ライフサイエンスコーパス: isolator

1 atter) and applied physics (e.g., magnetless isolators).

2 ttle of BacT/Alert or the aerobic culture of Isolator.

3 ivities within a purpose-built flexible-film isolator.

4 on has been achieved without any intracavity isolator.

5 lectrically controlled subwavelength optical isolator.

6 and non-reciprocal devices, such as optical isolators.

7 ations, such as on-chip few-photon microwave isolators.

8 down the functionalities of these nonlinear isolators.

9 medium and 41 of 42 (98%) which grew only in Isolators.

10 The Isolator 1.5 microbial system (ISO 1.5) (Wampole Laborat

11 The use of the Wampole Isolator 1.5-ml pediatric blood culture tube for the det

12 lawi by using the BACTEC MYCO/F LYTIC (MFL), ISOLATOR 10 (Isolator), Septi-Chek AFB (SC-AFB), and Sep

13 mia than were the heretofore standard manual ISOLATOR 10 and radiometric BACTEC 13A systems.

14 for BACTEC MYCO/F LYTIC versus 20.4 days for ISOLATOR 10 for 24 of 230 pairs, and 9.9 days for BacT/A

15 days for BacT/ALERT MB versus 19.0 days for ISOLATOR 10 for 24 of 257 pairs.

16 2.6 days for BACTEC 13A versus 20.0 days for ISOLATOR 10 for 26 of 261 pairs, 12.8 days for BACTEC MY

17 acT/ALERT MB (bioMerieux, Durham, N.C.), and ISOLATOR 10 lysis-centrifugation (Wampole Laboratories,

18 ctec Myco/F Lytic procedure, and that of the Isolator 10 lysis-centrifugation system in the detection

19 BacT/ALERT MB was positive for 22 (85%), and ISOLATOR 10 was positive for 21 (81%).

20 days for BacT/Alert MB versus 23.8 days for Isolator 10, and 21.1 days for Bactec Myco/F Lytic versu

21 for Bactec Myco/F Lytic versus 22.7 days for Isolator 10.

22 BACTEC MYCO/F LYTIC and BACTEC 13A and then ISOLATOR 10.

23 Laboratories; 1.5 ml of blood) or a standard Isolator (10 ml of blood) and a bottle of ESP anaerobic

24 ogens in the blood could be determined using Isolators, 73 (60.3%) represented low-level bacteremia (

25 uding optically controllable circulators and isolators, all-optical switching, nonlinear-enhanced rot

26 The use of a second Isolator and additional aerobic and anaerobic bottles an

27 However, a similar comparison showed the Isolator and the ESP 80A systems to have statistically s

28 ince it indicates broad applications such as isolators and chiral polarization transistors which are

29 Low-loss optical isolators and circulators are critical nonreciprocal com

30 y must be broken to realize devices (such as isolators and circulators) that provide one-way propagat

31 alization of non-reciprocal devices, such as isolators and circulators, of fundamental importance in

32 Nonreciprocal components, such as isolators and circulators, provide highly desirable func

33 b repertoire when animals were maintained in isolators and colonized with a defined gut flora.

34 mputing technologies, from nanoscale optical isolators and full-duplex nanoantennas to topologically-

35 araday rotators find applications in optical isolators and magnetic-field imaging technologies.

36 sodes for which two or more culture devices (Isolators and/or bottles) were inoculated, 85 (59%) were

37 tle of BacT/Alert and the aerobic culture of Isolator, and both of these combinations identified at l

38 gle mode lasers, coherent perfect absorbers, isolators, and diodes.

39 other experimentally demonstrated terahertz isolators, and indeed, even rivals that of commercially

40 ived as GF by embryo transfer, maintained in isolators, and sacrificed at 60 days in parallel with ag

41 nanoribbons and realization of a NEMS signal isolator are also discussed.

42 However, cryogenic circulators and isolators are disadvantageous in scalable superconductin

43 The presented FR isolators are made via lithography and sputter depositio

44 The isolators are simple 1D 2-element waveguides, where garn

45 10 germfree mice were maintained in separate isolators as controls.

46 ropose a device scheme to realize an optical isolator based on a pass-through silicon nitride (SiN) r

47 relatively bulky components such as optical isolators based on the Faraday rotation, hindering the m

48 ample of blood, cultures for fungi using the Isolator blood culture system (Wampole Laboratories, Cra

49 covery of 1,270 fungal isolates from 176,144 Isolator blood cultures (0.72% positive) on bacterial an

50 ed CD4 lymphocyte counts, immunophenotyping, isolator blood cultures, and radiological scans.

51 nfected cats were collected in both EDTA and Isolator blood-lysis tubes and were subsequently plated

52 Moreover, one cannot construct an optical isolator by incorporating this structure into any system

53 a lead-lined compounding aseptic containment isolator (CACI) was installed.

54 re separated from their neuron targets by an isolator chamber ring.

55 capitulate these findings in vitro using the isolator chamber system developed in our lab for analysi

56 dds complexity and scale to photonic diodes, isolators, circulators and also sets fundamental efficie

57 However, non-reciprocal components such as isolators, circulators and gyrators enable new applicati

58 interference by background contamination, an isolator column (PFC kit) was installed in between eluen

59 bacteremia, the sensitivities of the MFL and Isolator concentrate in the SC-AFB bottle were similar (

60 For bacteremia, the MFL was similar to the Isolator concentrate on chocolate agar (34 of 44 versus

61 ottle was as sensitive as the SC-B bottle or Isolator concentrate on chocolate agar or IMA slants.

62 Next, 0.5-ml aliquots of Isolator concentrate were inoculated into an SC-AFB bott

63 rs and the difficulty of integrating optical isolators directly on-chip.

64 The performance of our isolator far exceeds that of other experimentally demons

65 t-effective for those laboratories using the Isolator for routine blood cultures and furthermore may

66 f designing chip-based magnetic-free optical isolators for information processing and laser protectio

67 ssing, providing a way to chip-scale optical isolators for optical communications and computing.

68 , even rivals that of commercially available isolators for optical wavelengths.

69 Here, we realize an active isolator formed by coupling two nondegenerate Josephson

70 n that results in ultralow-noise lasers with isolator-free operation for silicon photonics.

71 ted broth systems that are comparable to the Isolator in recovery of fungi.

72 symmetric transmission based on EPs, optical isolators in nonlinear EP systems and novel concepts to

73 re spreading, and we show how to create such isolators in synthetic and real-world networks.

74 By incorporating our Josephson-based isolator into a superconducting qubit setup, we demonstr

75 As an application, a Si(3)N(4)-based optical isolator is demonstrated by spatiotemporal modulation, w

76 s observed in T(2E) when the Josephson-based isolator is turned on.

77 well as all of the bottles containing actual Isolator LAR failed to reach the maximum within 42 days.

78 Stabilization is achieved without an optical isolator, leveraging resilience to optical feedback of 3

79 to identify the specific component(s) of the Isolator lysis-anticoagulant reagent (LAR) responsible f

80 samples also were negative for fungi by the Isolator method.

81 reciprocity, we here demonstrate an optical isolator on a silicon chip enforced by phase-matched par

82 ve synthesizers without the need for optical isolators, owing to the ultrahigh-quality-factor cavity.

83 to immunologic injury and suggests that the isolator piglet model could serve as a useful model to d

84 This can best be tested in the isolator piglet model in which maternal and other extrin

85 Isolator piglets infected with porcine reproductive and

86 ectratypic analysis of B cells from neonatal isolator piglets show a non-Gaussian pattern with prefer

87 ate that PRRSV induces B cell hyperplasia in isolator piglets that leads to immunologic injury and su

88 However, only in PRRSV-infected isolator piglets was nearly the identical spectratype ob

89 Therefore, neonatal isolator piglets were colonized with a benign Escherichi

90 e-matched, virus-infected fetuses, colonized isolator piglets, and conventional adults.

91 anaerobic bottle and the aerobic culture of Isolator recovered as may isolates (374 versus 377) and

92 ly when combined with the aerobic culture of Isolator, resulted from not only enhanced recovery of ob

93 Isolator sediment was divided among eight agar media, in

94 the BACTEC MYCO/F LYTIC (MFL), ISOLATOR 10 (Isolator), Septi-Chek AFB (SC-AFB), and Septi-Chek bacte

95 Over this period, a total of 9,442 pediatric Isolator specimens were processed, with yeast or yeast-l

96 40 blood culture system, was compared to the Isolator system (IS) for the recovery of fungi and to th

97 , 6 to 18 days) for those recovered with the Isolator system (P < 0.05).

98 dium and 7 days (range, 5 to 7 days) for the Isolator system (P < 0.05); the mean times to identifica

99 EC Plus Aerobic/F bottle than for either the Isolator system (P = 0.0003) or the MYCO/F Lytic bottle

100 ess for the MYCO/F Lytic bottle than for the Isolator system (P = 0.0004).

101 ignificantly more pathogens overall than the Isolator system (P = 0.0006).

102 significantly more pathogens than either the Isolator system (P = 0.0084) or the standard method (P =

103 d.) was compared with aerobic culture of the Isolator system (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) f

104 ected H. capsulatum in seven samples but the Isolator system alone detected H. capsulatum in seven sa

105 vered, 6 from broth medium alone, 4 from the Isolator system alone, and 10 from both systems.

106 ystem required less processing time than the Isolator system and eliminates the hands-on time for det

107 ystem required less processing time than the Isolator system and eliminates the hands-on time for the

108 The combination of the Isolator system and MYCO/F Lytic bottle may be useful as

109 Both the Isolator system and the standard plate method recovered

110 The Isolator system detected statistically significantly mor

111 Similarly, the Isolator system detected statistically significantly mor

112 assessing individual probable pathogens, the Isolator system detected statistically significantly mor

113 bottle with two other BACTEC bottles and the Isolator system for the recovery of bacteria as well as

114 by comparing its performance to that of the Isolator system for the recovery of fungi and to that of

115 y of fungal isolates from blood by using the Isolator system has been reported previously.

116 sults support previous observations that the Isolator system is more sensitive than tubes containing

117 th systems, 7 samples were positive with the Isolator system only, and 5 samples were positive with M

118 ical difference in recovery that favored the Isolator system over the MYCO/F Lytic bottle (P = 0.0015

119 The Isolator system recovered more pathogens than the standa

120 Septi-Chek system (P = 0.083); however, the Isolator system recovered significantly more microorgani

121 The Isolator system recovered statistically significantly mo

122 The Isolator system required the most processing time compar

123 when blood collected and processed with the Isolator system was placed in BACTEC 12B bottles for rad

124 used and in 6 of 20 (30%) cases in which the Isolator system was used.

125 ely compared three blood culture system, the Isolator system, a lysis-centrifugation system, the Sept

126 -year study period, the use of the pediatric Isolator system, at the discretion of the treating physi

127 Compared with the manual Isolator system, the MYCO/F Lytic system has the advanta

128 , 7 to 11 days) for those recovered with the Isolator system.

129 ve Staphylococcus spp. (P = 0.0029) than the Isolator system.

130 ction of positive cultures required with the Isolator system.

131 nt medium for the recovery of fungi from the Isolator system.

132 ium and 9 days (range, 6 to 18 days) for the Isolator system; the mean times to identification were 2

133 me probable pathogens in the ESP 80A and the Isolator systems, there was no statistically significant

134 ent an active, purely mechanical stress wave isolator that consists of short cylindrical particles ar

135 istence of certain subgraphs, called network isolators, that can completely inhibit any failure sprea

136 obic BacT/Alert bottle or aerobic culture of Isolator, the BacT/Alert anaerobic bottle recovered sign

137 t mice were also housed in the same germfree isolator to study transmission patterns, and 10 germfree

138 loy table-scale systems with bulk-optics and isolators to achieve requisite noise, stability, and tun

139 ngs indicate that spines serve as electrical isolators to prevent input interaction, and thus generat

140 ed favoring the BACTEC resin bottle over the Isolator tube (P < 0.05).

141 each of four blood culture receptacles: the Isolator tube (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) and

142 F Lytic bottle only and one isolate from the Isolator tube (whose sediment was inoculated into the BA

143 e other from the MYCO/F Lytic bottle and the Isolator tube (whose sediment was inoculated into the BA

144 ed at 5 ml into an MFL bottle, 10 ml into an Isolator tube for lysis and centrifugation, and 10 ml in

145 ator tube on SDA, 30 days; and sediment from Isolator tube in a BACTEC 13A bottle, 42 days.

146 m Isolator tube on CA, 3 days; sediment from Isolator tube on BHI, 30 days; sediment from Isolator tu

147 robic Lytic/10 bottle, 5 days; sediment from Isolator tube on CA, 3 days; sediment from Isolator tube

148 d subcultures on chocolate agar and from the Isolator tube on fungal media showed no growth.

149 Isolator tube on BHI, 30 days; sediment from Isolator tube on SDA, 30 days; and sediment from Isolato

150 stoplasma capsulatum were recovered from the Isolator tube only.

151 eria from sediments of blood collected in an Isolator tube was evaluated by comparing its performance

152 The sediment from the Isolator tube was inoculated onto chocolate agar (CA), b

153 ubated for 7 days, and the sediment from the Isolator tube was inoculated onto solid medium and this

154 ubated for 7 days, and the sediment from the Isolator tube was inoculated to sheep blood and chocolat

155 um tube with sodium polyanetholsulfonate, an Isolator tube, and BACTEC aerobic and anaerobic bottles.

156 egative were blood specimens collected in an Isolator tube.

157 d with 25,333 CFU/ml after collection in the Isolator tubes (P < 0.01).

158 We do not advocate the routine use of Isolator tubes in the evaluation of the febrile, neutrop

159 om sediments of blood specimens collected in Isolator tubes, and it provided significantly faster det

160 Current experimental SOI isolators use nonreciprocal phase shift (NRPS) in interf

161 erimental TE-mode silicon-on-insulator (SOI) isolators using Faraday Rotation are here realized to fi

162 ed the utility of a fungal isolation device (Isolator) versus conventional techniques for recovering

163 wo manual aerobic blood culture systems, the Isolator (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) and the

164 knika, Durham, N.C.) and aerobic cultures of Isolator (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.).

165 al) was inoculated into at least a Pediatric Isolator (Wampole Laboratories; 1.5 ml of blood) or a st

166 e lysis-centrifugation blood culture system (Isolator, Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, NJ) from 1987

167 notobiotic transgenic rats raised in Trexler isolators were selectively colonized with either B. vulg

168 ing on the same idea, we also demonstrate an isolator with non-reciprocal transmission, providing hig