コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 and 2 (patients in cohort 3 did not receive loading doses).
2 ssessed by VerifyNow 1, 2, and 4 hours after loading dose.
3 h platelet-rich plasma sampled 4 hours after loading dose.
4 her crushed or integral tablets of prasugrel loading dose.
5 t improvement only with a higher intravenous loading dose.
6 ce of initiating therapeutic regimens with a loading dose.
7 c adverse event rates compared with a 300-mg loading dose.
8 latelet inhibition than a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose.
9 patients allocated AZD6140 received a 270-mg loading dose.
10 We have reported NR after a 300-mg loading dose.
11 f 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, or 2.5 mg/kg weekly with no loading dose.
12 or 4 (n=10) mg/m2/day for 14 days without a loading dose.
13 received sirolimus, 5 mg daily after a 15-mg loading dose.
14 mg or 2.0 mg monthly or PRN after 3 monthly loading doses.
15 ed monthly or on a PRN basis after 3 monthly loading doses.
16 monthly or pro re nata (PRN) after 3 monthly loading doses.
17 us administration of saline or dipyridamole (loading dose, 0.142 mg/kg per min for 5 minutes followed
18 hin 8 h of injury to either tranexamic acid (loading dose 1 g over 10 min followed by infusion of 1 g
19 hin 8 h of injury to either tranexamic acid (loading dose 1 g over 10 min then infusion of 1 g over 8
20 ials have shown leflunomide (LEF; 20 mg/day, loading dose 100 mg x 3 days) to be effective and safe f
23 ery 4 weeks during the treatment phase, with loading doses (120 mg subcutaneously) administered on st
25 Telet inhibition and patient Outcomes) trial loading dose (180 mg) with a high loading dose (600 mg)
26 dose (200 mg/kg) then 100 mg/kg TID; or (3) loading dose (200 mg/kg) followed by continuous infusion
27 ses: (1) 100 mg/kg IV 3 times/day (TID); (2) loading dose (200 mg/kg) then 100 mg/kg TID; or (3) load
28 t on a PPI at 6 h after a 600 mg clopidogrel loading dose (23.2+/-19.5% vs 35.2+/-20.9%, p=0.02), whe
29 T474 tumors were given trastuzumab (50 mg/kg loading dose, 25 mg/kg maintenance dose, administered in
30 t administered subcutaneously once per week (loading dose 320 mg followed by 160 mg weekly) or placeb
31 apatinib (1500 mg), intravenous trastuzumab (loading dose 4 mg/kg [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED], subsequen
33 (40,000 kallikrein inhibitor units [KIU]/kg loading dose, 40,000 KIU/kg pump prime, and 10,000 KIU/k
34 zumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg; pertuzumab 840 mg loading dose, 420 mg maintenance doses) or docetaxel, ca
35 f-administered injections of growth hormone (loading dose, 5 mg per day subcutaneously for one week,
36 ime curve 6 mg/mL x min; trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose, 6 mg/kg maintenance doses) plus pertuzumab
38 ed to groups given JNJ-6379 at 25 mg (100 mg loading dose), 75 mg, 150 mg, or 250 mg or placebo daily
40 , to receive either subcutaneous adalimumab (loading dose 80 mg; biweekly dose 40 mg) or placebo, wit
41 randomly assigned to receive an intravenous loading dose (800 mg) plus 5 maintenance doses (200 mg e
43 galcanezumab 120 mg per month (with a 240 mg loading dose administered as two 120 mg injections) for
44 (arm A) or concurrent cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) loading dose and 250 mg/m(2) per week during RT (arm B).
45 0 mg thereafter; plus trastuzumab at 8 mg/kg loading dose and 6 mg/kg thereafter; and docetaxel at 75
46 y intervention to receive prasugrel (a 60-mg loading dose and a 10-mg daily maintenance dose) or clop
47 y maintenance dose) or clopidogrel (a 300-mg loading dose and a 75-mg daily maintenance dose), for 6
48 between eras included elimination of the SRL loading dose and a reduction in TAC target trough concen
52 ), with the addition of trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose and then 2 mg/kg weekly or 8 mg/kg loading
53 spital to receive either rosuvastatin (40 mg loading dose and then 20 mg daily until the earliest of
54 e randomly assigned to cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) loading dose and then 250 mg/m(2) once per week with or
56 were treated with cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) as a loading dose and then weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m(2) with
57 were observed among patients who received a loading dose and those who had a shorter duration of nAM
58 atio using computer randomisation to receive loading doses and then 30 days of intensive antiplatelet
61 mics of a 300-mg versus a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose, and the comparative effect of eptifibatide
62 /kg in 100 mL of 0.9% saline over 4 hrs as a loading dose, and then a maintenance infusion of 50 mg/k
63 5 mg PRN group was 9.9 weeks after 3 monthly loading doses, and 93% of these patients did not require
64 ys 1 and 8 and weekly thereafter (plus an IV loading dose [ approximately 10 mg/kg] on day 1) or IV a
65 istered intravenously every 3 weeks (8 mg/kg loading dose at first cycle, and 6 mg/kg thereafter) for
67 ofatumumab (20 mg every 4 weeks after 20-mg loading doses at days 1, 7, and 14) or oral teriflunomid
69 choice of administration of the clopidogrel loading dose before or after the start of PCI had an imp
70 e the optimal timing of a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose before percutaneous coronary intervention (
71 domly assigned to receive prasugrel (a 30-mg loading dose) before the angiography (pretreatment group
72 umab (8.1 [2.3-28.7]; p=0.0012), and 160 mg (loading dose) bimekizumab (9.7 [2.7-34.3]; p=0.0004) gro
73 her with cetuximab (250 mg/m(2) weekly after loading dose; cetuximab group) or without (control group
74 id and greater platelet inhibition than high-loading-dose clopidogrel; this was sustained during the
76 al aflibercept was administered as 3 initial loading doses every 4 weeks (week 0, week 4, and week 8)
77 eatment consisted of trastuzumab (T) 4 mg/kg loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15; p
80 (1500 mg), intravenous trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg), or lapatinib (1000 mg
81 weeks plus concurrent cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) loading dose followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly) for four cy
82 re enrolled on 3 cohorts (cohort 1, 30 mg/m2 loading dose followed by 30 mg/m2 4-hour infusion; cohor
84 initiated a phase 1 study using a 30-minute loading dose followed by 4 hours of infusion administere
85 d to receive adalimumab, 80-mg, subcutaneous loading dose followed by 40 mg every other week or place
86 30 mg/m2 4-hour infusion; cohort 2, 40 mg/m2 loading dose followed by 40 mg/m2 4-hour infusion; and c
87 mg/kg every 3 weeks) and pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose followed by 420 mg every 3 weeks) concurren
90 n 200 mg QWk (400/200 mg), or CAS 70 mg as a loading dose followed by 50 mg daily for <= 4 weeks.
91 tion ACS to 1 of 3 doses of atopaxar (400-mg loading dose followed by 50, 100, or 200 mg daily) or ma
92 cetaxel 100 mg/m(2) plus trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg either with bevacizumab
93 antibody treatment with trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) and pert
94 assigned oral losmapimod (7.5 mg or 15.0 mg loading dose followed by 7.5 mg twice daily) or matching
96 olistin (9 million international units [MIU] loading dose followed by 9 MIU daily for normal renal fu
97 -one ratio to ticagrelor and placebo (180 mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice a day), or to clopi
98 30-day regimen of either ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice daily) plus aspirin
99 s were randomly assigned to receive a 30-min loading dose followed by 96-hr infusions of placebo, TAK
101 dose for treatments 1 to 4, then a 30 mg/m2 loading dose followed by a 50 mg/m2 4-hour infusion).
102 on-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (intravenous loading dose followed by continuous infusion) for 3 days
103 mg/m(2) once per week or CTX 400 mg/m(2) as loading dose followed by CTX 250 mg/m(2) once per week c
104 omly assigned to receive clopidogrel (300-mg loading dose followed by daily dose of 75 mg; n = 441) o
105 o receive the following: a 40 mg/kg IV VRC01 loading dose followed by five 20 mg/kg IV VRC01 doses ev
106 erapy) or intravenous cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) loading dose followed by seven weekly infusions of 250 m
107 to receive cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) intravenous loading dose followed by weekly maintenance of 250 mg/m(
108 l regimens tended to follow a large initial 'loading' dose followed by doses of incremental reduction
109 gned in a 2:1:1 ratio to oral tolevamer 9 g (loading dose) followed by 3 g every 8 hours for 14 days,
110 ibizumab with TRP, or 3 monthly ranibizumab (loading doses) followed by as-needed (PRN) injections an
112 irst-line treatment with trastuzumab 4 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 2 mg/kg weekly, or a higher 8
114 2 if tolerated; group A), pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose, followed by 420 mg every 3 weeks) and tras
115 m, to receive intravenous pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose, followed by 420 mg maintenance doses) plus
116 r neoadjuvant cycles of trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) plus do
117 doses) plus intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg maintenance doses) or
118 assigned them to receive clopidogrel (300-mg loading dose, followed by 75 mg once daily) or placebo.
119 o receive CytoFab, infused as a 250-units/kg loading dose, followed by nine doses of 50 units/kg ever
120 ungin acetate given intravenously as a 70-mg loading dose, followed up by 50 mg daily along with stan
122 ared with the 300-mg (n = 1,153) clopidogrel loading dose group had significantly lower 30-day unadju
124 om day 29 through 12 months, patients in the loading-dose group received clopidogrel, 75 mg/d, and th
125 ) once every 3 weeks plus pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose --> 420 mg) once every 3 weeks, all given i
126 m(2) once per week plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose --> 6 mg/kg) once every 3 weeks plus pertuz
127 r prasugrel (n = 95) or ticagrelor (n = 205) loading dose had platelet reactivity assessed by VerifyN
128 (1200 mg pertuzumab plus 600 mg trastuzumab loading dose in 15 mL, followed by 600 mg pertuzumab plu
129 g From Clopidogrel Loading Dose To Prasugrel Loading Dose In Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients study:
131 thereafter) for 18 doses or weekly (4 mg/kg loading dose in the first week, and 2 mg/kg thereafter)
134 ent study was to assess whether a ticagrelor loading dose is associated with a further platelet inhib
135 52) who were treated with a prasugrel 60-mg loading dose (LD) either as whole or crushed tablets.
136 5-day run-in phase with a ticagrelor 180-mg loading dose (LD) followed by a ticagrelor 90-mg twice-d
137 PD effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel loading dose (LD) in the peri-procedural period among tr
139 pen-label randomly assigned to a fulvestrant loading dose (LD) regimen followed by monthly injection
142 to 1 of the following 3 treatments: placebo loading dose (LD)/clopidogrel 75 mg maintenance dose (MD
143 4, and 8, with placebo at week 2; or 420 mg loading dose [LD] at week 0 followed by 300 mg at weeks
144 o receive either clopidogrel (300- to 600-mg loading dose [LD], 75 mg/day) or ticagrelor (180-mg LD,
145 andomly assigned to receive prasugrel (60 mg loading dose [LD]/10 mg maintenance dose once daily) or
146 estored using concentrated platelets after a loading dose/maintenance therapy in a time-dependent man
147 of aflibercept without the initial 3 monthly loading doses may be a good alternative in a select grou
149 mly assigned to receive a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose (n = 1053) or placebo (n = 1063) 3 to 24 ho
151 ntration may be achieved with an intravenous loading dose of 0.45 mg/kg followed by a continuous infu
154 viduals in the pexidartinib group received a loading dose of 1000 mg pexidartinib per day orally (400
155 eive levosimendan, 0.1 microg/kg/min after a loading dose of 12 microg/kg (n=15), or placebo (n=15).
158 Patients were followed for 1 year, with a loading dose of 3 monthly intravitreal injections, follo
160 dogrel (75 mg/d for long-term treatment or a loading dose of 300 mg) before the following tests.
162 voriconazole vs oral placebo; a voriconazole loading dose of 400 mg was administered twice daily for
163 to receive either intravenous cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m(2) 5-7 days before radiotherapy
164 very 2 weeks with regimen one and three or a loading dose of 400 mg/m(2) followed by a weekly infusio
165 very 2 weeks with regimen one and three or a loading dose of 400 mg/m(2) followed by a weekly infusio
167 mg/m(2)), or cetuximab (250 mg/m(2) after a loading dose of 400 mg/m(2)) until disease progression,
168 yrimidines, were treated with cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m2 followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly.
169 50 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15 (after an initial loading dose of 400 mg/m2), termed TPE, repeated every 2
170 commended dose for phase II/III studies is a loading dose of 400 to 500 mg/m(2) and a maintenance wee
172 Patients were treated with an oral sirolimus-loading dose of 6 mg after coronary angioplasty, followe
173 Twenty-four healthy subjects received a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel together with placebo
174 hours after PCI, was not superior to an oral loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel, administered 30 m
177 r one of three ALS-008176 dosing regimens: 1 loading dose of 750 mg followed by 9 maintenance doses o
178 y 9 maintenance doses of 500 mg (group 1), 1 loading dose of 750 mg followed by 9 maintenance doses o
179 ys) or trastuzumab-capecitabine (trastuzumab loading dose of 8 mg/kg followed by an infusion of 6 mg/
180 zumab delivered every 3 weeks intravenously (loading dose of 8 mg/kg followed by maintenance doses of
181 gned in a 1:1 ratio to receive adalimumab (a loading dose of 80 mg followed by a dose of 40 mg every
183 ients in the first cohort treated at 420 mg (loading dose of 840 mg) allowed termination of additiona
184 to receive either pertuzumab or placebo at a loading dose of 840 mg, and 420 mg thereafter; plus tras
186 enous LA 450 mg plus oral prasugrel 60 mg or loading dose of aspirin 300 mg plus prasugrel 60 mg oral
187 r bare metal stent), CYP2C19 genetic status, loading dose of aspirin, dose of clopidogrel before rand
189 ore MI induction: (1) placebo-control; (2) a loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg); (3) a loading dose
191 rmediate risk patients treated with a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel before PCI, incremental clin
193 Our aim was to determine whether a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel compared with 300 mg results
196 temporary anticoagulation regimens, a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel may safely reduce 30-day isc
197 nset of an antiplatelet effect seen with the loading dose of clopidogrel, which was used in most of t
200 1:1 randomization to receive either a single loading dose of girentuximab, 50 mg (week 1), followed b
202 Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a loading dose of intravenous LA 450 mg plus oral prasugre
206 fective were treated transplacentally with a loading dose of oral amiodarone for 2 to 7 days, followe
207 as seen with and without a PPI after a 60 mg loading dose of prasugrel (69.6+/-13.5% vs 76.7+/-12.4%,
209 e in the ambulance, before transfer, a 60-mg loading dose of prasugrel either as crushed or integral
211 vention, a higher (100 mg) than the standard loading dose of prasugrel results in greater and more co
214 whereas 83% of animals receiving a 10-mg/kg loading dose of remdesivir survived, as did 50% of anima
215 k baseline, patients received a subcutaneous loading dose of rilonacept 320 mg followed by weekly sub
216 nary angiography with planned PCI to an oral loading dose of SCH 530348 (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg) or m
218 ly assigned in a 1 to 1 fashion to receive a loading dose of study drug (prasugrel 60 mg or clopidogr
220 sought to assess platelet inhibition after a loading dose of the currently recommended antiplatelet a
221 loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg); (3) a loading dose of ticagrelor (180 mg); or (4) a loading do
222 t-elevation myocardial infarction received a loading dose of ticagrelor and were randomized to mainte
223 oading dose of ticagrelor (180 mg); or (4) a loading dose of ticagrelor followed by an adenosine A1/A
225 s randomly assigned to arm A received a 4-mg loading dose of trastuzumab followed by 2 mg weekly; in
226 eir 20-mg test dose or after their 400 mg/m2 loading dose of unlabeled C225 (patients 1/3/5 and 2/4/6
227 ents received PRM-151 in 28-week cycles with loading doses of 10 mg/kg by 60 min intravenous infusion
229 all US patients (99.1%) received clopidogrel loading doses of 600 mg, whereas 40.5% of non-US patient
231 ents with treatment naive DMO treated with 3 loading doses of aflibercept were included in the study.
232 y of persistent disease activity following 3 loading doses of anti- vascular endothelial growth facto
233 ercutaneous coronary intervention, receiving loading doses of clopidogrel (600 mg, n=13 or 900 mg, n=
234 ized to the study group received four to six loading doses of ivID, 100 mg each, over a 2-wk period t
237 electrographic seizures not responding to a loading-dose of phenobarbital from eight neonatal intens
238 located patients (1:1) to ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 90 mg twice daily for
239 weekly trastuzumab intravenously at 4 mg/kg loading dose on day 1 with subsequent weekly doses of 2
240 estrant 500 mg (day 1) every 28 days (plus a loading dose on day 15 of cycle 1) with either capivaser
241 ilable on the comparative effect of a 600-mg loading dose on the incidence of NR and high post-PA.
242 of subcutaneous denosumab every 4 weeks with loading doses on days 8 and 15 of the first cycle; those
243 /m(2), plus intravenous trastuzumab 4 mg/kg (loading dose) on day 1 and 2 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15
244 rasugrel, administered as chewed or integral loading dose, on IPA in patients undergoing primary perc
245 (2) and trastuzumab 2 mg/kg (after a 4 mg/kg loading dose) once per week for 12 weeks, while those ra
246 ), or to clopidogrel and placebo (300-600 mg loading dose or continuation with maintenance dose follo
247 eous adalimumab (40 mg every 2 weeks after a loading dose) or low-dosage oral methotrexate sodium (7.
248 ab, 160 mg bimekizumab with a one-off 320 mg loading dose, or 320 mg bimekizumab, which were administ
250 d point was platelet reactivity 2 hours post loading dose (P2Y12 reactivity units [PRU] measured by t
253 to six cycles of either trastuzumab 4 mg/kg loading dose plus 2 mg/kg weekly thereafter with paclita
254 2 every 3 weeks (TP), or trastuzumab 4 mg/kg loading dose plus 2 mg/kg weekly thereafter with paclita
255 90 mg, AZD6140 180 mg, or clopidogrel 300-mg loading dose plus 75 mg once daily for up to 12 weeks.
256 tandard clopidogrel therapy (300-600 mg oral loading dose plus 75 mg oral maintenance dose) in 56 pat
258 including higher clopidogrel maintenance and loading doses, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, clinicians can
260 fit for beginning therapy with a clopidogrel loading dose prior to PCI, the practical application of
261 s infusion of lorazepam, preceded by a bolus loading dose, produces a relatively constant sedative ef
269 bevacizumab injections every 12 weeks after loading doses supplemented with as-needed top-up treatme
270 d less well functionally and anatomically to loading dose than eyes with baseline CST of 400 um or mo
271 us) in combination with trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose then 2 mg/kg weekly) to determine the OTR.
272 h TIA or minor stroke to clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose then 75 mg daily; 198 patients) or placebo
274 d to commence subcutaneous dupilumab (600 mg loading dose, then 300 mg once weekly for 15 weeks [n =
276 with 3.6 mg/kg T-DM1 plus pertuzumab (840-mg loading dose, then 420 mg subsequently) once every 3 wee
277 eks, intravenously) and trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks, intravenously)
278 T12PR24 group, receiving telaprevir (1125-mg loading dose, then 750 mg every 8 hours) for 12 weeks an
279 before study entry, plus cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose, then weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m2, plus beva
280 ceived dual antiplatelet therapy as a single loading dose (ticagrelor 180 mg plus aspirin 325 mg) and
281 grel 600 mg in Transferring From Clopidogrel Loading Dose To Prasugrel Loading Dose In Acute Coronary
284 d to receive clopidogrel were given a 300-mg loading dose unless they had already been treated with c
285 ly on days 1, 8, and 15, plus three previous loading doses) until disease progression, unacceptable t
286 s greatest in the two groups that received a loading dose--viral clearance was accelerated (P</=0.05)
287 P2Y12 reactivity units 2 hours after the loading dose was 187 (153-221) and 133 (102-165) in pati
288 multivariable analysis, a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose was an independent predictor of lower rates
290 In the clopidogrel-only group (n=5438), a loading dose was given before (early load [EL]) or after
293 likely to be discontinued if a 3-day 100-mg loading dose was prescribed, patients were younger than
294 ndomization heparin and a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose were independent predictors of reduced acut
296 f 16 mg and 160 mg (with or without a 320 mg loading dose) were associated with significant improveme
297 raphic effects were maximal 0.5 hr after the loading dose, were maintained essentially constant durin
299 ndomization was stratified by thienopyridine loading dose, which was determined before random assignm
300 ersistent disease activity after the initial loading dose, with poorer BCVA compared to those without