ライフサイエンスコーパス: irrational

1 ry between the AWC neurons can make the worm irrational.

2 onclude that the strategy humans play is not irrational.

3 o account, human behaviour no longer appears irrational.

4 Neither system is the devil and neither is irrational.

5 ated with impulsivity, it is not necessarily irrational.

6 ing treatments are inconsistent and possibly irrational.

7 ected values, these decisions are considered irrational.

8 novel interpretation: choice is efficiently irrational.

9 rom our normative expectations often appears irrational.

10 o evidence-based arguments, or fundamentally irrational?

11 Should policymaking assume humans are irrational?

12 strong attachment to goals can often appear irrational - a perspective captured by terms such as per

13 Deviations in others were criticised as irrational and explained as superficial and part of a 's

14 ndividuals into behaviors that are otherwise irrational and it may be one source of the irrational be

15 the idea of humans lying to themselves seems irrational and maladaptive, if even possible.

16 imicrobial resistance (AMR), associated with irrational antimicrobial use (AMU) poses a significant h

17 and a formal explanation for this seemingly irrational behavior remains unclear.

18 Is irrational behavior the incidental outcome of biological

19 al prefrontal cortex correlates tightly with irrational behavior.

20 oice as a general explanation for apparently irrational behavior.

21 value range adaptation, eventually yielding irrational behavior.

22 timatum offers are often rejected, and this "irrational" behavior has been attributed to an emotional

23 e irrational and it may be one source of the irrational behaviors underlying market bubbles and crash

24 our model can account for several so-called 'irrational' behaviors, such as the similarity effect as

25 ng has long been taken as a prime example of irrational behaviour in human decision making; however,

26 study illustrates how experimentally induced irrational behaviour supports rather than weakens the ev

27 Agent-based computational models can capture irrational behaviour, complex social networks and global

28 explained by a mixture of self-interest and irrational beliefs about the game's payoffs, and not alt

29 te between two existing hypotheses about how irrational biases emerge: the hypothesis that biases res

30 economics has demonstrated that people have irrational biases, which make them susceptible to decisi

31 sks that are classically used to demonstrate irrational biases.

32 affect heuristic could account for similar 'irrational' biases in humans, and may reflect a more gen

33 irms to become overly optimistic, leading to irrational booms in adoption.

34 nment to infer when an action is rational or irrational; (c) making predictions about an agent's goal

35 e MHD offers one of the clearest examples of irrational choice behavior in humans.

36 emotional processes, which in turn leads to irrational choice behavior.

37 owever, we found that participants showed an irrational choice bias, preferring choices that had prev

38 and 2 (both p < 0.001), and a higher rate of irrational choice in task 1 (p = 0.046) before making de

39 al, multicomponent rewards that are prone to irrational choice of normal and brain-damaged individual

40 zation generate significant (and classically irrational) choice phenomena driven by either the value

41 We observe this type of irrational choices in behavior.

42 contexts, a relative value code can lead to irrational choices.

43 how that intransitive (and thus economically irrational) choices paradoxically improve accuracy (and

44 We identify irrational cognition easily when it leads to 'wrong' out

45 ether or not aneural cells may be capable of irrational cognition, making associations based on coinc

46 The degree to which people use "irrational" cognitive heuristics when choosing under unc

47 quences of sleep deprivation is imprecise or irrational communication, demonstrated by degradation in

48 eural foragers display conserved rational or irrational decision making depending on outcome predicti

49 Irrational decision making in humans and other species c

50 quantum Markov blankets ensure meta-learned irrational decision making is fitted to explainable mani

51 periment contradict the idea that people are irrational decision-makers when they do not optimize the

52 this affect heuristic can lead to apparently irrational decision-making.

53 near geometry predicts a specific pattern of irrational decision-making: that decision-makers will ma

54 rgy conservation, diverse psychopathologies, irrational decisions in invertebrates, and some aspects

55 Humans make irrational decisions in the presence of irrelevant distr

56 laying prospective punishing paths predicted irrational decisions to approach riskier environments, a

57 uld continue to pave the way for rational or irrational design of microbes or enzymes with novel reme

58 kly self-regulated emotional drives of fear, irrational desire, and mistrust, which predispose to psy

59 ut this principle successfully mitigated the irrational discounting of threats of AUD.

60 ction is thus non-normative and economically irrational, driven by valence rather than objective util

61 sual prioritization can thus be economically irrational, driven by valence rather than objective util

62 ain damage are associated with exceptionally irrational economic decision making in situations of unf

63 ional reactions, would result in exaggerated irrational economic decisions.

64 he longstanding question of why humans make "irrational" economic choices.

65 adults often default to treating immoral and irrational events as impossible, and provide a case stud

66 We must avoid "irrational exuberance."

67 individuals with subclinical social phobia (irrational fear of social situations without significant

68 phobia was defined, ranging from concern to irrational fear.

69 People can express irrational fears and disgust responses towards certain w

70 n the risks for phobias and their associated irrational fears in male twins.

71 l, and blood or injury) and their associated irrational fears.

72 the etiology of phobias and their associated irrational fears.

73 d/injury phobias as well as their associated irrational fears.

74 The irrational forms of attitude change that protect the sel

75 evaluation criterion and the conclusion that irrational frequency ratios near 0.8 typically yield hig

76 ons are surprisingly variable and can appear irrational in ways that have defied mechanistic explanat

77 the role models of the donees for relatively irrational individuals and the unchanged strategies of t

78 ent years to explain a variety of seemingly "irrational" judgment and decision-making findings.

79 I will look at three examples of irrational learning in aneural systems in terms of semio

80 emonstrate the utility of combinatorial, or "irrational", linker design for optimizing bivalent inhib

81 n fixed length games, which is often called 'irrational', may in fact be the favored outcome of natur

82 ization), resulting in overall increased and irrational monetary loss for the subjects.

83 ymmetry, outperforming alternative models of irrational, motivated updating and models lacking the fu

84 It does not represent irrational numbers (e.g., 2), however, and thereby fails

85 absence of causative stimuli) and delusions (irrational, often bizarre beliefs).

86 ribozyme motif has been found, rational and irrational optimization techniques can be used to identi

87 lly manifests in compulsive urges to perform irrational or excessive avoidance behaviors.

88 system, which some consider 'impulsive' or 'irrational', or our supposedly more rational deliberativ

89 lity in decision making processes leading to irrational outcomes is a major concern for their impleme

90 el metal-sequestering peptides, rational and irrational pathway engineering, and enzyme design.

91 which other species exhibit these seemingly irrational patterns [7-9], similarities across species w

92 Compulsive behaviour, an apparently irrational perseveration in often maladaptive acts, is a

93 o the biological rationality of economically irrational preferences.

94 rmation-seeking in humans is often viewed as irrational rather than utility maximizing.

95 behavior, which is commonly perceived as an irrational response to the presence of irrelevant option

96 ), an effect that may help explain seemingly irrational risk taking.

97 ther, it is usually the result of unplanned, irrational scheduling and resource allocation.

98 Random, irrational, subtherapeutic artemisinin doses and self-me

99 t y-alumina as well as the (100) segments of irrational surfaces (invariably always present in all y-

100 further 28% exhibiting paranoid, deluded or irrational thinking, whereas <4% of non-mutation bearers

101 ey still occur in the absence of any bias or irrational thinking.

102 enefits may explain unexpected and seemingly irrational thought patterns, such as belief polarization

103 specific interventions, such as challenging irrational thoughts or helping patients devise strategie

104 Type II and IV twins with irrational twin boundaries are studied by high-resolutio

105 provided by medicine sellers in Nigeria; the irrational use of antimalarials in the ACT era revealed

106 urn, allergic diseases increase the risk for irrational use of antimicrobial therapy.

107 d countries, resulting in high mortality and irrational use of antimicrobials.

108 The widespread and irrational use of azole antifungal agents has led to an

109 ous beliefs can have value-self-deception is irrational yet can facilitate optimal behavior.