ライフサイエンスコーパス: light perception

1 reased to a median 20/40 (range, 20/20 to no light perception).

2 20/1000), and total blindness (20/1250 to no light perception).

3 t last follow-up was 20/400 (range, 20/30-no light perception).

4 visual acuity of 20/100 (range, 20/20 to no light perception).

5 nellen visual acuity ranged from 20/20 to no light perception.

6 surgery, repeat glaucoma surgery, or loss of light perception.

7 s, 3 of whom had a final visual acuity of no light perception.

8 ation and by the PHYTOCHROME (PHY)-dependent light perception.

9 inal visual acuities ranged from 20/30 to no light perception.

10 opped DSAEK graft range from very good to no light perception.

11 Visual acuities ranged from 20/25 to light perception.

12 Visual acuities ranged from 20/40 to light perception.

13 superfamily to act as reversible switches in light perception.

14 tes FT expression downstream of red and blue light perception.

15 e of a phytochrome sensor domain involved in light perception.

16 dent on shoot-derived signals resulting from light perception.

17 retinal degeneration where mutations affect light perception.

18 form networks for both light harvesting and light perception.

19 d the other, providing a novel mechanism for light perception.

20 = 58) of eyes, and 12% (n = 88) of eyes lost light perception.

21 l acuity at baseline ranged from 20/16 to no light perception.

22 ry, or a catastrophic event, such as loss of light perception.

23 month 3, additional glaucoma surgery, or no light perception.

24 two consecutive visits, or progression to no light perception.

25 potony, reoperation for glaucoma, or loss of light perception.

26 tube due to plate exposure; and 1 eye, lost light perception.

27 apy; additional glaucoma surgery; or loss of light perception.

28 ved in shaping transretinal responses during light perception.

29 ficant visual acuity loss, including loss of light perception.

30 owed a steep trajectory of vision loss to no light perception.

31 cortex generated a behaviour associated with light perception.

32 5 mmHg, reoperation for glaucoma, or loss of light perception.

33 Visual acuity ranged from 20/25 to light perception.

34 al vision for individuals with limited or no light perception.

35 olled IOP or disease progression, or loss of light perception.

36 ery, or a catastrophic event such as loss of light perception.

37 ation of the primary cilium, specialized for light perception.

38 Presenting VA ranged from 7/200 to no light perception.

39 uction strongly suggests impaired non-visual light perception.

40 Visual acuity in LE was no light perception.

41 ents' visual acuity ranged from 20/200 to no light perception.

42 typically triggered by phytochrome-dependent light perception.

43 001), although 3.1% (n = 9) progressed to no light perception.

44 ng 201 cases with initial acuity better than light perception.

45 coma surgery (including needling) or loss of light perception.

46 COP1/SPA complex by phyA- and phyB-mediated light perception.

47 lue band peaked at 2.8 eV resulting in white light perception.

48 6 patients with visual acuity no better than light perception.

49 sual acuity ranged from hand movements to no light perception.

50 ons, de novo glaucoma procedures, or loss of light perception.

51 here were also significantly fewer eyes with light perception (6.7%; n = 19; P < .0001), although 3.1

52 ng all 4 open globe injuries with primary no light perception (8.3%) requiring enucleation or eviscer

53 This light perception ability requires the activities of prot

54 ive visits > 3 months after surgery, loss of light perception, additional IOP-lowering surgery, or hy

55 nnot be attributed to changes in red/far-red light perception alone.

56 PAS-domain regions of molecules involved in light perception and circadian rhythmicity in several or

57 In Arabidopsis, the interplay of light perception and circadian rhythms detects changes i

58 anner, plays a central role in linking shade light perception and growth responses.

59 sual acuity was severely reduced to residual light perception and hand motion vision, with the except

60 d by expansions of gene families involved in light perception and harvesting.

61 ow these two regulatory mechanisms depend on light perception and interact with each other has yet to

62 On examination, RE demonstrated light perception and intraocular pressure of 36 mmHg.

63 metabolism, extracts of mutants defective in light perception and light responses were analyzed for p

64 signifying a highly adapted eye for maximum light perception and protection.

65 The expression of several genes involved in light perception and signaling is altered in the high or

66 lecular mechanism by which they might impact light perception and signaling.

67 Light perception and temporal resolution with the implan

68 A mechanism for integrating light perception and the endogenous circadian clock is c

69 re, we give an overview of the mechanisms of light perception and the subsequent regulation of nuclea

70 nal BVA was hand motions (range, 20/20 to no light perception) and 6 (9.1%) patients maintained a Sne

71 on, 37 (26.2%) had hand motion, 7 (0.5%) had light perception, and 58 (41.1%) were uncooperative.

72 osa (RP), remaining vision no more than bare light perception, and an implanted Argus II epiretinal p

73 abiotic stress, transcriptional regulation, light perception, and development.

74 characteristics, presence of VA better than light perception, and fall history, the rate of contacts

75 a surgery; eight eyes (10%) progressed to no light perception; and 34 eyes (40%) also required TS rev

76 Light perception at dawn plays a key role in coordinatin

77 ChRmine and ChroME2s did restore light perception at higher light intensities.

78 R) at baseline to 1.34 logMAR (0.30 logMAR - light perception) at last follow-up.

79 Prosthetic vision was assessed by mapping light perception, bar orientation, letter recognition, a

80 eral retinoblastoma (group D) presented with light perception best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and

81 Here, we show that differences in light perception between mesophyll and bundle sheath cel

82 This patient had no light perception bilaterally and suffered from bilateral

83 On neurological examination, he had no light perception bilaterally.

84 s an elegant enzymatic mechanism that favors light perception by cones under daylight conditions when

85 lection of biliproteins that enable cellular light perception by photoconverting between a red-light-

86 When the seedlings protrude from soil, light perception by photoreceptors triggers a reduced ac

87 To elucidate the molecular basis of far-red light perception by this third frCBCR subfamily, we dete

88 e most frequently cited sensations included: light perception, changes in light brightness, movements

89 rected visual acuity better than or equal to light perception (cohort 1), 34 to 73 letters (20/40 to

90 ypotony, explantation of implant, or loss of light perception compared with 22 eyes (47% of failures)

91 During follow-up, no light perception developed in 17 cases (11.6%), mostly a

92 r the first postoperative month), or loss of light perception due to glaucoma; (D) aggregation of cri

93 d from retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and with no light perception each received a chronically implanted o

94 ion energy to the pyramid centers to enhance light-perception efficiency.

95 Following the initial light-perception event, the phytochromes initiate a sign

96 len equivalent 20/3000-20/4000, range 20/400-light perception); final BCVA was 0.318 (Snellen equival

97 9 (Snellen equivalent 20/347, range 20/60 to light perception); final median BCVA was logMAR 0.301 (S

98 1 (Snellen equivalent 20/400, range 20/20 to light perception); final median BCVA was logMAR 0.477 (S

99 Light perception for orientation in zoospore-forming fun

100 excludes the hypocotyl apex as the site for light perception for phototropism and shows that phot1-m

101 of severity: from mild visual acuity loss to light perception; from full kinetic fields with relative

102 Final vision improved to Light perception/ Hand movement (LP/HM) in 2(7.4%) eyes,

103 al acuities of no light perception (NLP) and light perception/hand motion (LP/HM), respectively.

104 three classes of photoreceptors that mediate light perception have been characterized at the molecula

105 e as exceeding these IOP thresholds, loss of light perception, hypotony revision surgery, or need for

106 axis impingement, and 5% of patients had no light perception in 1 or both eyes.

107 20/200 or better in 12 patients (33%) and no light perception in 11 of 36 patients (31%).

108 um angle of resolution in 43 children (45%), light perception in 21 eyes (22%), and no light percepti

109 13% (2/16), >/=20/400 in 50% (8/16), and no light perception in 25% (4/16).

110 VA at 6 months was light perception or no light perception in 3 of 6 cases (50%).

111 BCVA at last follow-up visit was no light perception in 5 patients.

112 The ecological significance of light perception in nonphotosynthetic bacteria remains l

113 ved in relevant biological functions such as light perception in plants and as protective agents agai

114 mes are multidomain photoswitches that drive light perception in plants and microorganisms by couplin

115 family of photoreceptors responsible for red light perception in plants, fungi and bacteria.

116 Five days later, the patient developed no light perception in the left eye.

117 ual acuity was 20/32 in the right eye and no light perception in the left eye.

118 0.93-2.92, corresponding to a Snellen VA of light perception) in the UIHC cohort (P = 0.031).

119 ease resistance, protein phosphorylation and light perception, including the phytochrome (Phy) A and

120 The first step toward light perception is 11-cis to all-trans photoisomerizati

121 No light perception is a devastating but uncommon outcome o

122 The first event in light perception is absorption of a photon by an opsin p

123 The first event in light perception is absorption of a photon by the retina

124 Our data show that in these fungi, light perception is accomplished by the function of a no

125 pendently of the degree of childhood vision, light perception level, or Braille reading.

126 Light perception liberates their protein kinase domain f

127 c patients who presented with vision of only light perception (LP) had better visual results with imm

128 presenting with either VA >=20/800 or VA of light perception (LP) or no LP (less than or equal to LP

129 ne, the change in vision in OD improved from light perception (LP) to counting fingers (CF).

130 a higher likelihood of last follow-up VA of light perception (LP) to hand motion (46% in the study c

131 Eight patients with bare light perception (LP) vision due to retinitis pigmentosa

132 ecorded before surgery ranged from 20/600 to light perception (LP), and vision in 2 eyes was fix and

133 ncy of Count Fingers (CF), Hand Motion (HM), Light Perception (LP), or No Light Perception (NLP) visi

134 ~ 70%) and patients with light perception/no light perception (LP-NLP) vision or VA of 20/20 or bette

135 eye was 20/40 to 20/60 (n = 5) or 20/400 to light perception (n = 3).

136 76% and 14% had final visual acuities of no light perception (NLP) and light perception/hand motion

137 His bilateral visual acuity was no light perception (NLP) despite prescribed IV erythropoie

138 es varied from 20/200 in the best eye, to no light perception (NLP) in each eye.

139 An eye injury that causes no light perception (NLP) typically carries an unfavorable

140 nd Motion (HM), Light Perception (LP), or No Light Perception (NLP) vision (p = 0.023).

141 Progression to no light perception (NLP) vision and 6-month surgical failu

142 g at 2 consecutive visits, progression to no light perception (NLP) vision, glaucoma reoperation, or

143 s, and clinical course of eyes developing no light perception (NLP) visual acuity (VA) following Bost

144 For eyes with no light perception (NLP), in which treatment goal was pain

145 n 2 consecutive visits, vision decline to no light perception (NLP), or glaucoma reoperation.

146 ith open globe injury 27 (15.7%) eyes had no light perception (NLP).

147 ears or older, and had vision better than no light perception (NLP).

148 visual acuity and 8 of 36 eyes (22%) had no light perception (NLP).

149 ar after diagnosis (~ 70%) and patients with light perception/no light perception (LP-NLP) vision or

150 UVR8-dependent UV-B light perception occurs mainly in the epidermis and cort

151 Her visual acuity was no light perception OD and counting fingers OS.

152 tients have an increased sensitivity to blue light; perception of blue light is mediated by what is n

153 l acuity was variable, ranging from 6/7.5 to light perception on initial presentation to the oncology

154 However, patients who presented with light-perception-only visual acuity had substantial bene

155 .003), and patients who had visual acuity of light perception or better had a 46% lower risk of death

156 yes (71.9%), among which 59 eyes (64.1%) had light perception or better.

157 ), light perception in 21 eyes (22%), and no light perception or impossible to assess in 32 eyes (33%

158 VA at 6 months was light perception or no light perception in 3 of 6 cases

159 erval [CI], 0.32/EY to 1.22/EY); the rate of light perception or no light perception vision was 0.07/

160 Blind subjects (bare light perception or worse in both eyes) with retinitis p

161 vements VA (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.69-0.75) and light perception or worse VA (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.44-0.5

162 f presentation after OGI, 64% of eyes showed light perception or worse vision.

163 rticipants (61%) had a visual acuity (VA) of light perception or worse, and 28 (90%) reported a long

164 gram-positive groups) and presentation with light perception or worse, with an odds ratio of 3.3 and

165 our of 15 cases had loss of visual acuity to light perception or worse.

166 99 eyes (47%) had a visual acuity of light perception or worse.

167 line, IOP <= 5 mmHg, reoperation, or loss of light perception) or qualified and complete success (wit

168 onal glaucoma surgery, vision decrease to no light perception, or IOP persistently <= 5 mmHg or > 21

169 Together with light perception, oxygen sensing therefore allows an int

170 77 (Snellen equivalent 20/60, range 20/20 to light perception, P < .001).

171 ellen equivalent of 20/40-20/50, range 20/20-light perception, P < .001).

172 ponsive growth by integrating the clock with light perception pathways through modulating daily phyB-

173 In addition to their role in light perception, phytochromes (PHYs) have been recently

174 ved to HM-0.3 Snellen in group A compared to light perception (PL)-0.1Snellen in group B (p = 0.035),

175 either phytochrome- or cryptochrome-mediated light perception prevents damping of the oscillations in

176 -up, pZ3 OGIs were more likely to exhibit no light perception (pZ3: 38%; aZ3: 17%; P < 0.003), lack c

177 ns, and finally reveal a significant leap in light-perception quantum efficiency from 35% to 73%.

178 y additional IOP-lowering procedure, loss of light perception, removal of eye or chemodenervation, or

179 Loss of light perception, requirement for additional glaucoma su

180 Argus II System in patients with bare or no light perception resulting from end-stage RP.

181 r-UV to blue light and a common mechanism of light perception: reversible photoisomerization of the b

182 Regarding treatment, all patients with light perception should receive pars plana vitrectomy, w

183 born without eyes and thus deprived from all light perception since conception.

184 d, that the apparatus for a CyclOp-organelle light perception system was an ancestral feature of the

185 Best corrected visual acuity ranged from light perception to 0.8.

186 The BCVA in patients with LCA ranged from no light perception to 1.00 logarithm of the minimum angle

187 ity during last follow-up was 20/231 (range, light perception to 20/20).

188 e of presentation was variable, ranging from light perception to 20/20.

189 y of one exceptional responder improved from light perception to 20/400.

190 fingers to 20/100, hand motion to 20/5, and light perception to 20/80, as suggested by the endoscopy

191 he macula were studied with initial VAs from light perception to 4/200.

192 t the cellular signaling cascades connecting light perception to cell cycle activation and progressio

193 argue that COL7 is a critical factor linking light perception to changes in auxin level in Arabidopsi

194 can allow RP patients with no more than bare light perception to guide fine hand movement visually.

195 Visual acuity was light perception to hand movements (n = 18) and 20/50 to

196 e guard-cell-signaling pathway coupling blue light perception to ion channel activity is relatively w

197 ciated, performs a critical role in coupling light perception to signal transduction by plant phytoch

198 the signal transduction pathway linking blue light perception to the induction of GSAT mRNA.

199 ation experiments have localized the site of light perception to the upper hypocotyl.

200 Here, we determined that light perception triggers a switch between two different

201 The majority of patients recovered light perception vision (n = 15, 60%) followed by 20/500

202 3 months, a reoperation for glaucoma, or no light perception vision and as successful otherwise.

203 repair of severely traumatized eyes with no light perception vision as preoperative visual acuity.

204 1 optic neuritis attack, 2 with residual no light perception vision in at least 1 eye.

205 1.22/EY); the rate of light perception or no light perception vision was 0.07/EY (95% CI, 0.02/EY to

206 rations for glaucoma, or experienced loss of light perception vision).

207 Hg, additional glaucoma surgery, or loss of light perception vision).

208 ion criteria were age less than 18 years, no light perception vision, combined surgery, previous glau

209 aser or incisional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, or hypotony.

210 aser or incisional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, or hypotony.

211 < 20% from baseline, IOP <= 5 mmHg, loss of light perception vision, reoperation for glaucoma, or re

212 n for glaucoma or a complication, or loss of light perception vision.

213 additional IOP-lowering surgery, or loss of light perception vision.

214 n for glaucoma or a complication, or loss of light perception vision.

215 rom mild and painless decreased vision to no-light perception vision.

216 no reoperation for glaucoma, and no loss of light perception vision.

217 n for glaucoma or a complication, or loss of light perception vision.

218 tation, reoperation for glaucoma, or loss of light perception vision.

219 r less, reoperation for glaucoma, or loss of light perception vision.

220 r less, reoperation for glaucoma, or loss of light perception vision.

221 mHg, no reoperation for glaucoma, no loss of light-perception vision).

222 no reoperation for glaucoma, and no loss of light-perception vision.

223 nstitutionalized US population with at least light-perception vision.

224 The interaction of light perception with development is the subject of inte

225 nown about the molecular events that connect light perception with increased growth in shade avoidanc

226 On examination, the right eye had no light perception with signs of panophthalmitis, while th

227 iving, recognition tasks, and assessments of light perception with the implant ON compared with OFF.

228 Final visual acuity ranged from 20/20 to light perception, with 40% of patients having residual v

229 sual acuity ranged from normal (20/20) to no light perception, with a mean of 20/43 at diagnosis, and

230 designed, especially for individuals without light perception, with the aim of maximizing their devel

231 uter retinopathy, leading to a total loss of light perception within a few days.