupus anticoagulants.

130 d that the popular Cheng-Prusoff equation is invalid for the calculation of the competitive inhibitio

131 management can be inconsistent, outdated, or invalid for the diverse population of the United States.

132 , we explicitly show that this assumption is invalid for the Euro-Dollar exchange rate.

133 solvent and protein nuclear coordinates but invalid for the solute nuclear coordinates in certain PC

134 apy or placebo (P< .20 for weeks 12-26, test invalid for weeks 26-50, and P<.67 for weeks 50-62).

135 Invalid GXEA result rates were markedly diminished by 82

136 The invalid GXEA results were reported for 43 (8.2%) specime

137 worker-collected swab alone; 1 child had an invalid health care worker swab.

138 The LRT becomes invalid, however, if offspring genotypes do not follow M

139 Patients with an invalid identification number, a duplicate surgery recor

140 nly design offers excellent power, but it is invalid if genotype and exposure are correlated in the p

141 Such actions may become invalid if the environment changes, at which point indiv

142 -1 MONITOR kit indicate that the results are invalid if the optical densities (ODs) from the PCR-ampl

143 however, have shown that this assumption is invalid in a number of animal models and suggest that th

144 usly been tested in an animal STD system, is invalid in a simple and general experimental model.

145 te for one another(an assumption that can be invalid in general) (b) leveraging the notion of a machi

146 undamental assumption of the MDRD formula is invalid in patients with advanced renal failure, and the

147 basis of self-reports will in most cases be invalid in settings such as epidemiological surveys and

148 d pendulum model despite this being shown as invalid in some instances.

149 based on tuberculin conversion rates may be invalid in such areas.

150 ensed matter or high-temperature plasmas are invalid in this intermediate regime.

151 ch as Students' T and the binomial tests are invalid in typical MRI experiments.

152 yme-to-substrate ratios for which the BHA is invalid, including the extreme of enzyme excess.

153 atings of 1-3, 4-6, and 7-9 were considered "invalid," "indeterminate," and "highly valid," respectiv

154 ielding inconsistent parameter estimates and invalid inference.

155 m treatment application, which can result in invalid inference.

156 our ability to use counterexamples to refute invalid inferences provides a foundation for rationality

157 Births with missing or invalid information on birth weight or gestational lengt

158 l horizontal pleiotropy and the influence of invalid instrumental variables, we performed sensitivity

159 eveloped specifically to address problems of invalid instrumental variables.

160 s study demonstrates the potential impact of invalid instruments on causal effect estimates and the p

161 However, biases from invalid instruments, such as weak instruments and horizo

162 After excluding invalid interactions within 12 community pharmacies, the

163 As a consequence of the position of these invalid intermediates in the sequence space, seven of th

164 ell lines are widely used, but can result in invalid, irreproducible research data.

165 new approach called R2S to select and remove invalid IVs (if any) to enhance the robustness.

166 ures of the method include its robustness to invalid IVs and applicability to GWAS summary data.

167 We also discuss the influence of invalid IVs and introduce a new approach called R2S to s

168 hods for causal inference in the presence of invalid IVs due to confounding, the reliability of MR me

169 l with more challenging situations with many invalid IVs with only weak pleiotropic effects, we modif

170 robustly and efficiently in the presence of invalid IVs.

171 Invalid labels decreased performance.

172 Invalid labels denoted unrelated objects in a different

173 Invalid labels do not affect drift rate directly, but th

174 reported 2 studies with intermixed Valid and Invalid labels shown before test displays and a third, c

175 Although that interpretation is invalid, large differences in k in different populations

176 ertebrate synaptic mechanisms of learning is invalid: learning in Aplysia cannot be explained in term

177 ed: (i) shifting spatial attention following invalid location cues, and (ii) adjusting the spatial sc

178 remaining 3 cases because of insufficient or invalid material.

179 ascribed bioactivities, designating them as invalid metabolic panaceas (IMPs).

180 n-assay interference compounds) and an IMPS (invalid metabolic panaceas) candidate.

181 particular, we point out that this work used invalid modeling tools, contained modeling errors, and m

182 ised cases where medical record numbers were invalid (n = 239), if esophageal or gastric varices were

183 lusion of facilities with missing (n=126) or invalid (n=1) data.

184 Mill's logic disqualifies as invalid nonexperimental evidence, which forms the bulk o

185 esults of the two types of research, because invalid observational studies normally are not publishab

186 ting false discovery rate (FDR) control: one invalid, one providing only a lower bound, and one valid

187 ears, 974 were excluded because there was an invalid Ontario Health Insurance Plan number or a date o

188 , where the RT-qPCR assay exhibited multiple invalid or inconclusive results.

189 les had Xpert results that were reported as "invalid" or "error" and were excluded, leaving 211 WB an

190 upcoming target (valid), on the other side (invalid), or on both sides (neutral).

191 y spatially informative (valid), misleading (invalid), or uninformative (neutral) cues.

192 ution that associated P-values may be either invalid, or a less-effective metric for discriminating D

193 d a contrast discrimination task with valid, invalid, or neutral probabilistic cues across multiple t

194 ne to avoid conclusions that are inaccurate, invalid, or not clearly justified.

195 emporal reconstruction, while also detecting invalid orderings.

196 However, existing DE methods either produce invalid P-values by ignoring the uncertainty in pseudoti

197 null distributions across genes can produce invalid P-values, since even non-DE genes can have diffe

198 dependent and provides an alternative to the invalid practice of using journal impact factors to iden

199 (control and/or TB-detection bands absent or invalid, precluding resistance reporting) in 19% (92 of

200 to reprogram their action in response to an invalid precue regardless of the type of preceding off-l

201 n either remained or slightly changed (valid/invalid preview).

202 verse reactions, of which 13 were considered invalid, primarily because of incomplete entries or beca

203 h that it is PRPP itself that is limiting in invalid PRPP-synthetase mutants and that the resulting m

204 g for 15 min prior to extraction reduced the invalid rate from 26.7% (52/195) to 0% (0/195).

205 les; dual Flu A/B virus positive, 4 samples; invalid rate, 1/201 [0.5%]), the LIAT detected 112 sampl

206 virus, 74 samples; Flu B virus, 38 samples; invalid rate, 11/201 [5.5%]), and the Xpert assay detect

207 virus, 76 samples; Flu B virus, 36 samples; invalid rate, 6/201 [3.0%]).

208 was 99.3% (95% CI, 98.0 to 99.8) with a 1.0% invalid rate.

209 ty of leave, a distinction between valid and invalid reasons for leave, poor mental health, absence o

210 is were stillbirths, infants with missing or invalid records, and births with missing or invalid birt

211 f both hemispheres showed higher activity on invalid relative to valid trials, reorienting responses

212 Such mistakes can lead to invalid research claims that reduce the credibility of t

213 Invalid result rates were determined to be 2.6% for the

214 and specificity 91.6%) while yielding fewer invalid results (0.8%) than conventional swabs.

215 Failure to do so may lead to invalid results even if they are mathematically correct.

216 The proportion of invalid results following Xpert HCV Viral Load Fingersti

217 The proportion of invalid results following Xpert HCV Viral Load Fingersti

218 There were zero invalid results from 220 total tests.

219 s were out of sequence, reducing the rate of invalid results from 3.2 to 0.59%.

220 lly consistent across laboratories, and most invalid results reflected a lack of HPV test sensitivity

221 The percentage of invalid results was 1.0%.

222 When samples with discordant or invalid results were retested, the agreement increased t

223 (25%) would be missed (1 extraction error, 2 invalid results, 15 MTBC-negative, 6 fluoroquinolone-ind

224 Aptima had fewer invalid results, and on average, the viral loads in CVL

225 pectively, were retested after indeterminate/invalid results.

226 ng of study-level RERI estimates may lead to invalid results.

227 to the whole dataset can yield statistically invalid results.

228 Significantly more non-determinate (error/invalid) results were observed with Truenat compared to

229 iability, lot-to-lot variability and rate of invalid runs were low for all RDTs (<2%).

230 ability, lot-to-lot variability, and rate of invalid runs were low for all RDTs (<2%).

231 d trials, with valid faster than neutral and invalid slower than neutral, indicating that the cues ef

232 biologically-relevant "valid" ligands from "invalid" small-molecule ligands bound to the protein.

233 rrently accepted names eventually will prove invalid, so diversity estimates are inflated by 32-44%.

234 ART and CTM, respectively (P = 1.000), with invalid specimen result rates of 1.0% (5 of 495 specimen

235 ll give distorted descriptive statistics and invalid statistical inference whenever the results stati

236 this issue have been small, used potentially invalid statistical tests, and produced inconsistent fin

237 MOSAEC, an algorithm that detects chemically invalid structures based on metal oxidation states.

238 e notion of continuous concentration changes invalid, such that signaling events are better described

239 whether a "translation" fails because of an invalid target in the human disease or because the thera

240 se increased the possibility of obtaining an invalid TE result significantly (P = .01).

241 ates is needed to minimize the potential for invalid test interpretation.

242 ever, the same tractograms contain many more invalid than valid bundles, and half of these invalid bu

243 tention networks activated more strongly for invalid than valid trials, particularly frontal regions.

244 eing effects (discrimination accuracy, valid-invalid) than high-probability cues, but only when respo

245 nal model parameters that are actually often invalid: That parameters generalize between contexts (e.

246 dependently by our two laboratories) renders invalid the molecular code mechanism of hemoglobin coope

247 A total of 20 randomizations were invalid, the main reason being lack of informed consent.

248 If invalid, the murid genome compositional organization wou

249 Comparing invalid to valid trials after right DLPFC conditioning r

250 l of the target or distractor, in a valid or invalid trial.

251 sis, we measured fMRI activity for valid and invalid trials (target at cued/un-cued location, respect

252 et) enhanced search accuracy relative to the invalid trials (when the cue surrounded a distracter); t

253 Release time on invalid trials in the attention task was increased after

254 d out of phase with respect to each other in invalid trials only, when attention had to be disengaged

255 Invalid trials showed a significant increase in response

256 c effects of cue predictability in valid and invalid trials were considered to reflect belief updatin

257 faster to look at the target on valid versus invalid trials, with valid faster than neutral and inval

258 s experienced significantly higher costs for invalid trials-reflected by larger RT differences betwee

259 ienting of attention is more demanding as in invalid trials.

260 rTMS selectively increases response times in invalid trials.

261 regions, and higher activity in valid- than invalid-trials.

262 -of-origin effects, showing that each can be invalid under certain scenarios.

263 of an individual, an assumption that may be invalid when considering recent admixture.

264 However, this assumption is invalid when mutations are not rare in a whole populatio

265 about the shape of the CMEs are likely to be invalid when significant spatial/temporal gradients in a

266 ariables, adjustment for birth weight may be invalid when there is an unmeasured common cause of LBW

267 However, this is invalid with more plausible mixed dominance and overdomi

268 es were either correct (valid) or incorrect (invalid) with respect to the subsequent move cue.