ライフサイエンスコーパス: laparoscopic cholecystectomy

1 : 42% for total knee arthroplasty to 96% for laparoscopic cholecystectomy).

2 users regarding surgical treatment (open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy).

3 pic cholecystectomies) or novice groups (<10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies).

4 ences in making entrustment decisions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

5 afety (CVS) and intraoperative events during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

6 ligation are now being joined by ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

7 require endoscopic removal prior to planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

8 bjectively assessed intraoperative errors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

9 roved the OR performance of residents during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

10 almost immediately after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

11 from the introduction and widespread use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

12 r laparoscopy for another procedure, such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

13 er two-dimensional systems in the conduct of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

14 atients with major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

15 te cholecystitis and underwent uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

16 ype II in whom kernicterus developed after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

17 with gallbladder and biliary problems due to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

18 iew Program, is the second complete audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

19 giography has intensified with the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

20 graphy in a series of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

21 ry bowel disease, but did not increase after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

22 eaths, and 90-day readmissions for inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

23 me of diagnosis; all others should undergo a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

24 ning of metabolic risk factors and growth of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

25 botic-assisted cholecystectomy compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

26 Robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

27 mong patients undergoing robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

28 , many tumors are discovered incidentally at laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

29 outcomes of hospitals in inpatient Medicare laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

30 cavity may rarely occur during the course of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

31 f acute cholecystitis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

32 ompared to lean controls undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

33 Both groups then performed another laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

34 er has been commonly reported to occur after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

35 of the arteria hepatica dextra induced by a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

36 rmance between the 2 groups during the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

37 ances the quality of performance based on VR laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

38 I is the most common serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

39 sful reorientation when disorientated during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

40 tients would prefer NOTES cholecystectomy to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

41 after a surgeon had performed more than 200 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

42 e "grabbed" from the video feed during these laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

43 fied biliary and arterial anatomy during six laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

44 he training program and performed 270 of 288 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

45 ), third (P = 0.021), and fourth (P = 0.023) laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

46 procedural complications (65%) compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (12%).

47 Laparoscopic appendectomy (35.2%) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (19.3%) were the most commo

48 nd nontechnical performance standard for the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, (2) assess the classificat

49 For laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 23 ratings are needed to a

50 emoval of bile-duct stones within 30 days of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4.9 percent).

51 ons (arthroscopic meniscal repair [116 749]; laparoscopic cholecystectomy [82 372]; hysterectomy [67

52 o evaluate complete episode expenditures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a common and lower-risk op

53 All surgeons in group A learned laparoscopic cholecystectomy after residency, and all th

54 Twenty-six laparoscopic cholecystectomies and 22 carotid endarterec

55 5 choledochoscopies, 4 were performed during laparoscopic cholecystectomies and 931 during 1320 bile

56 whereas the opposite is true in others (eg, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and elective groin hernia r

57 be transferable to the operative setting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy.

58 to the operating room for the procedures of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy.

59 These patients did not undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were explored electivel

60 ty-two of these patients underwent a routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were found to have gall

61 tively (n = 6) and those who had a completed laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were re-explored at a l

62 divided into 13 experienced (performed >100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies) and 6 inexperienced (per

63 rship, 30% could not independently perform a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and 66% were deemed unable

64 OR, technical proficiency of each sequential laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and nontechnical skills.

65 minal cavity is the first step to successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and the arrangement of sec

66 entually become a 'gold standard' as has the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and which will fall by the

67 t for a higher common bile duct injury rate, laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be at least as s

68 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to have a higher co

69 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to have resulted in

70 Adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and inguinal

71 fits compared with the standard, established laparoscopic cholecystectomy approach.

72 ntraoperative cholangiography as adjuncts to laparoscopic cholecystectomy are evolving.

73 Outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are examined for 78,747 pat

74 flect fundamental errors in the technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as practiced by a broad pop

75 lithiasis for cholecystectomy and rethinking laparoscopic cholecystectomy as treatment is needed to i

76 attention strategies used by surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy associated with successful

77 al antibiotic treatment, followed by delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy at days 7 to 45 (group DLC)

78 erations for many years, only recently has a laparoscopic cholecystectomy been possible.

79 roposed advantages and potential problems of laparoscopic cholecystectomy before referring them to a

80 a were collected on 9130 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 1993 and Ma

81 ients with acute cholecystitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 2003 and De

82 ccurrence of a major bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (bile leaks without a major

83 n of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes: laparoscopic cholecystectomy, biliary tract disorders, p

84 study includes patients with indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy but who underwent LSC (Henn

85 are beyond their initial learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but the majority of iatrog

86 Procedures such as laparoscopic cholecystectomies can safely be performed w

87 tudy was to perform a meta-analysis of large laparoscopic cholecystectomy case-series and compare res

88 bsets of patients with pancreatic resection, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, colectomy, and appendectom

89 including statements about the advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with those of open

90 During pregnancy, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy, compared with delayed oper

91 clinical outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, comparing them with patien

92 ned included practice description, number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies completed since residency

93 Independent of the number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies completed since residency

94 The impact and appropriateness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy continue to debated, and st

95 scovered with gallbladder carcinoma during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy do not have to be converted

96 ve mortality was higher during the first ten laparoscopic cholecystectomies done by a surgeon (compar

97 erved and traced to a rare complication of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to a gallbladder empyem

98 ds of 343 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during a 1-year period.

99 residency, and all those in group B learned laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency.

100 It is not known whether learning laparoscopic cholecystectomy during surgery residency in

101 hree hundred forty- three patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the period reviewed.

102 and 13 experienced) performed a median of 2 laparoscopic cholecystectomies each (range 1-5) on 53 pa

103 In recent years (since the popularity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy), endoscopic sphincterotomy

104 pic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP+LC) vs laparoscopic c

105 nalysis of the charts of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in

106 The first patient underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder empyema and

107 to prevent recurrence, the precise timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild disease remains co

108 Insufficient data exist regarding laparoscopic cholecystectomy for pediatric dyskinesia an

109 al and three-dimensional imaging in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone d

110 entified 19,213 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy from 2012 to 2015 using dat

111 rates of other types of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy generally were low.

112 thin 48 hours of admission) versus a control laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (performed after reso

113 prospectively randomized to either an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (within 48 hours of a

114 conservative management group and 217 to the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group.

115 ts was 15%; those discovered incidentally at laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a 5-year survival of 33

116 construction after injury or stricture after laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a better overall outcom

117 o have gallbladder carcinoma incidentally at laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a significant increase

118 urgery cholecystectomy, robotic-assisted and laparoscopic cholecystectomy had similar bile duct injur

119 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the standard of

120 of injury of major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been clearly defined.

121 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been prevalent in the U

122 The widespread adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to an increased fre

123 a resource limited country, the expansion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has transformed the care of

124 The benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been largely unavailab

125 with risk factors and with widespread use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hepatobiliary malignancies

126 ion, all participants performed 5 sequential laparoscopic cholecystectomies in the OR.

127 dergoing robotic-assisted cholecystectomy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute care surgery.

128 Robotic-assisted or laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute care surgery.

129 ts undergoing robotic-assisted compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in each subgroup (low-risk

130 Surgeons performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Ecuador or the Dominican

131 c and thromboembolic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Sweden has decreased by

132 Both groups performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the OR that was video-re

133 of a complete patient population undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the steady state.

134 raining in laparoscopy, and annual volume of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the surgeon's hospital.

135 Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the United States, hundr

136 d on abdominal MRI performed two years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, in a patient with only a m

137 es (colectomy, coronary artery bypass graft, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, kn

138 graphy) performed within 30 days of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, or

139 ones for the majority of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, IOUS is cost-effective rel

140 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a lower

141 evious investigations have demonstrated that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a shorte

142 n 1-3 days) vs late (performed after 3 days) laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved

143 In people older than 65 years of age, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with lower mo

144 Clinical recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is known to be more rapid t

145 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly

146 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is reported to be safe for

147 h stone extraction performed before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the procedure of choice

148 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the procedure of choice

149 gical procedures (ie, varicose vein removal, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy,

150 articipants performed 5 Virtual Reality (VR) laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC).

151 his study was to compare learning curves for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after training on a pr

152 all-incision open cholecystectomy (SIOC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) concerning costs and h

153 trained on a validated virtual reality (VR) laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) curriculum.

154 wing evidence in support of performing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystiti

155 The widespread application of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has led to a rise in t

156 re clinical outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in acute cholecystitis

157 y with sentinel lymph node biopsy (PM SLNB), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic inguinal

158 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), when performed effici

159 te the total costs associated with repair of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)-related bile duct inju

160 dissection, and anatomical landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

161 is of gallbladder malignancy who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC; n = 80,924) or open ch

162 paroscopic common bile duct exploration with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCBDE+LC).

163 f the present trial was to ascertain whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC) can prevent recurrent

164 Subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LSC) is a rescue procedure

165 titution with major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy managed between July 1, 199

166 y was randomly matched with 4 other elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies (n = 8312) performed by t

167 For laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 10 studies) and endosc

168 ic-assisted cholecystectomy (n = 35 037) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 35 037) had similar bi

169 nce 1991, 12 cases have been described after laparoscopic cholecystectomy of unsuspected gallbladder

170 en novice and 10 expert surgeons performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy on a porcine model in the D

171 e assessed the effect of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on surgical outcomes in rou

172 Surgeries included: laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open inguinal hernia repai

173 (OR 0.28, 95% CI, 0.20-0.40; P < 0.001), and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OR 0.37, 95% CI, 0.32-0.43

174 erioperative VTE than patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2-3.3;

175 classified into experienced (performed >100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies) or novice groups (<10 la

176 air, primary total or partial thyroidectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or laparoscopic appendecto

177 ned to routine preoperative ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or laparoscopic cholecyste

178 a single surgeon's database containing 5739 laparoscopic cholecystectomy over 28 years and analysed.

179 a single surgeon's database containing 5739 laparoscopic cholecystectomy over 28 years and analyzed.

180 CEA), lung lobectomy/pneumonectomy, open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, partial colectomy, and tot

181 The same QOL questionnaire was also sent to laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients and healthy contro

182 OL scores were comparable to those of the 37 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients and the 31 healthy

183 and psychological domains compared with the laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients and the healthy co

184 ne hundred fifteen open herniorrhaphy and 26 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients had attempted tele

185 Analyses were performed for laparoscopic cholecystectomy performances alone and for

186 complete records of 9054 (99.2%) of the 9130 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at 94 military

187 ts were 2078 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by surgeons who

188 te, despite an increase in the percentage of laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed for nonmalignan

189 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 2 days of

190 We hypothesized that laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 48 hours o

191 In mild gallstone pancreatitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 48 hours o

192 In most patient populations, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, performed within 3 days of

193 ost frequently performed procedures included laparoscopic cholecystectomy (PFS, 30.3-43.5), upper gas

194 the "gold standard." Overall mortality after laparoscopic cholecystectomy ranges from 0-1%, and the r

195 night before, matched with 4 other elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy recipients (n = 8312).

196 49 patients who have completed treatment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries

197 g, but its safety and efficacy compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy remain unclear.

198 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains a common treatment

199 botic-assisted cholecystectomy is safer than laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains unclear.

200 common bile duct (CBD) clearance followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy] remains the standard way o

201 of bile duct injuries (BDI) sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy require formal surgical rec

202 Compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, robotic-assisted cholecyst

203 botic-assisted cholecystectomy compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.07-1.1

204 Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be performed in pati

205 Therefore, we believe that immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy should become therapy of ch

206 ate motility is the only parameter for which laparoscopic cholecystectomy showed an improvement in po

207 botic-assisted cholecystectomy compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy suggests that the utility o

208 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy surpassed open cholecystect

209 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy takes longer to do than sma

210 rall rate of SSI was significantly lower for laparoscopic cholecystectomy than for open cholecystecto

211 Shortly after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the rate of injury to the

212 ective review of the transition from open to laparoscopic cholecystectomy throughout Mongolia.

213 abdominal surgery from a median of <0.1% in laparoscopic cholecystectomy to a median of 3.7% in open

214 The primary outcome was conversion from a laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy.

215 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy took significantly longer t

216 bserved General Surgery residents performing laparoscopic cholecystectomies using the Objective Struc

217 Episode payments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy vary widely across surgeons

218 One thousand fifty-one laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos were annotated by AI

219 idents, and 5 attendings) reviewed simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, determined the next

220 The mean operation time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 10% shorter for the pat

221 rol group who underwent outpatient, elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed.

222 st number of wRVUs (wRVUs, 491.0-618.2), and laparoscopic cholecystectomy was regularly the next high

223 Between August, 1995, and August, 1997, 471 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were done in our departme

224 In total, 94,183 eligible elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed between 20

225 Over last 5-years period, a total of 4578 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed, 120(2.6%)

226 lled trial, patients undergoing standardized laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to separate

227 ction for gallbladder carcinoma diagnosed at laparoscopic cholecystectomy were reviewed retrospective

228 uccessfully orientate at various stages of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy were unveiled, and a repres

229 g port tracks is a potential complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy when gallbladder carcinoma

230 hows that there are only a few points within laparoscopic cholecystectomy where the complication-caus

231 All subjects performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy with an attending surgeon b

232 followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy with selective postoperativ

233 Men and women underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the same frequency (41

234 esented with 8 images of various stages of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the task of interpreti

235 In this large, randomized trial, laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 hours of hospital

236 lectively with asymptomatic CBDS can undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy without suffering from CBDS