ライフサイエンスコーパス: laparoscopic surgery

1 tor antagonists) and surgical therapies (eg, laparoscopic surgery).

2 ing open, laparoscopic, and robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery.

3 additional damage due to prolonged PP during laparoscopic surgery.

4 nd best practices of simulation training for laparoscopic surgery.

5 ociated with better short-term outcomes over laparoscopic surgery.

6 to compare its outcomes to those of open and laparoscopic surgery.

7 of augmented reality and its application to laparoscopic surgery.

8 alize the target organ, in particular during laparoscopic surgery.

9 ols, fecal incontinence, and single incision laparoscopic surgery.

10 estigates whether MP enhances performance in laparoscopic surgery.

11 term results comparable to those of open and laparoscopic surgery.

12 ts who lack an absolute contraindication for laparoscopic surgery.

13 urgeons with experience in hepatobiliary and laparoscopic surgery.

14 The randomization ratio was 2:1 in favor of laparoscopic surgery.

15 e means to overcome this major impediment of laparoscopic surgery.

16 task efficiency, and surgeon comfort during laparoscopic surgery.

17 t been observed in pregnant women undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

18 the unique requirements and complications of laparoscopic surgery.

19 ragm near the phrenic nerve motor points via laparoscopic surgery.

20 ted real-time intraoperative consultation in laparoscopic surgery.

21 nses for surgery in general may not apply to laparoscopic surgery.

22 s relating to the immune responses evoked by laparoscopic surgery.

23 ng of the local inflammatory response during laparoscopic surgery.

24 appears to retain other patient benefits of laparoscopic surgery.

25 c surgery are generally higher than those of laparoscopic surgery.

26 nd peri-operative morbidity and mortality to laparoscopic surgery.

27 se across specialties such as gynecology and laparoscopic surgery.

28 nical and safety advantages over traditional laparoscopic surgery.

29 otic surgery system consistently outperforms laparoscopic surgery.

30 eliably and objectively captured in advanced laparoscopic surgery.

31 with extensive experience in pancreatic and laparoscopic surgery.

32 ive period and thus negating the benefits of laparoscopic surgery.

33 s, without substantial outcome benefits over laparoscopic surgery.

34 for long-term complications in both open and laparoscopic surgery.

35 vent-free recovery occurred frequently after laparoscopic surgery.

36 ransanal total mesorectal excision (TME) and laparoscopic surgery.

37 e sufficient evidence for the routine use of laparoscopic surgery.

38 established to assist local colleagues with laparoscopic surgery.

39 into better patient outcomes associated with laparoscopic surgery.

40 tivity, for training health professionals in laparoscopic surgery.

41 y represent an improvement over conventional laparoscopic surgery.

42 omerular filtration rate (eGFR) with PPCs in laparoscopic surgeries.

43 Of the 21 519 patients who had laparoscopic surgery, 359 (1.7% [95% CI 1.5-1.9]) were r

44 Although laparoscopic surgery accounts for >2 million surgical pr

45 Revisional laparoscopic surgery after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYG

46 abscess formation was more common following laparoscopic surgery, although this was not statisticall

47 l comparing robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery among 471 patients with rectal aden

48 Five recurrences occurred after laparoscopic surgery and 1 in the open group (P < 0.112)

49 Of them, 80.3% patients had laparoscopic surgery and 19.5% had open surgery.

50 uded 6594 patients, 3751 (57%) had undergone laparoscopic surgery and 2843 (43%) open nephrectomy.

51 nding the risks of viral transmission during laparoscopic surgery and balance these risks against the

52 .In univariable logistic regression analyses laparoscopic surgery and male sex predicted an event-fre

53 nificant difference in complications between laparoscopic surgery and open repair with local anesthes

54 sadvantages of RALS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for commonly perfo

55 However, robust evidence to conclude that laparoscopic surgery and open surgery have similar outco

56 nding the risks of viral transmission during laparoscopic surgery and propose mitigation measures to

57 on study and patients submitted to abdominal laparoscopic surgery and required liver biopsy for moder

58 ally invasive surgeries such as conventional laparoscopic surgery and robotic assisted laparoscopic s

59 including surgeon's experience with advanced laparoscopic surgery and steep learning curve which limi

60 se in open surgeries, a 3.5 fold increase in laparoscopic surgeries, and a 41.3 fold increase in robo

61 appreciating the limitations and pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery, and by carefully dissecting the he

62 ents were grouped by approach [open surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and robotic surgery (RS)] on an in

63 n training, the unique and complex nature of laparoscopic surgery, and the increasing demand that sur

64 Increasing numbers of successful cases of laparoscopic surgery are being reported.

65 agement of perianal disease, and the role of laparoscopic surgery are topics of debate.

66 Advocates of laparoscopic surgery argue that all inguinal hernias, in

67 emodynamic and physiological consequences of laparoscopic surgery as well as a defined operative plan

68 ble for curative resection, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery, as compared with conventional lapa

69 d clinical data from 900 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 200

70 The use of armrests in simulated laparoscopic surgery brings measurable comfort and task

71 roup) and compared with patients also having laparoscopic surgery but not cholecystectomy (control gr

72 Laparoscopic surgery can be exhausting and frustrating,

73 During laparoscopic surgery, carbon dioxide insufflation may pr

74 ic teaching, telesimulation, Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery certification, yearly workshops, an

75 by several hours of CO2 pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery characterized by upregulation of is

76 mpared with patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS).

77 16.0% [15.6-16.4]) of 21 519 patients in the laparoscopic surgery cohort were readmitted for disorder

78 were searched systematically for studies on laparoscopic surgery compared with open abdominal surger

79 with T1-T3 rectal tumors, noninferiority of laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for succ

80 Operative blood loss was less with laparoscopic surgery compared with open, and with roboti

81 red with laparoscopic and robotic, and after laparoscopic surgery compared with robotic.

82 copic surgery, as compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, did not significantly reduce the r

83 With further increases in the use of laparoscopic surgery expected in the future, the effect

84 We hypothesized that immediate laparoscopic surgery for appendiceal abscess would resul

85 laxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after laparoscopic surgery for cancer is unclear.

86 s from randomized trials have indicated that laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is as effective as

87 ve study of 165 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery for colonic and upper rectal cancer

88 PROphylaxis of venous thromboembolism after LAParoscopic Surgery for colorectal cancer Study II (PRO

89 Consecutive patients who had laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer were randomiz

90 placebo for extended prevention of VTE after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer without an in

91 In consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, complete com

92 After laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, extended ant

93 compared with no or sham acupuncture, after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

94 extended prophylaxis with rivaroxaban after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

95 postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

96 he potential benefits and adverse effects of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancy.

97 trolled trials COLOR and COLOR II, comparing laparoscopic surgery for curable colon (COLOR) and recta

98 was higher after open surgery compared with laparoscopic surgery for each procedure (RYGB 2.1% vs. 1

99 perienced in both GC management and advanced laparoscopic surgery for laparoscopic resection.

100 omise oncologic and functional outcome after laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer and seems as

101 Based on long-term morbidity outcomes, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer could be consider

102 Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer did not differ si

103 Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer has been adopted

104 s confirms the long-term oncologic safety of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

105 To compare robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery for risk of conversion to open lapa

106 should be focused on further development of laparoscopic surgery for the growing obese population.

107 The role of laparoscopic surgery for treatment of perforated peptic

108 ticles dealing with diagnostic and operative laparoscopic surgery from mid 2002 to late 2003 have bee

109 on was achieved in 194 patients (82%) in the laparoscopic surgery group and 208 patients (89%) in the

110 on was complete in 206 patients (87%) in the laparoscopic surgery group and 216 patients (92%) in the

111 argin was clear in 222 patients (93%) in the laparoscopic surgery group and in 228 patients (97%) in

112 argin was clear in 236 patients (99%) in the laparoscopic surgery group and in 234 patients (99%) in

113 l of 1044 patients were included (699 in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 345 in the open-surgery g

114 isease-free survival rates were 74.8% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 70.8% in the open-surgery

115 Overall survival rates were 86.7% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 83.6% in the open-surgery

116 The laparoscopic-surgery group had less pain initially than

117 The rate of complications was higher in the laparoscopic-surgery group than in the open-surgery grou

118 This analysis revealed that laparoscopic surgery had a significant shorter time to M

119 Those undergoing laparoscopic surgery had lower costs in the first few ye

120 Simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery has become a mainstay of surgical t

121 : Laparoscopic surgery has become an increasingly popular

122 Laparoscopic surgery has gained rapid acceptance based o

123 Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has had considerable impact on the

124 o reduce the number of trocars necessary for laparoscopic surgery has the potential to revolutionize

125 Pioneers of laparoscopic surgery have continually striven to replica

126 Advancements in laparoscopic surgery have primarily focused on enhancing

127 However, compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery imposes greater ergonomic constrain

128 Laparoscopic surgery in experienced hands is safe and fe

129 e risk of abdominal abscesses was higher for laparoscopic surgery in half of six meta-analyses.

130 Laparoscopic surgery in obese patients reduces surgical

131 Laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer was

132 The evolution of laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology has been limit

133 Laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology is beginning t

134 s review is to evaluate recent literature on laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy and make recommendatio

135 Present evidence suggests laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy is a safe option.

136 ion and AR, and support the continued use of laparoscopic surgery in these patients.

137 Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in urology has gained immense popul

138 ers a reasonable alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery, in particular in donors with highe

139 ere are inherent limitations to conventional laparoscopic surgery including surgeon's experience with

140 mpliance with an ERAS program and the use of laparoscopic surgery independently improve outcome.

141 The use of single-port (SP) robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is a novel approach in the manageme

142 It is assumed that laparoscopic surgery is associated with less pain, quick

143 Laparoscopic surgery is associated with minimal pain, fe

144 rology is rapidly advancing, and single-site laparoscopic surgery is being explored clinically.

145 Laparoscopic surgery is being used more widely to manage

146 Laparoscopic surgery is compared with the traditional la

147 In the short term (<=18 months), laparoscopic surgery is no more effective than conservat

148 Furthermore, laparoscopic surgery is now being applied to a broad spe

149 Laparoscopic surgery is preferred to open approaches.

150 Acute cholecystitis is a common disease, and laparoscopic surgery is the standard of care.

151 L-17A and that the removal of the lesion via laparoscopic surgery leads to the significant reduction

152 study was to compare open surgery (OS) with laparoscopic surgery (LS) for perforated peptic ulcer (P

153 Technical limitations of laparoscopic surgery may limit patient eligibility and r

154 with intramuscular diaphragm electrodes via laparoscopic surgery may provide a less invasive and les

155 The use of single-incision laparoscopic surgery may represent an improvement over c

156 ospital stay was significantly shorter after laparoscopic surgery (median: laparoscopy, 5; interquart

157 are enabling devices for minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery (MIS).

158 We compared the rate of laparoscopic surgery, mortality and morbidity for colore

159 We compared the rate of laparoscopic surgery, mortality, and morbidity for color

160 Technical skills for laparoscopic surgery must be acquired within a competenc

161 eal abscess were randomly assigned to either laparoscopic surgery (n = 30) or conservative treatment

162 of 280 patients were included in the trial (laparoscopic surgery: n = 133; open surgery: n = 147).

163 hese, 91% involved hand-assisted or straight laparoscopic surgery, occasionally combined with open su

164 combining upper endoscopy with intragastric laparoscopic surgery offers advantages of both.

165 s its practicality and safety during in vivo laparoscopic surgery on a porcine model.

166 aralleled increasing rates of CT imaging and laparoscopic surgery on the appendix.

167 was to determine the effects of open versus laparoscopic surgery on the development of adhesive smal

168 tly lower surgical site infection rate after laparoscopic surgery (OR = 0.19; 95% CI [0.08-0.45]; P =

169 successful to identify sentinel nodes during laparoscopic surgery per hemipelvis to be acceptably con

170 ll bowel obstruction (SBO) after open versus laparoscopic surgery performed for suspected acute appen

171 PP during laparoscopic surgery produces increased intra-abdominal

172 transfer exercises from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery programme were analysed.

173 ation and preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) for advanced endometriosis,

174 al laparoscopic surgery and robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) have significant advantages

175 Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) is evolving rapidly in the p

176 Laparoscopic surgery reduces pain after donor nephrectom

177 Laparoscopic surgery reduces the incidence of adhesion-r

178 n of complex tasks like hanging a picture or laparoscopic surgery requires coordinated motion of more

179 Complex laparoscopic surgery requires precise movements, and usu

180 Laparoscopic surgery resulted in lower overall postopera

181 Laparoscopic surgery resulted in more incomplete or near

182 Laparoscopic surgery revealed an inflamed and edematous

183 With challenges of pure laparoscopic surgery, robotic assistance may provide mor

184 However, for "first solo laparoscopic surgery" scenario, there was some indicatio

185 Enthusiasts of laparoscopic surgery show that this type of lower urinar

186 other PROs were similar in both groups, but laparoscopic surgery significantly reduced length of hos

187 xities that may be prohibitive with standard laparoscopic surgery such as intracorporeal suturing.

188 erformed in a specially equipped and staffed laparoscopic surgery suite, and all patients were superv

189 ring the performance of 3 tasks: 2 simulated laparoscopic surgery tasks (peg transfer and precision c

190 tions, surgical site infections are fewer in laparoscopic surgery than in open surgery.

191 s prospective study was to validate, through laparoscopic surgery, the accuracy of the isotopic senti

192 ate higher costs when using the robot during laparoscopic surgery, the costs of initial purchase and

193 In hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon inserts a hand into th

194 The proportion of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, time to surgery, and 30-day compli

195 Simulation-based laparoscopic surgery training of health professionals ha

196 erlying the early phase of motor learning in laparoscopic surgery training, using electroencephalogra

197 to intestinal surgery, including new data on laparoscopic surgery, treatment of enterocutaneous fistu

198 The ACDC ("Acute Cholecystitis-early laparoscopic surgery versus antibiotic therapy and Delay

199 Recently, an advanced robotic system for laparoscopic surgery was approved for use in the United

200 Laparoscopic surgery was associated with a decreased ris

201 Laparoscopic surgery was associated with reduced complic

202 Laparoscopic surgery was correlated to shorter operative

203 s, a national project for the development of laparoscopic surgery was organised.

204 cluding patients with advanced tumor grades, laparoscopic surgery was still associated with better ou

205 of the utility of robotics from the field of laparoscopic surgery, we can anticipate the emerging rol

206 prevalence of MSDs among surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery, we performed a systematic review o

207 However, patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were generally at lower risk for de

208 bilateral incisional wounds (>/=10 mm) after laparoscopic surgery were randomized to receive acute tr

209 Ninety-five subjects undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery were recruited and stratified based

210 These findings suggest that robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery, when performed by surgeons with va

211 Lapco delegates had a 37.8% increase in laparoscopic surgery which was greater than non-Lapco su

212 Lapco delegates had a 37.8% increase in laparoscopic surgery which was greater than non-Lapco su

213 ne function of HLA-DR in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with fast track care remains highes

214 esthesia, but no prior studies have compared laparoscopic surgery with open repair under local anesth

215 The changes in the rate of post-Lapco laparoscopic surgery with the Lapco sign-off competency

216 Superiority or even equality of NOTES to laparoscopic surgery would be the best argument for adva