ライフサイエンスコーパス: loud

1 ent modalities (auditory and visual: "red," "loud").

2 ocked to neural activity and stereotypically loud.

3 slower than controls when forced to read out loud.

4 The effects of loud (105-dB) noise stress were examined on a spatial wo

5 : 130 to Lee Silverman voice treatment (LSVT LOUD), 129 to NHS speech and language therapy, and 129 t

6 Hamsters exposed to a loud 2- or 10-kHz tone in 1 ear often shifted their resp

7 In this study, we paired loud acoustic stimulation (LAS) with transcranial magnet

8 In response to a series of loud acoustic stimuli, HR rats were faster to begin voca

9 agnetic stimulation (TMS; experiment 1) or a loud acoustic stimulus (LAS; experiment 2) were used to

10 orders of magnitude for a sample of 76 radio-loud active galaxies.

11 ly affected by ship noise but not by equally loud ambient noise.

12 ' acceptance of the technique has been heard loud and clear.

13 pattern of evoked responses to unexpectedly loud and quiet sounds that both supports this hypothesis

14 For example, dance songs tend to be loud and rhythmic, and lullabies tend to be quiet and me

15 We evaluated the impact of glaucoma on out-loud and silent reading.

16 A random sequence of equiprobable loud and soft speech sounds and bright and dim checkerbo

17 ated macular degeneration (AMD) on short out-loud and sustained silent reading speeds, and reading co

18 Exposure to loud and/or prolonged noise damages the cochlea and trig

19 t calls, and when they did, they were short, loud, and monotonic.

20 ironments as silent as L(Aeq) = 31 dB and as loud as L(Aeq) = 76 dB were observed, eliciting percepti

21 ater than 6 dB sensation level (SL; >half as loud) at week 6 for the bisensory treatment group, with

22 ut power enables thermoacoustic emissions at loud audible sound pressure levels of 90.1 dB, which are

23 Loud auditory stimuli were found to enhance reaction tim

24 such accelerated release can be elicited by loud auditory stimuli--a phenomenon known as 'StartReact

25 le-body musculature in response to a sudden, loud auditory stimulus, and PPI is the inhibition of aco

26 s mix and disperse, the misinfodemic creates loud background noise, preventing the general public fro

27 Loud bangs, bright flashes, and intense shocks capture a

28 petite-conditioning experiments in mice, the loud bell used to signal food presentation unexpectedly

29 A single exposure session (2 h) to loud broadband noise (120 dB SPL) produced permanent NIH

30 inant left hemisphere were easily spoken out loud, but could not be written.

31 ght hemisphere, she could not speak them out loud, but could write them with her left hand.

32 also distinguish between soft-but-nearby and loud-but-distant sounds, indicating that distance proces

33 equiring repetition, as is characteristic of loud calling behaviour in nonhuman primates, typically c

34 ural observations, gelada males responded to loud calls according to both their own and their opponen

35 ud calls, these echoes will be masked by the loud calls of other close-by bats.

36 Theropithecus gelada) males have conspicuous loud calls that may function as a signal of male quality

37 "Leader" males with harems putatively use loud calls to deter challenges from non-reproductive "ba

38 National Park, Nigeria, in which male alarm/loud calls were presented either alone, or following aco

39 sten for the faint returning echoes of their loud calls, these echoes will be masked by the loud call

40 ix healthy subjects were made in response to loud clicks presented to either ear.

41 ted (no conversational response, rousable by loud command).

42 LSVT LOUD consisted of four, face-to-face or remote, 50 min s

43 ubjected to environmental insults, including loud, damage-inducing sounds.

44 erspective article, we face the increasingly loud elephant in the room and ask a question that has be

45 These sounds are loud enough to be heard by insects and can be analytical

46 for neural resources.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Loud environments such as busy pubs or restaurants can m

47 n expression is downregulated in response to loud environments.

48 eption difficulties in people overexposed to loud environments.

49 We further found that obnoxious, loud firecracker sound of 120 dB induced a stronger and

50 hat the jet-launching regions of these radio-loud galaxies are threaded by dynamically important fiel

51 Patients in the LSVT LOUD group also reported lower voice handicap index scor

52 tely vocal strain) were reported in the LSVT LOUD group, 46 in the NHS speech and language therapy gr

53 tic resonance imaging while awake) generated loud high frequency inspiratory sounds (HFIS, defined as

54 rmed while participants counted backward out loud in their mother tongue.

55 est known in Puerto Rico for its notoriously loud mating call, which has allowed researchers to study

56 ional Reading Speed Text (IReST) passage out loud, maximum out-loud MNRead chart reading speed, susta

57 es preferentially orientate toward areas of 'loud' microbarom infrasound on their foraging trips.

58 t that repeatedly switches between quiet and loud, midbrain neurons accrue experience to find an effi

59 d Text (IReST) passage out loud, maximum out-loud MNRead chart reading speed, sustained (30 minutes)

60 and participating in workouts accompanied by loud music (odds ratio = 2.84, 95% confidence interval:

61 .79, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.89), as did exposure to loud music (OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.20, 4.23).

62 sis that listeners with frequent exposure to loud music exhibit deficits in suprathreshold auditory p

63 The results demonstrated that a history of loud music exposure can lead to a profile of peripheral

64 Acoustic overexposure, such as listening to loud music too often, results in noise-induced hearing l

65 30) have a history of frequent attendance at loud music venues where the typical sound levels could b

66 ed for seizure susceptibility by exposure to loud noise (an alarm bell) for 60 s.

67 aring their own vocalizations by exposure to loud noise after 35 d of age, before which they had been

68 imodal stress) with those of restraint or of loud noise alone.

69 association between occupational exposure to loud noise and acoustic neuroma.

70 ng stress was observed immediately after the loud noise but a similar increase in yawning 20 min afte

71 o the lateral amygdala blocked freezing to a loud noise but not to the male.

72 in the inner ear as a result of exposure to loud noise can lead to irreversible deafness.

73 Likewise, exposure to loud noise during early development produces a similar d

74 Rats exposed to a loud noise event that resulted in hair cell loss and red

75 The results from studies of loud noise exposure and acoustic neuroma are conflicting

76 y period of 13 or more years since the first loud noise exposure from any source was 2.12 (95% CI: 1.

77 The authors found that individuals reporting loud noise exposure from any source were at increased ri

78 Loud noise exposure is one of the leading causes of perm

79 duration of occupational and nonoccupational loud noise exposure of 146 acoustic neuroma cases and 56

80 f an increased risk of acoustic neuroma with loud noise exposure support previous research.

81 measured during an additional and drug-free loud noise exposure test.

82 he pathological events that follow intensely loud noise exposures and ischemia-reperfusion injury.

83 tual extinction procedure following repeated loud noise exposures failed to restore the habituated HP

84 drenal axis response habituation to repeated loud noise exposures is not derived from the auditory co

85 sibly by muscimol injections during repeated loud noise exposures to determine if brainstem or midbra

86 Importantly, habituation to repeated loud noise exposures was also prevented by reversible au

87 its putative role in habituation to repeated loud noise exposures, in rats.

88 t habituation-related plasticity to repeated loud noise exposures.

89 segment of a foreground sound is deleted and loud noise fills the missing portion, listeners incorrec

90 Exposure to loud noise from leisure activity without hearing protect

91 Exposure to loud noise from machines, power tools, and/or constructi

92 Exposure to occupational loud noise has been previously identified as a possible

93 Prolonged exposure to loud noise has been shown to affect inner ear sensory ha

94 ent study was to further examine the role of loud noise in acoustic neuroma etiology.

95 The effects of the lesions were specific to loud noise insofar as corticosterone release in response

96 at HPA axis response habituation to repeated loud noise lasted for at least 4 weeks in rats.

97 be awoken by intense stimuli (for example, a loud noise or a bright light) or by soft but qualitative

98 ynaptic functions, before acute and repeated loud noise or restraint exposures.

99 rats were exposed to inescapable tail shock, loud noise or restraint, and the effect on alpha(1d) ADR

100 to 3 weeks later, injected animals underwent loud noise stress, and their brains were processed for f

101 k in which the winner blasted the loser with loud noise through headphones.

102 sign: rural/urban collection sites and quiet/loud noise treatments, reflecting natural vibratory nois

103 in urban vs. rural habitats under quiet vs. loud noise treatments, was found to be able to influence

104 Exposure to loud noise triggers sensory organ damage and degeneratio

105 Mice exposed to hours-long restraint or loud noise were modestly or minimally impaired in novel

106 sociations between leisure-time exposures to loud noise without hearing protection and acoustic neuro

107 These mice have a normal startle reflex to loud noise, a normal sense of balance, a normal auditory

108 variety of other ototoxic factors, including loud noise, aging, genetic defects, and ototoxic drugs.

109 dent memory of concurrent, hours-long light, loud noise, jostling and restraint (multimodal stress) w

110 est ("foreground" sound) is interrupted by a loud noise, subjects perceive the entire sound, even if

111 eground" sound) is interrupted (occluded) by loud noise, the auditory system restores the occluded in

112 reased freezing to the male rat but not to a loud noise, whereas infusion into the lateral amygdala b

113 the RPa and PaMP that were colocalized with loud noise-induced Fos expression.

114 stages-especially in response to exposure to loud noise-remains largely unexplored.

115 upts acute HPA axis response specifically to loud noise.

116 erone in response to the perceived threat of loud noise.

117 ed by fear-potentiated startle response to a loud noise.

118 d un-conditioned reflex elicited by a sudden loud noise.

119 d corticosterone release normally induced by loud noise.

120 uder with uncertain intent and unpredictable loud noise.

121 tion disrupts stress habituation to repeated loud noise.

122 exposures reduce acute HPA axis responses to loud noise.

123 Exposure to loud noises not only leads to trauma and loss of output

124 Here we show that exposure to loud noises results in dysfunction of PV-positive but no

125 Exposure to loud noises results in neuroinflammatory responses in th

126 Here, we show that exposure to loud noises specifically reduces the density of cortical

127 its, including fetching tendency and fear of loud noises, while other traits revealed negligibly smal

128 ed epilepsy and have seizures in response to loud noises.

129 sing acronyms, such as lol for "laughing out loud," or clippings such as msg for "message." The prese

130 e many harmonic overtones of even moderately loud playing may become inaudible with earplugs to a lif

131 e accepted, except for those within the LSVT LOUD protocol.

132 it at the swim bladder to generate a rapid, loud pulse.

133 Every radio-loud quasar may have blazar activities, according to a u

134 both optical and radio observations of radio-loud quasars are the result of different viewing angles.

135 nd supports the unification scheme for radio-loud quasars.

136 Tests of out loud reading do not accurately reflect silent reading sp

137 trols and 64 glaucoma subjects had their out loud reading evaluated with the MNRead card and an Inter

138 Out-loud reading speed was measured using the International

139 the correlation of these two measures of out loud reading speed with each other (r = 0.72).

140 MNRead was used to assess short-duration out-loud reading speed.

141 10-87), and comparisons of sustained and out loud reading speeds demonstrated proportional error in B

142 People who received LSVT LOUD reported lower voice handicap index scores at three

143 nts, used for short-range communication, and loud, rhythmic, human-audible songs unique to the singin

144 owler monkeys (Alouatta spp.), which produce loud roars using a highly specialized and greatly enlarg

145 s can be grammatically constructed-cold food loud room-or is absent-rough give ill tell-showed cortic

146 Our analysis revealed loud signals due to a plume root beneath Hawaii and a pr

147 nd pain, discomfort to breathe, and cough or loud snoring), excessive daytime sleepiness, and reduced

148 OAL questionnaire (gender, obesity, age, and loud snoring), was developed and subsequently validated,

149 ry of sleep apnea or >/= 2 hallmarks of OSA: loud snoring, daytime sleepiness, witnessed apnea, and h

150 Symptoms include loud snoring, nocturnal awakening, and daytime sleepines

151 w of salsa and wild-type mice in response to loud sound (120 dB SPL, 30 minutes low-pass filtered noi

152 Exposure to loud sound (acoustic overexposure; AOE) induces hearing

153 the extent of reaction time shortening by a loud sound (StartReact effect), suggesting that plastici

154 the extent of reaction time shortening by a loud sound (the StartReact effect); (2) decreased the su

155 ning of each trial and delivers increasingly loud sound blasts to the participants, successfully prov

156 Finally, exposure of mice to loud sound caused G1 mGluR-dependent Z-LTD at DCN parall

157 We show herein that loud sound causes change of phenotype from neural/glial

158 Exposure to loud sound causes cochlear damage resulting in hearing l

159 Exposure to loud sound damages the postsynaptic terminals of spiral

160 Loud sound exposure sufficient to induce permanent heari

161 ntral auditory pathway occurring weeks after loud sound exposure.

162 mong the basic features of a sound envelope, loud sound onsets are a dominant feature coded by the au

163 onses are boosted in V1, most strongly after loud sound onsets.

164 ensory conduction time, we estimate that the loud sound reduced the central visuomotor processing tim

165 Exposure to loud sound reduces presynaptic zinc levels in the DCN an

166 lear nucleus (DCN) shortly after exposure to loud sound that produces hearing loss.

167 An unexpected loud sound typically elicits a reflexive eye-blink.

168 e to the environmental challenge of a sudden loud sound, and that the response can be restored in Plg

169 spiral ganglion neurons only when exposed to loud sound, and that Type II neurons are activated by ti

170 e of rats to randomly presented, inescapable loud sound, referred to as sound stress, increases centr

171 CR to visual stimuli paired with an aversive loud sound, whereas amygdala patients failed to do so.

172 proliferation of PCs and ECs, and attenuated loud sound-caused loss in endocochlear potential and hea

173 mination accelerated recovery from temporary loud sound-induced acoustic desensitization.

174 Our results indicate that loud sound-triggered PC transformation contributes to ca

175 ed to various traumas, the most common being loud sound.

176 in auditory impairment following exposure to loud sound.

177 ifier and mediates protection on exposure to loud sound.

178 magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) following a loud sound; (3) enhanced muscle responses elicited by a

179 kin conductance, and pupil area responses to loud sounds (multivariate p = .007) compared with trauma

180 wide-frequency range, decreased tolerance to loud sounds and reduced behavioral reaction time latenci

181 ated within appropriate tonotopic domains by loud sounds at hearing onset, indicating that early matu

182 In contrast, some neurons respond to loud sounds by adjusting their response functions away f

183 Loud sounds depleted Ca(2+) from the tectorial membrane,

184 nses in SWS compared with wakefulness, while loud sounds evoked similar responses in SWS and wakefuln

185 etics (which recover over 2 months) and that loud sounds reversibly modify excitatory synapses in the

186 populations go from preferring contralateral loud sounds to a symmetric preference across lateralizat

187 Acoustic trauma (AT, loud sounds) slow AMPAR-EPSC decay times, increasing Glu

188 , (b) to avoid presentation of uncomfortably loud sounds, and (c) to ensure that subjects have contro

189 hearing and balance deficits that arise when loud sounds, ototoxic drugs, infections, and aging cause

190 e of sensory deficits.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Loud sounds, ototoxic drugs, infections, and aging kill

191 oderate-level sounds and compressing them to loud sounds.

192 ore symptom of FXS is extreme sensitivity to loud sounds.

193 ption and emotional salience of tinnitus and loud sounds.

194 rate sound discrimination in the presence of loud sources of background noise.

195 vocal loading task (VLT) which consisted of loud speaking with background noise.

196 ement observed for soft and conversationally loud speech (all 52-dB and 62-dB conditions, P</=.001).

197 t scattering observations have revealed that loud speech can emit thousands of oral fluid droplets pe

198 Larger heart rate responses to sudden, loud (startling) tones represent one of the best-replica

199 ct proximally and proximal reaction times to loud stimuli correlated with gait and postural disturban

200 stimulus is presented immediately before the loud stimulus.

201 ophysical loudness adaptation to comfortably-loud sustained tones; and (ii) physiological adaptation

202 ally during super-spreading events involving loud talking or singing.

203 subjects listened to a series of 15 sudden, loud tone presentations while heart rate, skin conductan

204 that larger heart rate responses to sudden, loud tones represent an acquired sign of PTSD rather tha

205 ents and 23 cognitively normal controls to a loud, unexpected acoustic startle stimulus (115-dB burst

206 Under loud vibratory noise, rural webs retained more energy in

207 ciated with voice problems included frequent loud voice use, coughing, and/or throat clearing.

208 LSVT LOUD was more effective at reducing the participant repo

209 Conversely, urban/loud webs lost more energy in short-distance vibrations

210 of auditory feedback by chronic exposure to loud white noise (WN).

211 g juvenile zebra finches or exposing them to loud white noise throughout the sensitive period for son

212 ird groups following a nonspecific stressor (loud white noise) for a period of 1 hr, determining whet

213 rocedure in which one tone (CS+) predicted a loud white noise, whereas a second tone (CS-) was presen

214 dy in which one tone (CS+) was paired with a loud white-noise UCS and a second tone (CS-) was present