ライフサイエンスコーパス: keratometry

1 rameters (P < .001) except CCT and posterior keratometry.

2 r controlling for the effect of preoperative keratometry.

3 using either estimated or measured posterior keratometry.

4 erences between groups for age, sex, or mean keratometry.

5 onfiguration in TK-derived than in K-derived keratometry.

6 ers was higher than measurements by Pentacam keratometry.

7 -corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and average keratometry.

8 rnea, central corneal thickness, and maximum keratometry.

9 significantly influenced postoperative mean keratometry.

10 provement in CDVA and long-term stability of keratometry.

11 R (95% CI) 0.9 (0.90-0.91), maximum anterior keratometry 1.08 (1.07-1.09), and minimum corneal thickn

12 mum corneal thickness (12.1 months), maximum keratometry (12.3 months), corneal astigmatism (14.8 mon

13 l corneal thickness (16.6 months), back mean keratometry (18.4 months), and front mean keratometry (2

14 an keratometry (18.4 months), and front mean keratometry (24.4 months) criteria.

15 atism (TCA; 1.11 +/- 0.87 D), mean posterior keratometry (-5.87 +/- 0.26 D), posterior corneal astigm

16 tigmatism (TCA; 1.11 0.87 D), mean posterior keratometry (-5.87 0.26 D), posterior corneal astigmatis

17 gMAR), MRSE -11.1 +/- 5.6 diopters (D), mean keratometry 60.7 +/- 6.1 D, topographic astigmatism 4.7

18 iso- and anisomyopes (N = 56), from measured keratometry, A-scan ultrasonography, and central and per

19 he effects of deprivation were assessed with keratometry, A-scan ultrasonography, and cycloplegic ref

20 , corneal diameter, tear-film break-up time, keratometry, A-scan, and pachymetry on all participants.

21 reoperative and postoperative visual acuity, keratometry, aberrometry, and refraction were the main o

22 visual acuity (BCDVA), manifest refraction, keratometry, adverse events, spectacle use, and photogra

23 act tonometry), manifest refraction, average keratometry, age, gender, and postoperative IOP at 1 wee

24 nt sex, donor age, triple-DMEK, and anterior keratometry also did not predict final BCVA in the liter

25 In particular, maximal keratometry and anterior astigmatism showed significantl

26 In terms of pairwise comparisons, keratometry and axial length were not significantly diff

27 ost attention to patient selection, accurate keratometry and biometry readings, as well as to the app

28 ention to proper patient selection, accurate keratometry and biometry, and appropriate intraocular le

29 eyes that were also progressive for maximum keratometry and central corneal thickness.

30 Keratometry and corneal topography remain the most impor

31 ery 2 to 3 weeks by cycloplegic retinoscopy, keratometry and corneal videotopography, and A-scan ultr

32 nalyse changes in visual acuity, pachymetry, keratometry and densitometry.

33 The average keratometry and differences between steep and flat kerat

34 ulation requiring both prerefractive surgery keratometry and manifest refraction (i.e., clinical hist

35 methods requiring both prerefractive surgery keratometry and manifest refraction are no longer consid

36 ly significant improvements were observed in keratometry and pachymetry (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001).

37 The keratometry and pachymetry measurements obtained by Orbs

38 To assess the repeatability and agreement of keratometry and pachymetry measurements obtained using 3

39 Keratometry and pachymetry measurements were recorded.

40 Astigmatism may be measured by keratometry and refraction, while corneal topographic te

41 K was performed in order to minimally affect keratometry and retain correspondence of the anterior co

42 those reported in the literature for manual keratometry and somewhat better than has been reported f

43 However, there was poor agreement in flat keratometry and steep keratometry obtained by Orbscan II

44 al thickness were measured using telecentric keratometry and swept-source optical coherence tomograph

45 tion and corneal flattening with pachymetry, keratometry and their postoperative change.

46 d distance visual acuity (UDVA), refraction, keratometry and topography were recorded at 1st week and

47 Keratometry and videokeratography are the most important

48 ction of soft contact lens fit compared with keratometry and videokeratoscopy, accounting for up to 2

49 Meta-analysis of keratometry and visual acuity outcomes at 12 months or l

50 sed along the pupillary axis by retinoscopy, keratometry, and A-scan ultrasonography.

51 rs was assessed periodically by retinoscopy, keratometry, and A-scan ultrasonography.

52 ht were assessed by cycloplegic retinoscopy, keratometry, and A-scan ultrasonography.

53 simulated keratometry, cylindrical simulated keratometry, and apex keratometry (P > .05).

54 nd genetic study that included eye biometry, keratometry, and autorefraction.

55 rongly correlated with the astigmatism axis, keratometry, and BAD-D.

56 spherical equivalent, anterior and posterior keratometry, and corneal pachymetry at the apex & thinne

57 attest, steepest, average, cylindrical, apex keratometry, and inferior-superior value decreased signi

58 est simulated keratometry, average simulated keratometry, and inferior-superior value significantly d

59 and uncorrected near visual acuities (UNVA), keratometry, and manifest refraction.

60 preoperative spherical equivalent (SE), mean keratometry, and percentage of tissue altered (PTA).

61 easures are corneal scarring, visual acuity, keratometry, and quality of life.

62 rected and distance-corrected visual acuity, keratometry, and Scheimpflug and ocular wavefront (WASCA

63 was to determine associations of pachymetry, keratometry, and their changes with haze formation and c

64 ial dimensions were assessed by retinoscopy, keratometry, and ultrasonography, respectively.

65 l corneal thickness (CCT), and mean anterior keratometry; and rebubbling.

66 Corneal curvature was measured with keratometry, anterior chamber depth with ultrasound, and

67 ccording to 768 biometric subgroups based on keratometry, anterior chamber depth, and axial length.

68 mean values of maximum, average, and minimum keratometry as well as simulated keratometric astigmatis

69 astigmatism was calculated based on standard keratometry astigmatism (KA), total corneal astigmatism

70 was 36 months with clinical examination and keratometry at every visit.

71 Average keratometry (AveK) and simulated keratometry (SimK) alon

72 the Rabinowitz test (K & I-S), and simulated keratometry (average Sim K).

73 corneal thicknesses; anterior and posterior keratometry (average, steep, flat); axial curvatures; as

74 Steepest simulated keratometry, average simulated keratometry, and inferior

75 errors, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), keratometry, axial length (AL) and anterior chamber dept

76 growth and factors of age, sex, laterality, keratometry, axial length, intraocular lens power, and f

77 antly lower in the Barrett True-K with total keratometry (Barrett True-TK) than in the Haigis-L formu

78 tential postoperative visual acuity > 0.5, a keratometry between 40-45 diopters, a pupil >2.8 mm unde

79 rence in mean steep keratometry or mean flat keratometry between instrument pairs.

80 ing method, with that derived from simulated keratometry (CASimK), an anterior surface-based method,

81 , and power vector terms with vertical plane keratometry, CD, and CS.

82 ted (CDVA) distance visual acuity in logMAR, keratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT) and higher-

83 rvational procedure: Steep keratometry, flat keratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), and thinne

84 luding anterior and posterior flat and steep keratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest c

85 Axial length, keratometry, central corneal thickness, lens thickness,

86 under TKC-4 exhibited greater improvement in keratometry compared to those with TKC-2 and TKC-3 stagi

87 (SD +/-5.0) using videokeratoscopy (central keratometry, corneal height, and shape factor) and OCT t

88 icipants underwent axial length measurement, keratometry, corneal pachymetry, and candidate gene anal

89 Mean keratometry-corrected HRT disc area measurements were la

90 Changes in maximum keratometry correlated with preoperative maximum keratom

91 creased (P < .05), unlike flattest simulated keratometry, cylindrical simulated keratometry, and apex

92 l densitometry values and various changes in keratometry data implying ectasia can be observed in pat

93 The average keratometry decreased from 64.15 diopter (D) to 45.7 D a

94 Maximum keratometry decreased on average from 77.2+/-6.2 diopter

95 Mean keratometry decreased to a greater degree in stage IV co

96 mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), keratometry, endothelial cell density (ECD).

97 with the axial length, the PMF severity and keratometry established in this study suggest that PM ey

98 Corneal keratometry, expressed in the form of M, J0 and J45 (pow

99 c parameters: white-to-white (WTW) distance, keratometry (flat (K1) and steep (K2), mean (Km)) of ant

100 observational procedure: Steep keratometry, flat keratometry, central corneal thickness

101 Simulated keratometry, flattest, steepest, average, cylindrical, a

102 The mean reduction in maximum keratometry from baseline was equivalent with 2-minute a

103 ngle-site study investigating the use of the keratometry from the Lenstar LS 900(R) for toric IOL sur

104 However, keratometry gives no information about the peripheral co

105 re were no significant differences between 2 keratometry groups (higher or lower than 53 D) in visual

106 tive keratoconus eyes with preoperative mean keratometry >=60 diopters (D) that received either PK (2

107 Before surgery, steep and flat keratometry had no significant differences between group

108 ations, corneal biomechanical properties and keratometry had no significantdifferences.

109 UDVA, BDVA, sphere, cylinder, and simulated keratometry improved after treatment in both groups (P <

110 d for BUII when utilizing measured posterior keratometry in both devices.

111 Flat and steep keratometry increased significantly in amblyopic eyes (p

112 Flat keratometry, inferior-superior dioptric asymmetry, skewe

113 Mean keratometry influenced prediction error (P = .03) with S

114 ction, and corneal curvature measures: steep keratometry (K(2)), mean keratometry (K(mean)), or maxim

115 ur primary outcome was the change in maximal keratometry (K(max)) at 12 months after cross-linking, a

116 cluded inferior-superior (IS) value, maximum keratometry (K(max)), thinnest corneal thickness, asymme

117 (2)), mean keratometry (K(mean)), or maximum keratometry (K(max)), thinnest pachymetry, corneal trans

118 ance visual acuity (logMAR CDVA) and maximum keratometry (K(max)).

119 ure measures: steep keratometry (K(2)), mean keratometry (K(mean)), or maximum keratometry (K(max)),

120 The impact of keratometry (K) and IOL power (P) on SE was investigated

121 quantify the disparities between traditional keratometry (K) and TK values in normal eyes and assess

122 estigated the impact of the AP ratio, AL and keratometry (K) on the absolute prediction error (APE) i

123 l length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratometry (K) over a 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm diameter, lens

124 (UNVA), corrected near visual acuity (CNVA), keratometry (K), and manifest refraction spherical equiv

125 ge over 1 year of topography-derived maximum keratometry (K), comparing treatment with control groups

126 , cycloplegic refraction, axial length (AL), keratometry (K), intraocular pressure (IOP), cup-to-disc

127 egic refraction, slitlamp biomicroscopy, and keratometry (K).

128 .02), but no significant changes in central keratometry (K1 or K2).

129 .02), but no significant changes in central keratometry (K1 or K2).

130 ere significant differences in anterior flat keratometry (K1) (control 43.93+/-1.17 vs. case 42.75+/-

131 ences were found for axial length (AL), flat keratometry (K1), K1 and K2 meridians, or intraocular le

132 ductions in maximum keratometry (Kmax), flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2) (p < 0.05), and

133 Flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), anterior chamb

134 participants underwent measurements of flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), maximum kerato

135 tometry (Kmax), flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2) (p < 0.05), and astigmatic aberration c

136 The primary outcome was steep keratometry (K2) in the study eye as a measure of the st

137 er depth (ACD), mean keratometry (KM), steep keratometry (K2), and white-to-white distance (WTW) (p <

138 Flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and axia

139 measurements of flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), maximum keratometry (Kmax), central co

140 SCVA), spherical equivalent refraction, mean keratometry, keratometric astigmatism, and complications

141 edicting refractive outcomes, including mean keratometry, keratometric astigmatism, and spherical equ

142 atometric J0/J45 astigmatic components, mean keratometry (Km) and axial length (AL).

143 Keratometry (Km) repeatability did not change with cyclo

144 Mean keratometry (Km) values of IOLMaster 700 were compared f

145 coma, total HOA, coma-like aberrations, mean keratometry (KM), and central corneal thickness (CCT).

146 ty (UCNVA), manifest refraction, KA and mean keratometry (KM), corneal aberrometry, tIOL rotation, an

147 served in anterior chamber depth (ACD), mean keratometry (KM), steep keratometry (K2), and white-to-w

148 mary outcome measure was a change in maximum keratometry (Kmax) at 24 months.

149 ratoconus after 1 year, defined as a maximal keratometry (Kmax) increase <1 diopter (D).

150 ographic keratometry (SimK) and mean maximum keratometry (Kmax) reduced by -0.74 D (P < .0001) and -0

151 Improvement in the maximum keratometry (Kmax) value, corrected distance visual acui

152 t spectacle-corrected visual acuity, maximal keratometry (Kmax), and thinnest corneal thickness.

153 ometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), maximum keratometry (Kmax), central corneal thickness (CCT), thi

154 up 1 exhibited greater reductions in maximum keratometry (Kmax), flat keratometry (K1), steep keratom

155 flat keratometry, steep keratometry, maximum keratometry (Kmax), mean keratometry, thinnest corneal t

156 tabilization based on post-operative maximum keratometry (Kmax).

157 portion of those with progression of maximum keratometry (Kmax).

158 within 12 months: 1 dioptre (D) increase in keratometry (Kmax, K1, K2); or 10% decrease of corneal t

159 ppearance, topography-derived steep and flat keratometry (Kmax, Kmin), central corneal thickness (CCT

160 d 2 subgroups (group 1: preoperative maximum keratometry [Kmax] <69 diopters [D; n = 7); group 2: pre

161 lt to predict astigmatism and its axis, mean keratometry (Kmean), and Belin/Ambrosio enhanced ectasia

162 Both groups had flat corneas (average keratometry [Kmed] of 41.59 +/- 0.35 diopters [D] in adu

163 lent (SE), cylinder, flat keratometry, steep keratometry, maximum keratometry (Kmax), mean keratometr

164 Pentacam keratometry may help avoid hyperopic outcomes.

165 P = .81), steepest-K2 (P = .68), and average keratometry (mean power; P = .52).

166 r both) and the difference was a function of keratometry measurements (K-readings).

167 Tear film-stabilizing eye drops prior to keratometry measurements influenced K-readings significa

168 g pre-surgical examinations and biometry and keratometry measurements performed with the Pentacam AXL

169 Keratometry measurements were further transformed into p

170 luded cycloplegic refraction by retinoscopy, keratometry measurements, and A-scan ultrasound measurem

171 lity and reproducibility of the biometry and keratometry measurements.

172 etween treatment groups and correlation with keratometry measurements.

173 active growth was only associated with lower keratometry measures (P = .001).

174 am).The following parameters were evaluated: keratometry, minimum corneal thickness, pachymetry progr

175 keratometry (n = 50 [18.1%]), and front mean keratometry (n = 31 [11.2%]) criteria.

176 neal astigmatism (n = 55 [19.9%]), back mean keratometry (n = 50 [18.1%]), and front mean keratometry

177 corneal thickness (n = 111 [40.1%]), maximum keratometry (n = 76 [27.4%]), corneal astigmatism (n = 5

178 poor agreement in flat keratometry and steep keratometry obtained by Orbscan II compared with those o

179 ere; P = 0.02) on objective refraction, mean keratometry of the steep meridian (45.19 D vs. 43.76 D;

180 ere; P = 0.02) on objective refraction, mean keratometry of the steep meridian (45.19 D vs. 43.76 D;

181 y age, diagnosis, central corneal thickness, keratometry, operator, randomization sequence.

182 We investigated both keratometry or CXL as end points for progression and use

183 was no significant difference in mean steep keratometry or mean flat keratometry between instrument

184 Formulas requiring only preoperative keratometry or no history at all had lower MAEs (0.42-0.

185 grades of disease, allergy, eye rubbing and keratometry or pachymetry measurements.

186 1), axial length (OR:35; p < 0.001) and mean keratometry (OR:0.62; p < 0.001) were significantly inve

187 axial length (OR:3.05; p < 0.001), and mean keratometry (OR:1.61; p < 0.001).

188 cylindrical simulated keratometry, and apex keratometry (P > .05).

189 Preoperative mean keratometry (P = .007), time interval from surgery to ru

190 ssociated with younger age (P < .001), lower keratometry (P = .01), and male gender (P = .027); great

191 spherical equivalent and maximum and minimum keratometry (P = .03, P = .02, P = .04, respectively).

192 erical equivalent refraction (P = .27), mean keratometry (P = .09), and keratometric astigmatism (P =

193 ffected by any factor such as age (P = .31), keratometry (P = .32), and axial length (P = .27) of the

194 P = .71; posterior average K from simulated keratometry, P = .36).

195 minimal pachymetry measurement of 400 mum in keratometry (Pentacam, Oculus GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany).

196 Despite significant reduction of keratometry, postoperative corneal haze may limit final

197 Before and after photorefractive keratometry (PRK), subjects who had plateaued developmen

198 tometry correlated with preoperative maximum keratometry (R = -0.302, p = 0.038).

199 , p = 0.038) and with the changes in maximum keratometry (R = -0.412, p = 0.004).

200 icantly correlated with preoperative maximum keratometry (R = 0.303, p = 0.038) and with the changes

201 keratometry (r=-0.562, p < 0.001) and steep keratometry (r=-0.538, p < 0.001), and strongly positive

202 trongly negatively correlated with both flat keratometry (r=-0.562, p < 0.001) and steep keratometry

203 cted visual acuity (BCVA) and normal maximum keratometry reading (Kmax) were measured at study entry

204 flug imaging from which we extracted maximum keratometry reading (max-K), average of minimum and maxi

205 SH levels significantly affected the maximal keratometry reading (p = .036), the vertical keratometry

206 keratometry reading (p = .036), the vertical keratometry reading (p = .04), and the index of height a

207 P-PCA, and Kane KCN), and H1 with equivalent keratometry reading values (H1-EKR).

208 correlations were identified between COD and keratometry readings (K(m) and K(max)) across all zones

209 ected distance visual acuity (CDVA), maximum keratometry readings (K(max)), minimum radius of curvatu

210 months through analysis of maximum simulated keratometry readings (Kmax, diopters).

211 ding (max-K), average of minimum and maximum keratometry readings (mean-K), central corneal thickness

212 flattening was observed in maximum and mean keratometry readings (p < 0.001).

213 A significant decrease in both keratometry readings and spherical equivalent (from -4.0

214 difference in the comparison of AL, ACD and keratometry readings between the Lenstar and IOLMaster.

215 There was a reduction of the mean keratometry readings from 51.99 +/- 5.57 D to 49.33 +/-

216 e WTW distance, measurements for AL, ACD and keratometry readings may be used interchangeability with

217 Mean CCT, ACD and LT, average keratometry readings of affected RVO eyes, unaffected fe

218 pre-operative anterior chamber depth and the keratometry readings of the corneal power; hence mitigat

219 m-ring measurements provided by Pentacam HR, keratometry readings provided by IOLMaster 700, and cent

220 Spherical equivalent and keratometry readings showed a significant reduction in a

221 The mean difference in preoperative keratometry readings was 1.6 +/- 1.07 diopter (D), where

222 , and at last follow-up, both steep and flat keratometry readings were significantly flatter in the t

223 actual post-operation data (Correlations for keratometry readings with R2 above 0.95, for corneal tor

224 Average keratometry readings, central corneal thickness (CCT), a

225 neas of both probands were abnormally steep (keratometry readings, flat >/= 47.4 diopters [D] and ste

226 To assess and the level of agreement of Keratometry-readings (K), Central Corneal Thickness (CCT

227 es were UCVA, BCVA, steep and flat simulated keratometry, refraction, graft clarity, and complication

228 Mean keratometry, refractive and keratometric J0/J45 and AL s

229 Anterior keratometry remained stable (group 1) and improved in gr

230 In mild cones (Kmax < 55 diopter [D]), mean keratometry remained unchanged at 24 months.

231 l power were measured by ultrasonography and keratometry, respectively.

232 S), MTI Photoscreening (MTIPS), Nidek KM-500 Keratometry Screening (KERS), and Retinomax K-Plus Noncy

233 Average keratometry (AveK) and simulated keratometry (SimK) along 2.0-mm-ring measurements provid

234 D) (P < .005) and mean simulated topographic keratometry (SimK) and mean maximum keratometry (Kmax) r

235 Simulated keratometry (SimK), minimum central corneal thickness (M

236 ), spherical equivalent (SE), cylinder, flat keratometry, steep keratometry, maximum keratometry (Kma

237 uity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), flat keratometry, steep keratometry, thinnest pachymetry, spe

238 corneal curvature (average K from simulated keratometry) steepened (more negative dioptric power) by

239 eratometry, maximum keratometry (Kmax), mean keratometry, thinnest corneal thickness, and higher orde

240 The mean values of maximum keratometry, thinnest pachymetry, and corneal higher-ord

241 The mean values of maximum keratometry, thinnest pachymetry, and corneal higher-ord

242 cal equivalent (SE), flat keratometry, steep keratometry, thinnest pachymetry, specular microscopy, a

243 study aimed to explore the concept of total keratometry (TK) by analyzing extensive international da

244 ding standard (K), posterior (PK), and total keratometry (TK) values.

245 /- 0.1 logMAR), MRSE to -2.6 +/- 3.5 D, mean keratometry to 44.4 +/- 2.2 D, and topographic astigmati

246 ve error, visual acuity, corneal topographic keratometry, ultrasonic pachymetry, and topography-deriv

247 al acuity, contrast sensitivity, straylight, keratometry, ultrasonic pachymetry, intraocular pressure

248 IOL power calculation and keratometry using the IOL Master 700, along with topogra

249 sm, mean keratometry value (K-mean), highest keratometry value (K-max), thinnest point, anterior segm

250 Keratometric astigmatism, mean keratometry value (K-mean), highest keratometry value (K

251 in the analysis, namely the flattest central keratometry value (K1), the steepest central keratometry

252 keratometry value (K1), the steepest central keratometry value (K2), the maximum keratometry value (K

253 central keratometry value (K2), the maximum keratometry value (Kmax), and the parameters A, B and C

254 ry outcome measure was the maximum simulated keratometry value (Kmax).

255 The mean keratometry value changed from 50.3 (95% CI: 48.3-52.4)

256 In the CXL treatment group, the maximum keratometry value decreased by 1.6 diopters (D) from bas

257 In the treatment group, the maximum keratometry value decreased by 2.0 D or more in 28 eyes

258 +/- 2.8 D at the last visit, and the minimum keratometry value decreased from 44.3 +/- 4.7 D to 41.5

259 The maximum keratometry value decreased from baseline by 49.3 +/- 4.

260 ent change in the topography-derived maximum keratometry value from baseline to 6 months with 2-minut

261 l point (r(2) = 0.871, P = .001) and maximum keratometry value identified in the tangential curvature

262 nking was effective in improving the maximum keratometry value, CDVA, and UCVA in eyes with progressi

263 ge over 1 year of topography-derived maximum keratometry value, comparing treatment with control grou

264 ion, spherical equivalent, minimum simulated keratometry value, corneal thickness at the thinnest poi

265 produced equivalent reduction in the maximum keratometry value, with a favorable safety profile.

266 The included eyes had maximal keratometry values >/= 70 diopters, as measured using th

267 ared to the control group, including steeper keratometry values (K2: 46.62 Dioptre, K1: 45.24 Dioptre

268 orrected visual acuity (0.1 logMar), steeper keratometry values (K2: 47.95 Dioptre, K1: 45.83 Dioptre

269 ding standard (K), posterior (PK), and total keratometry values (TK).

270 In contrast, keratometry values from Placido-ring topography were fou

271 ly orientated, the use of measured posterior keratometry values improves prediction accuracy.

272 tments can be considered for eyes with lower keratometry values than expected for age.

273 atometry values were similar while mean flat keratometry values were significantly different between

274 Mean steep keratometry values were similar while mean flat keratome

275 AL, the IOLMaster measured the highest mean keratometry values, and the ANTERION measured the highes

276 of astigmatism for SimK 2.0 mm and IOLMaster keratometry values, as well as ACD and CCT measurements.

277 improved the visual acuity, refraction, and keratometry values.

278 al and cylindrical refraction, and simulated keratometry values.

279 Mean baseline simulated keratometry was 46.32 D in the flattest meridian and 51.

280 The maximum keratometry was 61.6 (95% CI: 58.2 - 64.9) diopters (D)

281 Keratometry was repeated 30 seconds, 2 minutes, and 5 mi

282 Flattening of steep and flat keratometry was significant in Groups I (P = .01) and II

283 The average keratometry was taken as an average of the flat and stee

284 When automated keratometry was used with a theoretical formula designed

285 Standard keratometry was with-the-rule in 48% of eyes, while the

286 Two native baseline keratometries were followed by instillation of either hi

287 Axial length and keratometry were measured and repeated with -0.5 D SofLe

288 09, P = .02), whereas age, sex, and baseline keratometry were not independent contributors.

289 ower (TCRP) and anterior/posterior simulated keratometry were obtained using Scheimpflug imaging preo

290 mp examination, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and keratometry were performed in a cross-sectional study of

291 justed normative values for axial length and keratometry were studied for variation in myopic shift a

292 bles, except for the anterior flat and steep keratometry, which were found to range from - 0.57 to 0.

293 ty and specificity associated with automated keratometry while maintaining an acuity component that c