ライフサイエンスコーパス: justice

1 yone an equal chance (so-called distributive justice).

2 s to evaluate distributive and participatory justice.

3 d Intervening) in the International Court of Justice.

4 cale cooperation and helps dispense criminal justice.

5 from adult control and the pursuit of social justice.

6 hat emphasises people's wellbeing and social justice.

7 nt-reported child empathy and sensitivity to justice.

8 ur understanding of environmental health and justice.

9 rious measures of environmental equality and justice.

10 lack standards for addressing environmental justice.

11 tal goals: impact, efficiency, equality, and justice.

12 ronger alternative preferences for restoring justice.

13 der versus social cooperation through Social Justice.

14 ts, environmental impacts, and environmental justice.

15 he cornerstone of modern systems of criminal justice.

16 ssues of both environmental and reproductive justice.

17 commitments to health care access and social justice.

18 tems, air quality, public health, and social justice.

19 les of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice.

20 ntity, and Tyler & Lind (1992) on procedural justice.

21 y concerned with community health and social justice.

22 erring negligence, and dispensing corrective justice.

23 lignment of conservation practice and social justice.

24 on of groups, and adherence to principles of justice.

25 r people, non-maleficence, beneficience, and justice.

26 les of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice.

27 be based on principles of equity and social justice.

28 sue-traditionalist, essentialist, and social justice.

29 nosed with tuberculosis from the Minister of Justice.

30 e examine non-punitive methods for restoring justice.

31 and (2) theories of cultural relativism and justice.

32 ts, credit, media, health care, and criminal justice.

33 ittle action on bringing the perpetrators to justice.

34 the Court acts as if composed of 4.68 ideal justices.

35 Why do people care so much about justice?

36 haping an innate human sense of distributive justice(6), influencing who we consider deserving of our

37 s were hopeful that the trials would promote justice, 87.2% (n = 681) of those older than 35 years be

38 was defined according to history of criminal justice adjudication, up to and including each subject's

39 tatutes are enforced by the US Department of Justice; administrative actions are pursued by the Depar

40 nant women referred to treatment by criminal justice agencies and other sources before and after the

41 OUD for pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies could provide public health benefits to

42 Pregnant women with OUD referred by criminal justice agencies received evidence-based treatment at lo

43 27.0) of pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies received medications for OUD, which was

44 routinely collected dataset used by criminal justice agencies, and outcomes from official criminal re

45 Among pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies, receipt of medications for OUD increas

46 with health-care and social-care services or justice agencies.

47 ith health-care and social-care services and justice agencies.

48 lementing policy, accountability, and social justice, all of which enhance public-health responses.

49 nsating the victim-as a method for restoring justice-also generalizes to judgments of more severe cri

50 ncludes humane detention and the delivery of justice and adequate health care for prisoners.

51 mportant adolescent values, including social justice and autonomy from adult control.

52 sidered for external validations of criminal justice and clinical risk models.

53 mental Health Sciences (NIEHS) environmental justice and community-based participatory research (CBPR

54 em with formal courts practicing retributive justice and customary courts applying restorative measur

55 The fight for social justice and diversity in medicine stems from racial ineq

56 dilemmas challenging traditional concepts of justice and equity of access.

57 omparatively, exploring behaviors related to justice and fairness in other species.

58 In particular, we discuss some problems of justice and fairness inherent in the system, focusing on

59 were influenced by parental values regarding justice and fairness.

60 re across human societies is our interest in justice and fairness.

61 en 1996 and 2005 from the U.S. Department of Justice and gathered further information from publicly a

62 The use of integrated programmes to align justice and health-care goals has great potential to imp

63 nd promoting the capacities of environmental justice and Indigenous communities-can clarify when valu

64 Juvenile justice and inpatient/residential facilities accounted f

65 nd reduce health disparities in the juvenile justice and mental health systems.

66 ff-label marketing from the US Department of Justice and other publicly available sources (date range

67 Collaboration between the criminal justice and public health systems will be required for s

68 endowed human kind with a tendency to pursue justice and punish defection that deviates from social n

69 factors are associated with attitudes toward justice and reconciliation.

70 claims, arguing that the GKE promotes global justice and reduces the potential for people in need of

71 lting in a dramatic increase in contact with justice and social service systems.

72 mate mitigation, conservation, environmental justice and sustainable development.

73 e have important implications for procedural justice and the building of police-community trust.

74 rrounding VCA include but are not limited to justice and vulnerability of subjects, and their experie

75 plications of these intersections for social justice and why policy makers need to stop considering t

76 n injury from negligence, provide corrective justice, and deter negligence.

77 nda is grounded in the principles of rights, justice, and equity and can address the root-cause deter

78 (sociodemographic, US Army career, criminal justice, and medical or pharmacy) were used to predict s

79 eases as a specialty is tilted toward social justice, and practitioners are frequently on the front l

80 fall on educational, primary care, juvenile justice, and social service agencies as well as on psych

81 n intersectional manner that centers equity, justice, and the creation of jobs.

82 surement, barriers to reporting, barriers to justice, and the false perception of CSA as a new phenom

83 d more critical about societal authority and justice, and to be more willing to participate in politi

84 the least restrictive/intrusive alternative, justice, and transparency.

85 tate attorneys general, and US Department of Justice; and searches (1975-2018) of peer-reviewed medic

86 Generalized attitudes toward authority and justice are often conceptualized as individual differenc

87 f beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice are the foundation of ethical decision making.

88 on Social Determinants of Health for social justice as a route to a fair distribution of health.

89 itutes of Health, the National Institutes of Justice as well as various international programs.

90 ind Victims and Jurors tasked with restoring justice become increasingly punitive (by as much as 40%)

91 stance, we present an optimal mapping of the justices between the Courts, which underscores the simil

92 earch more diverse would aid not only social justice but scientific quality and clinical effectivenes

93 Global cooperation is necessary not only for justice but to ensure our own health.

94 e of fairness is fundamental to distributive justice but, as suggested by moral sentimentalists, is r

95 terrence is an established theme in criminal justice, but its role in prevention of assault has been

96 It appears that a sense of justice centered on harm caused to victims emerges early

97 I explain that the International Court of Justice chose to conduct an objective review of JARPA II

98 ational commitment, psychological contracts, justice, citizenship behavior, and person-environment fi

99 Distributive justice concerns how individuals and societies distribut

100 tential environmental risk and environmental justice concerns related to septic infrastructure.

101 eral ban on transplanting HIV+ organs raises justice concerns.

102 eding the arsenic MCL, raising environmental justice concerns.

103 itoring to proactively address environmental justice concerns.

104 s would improve or deteriorate environmental justice conditions.

105 community care resources, avoiding criminal justice costs and disruptions in treatment for HIV, hepa

106 Although the rulings of a nine-justice Court require representation in nine dimensions,

107 ocial Sciences Index and Abstracts, Criminal Justice Databases, and the Education Resources Informati

108 The responsible justice department and ethics committee approved this st

109 The Justice Department background paper used to justify this

110 these alternative preferences for restoring justice depend on the perspective of the deciding agent.

111 s been paid to how punishment and a sense of justice develop in children.

112 y, beneficence, nonmaleficence, paternalism, justice, duty, rationing, informed consent, and withdraw

113 velopment is a growing area of environmental justice (EJ) research, particularly in the United States

114 on must meet the requirements of society for justice, equity of access, and avoidance of racial or ot

115 Independent effects linked with criminal justice exposure persisted with confounder adjustment.

116 Both clinical and criminal justice factors are associated with better public safety

117 reat one another, including concepts such as justice, fairness, and rights.

118 ncarceration data from the Vera Institute of Justice for 2640 US counties between 1983 and 2014.

119 s, respondents with high levels of perceived justice for violations during the Khmer Rouge era were l

120 an intersectional environmental reproductive justice framework in activism and environmental health s

121 ould explicitly incorporate an environmental justice framework that addresses racial/ethnic dispariti

122 A ruling from the European Court of Justice has interpreted this regulatory regime in a way

123 bjects-respect for persons, beneficence, and justice-have posed specific dilemmas in the design of in

124 , the NIH invested $40.9 million in criminal justice health research, or 1.5% of the $2.7 billion hea

125 nded grants, 180 (<0.1%) focused on criminal justice health research.

126 prisoners but may have relevance to criminal justice health was not included.

127 p by several sectors that span registration, justice, health, statistics, and civil society.

128 sk was raised even in people with a criminal justice history but without custodial sentences or guilt

129 han a third of all male cases had a criminal justice history, but relative risk against the general p

130 ity suggests that punishment aims to restore justice (i.e., reciprocity) between the criminal and his

131 Finally, I discuss environmental justice implications of this many-headed beast of a cris

132 nowledges social dimensions or environmental justice implications related to its implementation.

133 8, and was annulled by the European Court of Justice in 2000 following a protracted lobbying campaign

134 if not obstructing, progress towards social justice in a fuller sense?

135 tle is known about what motivates a sense of justice in children.

136 n expressed more empathy and sensitivity for justice in everyday life than non-religious parents.

137 e regarding the role played by principles of justice in negotiation.

138 It is impossible to do justice in one review article to a researcher of the sta

139 ies for improving environmental equality and justice in other locations.

140 Prompted by previous research on restorative justice in reducing recidivism in crimes other than DV,

141 itable and anti-racist initiatives promoting justice in urban conservation, and strengthen community

142 pical BIP with one that included restorative justice-informed treatment, called circles of peace (CP)

143 advance in our understanding of how criminal justice interventions could help shape public health.

144 We show that laypeople's justice intuitions closely match the logic and content o

145 d perpetrator shame-suggesting that multiple justice intuitions may be regulated by a common social-e

146 Laws against wrongdoing may originate in justice intuitions that are part of universal human natu

147 o show covariation across different types of justice intuitions: interpersonal devaluation of offende

148 s contrasts with the US, where Department of Justice investigations and whistleblower testimony have

149 Limitations: The study sample was limited to justice-involved male youths.

150 tanding and improving the health of criminal justice-involved persons is small, even compared with th

151 information on the cardiovascular health of justice-involved populations, and unique prevention and

152 outcomes, but trends in treatment data among justice-involved pregnant women are limited.

153 Criminal justice involvement is common among pregnant women with

154 th and other medical treatment, and criminal justice involvement.

155 nts and high-stakes negotiations reveal that justice is a complex concept, both in relation to attain

156 of beneficence, nonmaleficence and sometimes justice is paramount as well.

157 sdiction of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, is provided by the University of Texas Medical

158 ion of environmental health and reproductive justice issues in these communities as well as the limit

159 Our study raised important environmental justice issues that can inform public health programs an

160 intuitions in the context of modern criminal justice issues.

161 ocial psychological evidence suggesting that justice judgments and reactions may be determined more b

162 environmental pollution, the need for social justice, large gaps between the rich and the poor, lack

163 rmative post-MDG framework for global health justice look like?

164 We propose a city-specific environmental justice mapping index, inspired by a similar index used

165 sychology, including business, law, criminal justice, medicine, education, and political science.

166 emembered, and suggests that some historical justice might be done by using the adjective "Lamarckian

167 hile maintaining procedural and distributive justice; minimise the influence of financial incentives

168 n size and factors influencing environmental justice near oil and gas (O&G) wells.

169 history of the 27th president and 10th chief justice of the Supreme Court offers a unique opportunity

170 ntion of opioid relapse among adult criminal justice offenders (i.e., persons involved in the U.S. cr

171 In this trial involving criminal justice offenders, extended-release naltrexone was assoc

172 tic counselors to adhere to the principle of justice or equity in their practice cannot be successful

173 iatrists report such gun possession to state justice or police departments.

174 ents were referred for treatment by juvenile justice or social service agencies.

175 eating as more autonomy-assertive and social justice-oriented behavior and to forgo sugary snacks and

176 od supply, health, environmental, and social justice outcomes for the world's population.

177 earch has been done to evaluate the criminal justice outcomes of such courts.

178 l lending, mate selection, and even criminal justice outcomes.

179 ve received the most attention, distributive justice (outcomes of negotiation) and procedural justice

180 rgans to balance the competing principles of justice (patients with most urgent need for transplant a

181 l criminal records stored on the Ministry of Justice Police National Computer database.

182 Our findings suggest that criminal justice policies can be made more effective and humane b

183 encourage 8,480 officers to adopt procedural justice policing strategies.

184 upporting its effectiveness in U.S. criminal justice populations are limited.

185 We focus on how justice preferences guide the process and outcome of neg

186 chival research on the roles played by these justice principles in negotiation.

187 leased from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice prison system between January 2004 and December

188 is integral to the social sciences, criminal justice procedures, and the effective treatment of high-

189 ice (outcomes of negotiation) and procedural justice (process of negotiation), we introduce the topic

190 y experiments, we find that whereas criminal justice professionals see failures to appear as relative

191 ct that some elements typical of restorative justice programmes could not be attained in this DV cont

192 e of their effectiveness, few other criminal justice programs have shown such promise with drug-abusi

193 ch and Development Programme, UK Ministry of Justice, Psychiatry Research Trust, NIHR Biomedical Rese

194 Parallels between justice reactions to those acts of disrespect directed t

195 sitions for both retributive and restorative justice; recent focus has been on third-party punishment

196 e databases capturing treatment and criminal justice records for California (2006 to 2010); published

197 HIV due to structural, racial, and criminal justice-related factors than have White MSM.

198 nce (66%) was the most common theme, whereas justice represented the least frequently addressed ethic

199 Environmental justice research documents disparities in exposure to ai

200 ly, the review discusses the implications of justice research for understanding the specific and gene

201 Drawing on theories of "environmental justice," researchers have been concerned with whether t

202 ion has increased during the 1990s; criminal justice responses remain very popular; for many, illicit

203 gs on social punishment, that other forms of justice restoration (for example, compensation to the vi

204 cate that humans prefer alternative forms of justice restoration to punishment alone.

205 d foundation for incorporating environmental justice scholarship into urban ecological and evolutiona

206 examined the extent to which dispositions in justice sensitivity (i.e., how individuals react to expe

207 Justice sensitivity did not impact the neuro-hemodynamic

208 t knowledge in how individual differences in justice sensitivity impact neural computations that supp

209 problems and use costly health and criminal justice services at high rates.

210 for self-harm and have contact with criminal justice services, providing multiple opportunities for p

211 imization Survey, developed by the Bureau of Justice Statistics.

212 Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (UK).

213 ies, studies of the function of the criminal justice system and risk assessments have resulted in imp

214 s further collaboration between the criminal justice system and the health care communities.

215 Service by the criminal justice system and treatment of intellectual disabled of

216 disorders pose a challenge for the juvenile justice system and, after their release, for the larger

217 sion-making, and diversion from the criminal justice system are deemed indefensible.

218 ion of ex-military personnel in the criminal justice system for violent offences.

219 ect of law enforcement violence and criminal justice system interactions at disproportionately high r

220 oblems, mental health problems, and criminal justice system involvement.

221 INTERPRETATION: Contact with the criminal justice system is a public-health opportunity to promote

222 health of persons involved with the criminal justice system is unknown.

223 eyewitness identification and has warned the justice system of problems with eyewitness identificatio

224 Involvement in the criminal justice system often results from illegal drug-seeking b

225 The criminal justice system relies heavily on eyewitness identificati

226 arings, child death investigations, criminal justice system reports, and the National Health Service,

227 ility of receiving inpatient, emergency, and justice system services declined by 14, 32, and 17 perce

228 ductions in costs of inpatient/emergency and justice system services offset 82% of the cost of the FS

229 ffective, generating savings in the criminal justice system while only moderately increasing healthca

230 The Enga have a plural justice system with formal courts practicing retributive

231 (i.e., persons involved in the U.S. criminal justice system) who had a history of opioid dependence a

232 have extensive involvement with the criminal justice system, and 3) family intervention may have clin

233 with service outcome research, the criminal justice system, and a round up of other related research

234 intersection of clinical care, the criminal justice system, and public health to evaluate the effect

235 of intellectual disabilities in the criminal justice system, as well as individual characteristics of

236 eatment that, if implemented in the criminal justice system, could help improve public heath and redu

237 for all people in contact with the criminal justice system, including those not found guilty and tho

238 people with mental disorders in the criminal justice system, many communities have created specialize

239 In male youths involved in the criminal justice system, the relationship between psychological d

240 n popularity as a form of jail diversion for justice system-involved people with serious mental illne

241 ealth-sector perspective (excluding criminal justice system-related costs), 4 potential strategies fe

242 m a societal perspective (including criminal justice system-related costs), DAA 20% with MAT+ 80% was

243 m a societal perspective (including criminal justice system-related costs), DAA at 20% with MAT+ at 8

244 ealth-sector perspective (excluding criminal justice system-related costs), four potential strategies

245 However, with criminal justice system-related costs, DAA and MAT+ implemented t

246 However, with criminal justice system-related costs, DAA and MAT+ implemented t

247 ion-a ubiquitous and revitalized node of the justice system.

248 e models that will be useful in the criminal justice system.

249 primary care, social services, and the youth justice system.

250 filtrate decision-making within the criminal justice system.

251 ns about particular features of the criminal justice system.

252 ecially those not involved with the criminal justice system.

253 nd the soaring medical costs of the criminal justice system.

254 addiction that could be used in the criminal justice system.

255 l disorders who are involved in the criminal justice system.

256 e, including education, consumerism, and the justice system.

257 nsive negative experiences with the criminal justice system.

258 an be transinstitutionalised to the criminal justice system.

259 probability of interfacing with the criminal justice system.

260 nsurance coverage, as well as lower rates of justice-system involvement and substance abuse.

261 thcare of young persons involved in criminal justice systems but should assist policymakers, healthca

262 Justice systems delegate punishment decisions to groups

263 rms in criminal law, policing practices, and justice systems to reduce imprisonment, reforms in the o

264 ms, including the child welfare and juvenile justice systems, have experienced at least one traumatic

265 nst the backdrop of weak health and criminal-justice systems, high rates of pre-trial detention, and

266 fied pathways in the healthcare and criminal justice systems, modeled an average efficacy for substan

267 uals, effects that act to undermine criminal justice systems.

268 ncern of both the mental health and criminal justice systems.

269 nding the operation of contemporary criminal justice systems; and (h) the question of whether people

270 positive peace") than with the attainment of justice (termed "structural peace"), while members of th

271 and pressure and a lower sense of procedural justice than did those with bulimia.

272 o such diverse arenas as marketing, criminal justice, the military, and worker productivity.

273 est attainable standard of health, access to justice, the right to liberty, and the right to life.

274 estigate the central problem of distributive justice: the trade-off between equity and efficiency.

275 etting, social cognitive, and organizational justice theories are the three most important approaches

276 statement is to be useful to many and to do justice to a dynamic field of great complexity.

277 No single review could possibly do justice to all of these approaches.

278 rvention research should advocate for social justice to guarantee the safety of and respect for the b

279 owing the ethical principles of altruism and justice to guide organ allocation.

280 ssment are increasingly required in criminal justice to inform decisions about sentencing, release, p

281 ture-oriented mental time travel' neither do justice to its capacity to ground veridical beliefs abou

282 lth economics evaluations must be able to do justice to medical innovation and the market while prote

283 Neither story line does justice to our actual understanding of genomes, to ENCOD

284 But we don't do justice to that view -- how could we?

285 But we don't do justice to that view-how could we, older mammals on the

286 But we don't do justice to that view-how could we?

287 Static models of the epidermis may not do justice to the ECM, which is metabolically active, as it

288 rgy landscape and folding kinetics that does justice to the essential characteristic of high-dimensio

289 these cellular proteins as IAPs fails to do justice to this versatile group of factors that play a w

290 alism and dual aspect theories attempt to do justice to three central, but controversial, intuitions

291 ing Breast Cancer Advocacy and Environmental Justice," to help identify successful CBPR methods and t

292 icence, respect for individual autonomy, and justice, we conclude that a study of HLA-identical sibli

293 rs toward hospitalization, and of procedural justice were stable in the short term.

294 ains such as medicine, finance, and criminal justice, where making informed decisions requires clear

295 roduce improvements in impact, equality, and justice, whereas emission reductions from ships would wi

296 ements in terms of efficiency, equality, and justice, whereas off-road mobile source reductions can h

297 s can act as effective avenues for restoring justice, while also highlighting that moral reputation h

298 uch as cost-benefit analysis or distributive justice will be needed to inform resource allocation dec

299 tral to the modern provision of fairness and justice within society.

300 y and law; financing and resources; criminal justice; workforce, training, and research; and beliefs