ライフサイエンスコーパス: long-distance movement

1 C modification in mRNAs is crucial for their long-distance movement.

2 al CP functions in host- and strain-specific long-distance movement.

3 ieve elements in particular, to restrict TEV long-distance movement.

4 s TEV replication, cell-to-cell movement, or long-distance movement.

5 cell to cell slowly but were debilitated in long-distance movement.

6 ndirectly with host components to facilitate long-distance movement.

7 ons independently of the complete protein in long-distance movement.

8 systemic infection by vasculature-dependent long-distance movement.

9 n productivity, recruitment, and patterns of long-distance movement.

10 cted T. major to wet habitats and prohibited long-distance movement.

11 eraction in plants, nucleolar targeting, and long-distance movement.

12 short saltatory movements and unidirectional long-distance movements along the microtubule network.

13 and avoid harsh climates, but these regular, long-distance movements also have implications for paras

14 that 1) initial founders are well suited for long-distance movement and 2) loss of seasonal migration

15 l and animal-powered transport in medium and long-distance movement and exchange, using the Indus Civ

16 This vector is deficient in long-distance movement and is limited to locally inocula

17 mal features, such as the ability to undergo long-distance movement and propensity to accumulate in t

18 cleoprotein (RNP) particles capable of virus long-distance movement and systemic infection.

19 Although uncommon, long-distance movements and connectivity between habitat

20 CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Long-distance movements and disjunct spatial use of adul

21 enome amplification, polyprotein processing, long-distance movement, and suppression of posttranscrip

22 led virus we show that both cell-to-cell and long-distance movement are unusually limited, and the de

23 PAIV outbreak, GPS-tagged gannets instigated long-distance movements beyond well-documented previous

24 the RecA filament alone is incapable of such long-distance movement; both translocation and associate

25 mosquitoes, likely reflecting their limited long-distance movement compared to avian species.

26 ain had no effect on systemic infection by a long-distance movement-competent chimeric strain, sugges

27 Our work further suggests that barriers to long-distance movement could increase pathogen prevalenc

28 t mutants, several possessed cell-to-cell or long-distance movement defects in tobacco plants.

29 Furthermore, LIS1 and NDEL1 also undergo long-distance movement, despite being mainly implicated

30 an history as essential beasts of burden for long-distance movement, especially across semi-arid and

31 teins that are known to be essential for TEV long-distance movement, failed to infect V20 systemicall

32 In contrast, long-distance movement from leaf to leaf was markedly re

33 protein is multifunctional, with a distinct long-distance movement function in addition to its role

34 possibly altered CP, sat-RNA C reduces virus long-distance movement in a manner that is independent o

35 f RNA silencing-based antiviral defense, and long-distance movement in infected plants.

36 g of bird migration is heavily biased toward long-distance movements in the Northern Hemisphere,(1)(,

37 rior to their implementation, both local and long distance movement increased in multiple locations,

38 We argue that similarly long-distance movements likely exist in many other speci

39 the virus appears to function with only the long-distance movement mechanism, yet is able to survive

40 glycans in the ECM facilitate the remarkable long distance movement of Nodal.

41 coat protein (CP) has a relevant role in the long-distance movement of alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV) and

42 To study the role of the coat protein in long-distance movement of AlMV independent of other vita

43 that plant viral MPs cause cell-to-cell and long-distance movement of an animal virus in plants and

44 r results show that rather than enabling the long-distance movement of Fe in the phloem (as is the ca

45 osaic virus (ZYMV) were used to test whether long-distance movement of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) mRNA or

46 dence suggesting the existence of short- and long-distance movement of GAs in plants(3-8), the nature

47 Although numerous studies support the long-distance movement of hundreds to thousands of mRNAs

48 try is a decisive step for the initiation of long-distance movement of infectious and endogenous RNAs

49 ve previously been detected in phloem cells, long-distance movement of its mRNA was tested.

50 orticulture and used in science to study the long-distance movement of molecules.

51 mutation in tomato were used to demonstrate long-distance movement of mutant messenger RNA (mRNA) in

52 though glycosylation is not required for the long-distance movement of NHP during SAR, it is crucial

53 Long-distance movement of RNA through the phloem is know

54 tionally, we provide direct evidence for the long-distance movement of ShhN across the anteroposterio

55 These results illustrate that efficient long-distance movement of TCV requires both functions af

56 The genetic basis for the restriction of long-distance movement of TEV-GUS in Columbia was invest

57 ion, several strategies for cell-to-cell and long-distance movement of the infectious viral DNA were

58 other regions and hosts, indicated that the long-distance movement of these viruses between regions

59 s have a system to specifically restrict the long-distance movement of tobacco etch potyvirus (TEV) w

60 to exhibit a strain-specific restriction of long-distance movement of tobacco etch potyvirus (TEV).

61 Restriction of long-distance movement of tobacco etch virus (TEV) in Ar

62 e locus RTM1 is necessary for restriction of long-distance movement of tobacco etch virus in Arabidop

63 CPs of other viruses, such as protection and long-distance movement of viral RNA.

64 etrograde transport machinery to promote the long-distance movement of virion components to the nucle

65 It is thought that this signal can influence long-distance movement of viruses because protein suppre

66 ovided important details on cell-to-cell and long-distance movement of viruses in plants.

67 Long-distance movements of animals are an important driv

68 ock market prices, and religious calendar on long-distance movements of cattle and small ruminant her

69 We show how the study of individual long-distance movements of insects may contribute to a b

70 igher energetic requirements associated with long-distance movements or consumption of more contamina

71 their navigation capacity for accomplishing long-distance movements remains remarkably understudied

72 These data support the hypothesis that long-distance movement requires a set of host functions

73 -to-cell movement between adjacent cells and long-distance movement that allows the virus to rapidly

74 proposed that RTM1 mediates a restriction of long-distance movement through a mechanism that differs

75 uite of large mammals that had potential for long-distance movements to test which species displayed

76 apra americana) that undertook extraordinary long-distance movements (up to 399 km) to escape a once-

77 sieve elements, suggesting that the block in long-distance movement was associated with entry into, o

78 tantially decreased further, indicating that long-distance movement was reduced in those hosts.

79 me amplification, cell-to-cell movement, and long-distance movement were measured in V20 and a suscep

80 imary source of energy used to support these long-distance movements, yet how mitochondria meet the e