コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 can College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal).
2 erature values (in this issue of Biophysical Journal).
3 rt article submissions to another scientific journal.
4 redicted by the scientific discipline of the journal.
5 front cover of the January 2018 issue of the journal.
6 frequently than the other papers of the same journal.
7 tions take the form of published papers in a journal.
8 Care, an American Diabetes Association (ADA) journal.
9 d to authors, peer reviewers, and editors of journals.
10 remains below 50% and is inconsistent among journals.
11 ents the instructions to authors provided by journals.
12 between 2008 and 2018 in 40 frequently cited journals.
13 uly 2019, published in 11 high impact factor journals.
14 in dental, epidemiologic, and biostatistical journals.
15 ence and required by most funding bodies and journals.
16 media but has not been discussed in medical journals.
17 riginal research articles published in eight journals.
18 the last 10 years among the top 25 surgical journals.
19 databases and hand searching relevant trauma journals.
20 the citation of the papers published by the journals.
21 large-scale bibliometric study of psychiatry journals.
22 reach full-text publication in peer-reviewed journals.
23 tabases that mainly indexed English language journals.
24 NSORT guidelines occurs among cardiovascular journals.
25 nd-searching reference lists, citations, and journals.
26 SORT guidelines among leading cardiovascular journals.
27 ly encountered in submissions to our various journals.
28 s were defined as those in the top 5% of all journals.
29 irst authors tend to publish in lower-impact journals.
30 nlikely to win appeal among highly selective journals.
31 uately reported in RCTs published in nursing journals.
32 f published between 2008 and 2018 in leading journals.
33 y-step protocols in protocol repositories or journals.
35 d Clinical Immunology (EAACI) supports three journals: Allergy, Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, and
36 l checklist contains 12 items and applies to journal and conference abstracts that describe the devel
37 of policies on sex-related reporting at the journal and institutional level could inhibit effective
38 et of women (IDEALplus) also completed daily journals and a body fat assessment via dual-energy x-ray
42 abolomics repository for a number of leading journals and ELIXIR, the European infrastructure for lif
43 ials (RCTs) published in high-impact medical journals and explore RCT characteristics associated with
44 ted widely and is driving policy changes for journals and funders, but little quantitative informatio
47 researchers, funding agencies, peer-reviewed journals and universities to coordinate efforts to imple
48 rnal type (e.g., Open Access or subscription journals), and publisher are not good predictors of data
49 hange in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and USA Today from 1985 to 2014 (n = 34,948).
50 e 2017 were later published in peer-reviewed journals, and find a relationship between the number of
51 At the least, it is essential for authors, journals, and regulatory agencies to specify the carbape
53 odds than men of publishing in lower-impact journals (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.45).Conclusions: Wom
56 PubMed and Web of Science and identified 18 journal articles and conference abstracts addressing ano
69 iometric data from seven medicinal chemistry journals between 2000 and 2019 are collated including Bi
76 d trials published in 3 major cardiovascular journals ( Circulation, Journal of the American College
77 butions of the top 4 journals European Heart Journal, Circulation, Journal of the American College of
78 ies that foster intellectual growth, such as journal clubs, lab meetings, and philosophy of science r
83 Around 36% of the RCTs published in nursing journals did not report how they reached their sample si
84 Notably, all cardiothoracic subspecialty journals did not significantly increase the proportion o
85 found no evidence for bias based on topics, journals, disciplines, base rates of failure, persuasion
86 ver, many publications in high-impact factor journals do display a higher likelihood of accessible me
90 ted as editorial authors across epidemiology journals (e.g., as a marker of epidemiology leadership),
93 help ensure that researchers, reviewers, and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigou
94 n on October 15, 2020, at the request of the journal editors, with agreement from the authors, owing
96 Efforts by researchers, funding agencies, journals, equipment manufacturers and staff at shared im
97 ween the citation distributions of the top 4 journals European Heart Journal, Circulation, Journal of
99 y cancer networks have been provided only in journal figures and not for programmatic access, undersc
105 he large body of literature published in the Journal has inspired current research on how chromatin o
107 n of the articles published in peer-reviewed journals have previously been released as preprints.
110 ) were developed in 2010 to help authors and journals identify the minimum information necessary to r
112 We analyzed how often and in what ways the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is currently used in review,
113 % confidence interval] = 27.0 [1.4-528]) and journal impact factor (OR of 1.9 [1.3-3]) for each incre
114 horship positions over time; relationship to journal impact factor and editorial board makeup; and ra
116 he IF Median is substantially lower than the journal impact factor for all 30 journals under consider
120 l as association of first author gender with journal impact factor.Measurements and Main Results: Amo
123 ld who have authored pieces published in the journal in recent years for their thoughts on notable an
124 yses indicate a significant evolution of the journal in terms of publications, scientometric performa
126 gical disciplines for papers published in 34 journals in 2019, and compared our results with those of
127 ic with that on papers published in the same journals in 2019, for papers with first authors and last
128 r than that for papers published in the same journals in 2019, while our comparisons for last authors
131 ts the results of a survey of 322 editors of journals in ecology, economics, medicine, physics and ps
132 There are a significant number of predatory journals in ophthalmology, but fewer than in other speci
133 citations to papers published by the top 30 journals in the category Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
136 in a recent Communication published in this journal is shown to produce incorrect results because it
138 8(1):9-16) and reported in this issue of the Journal, is a maternally matched design based on a singl
141 nd number of authors), and were unrelated to journal-level variables such as access model and Impact
142 osted on dedicated preprint servers prior to journal-managed peer review, can play a key role in addr
143 2020;189(9):972-981) in this issue of the Journal moves beyond this standard by illustrating recen
147 icles focused on this topic published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology over the past
148 Eccles Breast Cancer Research Fund, British Journal of Anaesthesia International, College of Anaesth
155 Herb Tabor was the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Biological Chemistry (JBC) spanning the years
156 100(th) birthday this past year, served the Journal of Biological Chemistry as a member of the Edito
157 ibition, many of which were published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry under the tenure of Herb
161 nously in Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging, Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and JACC:
162 , International Journal of Epidemiology, and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology between 2010 and 2017.
173 163 authors and presenters who published in Journal of Clinical Oncology or who presented an abstrac
174 kly text message reminders (published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology) failed to improve adherenc
175 of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their
176 ses: Brain Maps 4.0 (BM4, rat) (Swanson, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 2018, 526, 935-943), a
177 ther with a companion study (Suntres et al., Journal of Comparative Neurology, this issue), our resul
182 of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, International Journal of Epidemiology, and Journal of Clinical Epidemi
183 n American Journal of Epidemiology, European Journal of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, International Jou
184 rials and commentaries published in American Journal of Epidemiology, European Journal of Epidemiolog
187 es as an introduction to a supplement of the Journal of Infectious Diseases entitled "Next-Generation
193 Trials recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine report on an oral lutenizing-hormone
194 igh impact journals (The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Ass
196 e lab's first research paper appeared in the Journal of Neuroscience (Quirk et al., 2000) and has bee
198 ted from a recent issue of the International Journal of Nursing Studies and discuss some proposed res
199 ublished in Ophthalmology (n = 31), American Journal of Ophthalmology (n = 26), and Archives of Ophth
200 At the behest of the editor of the American Journal of Ophthalmology, the IOL Power Club (along with
202 Authors for Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, a
204 lation, Cardiovascular Research and American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
205 icles in the June 2020 issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry address the overall construct of c
206 The Annals of Surgery has served as the journal of record for the ASA since 1928, with a special
207 as published and added by the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology Note
208 e American Medical Association, Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Europe
209 ournals European Heart Journal, Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, and Circu
210 major cardiovascular journals ( Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, and Europ
211 The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Circulation
213 ched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, African Journals Online, and African Index Medicus for studies o
214 of research outputs published in open access journals or made available on other freely-accessible pl
215 to estimate the false discovery rate for 94 journals over a 5-year period using p values from over 3
217 derable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has
218 verage, for Open Access versus closed access journals (p = 0.320, 95% CI - 0.015, 0.046, adjusted mea
219 is higher for cancer versus general medicine journals (p = 9.801E-07, 95% CI: 0.045, 0.097; adjusted
220 alysis was used more commonly in high-impact journals (p<0.05), it did not translate to higher citati
223 er review would benefit from changes in both journal policies and lab practices that encourage mentor
225 r process of evaluation and certification by journals, preprints also significantly accelerate the pa
226 st author positions, with self-citations and journal prestige accounting for most of the small averag
227 of authors, international collaboration and journal prestige, we find near-identical per-paper citat
231 ated against 390 compounds from the compiled journal publications and externally evaluated against 13
232 mic practice continues to rely on cumbersome journal publications for the description of new species,
234 including funding, number of publications or journals published in - were unable to completely differ
235 rch was performed in two major databases for journals published in English language from January 1975
237 ed for articles in English, in peer-reviewed journals, reporting on "psilocybin," "lysergic acid diet
240 ogical niche modelling community, as well as journal reviewers and editors, to utilize and further de
244 ned historical accounts from books, personal journals, scientific articles, logbooks, photographs, an
245 ents that investigators, drug companies, and journals should consider to optimize their translational
246 vid, and SSRN) up until April 5, 2020; major journal sites were monitored for US publications until A
249 tent throughout the article in line with the journal style and typographical errors have been correct
250 d in 1998, but subsequently retracted by the journal, suggested that measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR
252 blished in an English language peer-reviewed journal that described an educational intervention condu
253 9) demonstrate in a recent issue of The EMBO Journal that the pericentromeric protein, SGO2, serves a
257 rdiovascular RCTs published in 6 high impact journals (The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, J
258 andy Schekman reflects on the origins of the journal, the eLife approach to peer review, and current
259 (or Registered Reports), allows a scientific journal to maintain high selectivity for the importance
260 provided in the last taxonomy update in this journal to summarize new and revised clinically relevant
261 calls for radical changes at eLife and other journals to address racism in the scientific community a
263 ld be beneficial for both psychology and law journals to be more open to publishing scholarship from
264 ditor of eLife, she reflects on the need for journals to change and respond to their environment.
265 spiratory, sleep, and critical care medicine journals to consolidate contemporary best practices and
266 and significance tests we urge authors (and journals) to place more emphasis on measures of effect a
269 nstitutions-learned societies and scientific journals-transformed science in ways that still dominate
271 he peer review of manuscripts for scientific journals, typically under the guidance of or jointly wit
273 studies that were published in peer-reviewed journals; used probabilistic sampling methods and system
276 to January 2019 and a hand search of printed journals was also performed to identify human clinical t
286 s published in any language in peer-reviewed journals were systematically searched from the PubMed, E
287 t Tool to Assess SRs 2 were publication in a journal where Preferred Reporting Items for SRs and Meta
288 n a dataset of 70,694 publications from PLoS journals, which included 347,136 distinct authors and th
289 ") forces a focus on "getting into the right journals," which can delay dissemination of scientific w
290 e rise of Registered Reports among selective journals will change how research is evaluated and may t
292 erent countries, published in 15 high-ranked journals with a median impact factor of 3.3 (1.23-7.9) a
293 EMBASE, and CINAHL for HF RCTs published in journals with an impact factor >=10 between January 1, 2
294 ndations were associated with publication in journals with high impact factors (p < 0.001 for both).
296 were published in 11 different ophthalmology journals, with 73 of them published in Ophthalmology (n