戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  were traded against a potential risk (i.e., loudness).
2 he airway for variation in sound quality and loudness.
3 ainty and honesty across pitch, duration and loudness.
4 , negatively correlated with improvements in loudness.
5 olute threshold corresponds to a fixed small loudness.
6 reshold corresponds to a fixed small partial loudness.
7 hanges, suggesting a perceptual dimension of loudness.
8 s attended to voice identity versus stimulus loudness.
9  had substantial beneficial effects on vocal loudness.
10 ong thought to be the primary determinate of loudness.
11 uring faster tempi, but not during increased loudness.
12 ition, and behaviorally desensitized mice to loudness.
13 l processing to account for the summation of loudness across ears.
14 ral function can be associated with abnormal loudness adaptation and the magnitude of the adaptation
15 sorder had abnormally increased magnitude of loudness adaptation to both low (250 Hz) and high (8000
16  tested when afebrile for (i) psychophysical loudness adaptation to comfortably-loud sustained tones;
17 cts with auditory nerve disorders had normal loudness adaptation to low frequency tones; all but one
18 ort-term modifications in perceived tinnitus loudness after acoustic stimulation (residual inhibition
19 man speech is positively correlated with the loudness (amplitude) of vocalization, ranging from appro
20                   It is usually assumed that loudness and intensity change detection operate upon the
21 though the relationship between sound source loudness and power is well known when source distance is
22  disinhibition motif contributes to flexible loudness and the duration and persistence of bouts, whic
23  tinnitus characteristics such as subjective loudness and the percent of time during which the tinnit
24 umeric rating scale (NRS) scores of tinnitus loudness and tinnitus perception.
25 able to reliably report perceived intensity (loudness), and discriminate fine intensity differences,
26 sound frequency (pitch) and sound intensity (loudness), and thus suggest a resolution to a long-stand
27               Beyond the basics of pitch and loudness, aspects, such as pattern, distance, velocity,
28 ese modifications led to a finite calculated loudness at absolute threshold, which made it possible t
29       Neither age, sex, CO(2) emissions, nor loudness (average dBA) were significant predictors of la
30  difference in both arrival time (phase) and loudness between the two ears.
31 ng tinnitus phenomena such as discrepancy in loudness between tinnitus rating and matching.
32 ng an electrically evoked MMN in response to loudness changes in CI users is generally feasible, and
33  a mainly preattentive response to pitch and loudness changes.
34       We offer an alternative explanation of loudness constancy based solely on a reverberant sound e
35                        Here we show a robust loudness constancy, similar in many ways to visual size
36 strumental soundtrack excerpts (e.g., tempo, loudness) contributed to mental imagery of movie scenes.
37  to a key role of neurons in this nucleus in loudness control.
38                                            A loudness cue originated from changing the stimulation am
39 significant eMMN responses were elicited for loudness cues and for pitch cues at basal electrode pair
40 xploratory study with 21 CI users, pitch and loudness cues were presented in controlled oddball parad
41 over a 12-dB range to reduce the salience of loudness cues.
42 less of whether it is defined by phase or by loudness cues.
43 nsity change detection may be predicted from loudness data and vice versa.
44 mations of the underlying neural signal from loudness data contradict estimations based on intensity
45 views the evolution of a series of models of loudness developed in Cambridge, UK.
46       Problems include understanding speech, loudness discomfort, and annoyance with background noise
47  are also involved in auditory detection and loudness discrimination.
48  and 6 features were coded, including visual loudness; drama and intrigue; lavish excess and wish ful
49  accurate distance estimates to judge source loudness, even when distance is variable.
50 g targets by pitch (Experiments 1A and 2) or loudness (Experiment 1B) while ignoring previously prese
51 ection (Experiment 1), and enhance perceived loudness (Experiment 2).
52 rformance in PAI, which we term the acoustic loudness factor (ALF).
53 attention-capture designs such as the visual loudness feature (2278 thumbnails [79.1%]), drama and in
54 rallel, versions of the model for predicting loudness for hearing-impaired ears have been developed a
55 beyed a compressive function paralleling the loudness function up to sound pressure levels of at leas
56 was to test this prediction by examining the loudness functions in tinnitus ears (n = 124) compared w
57 ion paralleling both the cochlear output and loudness functions.
58                               However, while loudness grows as intensity is increased, improvement in
59 tudies characterize hyperacusis as increased loudness growth over a wide-frequency range, decreased t
60 te return (i.e., not considering the risk of loudness), however, DSL m[i/o] prescribed more outright
61 ng ACtx hyperactivity, PVN hypofunction, and loudness hypersensitivity following a restricted noise-i
62 ase, attention to voice while ignoring sound loudness increased neural selectivity.
63                   Additionally, vocalization loudness is a critical factor in acoustic communication.
64        Music with computer-altered tempo and loudness is rendered on a reproducing piano to 40 middle
65              Furthermore, increased tinnitus loudness is represented by increased activity in the coc
66 in most real-world environments vocalization loudness is the main factor controlling respiratory part
67  view is that sound intensity (subjectively, loudness) is encoded in spike rates, whereas sound frequ
68 es, 95% central normalization, and a central loudness JND constant of 5.5x10(-5) sones per ms.
69 el, featuring central adaptation to the mean loudness level and operating on the detection of maximum
70                           Decreased tinnitus loudness level and TFI scores extended into the washout
71 oints were changes in TFI score and tinnitus loudness level from baseline through week 6 and week 12.
72                        Decreases in tinnitus loudness level were greater than 6 dB sensation level (S
73 nses to sound stimulation were measured with loudness-matched pure-tone stimuli (0.25-8 kHz).
74             Envelope compression (1:8 ratio, loudness-matched) was applied to one or both streams con
75               In this paper we use empirical loudness modeling to explore a perceptual sub-category o
76 ects that are used to increase the effective loudness of mate-attraction calls.
77  to give predictions of partial loudness-the loudness of one sound in the presence of another.
78 ation hypothesis suggests that the perceived loudness of self-generated sounds is attenuated to help
79 e explanations include (a) the idea that the loudness of sound depends on its frequency, (b) the freq
80   For example, humans naturally regulate the loudness of speech in accord with a visual estimate of r
81 ng from stimulus intensity, for example, the loudness of the utterance.
82 strate that males can dynamically adjust the loudness of their songs according to the distance to a f
83 , people were more accurate at comparing the loudness of two sounds when making one of the sounds the
84  music differently; and, (2) whether music's loudness or tempo drives these differences.
85 ting in sympathetic vibrations that increase loudness, or at different frequencies, resulting in audi
86 n PC circuits in word recognition (P =.002), loudness (P =.003), overall liking (P =.001), aversivene
87 ption, (b) intensity discrimination, and (c) loudness perception.
88 perating on the detection of maximum central-loudness rate of change, can account for the paradoxical
89 ing detection thresholds, dynamic range, and loudness recruitment).
90 isentangle hypersensitivity (hyperacusis) to loudness recruitment, tinnitus and non-tinnitus ears wer
91 earing aids to compensate for the effects of loudness recruitment.
92 an be characterised by monotony of pitch and loudness, reduced stress, variable rate, imprecise conso
93          Through our findings, we argue that loudness reflects peripheral neural coding, and the inte
94 pened ACtx hyperactivity and restored normal loudness sensitivity for 1 week.
95                     Psychophysical measures (loudness, sharpness, roughness, fluctuation strength and
96 he algebraic operations are used to describe loudness summation and suggest a mechanism for the criti
97 eech were moderately correlated with maximum loudness task (r = 0.538; 95% CI, 0.145-0.931).
98 .039) and moderately correlated with maximum loudness tasks (r = 0.524; 95% CI, 0.127-0.921).
99 honation, conversational speech, and maximum loudness tasks were obtained for 22 patients.
100 seems to depend more on the overall specific loudness than on the peripheral masking properties of th
101 ibration, nerve-fiber activity, or perceived loudness, the ear is most sensitive to small signals and
102 also modified to give predictions of partial loudness-the loudness of one sound in the presence of an
103 t they listened to playlists of 9 tempo- and loudness-transposed versions of 8 distinct pieces of Wes
104 The nature of the neural codes for pitch and loudness, two basic auditory attributes, has been a key
105 xed, relatively little is known about source loudness under conditions of varying distance.
106 ansfer function and to the way that specific loudness was calculated from excitation level.
107  auditory cortex is correlated with tinnitus loudness, we assessed resting-state source-localized EEG

 
Page Top