ライフサイエンスコーパス: judge

1 n of a second, despite common advice "not to judge a book by its cover." Evaluations of trustworthine

2 These frankfurters were judged acceptable by the panellists and showed good ther

3 ly determined concentrations, and these were judged against in vitro active concentrations for AR ant

4 ement for many professions including pilots, judges, air traffic controllers, Federal Bureau of Inves

5 was manifested through an investigative, non-judging, analytic stance, a focus on evidence-based prac

6 We leave you to judge and comment.

7 n neuromodulators for IBS, few of which were judged as being at a low risk of bias, peppermint oil wa

8 om two equally weighted objects is typically judged as being heavier.

9 However, only 2 of 36 SAEs were judged as definitely related to the convalescent plasma

10 t of all 22 models and eight validations was judged as high or unclear.

11 Four trials were judged as low risk of bias, three were unclear risk, and

12 ces containing velocity-based synchrony were judged as more coordinated with performers rated as liki

13 Images from anatomical sites that were judged as not having cancer were excluded from the train

14 d motion was streaming toward an object were judged as paying more attention to the object.

15 There were no deaths judged as related to treatment with selinexor.

16 Thus, 1TC was judged as the most useful model for quantitative analysi

17 ent upper-body clothing rated by independent judges as looking 'richer' or 'poorer', although not not

18 the agent-to-object motion direction and to judging attention, not action or spatial orientation.

19 ved patients demonstrated lower precision in judging audiovisual simultaneity.

20 Long-term follow-up is important to judge both efficacy and safety of the different therapie

21 rf4(-/-) mice had a reduced ZIP response, as judged by a reduced number of neutrophils and macrophage

22 ion against influenza in sparser regions, as judged by a region's nonmetropolitan status, lesser popu

23 inhibitors, P450 3A4 showed rapid binding as judged by a spectral shift with at least partial high-sp

24 equence and chromatin-remodeling network, as judged by a yeast-like nucleosome repeat length.

25 al activity against blood-stage parasites as judged by an in vitro parasite Growth Inhibition Assay (

26 who had a complete or partial response), as judged by an independent review committee.

27 CaMKII activity was judged by analysis of CaMKII expression, autophosphoryla

28 Clinical response to resuscitation, as judged by APACHE II score, was weakly predictive of the

29 mulated PBMCs on human dermal fibroblasts as judged by C/EBP delta expression.

30 Most (68%, n = 43) of the 63 reviews were judged by Cochrane reviewers to provide inadequate evide

31 exposure led to reproductive dysfunction, as judged by continuous anestrus, smaller ovaries with a de

32 f quenching rhodopsin signaling normally, as judged by electroretinography and single-cell recording.

33 Patient performance, judged by finding and identifying objects in the periphe

34 tivation leads to loss of gene expression as judged by flow cytometry, Western blot or immunofluoresc

35 ies in primary congenital glaucoma (PCG), as judged by glaucoma and visual outcomes.

36 intain oxidative phosphorylation function as judged by growth in oxidative phosphorylation-requiring

37 s in a mouse model of CCM1 (Krit1(ECKO) ) as judged by histology and quantitative micro-computed tomo

38 ients bearing adenomas whose risk status was judged by histopathology.

39 expanded population was fully functional as judged by IFN-gamma production and MHC class I-restricte

40 than hDPP4+/- mice to MERS-CoV infection, as judged by increased LD50, reduced lung viral infection,

41 increased B cell receptor (BCR) signaling as judged by increased levels of phosphorylated Bruton's ty

42 ted in the bile-treated DeltacspE strain, as judged by induction of RpoE regulon genes (rpoE, degP, a

43 , and steps taken at and away from home were judged by integrating data from annual week-long acceler

44 more cardiovascular disease risk factors (as judged by INTERHEART risk scores) in HICs and the fewest

45 uman thymus reconstruction is functional, as judged by its capacity to support mature T cell developm

46 Lithium increased proliferation, as judged by Ki67-immunoreactivity, but did not alter the n

47 y reducing LEF1 transcriptional activity, as judged by luciferase assay.

48 tools on both the rat and NHP ON datasets as judged by mean absolute error, R(2) values when regressi

49 ecreased their tumor-inhibitory capacity, as judged by neighbor suppression in vitro and accompanied

50 ed with the degree of sensitisation (DoS) as judged by nitric acid mass loss testing (ASTM-G67-04), a

51 demonstrate that accessible cholesterol, as judged by PFO* or ALO-D4 binding, is not evenly distribu

52 l marker staining, and normal cell growth as judged by phosphohistone H3 staining, cell counting and

53 Statistical significance is judged by randomly permuting the affected status in the

54 particle, retained native-like antigenicity, judged by reactivity with NAbs and non-NAbs.

55 ronic hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension judged by right ventricular systolic pressure measuremen

56 om live cells, yet it is also reversible, as judged by several experiments including fluorescent stre

57 The effect of anakinra was rapid, as judged by significant decrease of fever and C-reactive p

58 among those allocated to placebo; none were judged by site principal investigators to be related to

59 esulted in a marked increase in synapses, as judged by synaptophysin (SYP) expression, and reduction

60 m transition on heating to 150 degrees C, as judged by TEM and SAXS.

61 e was directed toward hepatic lipogenesis as judged by the activity, protein levels, and expression o

62 e SF-6D showed good discriminant validity as judged by the analysis of variance and receiver operatin

63 pregnenolone or 17alpha-OH progesterone, as judged by the apparent K(d) and binding kinetics.

64 ance to DSS-induced experimental colitis, as judged by the colon length.

65 rious adverse events related to the vaccine (judged by the data and safety monitoring committee [DSMC

66 e 3-4 adverse events related to the vaccine (judged by the DSMC) within 2 weeks of vaccination, and d

67 placebo had a serious adverse event that was judged by the investigator to be related to treatment.

68 ncer or inflammatory bowel disease, and were judged by the medical ethics committee as not being rela

69 the cutoff that gave the best model fit (as judged by the pseudo-log-likelihood).

70 ascular failure 13 days after randomisation, judged by the site investigator as not related to study

71 extent through the use of a conditioner, as judged by the surface charge values.

72 ality of the synchronisation achieved can be judged by the uniform DNA content, narrow size distribut

73 often either empirically derived, or at best judged by their ability to elicit broad inflammation, it

74 eatures that are single and double layers as judged by their AFM heights of hAFM approximately 1.2 +/

75 ease of Panx1 by macrophages or monocytes as judged by Western blotting and immunocytochemistry assay

76 As judged by Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and EL

77 d fully susceptible or highly resistant when judged by World Health Organization discriminatory conce

78 nd PAH molecules in the AuNP suspensions, as judged by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, nuclear magn

79 ytic cycle to camphor-bound CYP101[FeO2](2+) Judging by the appearance of an absorbance maximum at 44

80 lude the use of classical considerations for judging causality in human studies, as well as triangula

81 EU standards and recommendations of The Beer Judge Certification Program.

82 Participants who were judged clinically as having no cognitive impairment and

83 allow analysts to compare clusterings or to judge cluster quality, there is no comprehensive method

84 In a context-aware blind evaluation by human judges, CUBBITT significantly outperformed professional-

85 sychological distinctions between how humans judge different types of moral obligations, such as pres

86 uably the most difficult patients in whom to judge disease severity.

87 uably the most difficult patients in whom to judge disease severity.

88 Raters also judged each article on indicators of good research pract

89 In this issue of the JCI, Judge et al. comprehensively explore the lack of PD-1 ex

90 We judged experimental treatments as efficacious as the ref

91 anatory values, or dimensions along which we judge explanations as better or worse.

92 elative to complete photographs-participants judge faces in incomplete photographs as physically more

93 Judged finger numerosity was analysed, in Exp.

94 mains challenging even for seasoned users to judge from the acquired images alone whether their super

95 parable binding affinity and specificity, as judged from binding competition against bulk genomic DNA

96 As judged from flow cytometric assays, bacterial killing by

97 cated that high activity in the extracts, as judged from LCMS(2) data, could be correlated to denticu

98 Judging from partial charge analysis, we find that the h

99 and PSST6, although in different populations judging from the colocalization of TH immunoreactivity a

100 Judging from the presence of fine versus beaded terminal

101 h closely resembled their human counterparts judging from their histology, size, and marginal tendenc

102 For each confirmed error, we judged harm on a 1-6 rating scale.

103 Participants judged if a sound was delivered in their frontal or back

104 Metrics used to judge importance of risk factors should be tailored to t

105 y analyses to demonstrate that FRM should be judged in context.

106 propriate response perspective (CARP) can be judged, in part, by its potential to stimulate new resea

107 We judged incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $1010 (Z

108 'number sense', or whether number is instead judged indirectly on the basis of other quantitative fea

109 on group had lower likelihoods of clinically judged infection from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95%

110 high risk of bias, and overall evidence was judged insufficient.

111 each item, 80% to 100% of survey respondents judged it to be a good measure of the IOM standards.

112 biased, or with studies given more weight if judged less biased.

113 sign thinking approach attempted to link the judged level of importance of different research areas t

114 One or more contemporary risk markers judged major within a given patient's clinical profile,

115 dations support CPR if and only if 1) CPR is judged medically beneficial, and in line with the patien

116 trials, corroborating previous findings for judging men's heights.

117 orated into first-principles calculations to judge mode-by-mode between the two phonon channels.

118 t level of post-conventional moral reasoning judge moral issues based on deeper principles and shared

119 n basic science departments; and research is judged more on its quantity (numbers of investigators an

120 r and electroencephalography while listeners judged motion direction.

121 ons in the posterior parietal cortex of mice judging multisensory stimuli.

122 Like controls, amusics used timbre cues to judge musical tension in Western and Indian melodies.

123 icide) occurred in the MVC-TDF group but was judged not to be related to study drugs.

124 and a number sense are used holistically to judge numerosity.

125 reduced participants' ability to accurately judge object size.

126 world coordinates but should be ignored when judging object motion in head coordinates.

127 independent cohorts demonstrates that being judged older by one's metabolome, as compared with one's

128 Image quality was subjectively judged on a 3-point Likert scale.

129 Here, participants judged on which hand the first of two stimuli, presented

130 perties that listeners pay attention to when judging other's personality vary across languages.

131 nned participants' brain activity while they judged others' mental states.

132 ng information with positive inferences when judging others' facial beauty.

133 te best practices for how we communicate and judge our scientific contributions.

134 he need for a national dialogue about how to judge outcome measures currently in use or proposed for

135 Human participants judged pleasantness and intensity of low- and high-conce

136 ety analysis set, of which seven deaths were judged possibly or probably related to treatment (pulmon

137 awning injury, should not be overlooked when judging prognostic importance of jaw injury.

138 In study 1, 966 judges rated the composites (facial averages) of women w

139 ade 2 or higher genitourinary adverse events judged related to study product and any grade 2 or highe

140 The most frequent adverse events judged related to study product were lymphadenopathy (n=

141 tive accuracy, and relevancy, with relevancy judged relative to a human audience.

142 d and spiked sediments and soils (e.g., when judging remediation necessity or interpreting results of

143 tudies 2 to 4 (n = 1,578) found that readers judged results expressed with generic language to be mor

144 onally, clinical variables have been used to judge risk in cardiogenic shock.

145 their confidence of image interpretation and judge scans as easy or difficult to read.

146 Judging self-motion (heading) in the presence of indepen

147 tion during contrast-enhanced ultrasound was judged semiquantitatively; low-grade contrast enhancemen

148 rences of each contrast level from zero were judged significant when the two-tailed P value was less

149 ame face when seen with 'richer' clothes was judged significantly more competent than with 'poorer' c

150 relative importance of various attributes in judging similarity.

151 Projection and preference were judged simultaneously by dividing listeners into two gro

152 was drawn from 1778 children when clinically judged stable before discharge from hospital.

153 Human observers (female and male) judged stimuli presented within a short sequence.

154 not required for the working-memory task of judging stimulus orientation.

155 lue) relative to long (red) wavelengths were judged subjectively more pleasant and had objectively gr

156 s, and the criteria by which the field might judge success.

157 ruses was termed "Leishbunyavirus" (LBV) and judged sufficiently distinct to warrant assignment withi

158 mixture, nurses-in-charge are more likely to judge that they have enough staff.

159 portant analyses, the ECDP writing committee judged that it would be desirable to provide a focused u

160 If it is judged that the evidence could not plausibly change by m

161 Theory authors and experts judged that the system was able to capture the main prop

162 The ECDP writing committee judged that these new data did not warrant changes to th

163 d with a set of moral scenarios and asked to judge the acceptability of a controversial action.

164 iring participants to watch a short film and judge the actors' mental states.

165 Yet, people often judge the attractiveness of others based on incomplete a

166 Here, observers were asked to judge the average tilt in a circular array of high-contr

167 egree of variability meant we were unable to judge the benefit or harms of the intervention (OR 1.22,

168 dy, US and Indian participants were asked to judge the emotion categories or affective features commu

169 ch patterns in preinterview conversations to judge the fit, competence, starting salary, and signing

170 sorimotor cortices when healthy participants judge the meaning of visually-presented action verbs.

171 Here we show that when people judge the mechanical forces acting on an object, their j

172 We use visual image motion to judge the movement of objects, as well as our own moveme

173 etion of this activity one should be able to judge the prognosis of patients harboring metastasized d

174 nformation from clinical big datasets and to judge the quality and utility of that information.

175 algorithms, there is no consensus for how to judge the quality of the deconvolution, and many scoring

176 blind and late blind adults could accurately judge the relative heights of women from paired voice st

177 option was uncertain and asked them to: (1) judge the risks (probability of serious complications) a

178 Humans are able to judge the speed of an object's motion by touch.

179 ria on which the global health community can judge the success or failure of a Trump presidency, base

180 nducted seven experiments where participants judged the attractiveness of human faces in complete and

181 Subjects judged the average orientation of a series of Gabor patc

182 psychophysical experiments, human observers judged the average orientation of an array of contrast g

183 Observers judged the expression of faces covering approximately 1

184 We judged the intervention to be cost-effective if the incr

185 The surgeon judged the liver to be easier to manipulate in the diet

186 same cutaneous receptive field while monkeys judged the presence or absence of a tactile stimulus.

187 se stimuli, as well as natural examples, and judged the probability of presence of each digit/object

188 Participants judged the temporal order of successively presented, spa

189 When the US Food and Drug Administration judges the potential cardiovascular safety signal to be

190 nd (iii) a quantitative quality estimate for judging the accuracy of FRET-derived structures as oppos

191 bthreshold motion processing plays a role in judging the attention of others.

192 the substrate can be effectively inferred by judging the degree of color change.

193 This region may be key for judging the emergent "value of the forest," rather than

194 By providing a means of judging the quality of the overall deconvolution as well

195 them with mass spectrometry is valuable for judging the success of the CFPS reaction.

196 s of others, we lack the knowledge needed to judge their importance for coexistence in nature.

197 g in the virtual world, while simultaneously judging their heading.

198 causal for CAD, and for 10 further genes we judge them most likely causal.

199 cial cosmological benchmark against which to judge theories of structure formation.

200 icted by what other members of their society judge to be the correct social norm, (2) the responsiven

201 with a slightly lower BP (ND), (11)C-EKAP is judged to be a better tracer for imaging and quantificat

202 Sequence generation was judged to be adequate (at low risk of bias) in 32% ( n =

203 3) of trials, and baseline comparability was judged to be adequate in 77.8% of trials.

204 (21,510 patients) were included; seven were judged to be at high risk of bias.

205 r conservative management of an adnexal mass judged to be benign on ultrasound on the basis of subjec

206 Calculus remains on root surfaces judged to be calculus free using surgical loupes for vis

207 mained on the roots surfaces after they were judged to be clean using 3.5x loupe magnification.

208 were reclassified, and reclassification was judged to be clinically relevant in n=33 (41.3%).

209 se group compared with the placebo group was judged to be clinically relevant.

210 e threshold, then the condition category was judged to be concordant.

211 Lesions judged to be deeply invasive by an expert panel will be

212 ine nivolumab who were clinically stable and judged to be eligible for treatment beyond RECIST v1.1-d

213 ant differences between the methods (DDG was judged to be inferior to BG in 22 cases, equal in 12 cas

214 of 1 366 736) of the one-badge entries were judged to be informative.

215 Harms evidence reported in trials was judged to be insufficient or of low certainty for most h

216 ather than offering paternalistic advice are judged to be less competent and less helpful.

217 ata from registries from which the data were judged to be less reliable, or included only lymphomas,

218 a total of eight studies, half of which were judged to be methodologically weak with the remaining fo

219 e news items and found that the research was judged to be of higher quality when paired with research

220 gically weak with the remaining four studies judged to be of moderate quality.

221 Four serious adverse events were judged to be potentially related to the trial drugs.

222 Most risk factors were judged to be practical and feasible to routinely collect

223 resulted only in symptoms (77%) and 36% were judged to be preventable.

224 d within 24 h of MSC infusion, but death was judged to be probably unrelated.

225 ed in three (1%) patients, none of which was judged to be related to sofosbuvir-velpatasvir treatment

226 the adalimumab 0.4 mg/kg group, and were not judged to be related to study drug.

227 No adverse events were judged to be related to study procedures.

228 treatment-emergent adverse events that were judged to be related to study treatment (one had acute k

229 caused by disease progression and none were judged to be related to study treatment.

230 ardiorespiratory failure); neither death was judged to be related to the study drug.

231 bo group, although none in either group were judged to be related to the study interventions.

232 No adverse events were judged to be related to the study procedures.

233 om adverse events; five of these deaths were judged to be related to treatment (two in the control gr

234 the placebo group had died, but no death was judged to be related to treatment.

235 se events were identified, of which two were judged to be related to vaccination (one febrile reactio

236 intraretinal or subretinal fluid at baseline judged to be reversible, six showed substantial fluid re

237 those in the placebo group, though none were judged to be serious.

238 pment and low capabilities of the state, are judged to be substantially more influential, and the mec

239 s) accounted for 29 deaths (36.7%), with RSV judged to be the primary cause of death in 9 of these ca

240 e physician's choice group (of which one was judged to be treatment related) and nine (2%) in the tra

241 tuzumab emtansine group (of which three were judged to be treatment related).

242 of grade 3 bacteraemia), none of which were judged to be treatment related.

243 None of these serious adverse events was judged to be treatment related.

244 o severe adverse events in either group were judged to be treatment related.

245 all in the ceftazidime-avibactam group) were judged to be treatment related.

246 None of the deaths were judged to be treatment related.

247 en including a narrow range of human studies judged to be unbiased in evidence synthesis.

248 Entries judged to be uninformative of occupational doses to FGI

249 suddenly 2 years after surgery, but this was judged to be unrelated to DBS implantation.

250 duration, both in the drink powder arm, but judged to be unrelated to the intervention.

251 e variant set that consisted of all variants judged to be valid from either approach.

252 Certainty in the evidence was judged to be very low, because the data came from observ

253 vessel in the dark for a period until it is judged to have concluded.

254 rticipants; 18 FITs) were included; all were judged to have low to moderate risk of bias.

255 egistration: ISRCTN59696243) adults (N = 97) judged to have moderate oral hygiene attended a primary

256 Kinetic imaging was judged to have provided higher quality images than DSA i

257 h fever, whereas the remaining patients were judged to have subclinical infections.

258 however, 11 of 13 scanners were subjectively judged to have very good or excellent image quality.

259 canners, although 12 of 13 were subjectively judged to have very good to excellent uniformity.

260 Adverse events judged to potentially be due to ART were few and similar

261 experiment based on the random assignment of judges to criminal cases.

262 T and the common refusal of kidneys that are judged too marginal.

263 tudy investigates how accurately individuals judge torques at their arm during a multi-joint task.

264 ng to patients with one or more 3-25 mm UIAs judged treatable both ways.

265 perienced grade >= 3 AEs; only one event was judged treatment related (hypophosphatemia, n = 1).

266 b and in 23 (11%) on teriparatide; none were judged treatment related.

267 ual studies followed by synthesis of studies judged unbiased, or with studies given more weight if ju

268 kup in case of large local reaction is often judged unnecessary, as well as adrenaline auto-injector

269 patients died during the study, from causes judged unrelated to active treatment; one patient assign

270 group, had serious adverse events that were judged unrelated to study product.

271 eloped intracranial malignancies, which were judged unrelated to the radiation field.

272 Therapy was judged unsuccessful because of the continuous growth of

273 t that represents reasonable value for money judged using US benchmarks for cost-effectiveness.

274 the brain incorporates these statistics when judging value and confidence.

275 nformation according to its reliability when judging value and confidence.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The

276 In contrast, when judging visual or tactile stimuli presented on their own

277 e has found evidence for spatial biases when judging visual targets distanced at 2 m, but not in dire

278 Surprisingly, patients performed normally in judging visuotactile simultaneity after either monocular

279 ecific factors, clinicians can use FFR-CT to judge when the cost and risk of an invasive angiogram ma

280 -date progress that will allow the reader to judge where the field stands currently and what remains

281 First, we asked participants to judge whether a stimulus was oriented closer to vertical

282 Generalization task, where subjects have to judge whether pairs of auditory stimuli are equal in dur

283 How do people judge whether someone deserves moral praise for their ac

284 ject after lifting and asked participants to judge whether the object became lighter or heavier.

285 Participants were asked to judge whether the stimuli were all identical or not.

286 ositioned colored items, and the task was to judge whether the test item was changed compared to the

287 wo bell pepper replicas and were required to judge whether they possessed the same shape or had diffe

288 n which they were incentivized to accurately judge whether they were in a desirable state, which was

289 In two experiments, participants judged whether a given consonant-vowel speech sound was

290 e classic mental rotation task, participants judged whether characters presented in different orienta

291 ipants viewed a spatial array of numbers and judged whether the average was greater or smaller than a

292 beautiful or non-beautiful stimulus and then judged whether they had experienced beauty.

293 subjects report their level of confidence in judging whether there has been a change in a stochastic

294 mplified form of contour integration, namely judging whether two line segments separated by an occlud

295 or a localization task in which participants judge which two fingers were stimulated.

296 iplets varying in pitch, timbre, or both and judged which tone triplet had the higher pitch or bright

297 Participants heard two sounds and judged which was higher.

298 ision about a given input, whereas imprecise judges will make different decisions.

299 n be marked individual differences - precise judges will repeatedly make the same decision about a gi

300 al experiment using the random assignment of judges with different propensities for sentencing offend

301 56) and sighted (n = 61) listeners correctly judged women's relative heights on approximately 70% of