戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 chnique carries the accompanying risks of an invasive procedure.
2 id VKA reversal before an urgent surgical or invasive procedure.
3  for an elective operation or other elective invasive procedure.
4 nical utility, mainly because it requires an invasive procedure.
5 s accessed using microneedles in a minimally invasive procedure.
6 ver, obtaining such tissue often requires an invasive procedure.
7 liver disease who are undergoing an elective invasive procedure.
8 is a deep tissue biopsy culture, which is an invasive procedure.
9 e presence of a stenosis, but it requires an invasive procedure.
10 e-positive chest radiography had a resulting invasive procedure.
11 icance of coronary stenosis, but requires an invasive procedure.
12 ute coronary syndromes who are undergoing an invasive procedure.
13 d harm due to adverse events related to this invasive procedure.
14 te in brain tumours where biopsy is a highly invasive procedure.
15 men within 2 years, with 14.1% undergoing an invasive procedure.
16 g intracranial pressure directly requires an invasive procedure.
17 with nodular thyroid disease undergoing this invasive procedure.
18 , AMR diagnosis relies on biopsy which is an invasive procedure.
19 or embolization was proceeded as a minimally invasive procedure.
20 nts who receive AC and undergo surgery or an invasive procedure.
21 an 4 (Prg4) mutant TMJ discs without further invasive procedure.
22 nt <50 x 10(9) /L) who will be undergoing an invasive procedure.
23 void and reduce the complications during the invasive procedures.
24 -treated patients needing urgent surgical or invasive procedures.
25  needing VKA reversal for urgent surgical or invasive procedures.
26 avioral therapy, drug therapy, and minimally invasive procedures.
27 sary for patients needing urgent surgical or invasive procedures.
28 urgical safety for currently used, minimally invasive procedures.
29 health-care costs by eliminating unnecessary invasive procedures.
30 e choice reported increases in rates of less invasive procedures.
31  trabeculectomy success rates with minimally invasive procedures.
32 fetal infection while decreasing unnecessary invasive procedures.
33 31 patients were included; 247 underwent 700 invasive procedures.
34  evolving, with recent advances in minimally invasive procedures.
35  and management, noninvasive procedures, and invasive procedures.
36  and delay or even prevent the need for more invasive procedures.
37 ncer within at-risk groups without resort to invasive procedures.
38 al processes and enable improved planning of invasive procedures.
39 at-risk patients undergoing dental and other invasive procedures.
40 nfants admitted to hospital undergo repeated invasive procedures.
41 d trials that examined statin therapy before invasive procedures.
42 t improve clinical outcomes when used before invasive procedures.
43 outcomes are equally applicable to minimally invasive procedures.
44 they require antibiotic prophylaxis prior to invasive procedures.
45 tabolic readouts primarily through minimally invasive procedures.
46 e patients is challenging and often requires invasive procedures.
47 raining physicians for a number of minimally invasive procedures.
48 ls at any developmental stage with minimally invasive procedures.
49  in bleeding patients or in those undergoing invasive procedures.
50 nce of active bleeding or before surgical or invasive procedures.
51 blood flow in a manner directly analogous to invasive procedures.
52 ently as adjuncts to endoscopic or minimally invasive procedures.
53 ciated with a greater risk of requiring more invasive procedures.
54 m monitoring or treatment generally requires invasive procedures.
55 ia, and acute management of complications of invasive procedures.
56 cies or solid tumors or in those who undergo invasive procedures.
57  by nurses and doctors; and task shifting to invasive procedures.
58                 Indeterminate scans led to 6 invasive procedures, 1 patient died of complications of
59  total of 4591 patients underwent at least 1 invasive procedure: 24.7% of patients received dabigatra
60 5%]; risk ratio, 2.4 [95% CI, 2.3-2.5]), and invasive procedures (51% [95% CI, 50%-52%], vs hospice w
61                                              Invasive procedures (68.2% vs. 40.8%, p = .004) and hist
62 rgical implantation of a telemeter, but this invasive procedure adversely impacts animal welfare.
63  patients as well as their downstream use of invasive procedures after noninvasive testing in communi
64 ing from a very low frequency of testing and invasive procedures among a predominantly large percenta
65 total of 23,541 cancer patients underwent an invasive procedure and 474 (2%) had a postoperative VTE.
66                   Skin biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure and has been used in the evaluation o
67  For both sexes, these approaches involve an invasive procedure and have an uncertain risk of tissue
68 osis assessment; however, biopsy requires an invasive procedure and is prone to sampling error and re
69                                The effect of invasive procedures and analgesic-sedative exposure on h
70 n be introduced into the body with minimally invasive procedures and are often applied in tissue engi
71 y, family members were excluded from viewing invasive procedures and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in
72 rents' overwhelming desire to be present for invasive procedures and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
73 les (IPNs) remains challenging, resulting in invasive procedures and delays in diagnosis and treatmen
74 tentially reducing the number of unnecessary invasive procedures and delays in diagnosis.
75 thod has the potential to reduce unnecessary invasive procedures and emotional distress for breast ca
76 restoration of visual function avoiding more invasive procedures and enabling early assessment of the
77 t and quantify CTCs and ctDNA could minimize invasive procedures and improve prediction of clinical o
78 ting that the use of these biomarkers avoids invasive procedures and improves patient or transplant o
79               Both approaches involve highly invasive procedures and neither allows examination of in
80 rategies to decrease the rate of unnecessary invasive procedures and optimize surveillance regimens a
81 ancer (NMIBC) are committed to a lifetime of invasive procedures and potential hospitalizations that
82 ported that parents were present during more invasive procedures and reported higher levels of comfor
83 heparin (LMWH), with brief interruptions for invasive procedures and surgery.
84  be beneficial, in particular with minimally invasive procedures and when performed soon after sympto
85                       Parent presence during invasive procedures and/or resuscitation is a relatively
86  options and support during their children's invasive procedures and/or resuscitation.
87  validated (13 with urgent surgical or other invasive procedures) and 14 were discoverable (54%; 95%
88 rrhythmic therapy that includes medications, invasive procedures, and a combination of both in approp
89 n were measured and subsequent transfusions, invasive procedures, and bleed volume recorded.
90 ymptoms, with subsequent use of medications, invasive procedures, and clinical outcomes.
91  proxy for access and willingness to undergo invasive procedures, and examined treatments and outcome
92 have revolutionized medicine by facilitating invasive procedures, and have thus become essential drug
93 ed with greater use of statins, aspirin, and invasive procedures, and higher costs than functional te
94 novative behavior-based treatment, minimally invasive procedures, and medications currently under dev
95        The mean costs of subsequent testing, invasive procedures, and medications were higher after c
96 s monitoring, frequent physical evaluations, invasive procedures, and other demands of bedside care a
97 cant risk for bleeding, plans for surgery or invasive procedures, and platelet count </=5,000/mm.
98 eter aortic valve replacements are minimally invasive procedures, and therefore have emerged as an al
99 nds is mediated in part by the lower rate of invasive procedures, and we speculate that better access
100 ases in which the wrong patient undergoes an invasive procedure are sufficiently distressing to warra
101 bleeding and bleeding associated with urgent invasive procedures are concerns with ticagrelor, as wit
102 World Health Organization grade 2 or planned invasive procedures are established indications for plat
103                                              Invasive procedures are frequent in the ICU and consent
104                                              Invasive procedures are often performed emergently in th
105  monitor single-unit activity in humans when invasive procedures are required due to particular patho
106 ency have been key advantages, laborious and invasive procedures are required for electrophysiologica
107 t it might increase bleeding when surgery or invasive procedures are required.
108  for each patient and in determining whether invasive procedures are warranted.
109  the newer applications of PVF in monitoring invasive procedures, are mentioned.
110 eterm human neonates are exposed to numerous invasive procedures as part of life-saving care.
111 lve, and include its latest use in minimally invasive procedures as well as in the operating room.
112 e the feasibility of phaco-ECPL, a minimally invasive procedure, as first-step management in PAC dise
113       Policies to concentrate or regionalize invasive procedures at high-volume medical centers are u
114 lization, intensive care unit admission, and invasive procedures at the end of life, along with signi
115 ic lung volume reduction (BLVR), a minimally invasive procedure based on tissue engineering principle
116 c liver disease who were undergoing elective invasive procedures, but it was associated with an incre
117 nd is well suited for guiding many minimally invasive procedures, but its use is often precluded by t
118             A placebo-controlled trial of an invasive procedure can be ethically justified if: 1) the
119 ents with ACS who are scheduled for an early invasive procedure can prevent CI-AKI and improve short-
120                              The efficacy of invasive procedures can be assessed with a placebo contr
121                                              Invasive procedures can result in adverse cardiovascular
122 t confounders (underlying illness, severity, invasive procedures, Candida colonization), and using a
123  to determine whether the FNAB or additional invasive procedures caused the subsequent extraocular di
124 nutrition (TPN), blood product transfusions, invasive procedures, central venous catheters, hemodialy
125 n account the consequent diagnostic testing, invasive procedures, clinical outcomes, radiation exposu
126                            Acupuncture is an invasive procedure commonly used to relieve pain.
127 uated from 7 days before until 30 days after invasive procedures, considering only the first procedur
128       Evaluation and management services and invasive procedures contributed relatively little to thi
129 haracteristics (ACS presentation, low use of invasive procedures, coronary access issues) and were as
130 osis in 30 of 64 (46.8%) eyes; thus, further invasive procedures could be avoided.
131 upplement, and may even replace, some of the invasive procedures currently applied routinely to the e
132 creased MD (beta = 0.002, p = 0.02), whereas invasive procedures did not (beta = 0, p > 0.5 each).
133 , possibly due to growing evidence that this invasive procedure does not reduce mortality.
134 ble agents to include patients desiring less invasive procedures due to personal preference or as a r
135 ditional methods of fetal evaluation require invasive procedures (e.g. amniocentesis) with an inheren
136  of surgical procedures; number of minimally invasive procedures (eg, operative laparoscopy or ultras
137 ntial diagnosis of new lesions arising after invasive procedures, even in immunocompetent patients in
138                                Surgery is an invasive procedure evoking acute inflammatory and immune
139 econdary outcomes included nodule detection, invasive procedures, follow-up tests, and smoking cessat
140                    TCAR is a novel minimally invasive procedure for carotid revascularization in high
141 ane (CH(4)) breath tests are a cheap and non-invasive procedure for diagnosing fructose and lactose m
142 ment of hemophilia would require a minimally invasive procedure for gene delivery, have minimal assoc
143      Recent studies reported a new minimally invasive procedure for inguinal lymphadenectomy in patie
144            Sentinel-node biopsy, a minimally invasive procedure for regional melanoma staging, was ev
145 iewed all patients who underwent a minimally invasive procedure for the management of hepatic tumors
146           Balloon kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of painful vertebra
147 utaneous lumbar decompression is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of symptomatic lumb
148 d is simple and entails a significantly less invasive procedure for tissue sampling.
149     Percutaneous cryoablation is a minimally invasive procedure for tumor destruction, which can pote
150 eons, and fuels the study of alternate, less invasive procedures for Behcet patients.
151                                              Invasive procedures for complications declined during th
152               In contrast to the advances in invasive procedures for complications, early management
153 hrinking lung, and might obviate unnecessary invasive procedures for MPM.
154 em cell seeding on a scaffold and relatively invasive procedures for stem cell harvesting.
155  repair and recent developments in minimally invasive procedures for the repair of ureteropelvic junc
156               The authors went on to perform invasive procedures for the treatment of CCSVI with ques
157  the recent introduction of novel, minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of prostate cancer
158       With such a large variety of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of ureteropelvic j
159 ea and accessibility, which allows minimally invasive procedures for transplantation, graft monitorin
160 stic lesion and supports the necessity of an invasive procedure, for example, biopsy or surgical rese
161  for an elective operation or other elective invasive procedure, forgoing bridging anticoagulation wa
162                                The minimally invasive procedure has been successfully performed in 25
163                            Various minimally invasive procedures have emerged recently for the treatm
164                        Advances in minimally invasive procedures have resulted in an increased demand
165 ften associated with health-care contact and invasive procedures, have overtaken streptococci as the
166              The number of diagnostic tests, invasive procedures, hospitalizations, and medications d
167      Additional factors including surgery or invasive procedure in the past 30 days, prosthetic heart
168 ominent role of acute coronary syndromes and invasive procedures in cardiology, we practically consid
169       Venepuncture is one of the most common invasive procedures in healthcare.
170 timely diagnosis but also reduce unnecessary invasive procedures in patients with adequate blood flow
171         Bleeding is a feared complication of invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis and signi
172 al benefits, as do potential noninvasive and invasive procedures in recalcitrant cases.
173                        There were also fewer invasive procedures in specialized surveillance compared
174 owever, craniotomy was superior to minimally invasive procedures in the management of recurrences (RR
175 edictive value of recall examinations and of invasive procedures, in addition to rates of screening-d
176 and had been subjected to multiple and often invasive procedures including arthroscopy/synovial biops
177 the risk of acute adverse outcomes following invasive procedures, including postoperative atrial fibr
178 ; intraoperative graft assessment; minimally invasive procedures, including robotic-assisted surgery;
179 edictive value of recall examinations and of invasive procedures increased from 19.3% (4559 of 23 598
180           As tissue-based approaches require invasive procedures, information was mainly gleaned from
181       HWs protected themselves better during invasive procedures (injections, venipuncture, and surge
182 bnormal coagulation test results prior to an invasive procedure is a common clinical practice; howeve
183  oral anticoagulation (AC) for surgery or an invasive procedure is a complicated process.
184                               This minimally invasive procedure is an option for patients with centra
185 gulopathy when there is overt bleeding or an invasive procedure is planned.
186  from healthier patients undergoing the less invasive procedure is unclear.
187 ment but the technology to perform minimally invasive procedures is not currently available.
188 ve to be used as tissue sealant in minimally invasive procedures is reported.
189 heir welfare and ensure valid results during invasive procedures it is vital that we can detect subtl
190 loped to improve the rational use of cardiac invasive procedures, it is unknown whether greater adher
191                       Unlike other minimally invasive procedures, laparoscopic appendectomy did not o
192 oming years will be to find a way to obviate invasive procedures like posterior capsulotomy and vitre
193 gs to help patients avoid long-term pain and invasive procedures, like TMJ replacement.
194 ilation patients required significantly more invasive procedures, longer hospital stays, and longer t
195          Further use of noninvasive testing, invasive procedures, medications, and medical costs with
196  and Complex randomised controlled Trials In Invasive procedures, MR/K025643/1).
197 agnostic imaging tests (n = 19), nonsurgical invasive procedures (n = 19), and surgical procedures (n
198             In patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures (n = 5177; 17 studies), 13 frailty i
199 ble analysis, combined urinary diagnoses and invasive procedures (obstruction, incontinence, bleeding
200                  A complication diagnosis or invasive procedure occurred in 54.5% of men within 2 yea
201           Its diagnosis is contingent on the invasive procedure of allograft biopsy.
202 tion, and its diagnosis is contingent on the invasive procedure of allograft biopsy.
203 s and human outcomes and the need to perform invasive procedures on animals; hence requiring new pred
204  initiation of treatment, before surgical or invasive procedures, on the occasion of hemorrhagic or t
205 ture and, after mechanical denudation during invasive procedures or cellular loss from natural causes
206  appropriate selection of elderly people for invasive procedures or drug treatments and would be the
207 ed coronary atherosclerosis as the basis for invasive procedures or for lifelong intense risk factor
208 ethods of stimulating brain activity require invasive procedures or have other limitations.
209 ate patients' comfort and their tolerance of invasive procedures or other interventions within the IC
210 alization, physician fees, laboratory tests, invasive procedures, outpatient encounters, and readmiss
211 ten for a noninvasive or, when indicated, an invasive procedure (P < .05).
212 ferences in the use of acute medications and invasive procedures partially attenuated this mortality
213   Because APA diagnosis requires a difficult invasive procedure, patients often remain undiagnosed an
214 mortality reduction) and 1186 false-positive invasive procedures per 100 000 persons.
215 bcutaneous (SC) site may require a minimally invasive procedure performed under local anesthesia, but
216                                              Invasive procedures performed by residents were recorded
217 related problems by using targeted minimally invasive procedures performed with image guidance.
218                                    Number of invasive procedures performed, failure and complication
219                    SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure, performed on an outpatient basis at
220 ose prolonged stays in hospital and need for invasive procedures place them at increased risk for hos
221 opic procedures and may facilitate minimally invasive procedures previously felt unfeasible with stan
222                                              Invasive procedure rates declined with later year of bra
223 e 33.8%, 21.0%, and 16.7%, respectively, and invasive procedure rates were 10.3%, 0.8%, and 4.0%, res
224         The use of antithrombotic agents and invasive procedures reduces ischemic complications but i
225  intensive care, mechanical ventilation, and invasive procedure remained unchanged after the introduc
226 loping advanced surgical tools for minimally invasive procedures represents an activity of central im
227 thods for staging exist; mediastinoscopy, an invasive procedure requiring general anesthesia, is curr
228            The routine use of statins before invasive procedures should be considered.
229                  Statins administered before invasive procedures significantly reduce the hazard of p
230 nd difficult, and it is hard to justify more invasive procedures such as a bronchoscopy in young chil
231  cycle phase without fatal and/or perturbing invasive procedures such as cell staining, fixing, and/o
232                               Prior to FAST, invasive procedures such as diagnostic peritoneal lavage
233                                         More invasive procedures such as hemispherectomy and multiple
234 ome more adept at such procedures, maximally invasive procedures such as intestinal neovagina may be
235  Generally, agreement was excellent for more invasive procedures such as prostatectomy or radiation (
236 failure and death, are usually assessed with invasive procedures such as right heart catheterization
237        Bleb needling may defer or avoid more invasive procedures such as tube-shunts or repeat trabec
238                     The results of minimally invasive procedures such as urethral dilation and transu
239 g devices are valuable for guiding minimally invasive procedures such as vascular stent placements.
240 ently, family member presence during routine invasive procedures such as venipuncture, intravenous ca
241  morbidity and mortality incidence, requires invasive procedures such as, debridement with primary cl
242 he most sensitive diagnosis of PDAC requires invasive procedures, such as endoscopic ultrasonography,
243 Diagnosis and monitoring of disease requires invasive procedures, such as endoscopy and tissue biopsy
244                                 Several less invasive procedures, such as sentinel lymph node biopsy
245 irrhosis and significant coagulopathy before invasive procedures, TEG-guided transfusion strategy lea
246 acoronary stents in most patients, is a less invasive procedure than coronary artery bypass graft (CA
247 omy without axillary surgery, it is an extra invasive procedure that does not facilitate obtaining ne
248             Radioembolization is a minimally invasive procedure that involves implantation of radioac
249                           PTK is a minimally invasive procedure that is often successful in delaying
250 lagen crosslinking (CXL) is a relatively non-invasive procedure that leads to an increase in corneal
251 IAC) is only identified by amniocentesis, an invasive procedure that limits its clinical translation.
252                                   This is an invasive procedure that may interfere with the microtubu
253    Transcatheter embolization is a minimally invasive procedure that uses embolic agents to intention
254 lacebo for 14 days before a planned elective invasive procedure that was performed within 5 days afte
255 minished by the use of other putatively more invasive procedures that are frequently used in the labo
256 eal-time x-ray fused with MRI (XFM) to guide invasive procedures that combines the best features of b
257 lizations in hospitals capable of performing invasive procedures that had at least 25 HF hospitalizat
258  malignant involves either repeated scans or invasive procedures that sample the lung tissue.
259 ctice of neurosurgery has moved towards less invasive procedures the need for prolonged, deep general
260 cytopenia) or that were addressed partially (invasive procedures), the ASCO search extended back to J
261           Once implanted through a minimally invasive procedure, the microprobe can stay within a sol
262            Among patients who do not receive invasive procedures, the cost of HF hospitalization is h
263             Along with a trend for minimally invasive procedures, these forces have challenged the ea
264            Transfusion of plasma prior to an invasive procedure to correct mild to moderate abnormal
265 er to determine whether we are offering this invasive procedure to the patients who are most at risk
266               Too few patients had minimally invasive procedures to comment on their effect on sexual
267  is readily available, patients must undergo invasive procedures to differentiate heartworm from othe
268 mising alternatives to hBMSCs, which require invasive procedures to harvest with limited cell quantit
269 G is voltage calibrated and does not require invasive procedures to impale electrodes in nerves and t
270 will allow for more judicious application of invasive procedures to pregnancies at significant risk f
271 utilized glabrous skin biopsies, a minimally invasive procedure, to evaluate these issues systematica
272          Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive procedure used during coronary angiography to d
273 copic mucosal resection (EMR) is a minimally invasive procedure used for the treatment of lesions in
274 ent System (Pulmonx Inc., Redwood, CA) is an invasive procedure used to assess collateral ventilation
275 ammation undergoing topical therapy alone vs invasive procedures (vitreous biopsy and/or intravitreal
276                              A slightly more invasive procedure was performed later in the study: the
277 or kidneys procured by open versus minimally invasive procedures was compared (procedures compared we
278         Only 1 study investigating minimally invasive procedures was identified.
279 s treated with dabigatran and planned for an invasive procedure were eligible for inclusion.
280 r 3 of 6 types of surgery studied, minimally invasive procedures were associated with significantly l
281            For 4 types of surgery, minimally invasive procedures were consistently associated with si
282                                              Invasive procedures were defined as percutaneous coronar
283                           Complications from invasive procedures were low in both groups (9.8% in the
284 ions were nondiagnostic for lung cancer, and invasive procedures were performed after bronchoscopy in
285 er prostate brachytherapy was common, though invasive procedures were required infrequently.
286                              Medications and invasive procedures were used to a similar extent in pat
287 ucosal bleedings and bleeding at the time of invasive procedures, whereas other life-threatening symp
288 w in addition to structural OCT data without invasive procedures will help to further elucidate both
289    Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive procedure with increasing promise in treatment
290 n valve durability (TAVR) and that of a more invasive procedure with known durability (SAVR).
291   Today open radical prostatectomy is a less-invasive procedure with low morbidity providing excellen
292                      However, this is a semi-invasive procedure with rare but potential life-threaten
293 ey health after kidney transplantation is an invasive procedure with some risk to the patient.
294 used to estimate the tradeoff between a less invasive procedure with unknown valve durability (TAVR)
295 of the most commonly practiced and minimally invasive procedures with a recognized morbidity relating
296            Models testing the association of invasive procedures with hippocampal volumes and DTI mea
297                                    Minimally invasive procedures with little-to-no recovery time are
298  needed to compare the outcomes of minimally invasive procedures with those of open procedures.
299 ocietal shifts have focused patients on less invasive procedures, with less downtime and more rapid r
300                 We found that both minimally invasive procedures yielded kidney allografts with excel

 
Page Top