戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 c [LAP] approach, and the hand-assisted [HA] laparoscopic technique).
2 y, morbidity, and patient recovery after the laparoscopic technique.
3 e specifically related to limitations of the laparoscopic technique.
4  sacrocolpopexy and various transvaginal and laparoscopic techniques.
5 section may be performed at the same time by laparoscopic techniques.
6 te experience of radical vaginal surgery and laparoscopic techniques.
7 ted appendicitis can be treated with open or laparoscopic techniques.
8 on have been related to the advances made in laparoscopic techniques.
9 prosthetic materials, and the development of laparoscopic techniques.
10 ures, as well as comparisons between various laparoscopic techniques.
11 , with 5 patients successfully treated using laparoscopic techniques.
12 ent types of mesh repair with either open or laparoscopic techniques.
13 rgical morbidity has been sharply reduced by laparoscopic techniques.
14 al questions about the future of traditional laparoscopic techniques.
15  all of the reports to date have used hybrid laparoscopic techniques.
16 (0.25%) compared with procedures utilizing a laparoscopic technique (0.09%, P < 0.001).
17 cystectomy was typically performed using the laparoscopic technique (72.9%), followed by the open (19
18                                              Laparoscopic techniques, although feasible, have not gai
19                          Ongoing advances in laparoscopic techniques and operator skills have allowed
20              The technique requires advanced laparoscopic techniques, and great care must be taken to
21 lts of 10 cases performed using the original laparoscopic technique are compared with the results of
22                                              Laparoscopic techniques are being applied more frequentl
23                                         Pure laparoscopic techniques are being employed for the extir
24        As in other areas of general surgery, laparoscopic techniques are being used with increasing f
25  left pancreatectomy differ when open versus laparoscopic techniques are employed.
26                                     Although laparoscopic techniques are increasingly used in colorec
27 rrently, the percutaneous, ureteroscopic and laparoscopic techniques are recommended by individual in
28  surgery was dominated by the development of laparoscopic techniques during the last decade.
29                                          The laparoscopic technique for living donor nephrectomy is a
30        The open technique is superior to the laparoscopic technique for mesh repair of primary hernia
31 ion regimen, and we encourage the use of the laparoscopic technique for SCA patients undergoing elect
32        These data call into question whether laparoscopic techniques for aortic surgery have a signif
33                          Although the use of laparoscopic techniques for bilateral or recurrent herni
34                                   The use of laparoscopic techniques for the pancreas continues to ad
35                         Modifications in the laparoscopic technique have increased the length of the
36 esophageal reflux disease (GERD); similarly, laparoscopic techniques have allowed less morbidity in p
37                                    Recently, laparoscopic techniques have been applied to transplant
38  of laparoscopy for general surgery, various laparoscopic techniques have been developed for inguinal
39                                       Hybrid laparoscopic techniques have been developed to allow han
40 ery technology with alternative conventional laparoscopic techniques, have been described in human cl
41 ve randomized study to determine the optimal laparoscopic technique in children.
42                                       Use of laparoscopic techniques in colorectal cancer surgery in
43 ner, there were no significant benefits over laparoscopic techniques in operative outcomes.
44 progressively more widespread application of laparoscopic techniques in pediatric urology, which has
45 lecystectomy procedures reported, use of the laparoscopic technique increased from 59% in 1992 to 79%
46                                     The pure laparoscopic technique of left lateral sectionectomy was
47                             If unsuccessful, laparoscopic techniques offer good outcomes and quick re
48 my exceeded that for patients undergoing the laparoscopic technique (P < 0.001).
49                     The modifications of the laparoscopic technique presented here provide measurable
50 expertise in percutaneous, ureteroscopic and laparoscopic techniques provide the urologist with the b
51  after adjusting for significant covariates (laparoscopic technique, surgical site, postoperative com
52 for SSI was lower in patients undergoing the laparoscopic technique than the open technique.
53                           With the advent of laparoscopic techniques, the frequency of bile duct inju
54 epair using mesh performed by either open or laparoscopic techniques vs open repair without use of me
55                                            A laparoscopic technique was employed in 16,315 (6.3%).
56              Satisfactory repair using video-laparoscopic techniques was achieved in all cases.
57                        Patients undergoing a laparoscopic technique were, however, more likely to be
58 ntraindications to the pure or hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques where found.
59 hnology simulations currently being used are laparoscopic techniques, which provide surgeons with an
60 nd $4,221 (P<0.001 for the comparison of the laparoscopic technique with both other techniques).
61 eminations were performed by an intrauterine laparoscopic technique with fresh or cryopreserved elect
62        : The aim of the trial was to compare laparoscopic technique with open technique regarding sho
63 n be successfully placed using endoscopic or laparoscopic techniques with low complication rates.