戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  exhibited the postsynaptic relationships of lemniscal afferents.
2 uclei exhibited the morphology of ascending "lemniscal" afferents.
3 s (SpVc) and the dorsal column nucleus-based lemniscal and cortical pathway.
4 ly, for the formation of the whisker-related lemniscal and cortical structures.
5 he corticothalamic system suggests that both lemniscal and extralemniscal auditory thalamic nuclei re
6 ther rapidly changing stimuli unaffected, in lemniscal and nonlemniscal (but not polysensory) subdivi
7 rol and the predictable "cascade" control by lemniscal and nonlemniscal IC neurons that is not presen
8 ion appeared differentially affected in aged lemniscal and nonlemniscal MGB.
9                   Our findings indicate that lemniscal and nonlemniscal nuclei are indeed different i
10 pattern of PV/CB staining that distinguishes lemniscal and nonlemniscal pathways.
11  species and are related to the functions of lemniscal and nonlemniscal somatosensory pathways.
12               Our results indicate that both lemniscal and nonlemniscal TC afferents play a role in i
13 te body (MGBv and MGBm) respectively are the lemniscal and nonlemniscal thalamic auditory nuclei.
14  differences in the nature and plasticity of lemniscal and paralemniscal information processing.
15  investigated the synaptic properties of the lemniscal and paralemniscal input to VPm and POm.
16  through two glutamatergic routes called the lemniscal and paralemniscal pathways via the ventral pos
17 nct classes of thalamocortical input via the lemniscal and paralemniscal pathways, the former via ven
18 nal nuclei, which give rise to the ascending lemniscal and paralemniscal pathways.
19                    Our data suggest that the lemniscal and paralemniscal projections should not be th
20 tinuations of, respectively, the subcortical lemniscal and paralemniscal systems conveying somatosens
21 longing to two major somatosensory pathways (lemniscal and paralemniscal) and explored the way in whi
22 sory cortex via two major parallel pathways, lemniscal and paralemniscal.
23              Slow, inexorable progression of lemniscal and thalamocortical axonal withdrawal is a neu
24 evaluate the relative contributions of core (lemniscal) and matrix (nonlemniscal) thalamic afferents
25  visual, auditory/vestibular, somatosensory (lemniscal), and proprioceptive (spinocerebellar) systems
26 es some neurons of the parabrachial, lateral lemniscal, and deep cerebellar nuclei, in addition to ce
27 ral subdivision of the MGN (MGv; the primary/lemniscal auditory pathway).
28 laterally and the somatosensory and auditory lemniscal axons are transected unilaterally on the day o
29                    Examination of trigeminal lemniscal axons in dcc knockout mice revealed absence of
30 fic excitatory synapses, competition between lemniscal (barrel) and non-lemniscal (septal) processing
31 vel family of all-phenylene figure-8 shaped (lemniscal) bismacrocycles, termed spiro[n,n]CPPs.
32 eurons, whereas it caused less adaptation in lemniscal cells.
33 y being an information route parallel to the lemniscal channel.
34 abeled cells localized ventromedially in the lemniscal division, i.e., the ventral subdivision of the
35 ble overlay on the more obligatory system of lemniscal feedforward type responses.
36 sformation of sensory representations in the lemniscal (high-fidelity) auditory thalamocortical netwo
37 an be transmitted to the amygdala via either lemniscal (i.e., LG --> V1, V2 --> TE2/PR) or non-lemnis
38 scal (i.e., LG --> V1, V2 --> TE2/PR) or non-lemniscal (i.e., LP --> V2, TE2/PR) thalamo-cortico-amyg
39  effect on sound-evoked activity in central (lemniscal) IC of the marmoset.
40  VP, an effect consequent to a modulation of lemniscal input at the cortical rather than subcortical
41 of the cuneate nucleus, the source of medial lemniscal (ML) axons carrying information from the contr
42                                              Lemniscal neurons are narrowly frequency tuned and provi
43                                              Lemniscal neurons most faithfully encoded stimuli when t
44 t of auditory nuclei projections and lateral lemniscal nuclear projections in embryonic rats, respect
45 entral nuclei of the trapezoid body, lateral lemniscal nuclei, and inferior colliculus.
46 the majority of projections from the lateral lemniscal nuclei, did not label in these experiments, in
47                                       In the lemniscal nuclei, most neurons contained low levels of G
48 emporal cortex, nucleus sagulum, and lateral lemniscal nuclei.
49 ditory-evoked response originates in the non-lemniscal pathway and not in cortical areas of the rat b
50 teral thalamus, resulting in a bilateral PrV lemniscal pathway at P0.
51 ed that the spike rates in neurons along the lemniscal pathway from receptors to cortex, which includ
52 bed the normal development of the trigeminal lemniscal pathway in the mouse.
53                           Stimulation of the lemniscal pathway produced class 1, or "driver," respons
54          Here we find that neurons along the lemniscal pathway robustly encode rhythmic whisking on a
55 ese layer I projections represent a separate lemniscal pathway to the molecular layer or arise as col
56 In the mouse, thalamic relay synapses of the lemniscal pathway undergo extensive remodelling during t
57            Our data suggest that, unlike the lemniscal pathway, the paralemniscal one is not homogeno
58  have impaired development of the trigeminal-lemniscal pathway.
59  of these levels of the dorsal column-medial lemniscal pathway.
60 ving direct inputs from the primary sensory (lemniscal) pathway show the greatest decrement in synchr
61 esponse properties of LC and neighboring non-lemniscal portions of the inferior colliculus.
62 icipants (11 females) we continuously probed lemniscal processing in the primary somatosensory cortex
63 where the thalamic input is dominated by the lemniscal projection.
64                                        While lemniscal projections are somatotopically mapped from br
65 eurons giving rise to the principal sensory (lemniscal) projections to the IC, i.e., those from the c
66 rthermore, increasing the intensity sharpens lemniscal receptive field profile as adaptation progress
67 eled thalamic synapses observed, 10-29% were lemniscal (RL) type synapses in VPL; 60-70% were cortico
68 tors to responses of thalamic relay cells to lemniscal (sensory) input in thalamic slices studied wit
69 mpetition between lemniscal (barrel) and non-lemniscal (septal) processing streams, and regulation of
70 ern had inputs from a variety of olivary and lemniscal sources, notably the contralateral lateral sup
71         SSA neurons were confined to the non-lemniscal subdivisions and exhibited broad receptive fie
72                                    Ascending lemniscal substrates are characterized by cascading exci
73 d developmental refinement of whisker relay (lemniscal) synapses in the thalamus in mice deficient of
74 l chemosense apparently relies on the medial lemniscal system to guide this chemically driven feeding
75 some engaging, predominantly, the ascending "lemniscal," taste pathway, a circuit associated with hig
76               Hence, monosynaptic excitatory lemniscal TC connections onto layer 4 do not behave unif
77 es from cortico-cortical feedback and/or non-lemniscal thalamic projections and targets the apical de
78 er-crossing areas, was closely examined: the lemniscal thalamocortical (TC) pathway.
79 sensory input transmitted through canonical "lemniscal" thalamocortical pathways remains unknown.
80 ensory processing mediated by high-fidelity 'lemniscal' thalamocortical pathways to primary sensory c
81 l type differences in their relationships to lemniscal versus paralemniscal pathways.