コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 participants were randomized: placebo, 356; lifitegrast, 355 (intention-to-treat [ITT] population).
2 eye (cyclosporine 0.05%, cyclosporine 0.09%, lifitegrast 5%, and loteprednol 0.25% eye drops and vare
3 omized 1:1 to receive topically administered lifitegrast (5.0%) or placebo (vehicle) twice daily for
4 mbined CSP and STD NMR experiments show that lifitegrast, a compound used for the treatment of dry ey
5 eving clinically meaningful improvement with lifitegrast across all sign and symptom end point pairs
8 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of lifitegrast compared with placebo for the treatment of D
10 eSure sealant to seal corneal incisions, and Lifitegrast for dry eye represent some of the major deve
18 m baseline in EDS also significantly favored lifitegrast on days 42 (TE, 9.32; 95% CI, 5.44-13.20; P
19 mic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis((R)); CsA), and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5% (Xiidra((R)); LFT) ar
20 andomized 1:1 after 14-day placebo run-in to lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% or placebo twice da
21 run-in, participants were randomized 1:1 to lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% or placebo twice da
23 An investigation of the treatment effect of lifitegrast ophthalmic solution, 5.0%, in different subg
26 Only unreliable systematic reviews evaluated lifitegrast, oral antibiotics, and moisture chamber devi
27 le systematic reviews are needed to evaluate lifitegrast, oral antibiotics, and moisture chamber devi
35 vement of secondary symptom end points among lifitegrast-treated subjects: ocular discomfort (nominal
38 ponder and composite responder rates favored lifitegrast vs placebo (odds ratio range, 1.29 [95% CI,