戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 iation with the studied outcomes (P<0.05 for linearity).
2  precursor ion having its specific domain of linearity.
3      Statistical tests were used to evaluate linearity.
4 f the viruses was performed, showing a clear linearity.
5 good accuracy, selectivity, sensitivity, and linearity.
6 025 and 0.100 mg/mL, respectively, with good linearity.
7 cted using a simple model to account for non-linearity.
8 ed to assess accuracy, precision, and sample linearity.
9 ctive features such as Compton edges and non-linearities.
10 rom maize in a single step with satisfactory linearities (0.986-0.999), recoveries (14-124%) and othe
11 g/L), limit of quantification (13.4mg/L) and linearity (0.993).
12 mit of detection (LOD) of 21.1ngmL(-1), wide linearity (50-500ngmL(-1)) and high specificity toward N
13  in terms of relative retention time window, linearity (6-167 ug kg(-1) and 0.6-16.7 ug kg(-1), coeff
14                                    Excellent linearity, accuracy and limits of detection were achieve
15                                     The high linearity, accuracy and rapidity of investigation enable
16 idated in human plasma and demonstrated good linearity, accuracy, and precision for all analytes.
17                           All other metrics (linearity, accuracy, and precision) were observed to be
18  quantitation, method limit of quantitation, linearity, accuracy, and precision.
19  analytical parameters, such as selectivity, linearity, accuracy, dynamic linear range, "intra-day" a
20 g the different performance criteria such as linearity, accuracy, precision, and quantitation limit.
21 was extensively validated by determining the linearity, accuracy, repeatability, and assay stability.
22 s DKTIGGG and DKTIGGGD, we demonstrate assay linearity across 4 log magnitude and reproducibility of
23 ates satisfactory analytical parameters with linearity across a concentration range of 0.75 to 100 mu
24 ectional pooling may potentially affect BOLD linearity across cortical depth.
25                   The LC-MS/MS method showed linearity across the range of calibrators and had a limi
26 y, LSPR results indicated good integrity and linearity, along with promising accuracy in qualitative
27                        In these studies, AED linearity, analyte recovery, matrix effects, precision,
28 admission characteristics, incorporating non-linearity and interactions.
29     Further, these assays were validated for linearity and intra-assay precision.
30 over-parameterized and suffer from severe co-linearity and lack of statistical power.
31 power and feature bidirectional tuning, high linearity and low hysteresis.
32                                The LOD, LOQ, linearity and matrix effect were 0.035 ng mL(-1), 0.1 ng
33                                              Linearity and matrix effect, accuracy, within-laboratory
34 ative ray tracing is applied to optimize the linearity and minimize the optical path differences for
35 rs in metastatic lung tumors exhibit greater linearity and organization as a result of collagen cross
36     We used in vitro 1H-MRS to verify signal linearity and possible noise sources.
37    The analytical figures of merit including linearity and repeatability for the tested compounds wer
38                                     Sorption linearity and reversibility are implicit in models for t
39 a maximum of 78% to 442 nm illumination, the linearity and saturation limit to 1060 nm light are also
40 variable wavelength detectors offered better linearity and sensitivity, and would be more suitable fo
41 -ammonium tetrafluoroborate, with the record linearity and shortness (2.07 angstrom) of the NH...pai-
42                Results show signal intensity linearity and small band shifts as long as the sample is
43 ather than mass, shows considerably improved linearity and uniformity of detection, reducing the aver
44 erty of tissue-specific genes - their mutual linearity - and use it to reveal the structure of the to
45 h an external calibration curve of excellent linearity, and a low limit of detection and quantificati
46 or performance was evaluated by correlation, linearity, and bias.
47 tivity, recovery and matrix effect, dilution linearity, and carryover.
48  metrics that include high sensitivity, good linearity, and low variation.
49 ic consensus sequence deviated slightly from linearity, and mutant spectrum analyses revealed a compl
50 city, and performance with negative samples, linearity, and performance with hepatitis C virus (HCV)
51 sitivity, performance with negative samples, linearity, and performance with HIV-1 groups/subtypes we
52 experimental system to evaluate sensitivity, linearity, and reproducibility of an MRM assay targeting
53 ty, accuracy/precision, carry-over, dilution linearity, and reproducibility.
54 d H-AN assays had high reproducibility, good linearity, and sufficient sensitivity to detect trace am
55                           However, these non-linearities are inconsistent with the balanced-state mod
56 f frequencies (1~100%) and demonstrated good linearity as compared to the reference frequency values.
57 obtained PLSR model exhibited a good fit and linearity, as indicated by the coefficients of determina
58     The sensing mechanism also exhibits high linearity, as well as insensitivity to bending and twist
59 e were, in some cases, very sensitive to the linearity assumption in the association, but in other ca
60 m a mixed signal and most of them follow the linearity assumption.
61    We used restricted cubic splines to relax linearity assumptions and bootstrapping to generate 95%
62       To determine the sensitivity of HIA to linearity assumptions, we estimated [Formula: see text]-
63 eijing, China, and the sensitivity of HIA to linearity assumptions.
64           The limits of detection (LODs) and linearity at lower concentrations (5 to 1000 IU/ml) were
65 inesterase obtained in blood sample provided linearity between 2 and 12 U/mL, with sensitivity of 0.0
66 ed by the as prepared immunosensor (range of linearity between 2.5 and 1000pgmL(-1) TGF-beta1; detect
67 rom the horizontal level, confirming the non-linearity between arterial volume distensibility and ext
68                                          The linearity between LipL32 concentration and the measured
69 of the crystal framework leads to strong non-linearity between magma decompression rate and eruption
70  their applications due to the assumption of linearity between motifs and their functional effects.
71 correlation, bias, limits of agreements, and linearity between predicted fat fraction and MRI PDFF.
72             Under optimal conditions, a good linearity between the electrochemical signal and the log
73 n of perfusion is challenging due to the non-linearity between the magnetic resonance signal intensit
74                                              Linearity between the widely varying projected area of a
75                                          The linearity between V cr and the transition diffuseness is
76                                              Linearity, by contrast, occurred in less than 14% of cas
77 parameters are those related to the matrix - linearity (calibration) and trueness.
78 sent a simple theoretical model of how a non-linearity can arise from photothermal effects, which gen
79 ity data and (b) morphologic (width, volume, linearity) characterization of each resultant cluster.
80 luation, the method is validated in terms of linearity (coefficient of determination R(2)), repeatabi
81  gels supported a pH gradient with slope and linearity comparable to benchmark gels.
82 an be achieved by applying a newly developed linearity correction.
83 lexible methods that relax the assumption of linearity: cubic regression splines and fractional polyn
84 armonisation (ICH) guidelines which evaluate linearity, detection limit, quantification limit, accura
85 s, and deciduous forest), and recover hidden linearity embedded in universal 'scaling laws' of specie
86            Specifically, we observe that non-linearity exists in the correlation; higher firm-level e
87      The calibration plot allowed a range of linearity extending between 15 and 3000pg/mL TGF-beta1 w
88 e responsive and did not change the response linearity (F1/F0 ratios) of visually responsive CG neuro
89 oposed sensor has a wide dynamic range, high linearity, fast operation and low-cost.
90                      After optimization, the linearities for Ni(II) and Co(II) were 0.05-80 ng mL(-1)
91  DA-d4 and DOPAC-d5 result in standard curve linearity for DA from 0.05-100 ng/mL (LOD = 6 pg/mL) and
92 ression for suboptimal combinations and near-linearity for preferred combinations sharpened combinati
93            The system shows good calibration linearity for tested elements (Ca, Sr, and K), quick dat
94                        The method shows good linearity for the 16 pesticides studied (R2 > 0.999); it
95 optimize the critical performance parameter, linearity, for the Cr reduction method for hydrogen isot
96                                              Linearity found for pH and protein concentration with 1/
97 sensor-based on binder-free Iso-AgNPs showed linearity from 0.1 uM to 4 mM with a detection limit of
98 m(-2) with an average response time of ~1 s, linearity from 1 to 20 mM, and low detection limit of 6.
99 ation (median, approximately 0.5 ng mL(-1)), linearity (&gt;/=0.99), and accuracy (80-120%) over the eva
100 mbrane is utilized to achieve wide detection linearity, high selectivity, and long-term stability.
101         Compounds that increased junctional "linearity" (i.e., stability) counteracted the double-hit
102 monitoring has become very popular since non-linearities in the relationship between signal and predi
103 n has been constructed with the experimental linearity in 0.04-0.4 mM range and having the limit of d
104                        They demonstrate good linearity in a broad linear range (1 nM to 100 muM) with
105 PM value from Kallisto and Salmon shows high linearity in all analyses.
106      Finally, we show how accounting for non-linearity in coastal impact assessment modulates coastal
107 ing a standard addition approach showed good linearity in concentration ranges 0-250, 0-125, and 0-25
108 es and a stronger enhancement due to the non-linearity in excitation.
109 ed multi-parameter aptasensor exhibited good linearity in ranges of 0.01-500 ng mL(-1) for CEA (R(2)
110                               LC/MS provides linearity in response, data processing automation, impro
111                                  Appropriate linearity in solvent and matrix-based calibrations, very
112  gain (in terms of the amplification and non-linearity in stimulus-response transfer function of brai
113 with varying quercetin content revealed good linearity in the 0-50.0 muM range with regression coeffi
114                         We show that the non-linearity in the acoustic transformation plays a critica
115                                              Linearity in the analytical blank was obtained by using
116                       The sensor showed good linearity in the concentration range from 19 to 190nM (R
117 and a very good detection limit of 1 mM with linearity in the concentration range of 25-230 mM (~0.1-
118                The calibration curves showed linearity in the concentration ranges from 0.01 to 1500
119                                    A perfect linearity in the current-concentration profile under opt
120 ethroids and triazines compounds showed good linearity in the range 0.5-200 mug.Kg(-1).
121                                   Studies of linearity in the range 2.5-40ngg(-1) produced determinat
122       After validation, the method presented linearity in the range of 0.02-10 ug mL(-1) (r > 0.99),
123 dividuals first formed a cognitive schema of linearity in the relationship between the cued threat va
124 ality associations and that an assumption of linearity in this association can influence HIAs, highli
125 as the standard and by studying sensitivity, linearity in working range, intraday repeatability, and
126                    This method provides high linearity, in all cases higher than 98.65%, and high sen
127    Therefore, we hypothesize that junctional linearity is a better and more predictive readout than e
128                                              Linearity is evaluated through parameter estimation, con
129                                         This linearity is obtained in the limit of very large recurre
130                               Interestingly, linearity is violated even by open timelike curves (OTCs
131 response latencies and extended temporal non-linearities, L6 CTs exhibited sparse selectivity and rap
132 s, at the cost of violating quantum theory's linearity-leading e.g. to universal quantum cloning.
133         The method was validated in terms of linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantifica
134 idation studies were carried out in terms of linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantitati
135  procedures were optimized and validated for linearity, limit of detection and quantification, intra-
136                  The assay was validated for linearity, limit of detection, sensitivity, and specific
137                   At optimum conditions, the linearity, limits of detection and limits of quantificat
138                  The method was assessed for linearity, limits of detection and quantification, matri
139 ters, the method was validated by evaluating linearity, limits of detection and quantification, preci
140 ethod was validated in-house by calibration, linearity, limits of detection and quantification, preci
141                                              Linearity, LODs, LOQs, precision and recovery were deter
142 ures with multi-level analog states, "write" linearity, low-voltage switching, and low power dissipat
143 n after injection of (18)F-MK-6240 indicated linearity near unity when compared with DVR estimates an
144 ould help to understand the diversity of non-linearities observed in cortical networks.
145          The developed method exhibited good linearity of 0.0010-50 mug L(-1) for danofloxacin; 0.005
146 t sensing response characteristics with good linearity of 1aM to 1pM and low limit of detection of 0.
147                                            A linearity of 20-200 mug L(-1) was found, with a limit of
148                    The SSH assay exhibited a linearity of 7 logs with a lower limit of detection of 6
149 nchmark RNA-seq dataset, we investigated the linearity of abundance estimated from seven most popular
150 epeatability, reproducibility, recovery, and linearity of both methods.
151                     Method validation showed linearity of calibration curves (alpha = 0.05).
152                                              Linearity of delta(15)N value determinations up to delta
153 hin-laboratory reproducibility, specificity, linearity of detector response, the limits of quantifica
154                          The consistency and linearity of effects strongly support the hypothesis tha
155 ime (theta50 ) for each species based on the linearity of germination rate with temperature.
156 ed by organisms under study; and (b) the non-linearity of most biological responses in combination wi
157         This interaction, encoded in the non-linearity of Navier-Stokes equations, is non-local, i.e.
158                           To examine the non-linearity of restoration, we used moderate resolution im
159                                          The linearity of sensor response was found to be between 0.0
160             Inter- and intraslide variation, linearity of signal and working range, sensitivity and a
161                                              Linearity of steroid isotopic standards ranged from 0.02
162           Based on the obtained results, the linearity of the biosensor was found between 5 and 400 n
163         These results would suggest that the linearity of the BRAF-MEK-ERK module is at least context
164        Although this study reveals a lack of linearity of the CI-Orbitrap when measuring product ions
165 ntification, relative standard deviation and linearity of the method were 0.60 ug/L, 2.0 ug/L, <6.0%,
166  the accuracy, precision, repeatability, and linearity of the method were assessed, the method demons
167                                              Linearity of the peak current depended on the concentrat
168                        The dynamic range and linearity of the refractive index are comparable to the
169 itis virus) antigens and acceptable accuracy/linearity of WHO SRIGs using IRRSs as calibrators.
170               The method showed an excellent linearity over a range of 5-400 mug kg(-1), with r(2) >=
171 icase/CZTS/ITO/glass electrode exhibits good linearity over a wide range of 0-700 muM uric acid conce
172 s of (15)N-enriched amino sugars in terms of linearity over an enrichment range (natural abundance to
173 mination against potential interferences and linearity over the 90-300mg/L range, with a sensitivity
174                   HPLC-DAD provided suitable linearity, precision and accuracy.
175 ent validation results based on selectivity, linearity, precision, accuracy and robustness revealed t
176  Both methods were validated with respect to linearity, precision, accuracy and sensitivity, enabling
177                                              Linearity, precision, accuracy, and limits of detection
178 imits of detection (LOD) and quantification, linearity, precision, accuracy, recovery, matrix effect,
179 to meet European Union guidelines concerning linearity, precision, and accuracy while both CBS-MS/MS
180       Our models did not show departure from linearity (quadratic sleep terms: P >= 0.55).
181 ange of 1.0x10(-11)M to 1.0x10(-6) with good linearity (R =0.9927), high sensitivity with low detecti
182 od in which all calibration curve shows good linearity (r>0.95).
183                            The method showed linearity (R>0.9995), good precision (CV%<2.78), recover
184 s high wavelength selectivity (>10(2)), high linearity (R(2) > 0.98), and low detection limit (45.1 m
185                            Good instrumental linearity (r(2) > 0.99) and recoveries (83.3-128.4%) wer
186 ere obtained with good accuracy (>/=90%) and linearity (R(2) > 0.99) over the range evaluated for all
187                       657/2002 revealed good linearity (R(2) > 0.99), repeatability (RSDr < 15%), rep
188  minor exceptions, the method displayed good linearity (R(2) > 0.99), with appropriate limits of dete
189 with reproducibility (%RSD < 10%; n = 6) and linearity (R(2) > 0.99).
190 imized conditions, the method exhibited good linearity (r(2) > 0.9960).
191  (0.10-10 ng/g), while granting satisfactory linearity (R(2) > 0.998) in a wide linear range of 0.1-2
192                     Good results in terms of linearity (r(2) > 0.9980), repeatability (RSD <= 3%), re
193                     Both methods showed good linearity (r(2) > 0.9996 and 0.9945), adequate recoverie
194                                    Excellent linearity (R(2) > 0.9999), repeatability (<3.55%), and a
195 rinting was verified, demonstrating adequate linearity (R(2) >/= 0.90) for 75.3% and acceptable repea
196  approximately 2.5%), accuracy (>/=90%), and linearity (R(2) >/= 0.99) were attained for all the stud
197  and excellent repeatability (RSD </= 3.9%), linearity (r(2) >/= 0.9989), and limits of detection (</
198 ormance was satisfactory displaying suitable linearity (R(2) >0.99) and recovery (71-102%).
199 e majority of the profiled metabolites, good linearity (R(2) >= 0.99) and precision (coefficient of v
200 efficient of variance <= 30%) and 82.7% with linearity (R(2) >= 0.99).
201 developed UHPLC-HRMS method resulted in good linearity (r(2) >= 0.997), accuracy (RE <= +/- 9.1%), pr
202 cross five compounds, which resulted in good linearity (R(2) >= 0.999) and lowered detection levels (
203                                   Instrument linearity (r(2) >=0.98), inter-day precision (RSD <=9.0%
204            The calibration showed acceptable linearity (R(2) = 0.97) and a limit of detection of 6.7
205  (RNase B, bovine fetuin, and IgG) with good linearity (R(2) = 0.9884) and a dynamic range from 0.1 t
206 atrix-matched calibration curves showed good linearity (R(2) = 0.99) within the tested ranges.
207  The internal standard curcumin yielded good linearity (R(2) = 0.994), and with confidence intervals
208 rameters, the fabric sensor exhibited a good linearity (r(2) = 0.998) for wide a linear range from 1
209 ity (RSD% 1-10%), accuracy (+/-1.0-15%), and linearity (r(2) = 0.9996-0.9999).
210  sensitivity (LODs below 0.16mg/L), and good linearity (r(2) higher than 0.995), precision (RSD below
211 s confirmed the satisfactory selectivity and linearity (r(2)>/=0.99) within the mass ranges.
212  high selectivity and specificity, excellent linearity (R(2)>0.988) low decision limits and detection
213                  The method resulted in good linearity (R(2)>0.99) and low limits of detection and qu
214        The validated methodology showed good linearity (r(2)>0.993) and precision (<5.6%); high recov
215 r chromatographic analysis was validated for linearity (R(2)>0.999), limits of detection (6.23-186.66
216 the calibration curves showed high levels of linearity (R(2)>0.9993) for acrylamide in the range of 2
217 , calibration range (0.01-0.05 to 0.5mg/kg), linearity (r(2)>0.9998), trueness (89.3-105.1%), precisi
218                                              Linearity (r(2)) and repeatability (%RSD of migration ti
219 n equations of these parabens exhibited good linearity (r(2)=0.998, 0.1-10mug/mL), good precision (RS
220                                         Good linearity (R(2)=0.9990) was achieved for all samples usi
221 nalytical performance with good selectivity, linearity (R(2)=99.9%, r>0.99), accuracy and low limits
222  matrix match calibration curves showed good linearity (r0.994) over a concentration range of 1-500pp
223 ation range of 0.1-0.6ngg(-1) obtaining good linearity (r0.998) and precision (RSD)10%.
224 pole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), with high linearity (R2 > 0.99) and reproducibility (0.23-6.23 R%)
225 aluated according to the INMETRO Guidelines: linearity (r2 >0.99), selectivity (no matrix interferenc
226 Moreover, the modified nanoprobe showed wide linearity range (0.34-115 x 10(-8) M), lower detection l
227 nsor exhibited stability and decent response linearity range (10-800 pM, R(2) = 0.9943).
228 rms of limit of detection (1.29-29.17 ng/g), linearity range (25-1000 ng/g), coefficient of determina
229 d for patulin, giving LOQ of 1 ug.kg(-1) and linearity range 1-100 ug.kg(-1) with R(2) >= 0.997.
230 owest DNA detection limit of 1x10(-14)M with linearity range 1x10(-13) to 1x10(-9)M.
231 L(-1) and 0.0005 ng mL(-1) were found as the linearity range and the detection limit (LOD).
232  mL(-1) (4.25 x 10(-13) M) were found as the linearity range and the detection limit (LOD).
233 s done by external standard calibration with linearity range between 0.5 and 3mg/kg, with correlation
234                                       With a linearity range from 9.9muM to 43muM, the concentration
235                                          The linearity range obtained for the determination of CIP an
236      By using the liquid drop of 50 muL, the linearity range of 1-1000 mug L(-1) was achieved.
237 st detection limit of 1 x 10(-11) muM with a linearity range of 1.0 x 10(-11) - 1.0 x 10(-2) muM.
238       Analytical figures of merit includes a linearity range of 10-5,000 ug L(-1) (R(2) = 0.9986), pr
239                     The detection limits and linearity range of various OP biosensors have also been
240 d impedimetric immunosensor displayed a wide linearity range towards 2,4-D (1-100ppb), good repeatabi
241                                          The linearity range was 0.005-0.4 mg kg(-1) and R(2) values
242                                          The linearity range was found as from 1.5 x 10(2) to 7.5 x 1
243 rms of specificity (methoxy/acetate signal), linearity (range 0.05-5.00 mg per assay), sensitivity (l
244  was done by matrix-matched calibration with linearity ranging from 5 to 500 ug/L with a correlation
245 ach was satisfactorily validated in terms of linearity, recovery, matrix effects, specificity, limits
246             In order to validate the method, linearity, recovery, precision (repeatability), intermed
247 essed with statistical estimates of bias and linearity relative to ex vivo histologic findings.
248 out in the selected matrices, providing good linearity, relative recovery values in the range 70-120%
249 ion (LODs), limits of quantification (LOQs), linearity, repeatability and recoveries.
250  ketones and furan aldehydes) with regard to linearity, repeatability, inter and intra-day precision
251            The new methods demonstrated good linearity-reproducibility, providing reliable data about
252 operties, such as changes in periodicity and linearity, reveal that while deletion mutations indicate
253 d when selecting a functional form: low-dose linearity, scalability, concavity, and whether it is a s
254 s) with no impairment of analytical quality (linearity, sensitivity and variance).
255                                              Linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, and precision of the m
256                   To improve the calibration linearity, sensitivity, and detection limit, we converte
257           The method was validated regarding linearity, specificity, accuracy and precision, as well
258 profile method were satisfactory in terms of linearity, specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, repeatabi
259 boratory reproducibility, LOD, LOQ, range of linearity, standard measurement uncertainty parameters f
260 r dynamic physical drivers such as tidal non-linearity, storms, short-term climate variability, erosi
261 an plot graphical analysis demonstrated late linearity, supporting reversible kinetics and modeling w
262 k, the coefficient of determination from the linearity test was greater than 0.95.
263 lation with a standard method (n = 15; CUSUM linearity test, p > 0.10), thus permitting the potential
264 of the probes ZnO@PLP and ZnO@Py showed good linearity to histidine concentration from 2.49 to 24.4 m
265 detection and quantification, matrix effect, linearity, trueness and precision.
266 dation included experiments for specificity, linearity, trueness, precision, matrix effect and limits
267 ction limits as low as tens of ng m(-3) with linearity up to hundreds of mug m(-3) at 0.2 Hz time res
268 zyme were also measured in blood sample with linearity up to respectively 0.5 muM, 25 muM, 30 muM, an
269                       The assay demonstrated linearity upon dilution with all HCV genotypes.
270                                              Linearity using patient samples was shown from 1.34 to 6
271                                              Linearity using patient samples was shown from 1.54 to 6
272                                              Linearity was between 1 and 500mg/L.
273                                              Linearity was established for all the analytes (from 10
274                Under optimum conditions, the linearity was in the range of 0.05-400 ng mL(-1) with de
275 n limit of the biosensor was 0.13 nM and the linearity was maintained from 1.05 to 206 nM.
276                                    Excellent linearity was obtained for 168 of the 204 pesticides in
277                                       A good linearity was obtained in all cases, while the study of
278                                         Good linearity was obtained ranging from 0.05 to 1500microgL(
279                            Subsequently, the linearity was reduced gradually, and participants partia
280                                              Linearity was verified in the range 5-320 mg L(-1) (corr
281                             However, loss of linearity was visible for some replicates when exposed t
282               Lowest amount dependence (good linearity) was obtained (i) in H-containing fragment ion
283                                    Also good linearities were obtained in the range of 2.5-1200ngmL(-
284                                         Good linearity were obtained for SPI in a range of 24-965mugk
285                 Specificity in detection and linearity were verified.
286 sulfanyl)phenyl substituent, deviations from linearity when the Hammett parameter (sigma(C(+))) is pl
287            The method demonstrated excellent linearity with a limit of detection 0.004mug/ml.
288 stic in array formation breaks away from the linearity with a peculiar dip in current for a critical
289  assay performed well, detecting and showing linearity with all HIV-1 genotypes tested.
290               Calibration graphs showed good linearity with coefficients of determination higher than
291                                    Excellent linearity with correlation coefficient value of 0.94 was
292             The validated method showed good linearity with correlation coefficients, r(2)>0.9990 for
293 e method presented an adequate precision and linearity with detection limits ranging from 0.133 to 0.
294                                         Wide linearity with high R(2) values and low detection limits
295               The method also indicated good linearity with R(2) > 0.99 and good recoveries of 85.12-
296                                         Good linearity with ranges of 3.0-7.5 x 10(3), 6.0-4.5 x 10(3
297 /kg for each individual amino acid, and good linearity with regression coefficients greater than 0.99
298  The validation parameter showed a very good linearity, with a correlation coefficient of 1.00 for al
299     Validation parameters exhibited adequate linearity, with relative standard deviation values betwe
300 for efficient heat management and high field linearity within the tube-achieved from a single PCB.

 
Page Top