ライフサイエンスコーパス: left circumflex

1 rtery stenoses (left anterior descending, 9; left circumflex, 2; mean, 59 +/- 23% diameter stenosis)

2 ry angiography (left anterior descending, 4; left circumflex, 2; right coronary artery, 4; and right

3 onary occlusion (64% versus 47%), especially left circumflex (20% versus 6.4%) and graft vessel (7.3%

4 left main, 19; left anterior descending, 51; left circumflex, 4; right coronary, 9).

5 y for the detection of > 50% stenosis in the left circumflex (74% and 96%; 50% and 100%; 63% and 91%,

6 swine fed a high-cholesterol diet underwent left circumflex ameroid constrictor placement to induce

7 Four weeks after left circumflex ameroid implantation, freshly aspirated

8 similar among the left anterior descending, left circumflex and right coronary arteries.

9 territories of the left anterior descending, left circumflex and right coronary artery.

10 nce interval, 1.00 to 1.64; P=0.046) for the left circumflex, and 1.32 (95% confidence interval, 1.03

11 th those in distal left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries (0.80+/-0.0

12 cle) and regional (left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries) MBF and fl

13 collected from the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries, and locati

14 er stenosis in the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries.

15 territories (left anterior descending [LAD], left circumflex, and right coronary artery [RCA]).

16 r the detection of left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery stenosis, sen

17 automatically for left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery territories a

18 defect size in the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery territories,

19 artery territories-left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right-as well as left ventricular (

20 Left anterior descending, left circumflex, and/or right coronary arteries were inj

21 Left anterior descending, left circumflex, and/or right coronary arteries were inj

22 Both left circumflex- and right coronary artery-mediated deli

23 er ablation of atrial fibrillation, adjacent left circumflex arterial vasospasm frequently occurred w

24 The frequency and severity of left circumflex arterial vasospasm was assessed and moni

25 ronary artery and the left main and proximal left circumflex arteries was performed with BRSs.

26 left anterior descending arteries and 86% of left circumflex arteries, whereas calcified nodules with

27 anterior descending artery (LAD) (n = 27) or left circumflex artery (LCx) (n = 29) were evaluated wit

28 le in the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex artery (LCx) branches of the LMCA, and i

29 Absence of the left circumflex artery (LCX) is an extremely rare congen

30 detection of right coronary artery (RCA) and left circumflex artery (LCX) lesions (0.84 +/- 0.08 vs.

31 In the 6 critical-stenosis dogs, the LAD-to-left circumflex artery (LCx) microsphere flow ratio was

32 MI was induced by occlusion of the left circumflex artery (LCX) or left anterior descending

33 ries: left anterior descending artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), and right coronary artery

34 severe stenoses in the rJS>=4 group was the left circumflex artery (LCX), and the post-PCI absence,

35 Perfusion measurements in the LAD, left circumflex artery (LCx), right coronary artery, and

36 t anterior descending coronary artery [20%], left circumflex artery [12%] and right coronary artery [

37 .2% +/- 1%), 123I-IPPA defect magnitude (LAD/left circumflex artery [LCX] count ratios) decreased fro

38 itory (left anterior descending artery [LAD] left circumflex artery and posterior descending artery [

39 nary collateral channels were induced in the left circumflex artery bed of 12 chronically instrumente

40 rescent microsphere-derived MBF ratio in LAD/left circumflex artery beds demonstrated close correlati

41 Left circumflex artery crossed between CS and MA in 80%

42 Recurrent MI was induced by ligating the left circumflex artery followed by the left anterior des

43 The left circumflex artery group demonstrated the following

44 t describes a hybrid intervention addressing left circumflex artery occlusion during minimally invasi

45 illation (VF) was evaluated using a 2-minute left circumflex artery occlusion during the last minute

46 ctive CFI differences during either IMA with left circumflex artery occlusion were inconsistently pos

47 right coronary artery occlusion, and 12% had left circumflex artery occlusion.

48 emia, followed by left anterior ascending or left circumflex artery occlusion.

49 A occlusions but not during contralateral or left circumflex artery occlusions.

50 1 month after the surgery, occlusion of the left circumflex artery regularly produced ventricular fi

51 In six open-chest dogs with left circumflex artery stenosis, radiolabeled microspher

52 In the right coronary and left circumflex artery territories, these associations w

53 myocardial flow reserve were reduced in the left circumflex artery territory (both P<0.001), and hib

54 placement of an ameroid constrictor into the left circumflex artery to induce chronic myocardial isch

55 ients selected for coronary angiography, the left circumflex artery was the culprit vessel in 34.6% o

56 nary artery, 10 right coronary artery, and 5 left circumflex artery) retrieved by using directional c

57 erior descending artery, 90% and 70% for the left circumflex artery, and 74% and 79% for the right co

58 lium chloride staining demonstrated that the left circumflex artery, and not the LAD, group had atria

59 1; left anterior descending artery, P=0.003; left circumflex artery, P=0.001).

60 was found between right coronary artery and left circumflex artery.

61 oronary artery, and 72% (kappa=0.40) for the left circumflex artery.

62 % for right coronary artery, and 30+/-9% for left circumflex artery.

63 for right coronary artery, and 30+/-12% for left circumflex artery.

64 t placement of an ameroid constrictor on the left circumflex artery.

65 er, an ameroid constrictor was placed on the left circumflex artery.

66 instrumented dogs by partially occluding the left circumflex artery.

67 t anterior descending artery, and 26% in the left circumflex artery.

68 ement of an ameroid constrictor around swine left circumflex artery.

69 arrowing of the right coronary artery or the left circumflex branch or both.

70 terior descending branch, 115.9 mm +/- 19.7; left circumflex branch, 97.2 mm +/- 12.5; and right coro

71 ion, and to its left anterior descending and left circumflex branches, before modelling their TAWSS u

72 retch of normal left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary arteries dose dependently reduc

73 two Yorkshire pigs with chronically occluded left circumflex coronary arteries were randomly assigned

74 n injury of the left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary arteries.

75 rior descending coronary artery, 96% for the left circumflex coronary artery (22/23), and 100% for th

76 ith a lower rate of revascularization of the left circumflex coronary artery (84.1% vs. 90.0%; p = 0.

77 680 were then separately infused to maximize left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) flow velocity.

78 A hydraulic occluder was placed in the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) in 10 dogs.

79 oronary artery (RCA) in six subjects and the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) in one patient.

80 A 90-min left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) occlusion was foll

81 The proximal left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) of female Yucatan

82 t anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), left circumflex coronary artery (LCX), and right coronar

83 rogressive ameroid occlusion of the proximal left circumflex coronary artery (LCx); after 2 months, a

84 +/- 0.01; P < 0.01) defect count ratios (LAD/left circumflex coronary artery [LCx]) differentiated be

85 artery [LAD]: n = 13, r = 0.89, p < 0.0001; left circumflex coronary artery [LCx]: n = 11, r = 0.7,

86 gs underwent operative placement of proximal left circumflex coronary artery ameroid constrictors.

87 cending coronary artery, 44% and 90% for the left circumflex coronary artery and 75% and 77% for the

88 ubjected to ameroid-induced occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery and randomized to bFGF (

89 ubjected to ameroid-induced occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery and randomized to bFGF 1

90 ulse Doppler flow probe implanted around the left circumflex coronary artery and with catheters in le

91 es along the left anterior descending and/or left circumflex coronary artery by intracoronary ultraso

92 n was provoked by transient occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery during submaximal exerci

93 A conscious dog model of left circumflex coronary artery electrolytic injury was

94 gs (left anterior descending coronary artery/left circumflex coronary artery flow 0.53+/-0.16 in the

95 n either the left anterior descending or the left circumflex coronary artery in 18 dogs.

96 ients, right coronary artery [RCA] in 14 and left circumflex coronary artery in 2).

97 sed at a rate of 2 ng/kg per minute into the left circumflex coronary artery in normal dogs (n = 5) a

98 e from the infarction zone eight weeks after left circumflex coronary artery ligation in pigs, demons

99 Myocardial infarction was produced by left circumflex coronary artery ligation in swine.

100 protein subunits in pig hearts with proximal left circumflex coronary artery ligation.

101 (open chest) before and continuously during left circumflex coronary artery occlusion to induce acut

102 ht of early passage autologous MSCs into the left circumflex coronary artery of anaesthetised dogs.

103 gher occurrence of TLR for restenosis of the left circumflex coronary artery ostium (LCX-ISR) (HR, 2.

104 chest dogs with left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary artery stenoses that reduced hy

105 erritories: the left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary artery territories and the righ

106 left anterior descending coronary artery and left circumflex coronary artery territories, whereas AC

107 Electrolytic injury of the left circumflex coronary artery to induce thrombotic occ

108 A) and coronary sinus (CS) as well as CS and left circumflex coronary artery using cardiac computed t

109 y greater than or equal to 10% (4.9% vs 0%), left circumflex coronary artery V15 Gy greater than or e

110 V15 Gy greater than or equal to 10% (0.64), left circumflex coronary artery V15 Gy greater than or e

111 this hypothesis, a 2-minute occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery was made during the last

112 dogs, either the left anterior descending or left circumflex coronary artery was occluded for 90 minu

113 Segments of thoracic aorta and left circumflex coronary artery were obtained from 3 gro

114 three segments of LAD and three segments of left circumflex coronary artery) increased by 19.3% (3.2

115 vena cava, a flow probe around the proximal left circumflex coronary artery, and catheters in the le

116 cle-area of infarct, territory served by the left circumflex coronary artery, and remote myocardium-o

117 on in either the left anterior descending or left circumflex coronary artery, and the S-VF DFT was de

118 s with an ameroid constrictor applied to the left circumflex coronary artery, in each pig, peak beta-

119 se of an asymptomatic 72-year-old man with a left circumflex coronary artery-to-CS fistula, together

120 lly and an inflatable cuff placed around the left circumflex coronary artery.

121 c injury (250 microA for 180 minutes) in the left circumflex coronary artery.

122 t of an ameroid occluder around the proximal left circumflex coronary artery.

123 rolytic injury of the intimal surface of the left circumflex coronary artery.

124 id implantation or repeated occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery.

125 n grafted to a stenosed branch of the native left circumflex coronary artery.

126 l regurgitation produced by occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery.

127 porcine coronary ECs were isolated from the left circumflex coronary artery.

128 t ventricular pressures, wall thickness, and left circumflex coronary blood flow (CBF).

129 or measurements of systemic hemodynamics and left circumflex coronary blood flow (CBF).

130 internal diameter and wall thickness, and a left circumflex coronary blood flow velocity transducer.

131 The left circumflex crosses under the CS the majority of tim

132 D above normal (P<0.0001), and single-vessel left circumflex disease (P<0.0007; odds ratio, 7.6).

133 of false-negative studies were single-vessel left circumflex disease, increased wall thickness, small

134 gher resting left anterior descending artery/left circumflex flow ratio compared with placebo (P<0.03

135 microsphere-derived LAD flow, normalized to left circumflex flow, correspondingly increased between

136 hy of the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries (30 degrees right anterio

137 hy of the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries (30 degrees right anterio

138 hy of the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries (30 degrees right anterio

139 hy of the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries (30 degrees right anterio

140 CA) in 67 and from the proximal 35 mm of the left circumflex (LCX) artery in 28 patients.

141 , left anterior descending (LAD) artery, and left circumflex (LCX) artery were evaluated by 2 paediat

142 Videointensities in the LAD and left circumflex (LCx) beds were plotted against pulsing

143 f adenosine infusion via a surgically placed left circumflex (LCx) catheter (n=11) or via a right atr

144 ree models of MI were generated: 1) proximal left circumflex (LCx) coronary artery occlusion involvin

145 yocardium, mini-swine underwent 90% proximal left circumflex (LCx) coronary artery stenosis.

146 e-related left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCx) coronary artery vasodilatation wit

147 In seven dogs with acute left circumflex (LCX) coronary ligation, LV expansion wa

148 left circumflex (LCX) count ratios for both tracers and

149 In protocol 2, the LAD/left circumflex (LCx) defect count ratios for 99mTc-tetr

150 in chronically instrumented dogs with either left circumflex (LCx) infusion of adenosine or partial L

151 Rabbits underwent ligation of the left circumflex (LCx) marginal artery and implantation o

152 ion measurement, where the resulting LAD and left circumflex (LCx) measurements were compared to refe

153 te loss was significantly greater within the left circumflex (LCX) ostium compared to the parent vess

154 MCE acoustic intensity in the LAD and left circumflex (LCx) regions were fit to the following:

155 Eight open-chest dogs with left circumflex (LCx) stenoses were studied.

156 -line for the LAD risk area and the adjacent left circumflex (LCx) territory, and peak background-sub

157 e from ostium of CS to the intersection with left circumflex (LCX), and anatomical relation of LCX an

158 f the left anterior descending (LAD, n = 5), left circumflex (LCx, n = 5), and carotid (n = 5) arteri

159 Ischemic zone (left circumflex) myocardial blood flows (in ml/min/g) we

160 ed in the left anterior descending (n = 11), left circumflex (n = 7) or right (n = 1) coronary artery

161 ning the annuloplasty suture during proximal left circumflex occlusion.

162 left versus right dominance among those with left circumflex or left main culprit lesions was 1.25 (9

163 ns (mid left anterior descending artery, mid left circumflex, or branches) where no unstented native

164 n the left anterior descending (P=0.004) and left circumflex (P=0.0002) regions.

165 n the left anterior descending (P=0.038) and left circumflex (P=0.009) regions persisted, which indic

166 sty in both the left anterior descending and left circumflex plus stent implantation in the right cor

167 pressed as lower Ecc in the RCA (P<0.01) and left circumflex regions (P<0.05) measured in the subendo

168 onary territories (left anterior descending, left circumflex, right coronary artery).

169 ght coronary segments were reassigned to the left circumflex territory (39% of reassigned segments),

170 80%, P<0.0001) and was more accurate for the left circumflex than for the left anterior descending co