戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 mals (15.3% (pets), 0.0% (poultry) and 0.1% (livestock)).
2 nt a major source of mortality in humans and livestock.
3  models, and the risk to pets, wildlife, and livestock.
4 ns, whose consumption is toxic to humans and livestock.
5 r known roles as rumen symbionts in domestic livestock.
6 med towards producing more disease resistant livestock.
7 rom the overuse of antibiotics in humans and livestock.
8 ial resistance between humans, wildlife, and livestock.
9  of these viruses with disease in humans and livestock.
10 s a source of infection for people and their livestock.
11 ctors) that pose a health risk to humans and livestock.
12 s causes cystic echinococcosis in humans and livestock.
13 ause life-threatening diseases in humans and livestock.
14 as generating transplantable human organs in livestock.
15  in the health, welfare, and productivity of livestock.
16 ose found in conventional human-domesticated livestock.
17 ed alterations of the GI microbiota in young livestock.
18 e research is the impact of noncarnivores on livestock.
19 FMD) can cause large disruptive epidemics in livestock.
20  often causing severe hemorrhagic disease in livestock.
21 of industrial hemp (IH) as a feed source for livestock.
22 e of antibiotics in human populations and in livestock.
23  parallel to Brucella adaptation to domestic livestock.
24 significant growth and production losses for livestock.
25 oric intake of contemporary humans and their livestock.
26 ica is a global parasite of humans and their livestock.
27  is a major cause of abortions in humans and livestock.
28 aptive evolution, and genomic improvement in livestock.
29 the causative agent of bluetongue disease in livestock.
30 (95% CI: 17.5-168.6 million) and 1.1 billion livestock (95% CI: 0.4-2.3 billion) live within vulnerab
31 ever, the level of herd immunity of ruminant livestock, a key determinant of outbreaks, is unknown.
32                   Wildlife interactions with livestock, acquiring associated AMR bacteria and genes,
33 flies transmit trypanosomiasis to humans and livestock across much of sub-Saharan Africa.
34  effective vaccines, suitable for people and livestock, against HeV and NiV has been a research focus
35 a highly adaptable forage crop for temperate livestock agriculture.
36  global change processes are determinant for livestock agrobiodiversity.
37 terns across three FAO definitions of grazed livestock agroecosystems (arid, humid, and temperate), a
38  improve the nutritional profile of feed for livestock and aquaculture.
39 omes are important disease agents of humans, livestock and cold-blooded species, including fish.
40                     Traditional selection in livestock and crops focuses on additive genetic values o
41 ssful implementation of genomic selection in livestock and crops, estimation and selection for gameti
42 electively breed stronger or more productive livestock and crops.
43 intic resistance in a number of parasites of livestock and domesticated animals has occurred in respo
44 aped by the assemblage of co-existing avian, livestock and human communities, and the habitat within
45         The structure of sympatric wildlife, livestock and human populations are characterized using
46 itted a mathematical model to seroprevalence livestock and human RVF case data from the 2018-2019 epi
47                                         Many livestock and human vaccines are leaky because they bloc
48 tic, arboviral hemorrhagic fever threatening livestock and humans mainly in Africa.
49 ups of giraffes are more likely to encounter livestock and humans on foot, thus disrupting the social
50 mportant and widespread disease of wildlife, livestock and humans world-wide, but long-term empirical
51 ad host range and can be transmitted between livestock and humans.
52 od products that have deleterious effects on livestock and humans.
53 auses substantial morbidity and mortality in livestock and humans.
54 control in wildlife of conservation concern, livestock and humans.
55 stating neglected tropical disease affecting livestock and humans.
56  density and species assemblage of wildlife, livestock and humans.
57 gets for pathogen surveillance programmes in livestock and illustrates the power of genomic epidemiol
58 s based upon experimental data from domestic livestock and laboratory animals.
59 late 1990s in outbreaks of severe disease in livestock and people in Australia and Malaysia, respecti
60 s chronic systemic infection in domesticated livestock and poses a zoonotic infectious risk to humans
61 and 92 C. coli strains isolated from humans, livestock and urban effluents in Spain.
62 ssion given: (1) the high density of humans, livestock and vermin living in close proximity; (2) freq
63 tion that most significantly affects grazing livestock and wild ungulates, but also poses a threat to
64 ompile a global occurrence dataset of human, livestock and wildlife anthrax outbreaks.
65 panding hazardous interfaces between people, livestock and wildlife reservoirs of zoonotic disease.
66 e production levels of 41 major crops, seven livestock, and 14 aquaculture and fish products.
67  Wildlife that interact closely with humans, livestock, and both human and livestock waste within hou
68                 Antenatal exposures to pets, livestock, and cigarette smoke were assessed.
69 nary interactions among pathogens of humans, livestock, and crops.
70 ern, but also pose direct threats to humans, livestock, and endangered wildlife.
71 pose nontarget organisms including wildlife, livestock, and humans to health risks.
72 ebrate ranges expand by climate change [17], livestock, and pet trade in general and because of the p
73 Mayotte to estimate viral transmission among livestock, and spillover from livestock to humans throug
74 his exposure; however, compared with humans, livestock, and the environment, low phenotypic diversity
75 was compared between urban wildlife, humans, livestock, and the environment, to investigate whether w
76  overlap between sympatric wildlife, humans, livestock, and their shared environment across the devel
77  for this virus to infect companion animals, livestock, and wildlife that could act as viral reservoi
78 ection to a wide range of companion animals, livestock, and wildlife.
79  human lives and 100 million small and large livestock animals in sub-Saharan Africa.
80  from wildlife hosts and infected humans and livestock animals to cause epidemics with significant mo
81                                     Ruminant livestock are a significant contributor to global methan
82 othesis that GI helminth infections in young livestock are associated with significant alterations to
83 stication and subsequent global dispersal of livestock are crucial events in human history, but the m
84 he method has the potential to transform how livestock are monitored and address issues in livestock
85  constraints and low-quality forage, African livestock are rarely fed at 100% maintenance energy requ
86                                     Cases in livestock are thought to occur through contact with infe
87 f the major crops that feed humans and their livestock arose from agricultural revolutions that incre
88 -capsid virus causing hemorrhagic disease in livestock around the world.
89 -to-patient transmission and no evidence for livestock as a source of K. pneumoniae infecting humans.
90                Restructuring of wildlife and livestock assemblages (both in terms of species diversit
91 n their nares, particularly strains that are livestock-associated (LA) and multidrug-resistant.
92                                              Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcu
93 the E.U., and the U.S.A. for plant-based and livestock-based food and nonfood products.
94             Our results provide evidence for livestock-based, herding subsistence in Mongolia during
95                  It is harmful to humans and livestock because the entire plant is covered with spine
96 ho were the first to introduce Mediterranean livestock beyond its natural climatic range.
97 timated the rate of change in the density of livestock bomas as a proxy for livestock density.
98 on two endemic respiratory CoV infections of livestock: bovine coronavirus (BCoV) and porcine respira
99          Yet, our gap of knowledge regarding livestock breed-environment relationships may prevent th
100                Applying such a model to both livestock breeding and conservation could provide a bett
101 diting tool has the potential to improve the livestock breeding industry by allowing for the introduc
102               Introducing useful traits into livestock breeding programs through gene knock-ins has p
103  disease susceptibility has been targeted in livestock breeding, emerging evidence suggests that ther
104 ing genetic disorders and improving crop and livestock breeding.
105 ociations between the distribution of native livestock breeds and environmental factors.
106  the llama (one of the most extensively kept livestock breeds) exhibits seasonal adjustment of their
107 his context, reliance on dominant commercial livestock breeds, featuring small effective population s
108                                       Native livestock breeds, i.e. those autochthonous to a specific
109              Design of new highly productive livestock breeds, well-adapted to local climatic conditi
110 bolism pathways is of importance not only in livestock, but also in humans in order to provide the ul
111 l Swine Fever (CSF) should not only focus on livestock, but must also include wild boar.
112 administration is used to control disease in livestock, but we have little insight into how this impa
113                    Continuous observation of livestock by farm staff is impractical in a commercial s
114 ovide compelling evidence for the keeping of livestock by hunter-gatherer groups and their probable i
115 oitation of secondary products from domestic livestock by hunter-gatherers in Lesotho, directly dated
116 ny interventions that seek to target food or livestock can affect the numbers of human infections cau
117           Macrocyclic lactone treatments for livestock can have detrimental effects on the arthropod
118  from anthropogenic resources in the form of livestock carcass dumps (LCDs) on wolf space use, activi
119 drawals across eight different crops and six livestock categories and differentiate the trends over 1
120 opulations show a high propensity to feed on livestock (cattle) and rest in outdoor structures such a
121 exan parasite related to important losses in livestock, causing abortions and decreased fertility in
122 he disease, in particular where wildlife and livestock co-occur.
123 hat has a cosmopolitan host range, including livestock, companion and wild animal species.
124 rn how to live with apex predators that kill livestock, compete for game species, and occasionally in
125 cipitation (p < 0.001; OR = 1.44) and higher livestock density (p = 0.05; OR = 1.11), while low conta
126 hanges, population density, burned areas and livestock density.
127 he density of livestock bomas as a proxy for livestock density.
128                           Spatially explicit livestock disease models require demographic data for in
129      Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a major livestock disease with direct clinical impacts as well a
130 diseases, the emergence of a vicious climate-livestock-disease cycle is a looming threat.
131               Epidemiological parameters for livestock diseases are often inferred from transmission
132 omarkers associated with human, wildlife and livestock diseases for development of diagnostic point-o
133 control efforts for BVD and other infectious livestock diseases.
134 diation (13.6%), annual precipitation (11%), livestock distribution (6.2%), vapor pressure (3.4%), wi
135 ble modeling approach by combining climatic, livestock distribution and land cover covariates, togeth
136   In this work, we analyse the links between livestock diversity -i.e. richness of native breeds- and
137 collected and bacteria isolated from people, livestock, dogs, wildlife and water sources (n = 62,376
138 s(2,3) and increased nitrogen discharge from livestock, domestic and industrial sources have resulted
139 onservation of wildlife that often depend on livestock-dominated landscapes for habitat.
140 ney bees is more difficult compared to other livestock, due to the very different reproductive behavi
141 the evolution of CH4 emissions from ruminant livestock during 1890-2014.
142 personnel proved to be important for several livestock epidemics.
143 contamination from the main reservoir hosts (livestock, especially poultry) is the principal route of
144 ures of modern cattle, aided by cultural and livestock exchange among historic human societies.
145 ntal effects on the arthropod populations in livestock faeces.
146 e to oil palm, rubber, and non-poultry based livestock farming and for hookworm (OR 2.42, CI 1.56-3.7
147 antitative data on impacts and adaptation in livestock farming have been extremely scarce in the ARs.
148 ivestock are monitored and address issues in livestock farming, such as targeted treatment of individ
149  resulting in substantial economic losses in livestock farming.
150                 Microbial air pollution from livestock farms has raised concerns regarding public hea
151 oducts has been a standard recommendation on livestock farms that are managed for wildlife by the Roy
152 ntified associations suggest contribution of livestock farms to microbial air pollution in general an
153 s-sectional surveys of K. pneumoniae from 29 livestock farms, 97 meat products, the hospital sewer, a
154  improved crickets for human consumption and livestock feed.
155           In 2011, ticks were collected from livestock following an outbreak of Crimean Congo hemorrh
156 he livelihoods of communities that depend on livestock for sustenance, and the conservation of wildli
157 n have invoked changes in tropical wetlands, livestock, fossil fuels, biomass burning, and the methan
158 g activity of 3 guardian dogs as they defend livestock from coyote depredation in California, providi
159 owered average daily gains (ADG) result when livestock graze toxic endophyte (Epichloe coenophialum)-
160 anges in soil micro-food webs resulting from livestock grazing are poor predictors of soil C and N pr
161                                              Livestock grazing often alters aboveground and belowgrou
162 ion causes forest degradation in SSA through livestock grazing, reducing forest carbon (C) sinks and
163 ctional surveillance for tuberculosis in 271 livestock handlers and 167 cattle on three farms in Chen
164                  The performance of ruminant livestock has been shown to benefit from the enhanced nu
165  production of food for humans via crops and livestock have featured in one form or another.
166 ria, which poses a serious risk to human and livestock health when treating bacterial infections.
167 Saharan Africa because of its huge impact on livestock health.
168 rns and perceived priorities in the field of livestock helminthology, and we hope that they will stim
169 igh vertebrate grazing intensity or domestic livestock, herbivores consumed the additional fertilizat
170                   The intimate links between livestock host, vector composition and agricultural prac
171 n of habitats, and reduction of the wildlife-livestock-human interface.
172          We sample wild birds at 99 wildlife-livestock-human interfaces across Nairobi, Kenya, and us
173 rs, but previous studies evaluating putative livestock-human transmission used typing techniques with
174 sistant E coli in wildlife was lower than in livestock, humans, and the environment.
175 rt of the Infectious Disease of East African Livestock (IDEAL) cohort.
176 (95% credible interval [CrI] [42.9-59.4]) of livestock immune at the end of the epidemic wave, viral
177              Culicoides-borne arboviruses of livestock impair animal health, livestock production and
178  ecosystem and serve as a basis for managing livestock in a more efficient way.
179 ated with, antibodies to RVF virus (RVFV) in livestock in an area heavily affected by that outbreak.
180 irect ELISA to assess RVFV seroprevalence in livestock in areas of endemicity and nonendemicity.
181 thropod-borne virus of ruminants, emerged in livestock in northern Europe in 2006, spreading to most
182  of warm-blooded animals and a major pest of livestock in parts of South America and the Caribbean wh
183                                  Non-porcine livestock in the family Bovidae shared the most pathogen
184 sity of aquaculture, compared to terrestrial livestock (in particular cattle, sheep and goats), which
185  as vector for a number of viral diseases of livestock, including Bluetongue, and African Horse Sickn
186 sponsible for significant economic losses to livestock industries worldwide.
187             The use of antimicrobials by the livestock industry can lead to the release of unmetaboli
188 f the most notorious pathogens in the global livestock industry, needs to navigate antiviral host res
189 t puts a major economic burden on the global livestock industry.
190 to communities for a wide range of human and livestock infections.
191 nd Asian elephant species are known to cause livestock injuries and deaths.
192  using field samples collected at a wildlife-livestock interface in Africa.
193 ng at the wildlife-public health or wildlife-livestock interfaces.
194 biotics served as growth promoters in animal livestock, investigators explored the role of antibiotic
195        In this rural environment exposure to livestock is the strongest protective factor.
196 go and the extent to which people moved with livestock is unclear.
197    Bluetongue virus (BTV), a major threat to livestock, is a multilayered, nonturreted member of the
198 atively, a global total of 63.8 million poor livestock keepers (95% CI: 17.5-168.6 million) and 1.1 b
199                                  Smallholder livestock keepers experience significant losses due to d
200 rate infection of cattle, practiced by local livestock keepers in parts of Africa, has little effect
201 agement may be used to reduced FMD impact to livestock keepers.
202 s can cause major pathology and mortality to livestock leading to significant welfare and socio-econo
203 , the model estimates the viability of broad livestock management decisions, and suggests possible im
204 , improved grazing land management, improved livestock management, agroforestry, integrated water man
205 n from feed additives and fertilization with livestock manure.
206                            Here, by sampling livestock markets and slaughterhouses in Western Kenya,
207 attle trade network including a total of 127 livestock markets within Cameroon and five neighboring c
208        The current level of herd immunity in livestock may be insufficient to prevent another large o
209 results suggest that veterinary treatment of livestock might contribute to a reduction in the food su
210           The data generated from integrated livestock monitoring is anticipated to assist farmers an
211 migration and trade facilitated domesticated livestock movement, gene flow and development of diverse
212  one for vector dispersal, but below one for livestock movements.
213                   We suggest that increasing livestock numbers are driving this decline, presumably b
214                       Informed management of livestock on rangelands underpins both the livelihoods o
215 f the more than 180 million people who raise livestock on those rangelands.
216 tor emissions as the reported emissions from livestock operations (0.6 MtCH(4)) are well substantiate
217 rticulate matter emissions from agricultural livestock operations contain both chemical and biologica
218 ticks in endemic areas, handling of infected livestock or care of infected patients.
219                                              Livestock owners within elephant ranges perceive elephan
220  a global selective sweep of a highly inbred livestock pathogen that originated within European dairy
221              Trypanosoma vivax is a related, livestock pathogen whose VSG lack structures that facili
222 s indicate that RESTV should be considered a livestock pathogen with zoonotic potential.
223 he related pestiviruses, which are important livestock pathogens.
224 ases and deaths associated with proximity to livestock plants to be 236,000 to 310,000 (6 to 8% of al
225 tance is a global public health concern, and livestock play a significant role in selecting for resis
226 ombined effect of higher rate of increase in livestock population and low feed quality.
227   Reactive vaccination immunizing 20% of the livestock population reduced the number of human cases b
228 gical conditions has led to a diverse set of livestock populations to utilize.
229 ection, which may spread to cause disease in livestock populations.
230 ns across the interface between wildlife and livestock presents a challenge to the development of eff
231 icate a strong positive relationship between livestock-processing plants and local community transmis
232  architecture of methane production may help livestock producers to reduce the methane emission from
233 s an important predictor of the viability of livestock production and forage available for grazing wi
234 boviruses of livestock impair animal health, livestock production and livelihoods worldwide.
235 as significant implications both locally for livestock production and poverty reduction but also glob
236 importance of pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) in livestock production and their increasing role as a mode
237                       Gaseous emissions from livestock production are complex mixtures including ammo
238 1) in high-suitability agricultural crop and livestock production areas with reliable rainfall and fe
239                                              Livestock production both contributes to and is affected
240                         Antimicrobial use in livestock production is a driver for the development and
241                                              Livestock production is the largest anthropogenic source
242 itted to humans, but the impact of intensive livestock production on host-associated bacteria has rar
243 ults indicate also a decreasing water use in livestock production partially due to a shift from red t
244 d the assessment of the climate-smartness of livestock production practices at the national level in
245 cers to reduce the methane emission from the livestock production system.
246            Much of the N(2) O emissions from livestock production systems result from transformation
247                      In contrast to crop and livestock production, aquaculture production is derived
248 c challenge both in clinical settings and in livestock production, but the prevalence of antibiotic r
249 ed biodiversity conservation and sustainable livestock production.
250 s of GHG-release associated with terrestrial livestock production: fermentation in the animal gut, ma
251  (72%), pulses (67%), fruits (66%), fish and livestock products (60%), and cereals (56%) are produced
252 on of a broad range of primary and secondary livestock products, and the evolution of lactase persist
253 oncarnivore species in policies that promote livestock protection because it will allow for better co
254                      Residential exposure to livestock-related bacteria and AMR genes was demonstrate
255 patial associations (temporal adjusted) with livestock-related characteristics of the surroundings.
256               Little is known about airborne livestock-related microbial levels in residential areas.
257 the migratory episodes during the history of livestock remain poorly documented [1-3].
258 ading to the pecoran ancestor (including all livestock ruminants) included multiple interchromosomal
259            Our results further indicate that livestock sector in drylands had 36% higher emission int
260  the household and its perimeter; n=849), 13 livestock species (n=656), and humans (n=333), and from
261 habitat diversity and containing several key livestock species.
262 ill mitigate the risks of emergent human and livestock strains.
263 e main drivers of GHG-release in terrestrial livestock systems, oyster aquaculture has less than 0.5%
264 h the classical zoonotic species of domestic livestock that exclusively use the pentose phosphate pat
265 read of bluetongue, an infectious disease of livestock that is becoming increasingly prevalent due to
266 implications not only in humans, but also in livestock that sustain our current societal needs.
267 possibility that those hunter-gatherers kept livestock themselves remains controversial.
268 sion of mcr-1 positive E. coli to humans and livestock through fecal contamination of water, public a
269                                      Loss of livestock to carnivore species (e.g., lions, tigers, wol
270  biophysical model of land use for crops and livestock to estimate food system GHGE from the combusti
271 ave been initiated by accidental exposure of livestock to frozen material contaminated with virus fro
272 smission among livestock, and spillover from livestock to humans through both direct contact and vect
273 estions concerning the study of helminths in livestock, to help guide research priorities.
274 ided with the initiation of transcontinental livestock trade after the 1850s.
275 pe data to study the genetic architecture of livestock traits.
276 dy over two years to quantify the effects of livestock treatments containing copper, deltamethrin and
277 nd prompted us to investigate the effects of livestock treatments that are commonly used on these isl
278 n and animal health surveillance, and timely livestock vaccination appear to be key to controlling RV
279                                              Livestock vaccination strategies for the region should i
280 ns remain, despite decades of bats culls and livestock vaccinations.
281 y remaining samples of this once much-feared livestock virus were those held in various laboratories.
282                                    Human and livestock vulnerability are both concentrated in rural r
283 e elevated effects of political pressures on livestock vulnerability.
284 y with humans, livestock, and both human and livestock waste within households, are exposed to more a
285 rom fertilizers, fossil fuels, and human and livestock waste.
286 ce genes (ARGs) from the land application of livestock wastes can be a potential public health threat
287 as a source of freshwater for irrigation and livestock; wastewater leaked into this aquifer may possi
288 en dams, meant to capture surface runoff for livestock watering, were a major component of wetland re
289                                   Humans and livestock were screened for active mycobacterial infecti
290 T = 10(12) g, 1 Gt = 10(15) g) from ruminant livestock, which accounted for 47%-54% of all non-CO2 GH
291 ranges perceive elephants as a risk to their livestock, which may reduce their tolerance towards elep
292 less disturbed by shrubification compared to livestock, which rely primarily on herbaceous plants and
293  0.15, 0.68; P = .002), and ownership of pig livestock, which was a binary variable (beta coefficient
294                                    Brazilian livestock with a herd of more than 215 million animals i
295                     Swine represent the only livestock with an established invariant NKT (iNKT) cell-
296 e expense of providing good nutrition to the livestock with potential income.
297 tivities on the biodiversity of wildlife and livestock with which humans co-exist across the city.
298 n the distributional ecology of wildlife and livestock, with implications for biodiversity conservati
299                  It causes massive damage to livestock worldwide.
300 ill probably require the explicit linkage of livestock yield increases with habitat protection or res

 
Page Top