ライフサイエンスコーパス: low-carbohydrate diet

1 m glyceroneogenesis of from 17 to 50% on the low carbohydrate diet.

2 A1c levels improved more for persons on the low-carbohydrate diet.

3 mount of carbohydrates per day constitutes a low-carbohydrate diet.

4 ring adaptation to an isoenergetic high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet.

5 n the animals were placed on a high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet.

6 pant withdrew due to hypoglycemia during the low-carbohydrate diet.

7 (40% energy); and (4) a low-glycemic index, low-carbohydrate diet.

8 glycemic index diet, and least with the very low-carbohydrate diet.

9 01), and mood (P < 0.01) after the high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet.

10 effects on NAFLD, with special emphasis on a low-carbohydrate diet.

11 ches range from conventional low-fat to very-low-carbohydrate diets.

12 at diets compared with the currently popular low-carbohydrate diets.

13 ay contribute to the weight loss produced by low-carbohydrate diets.

14 tified 2609 potentially relevant articles of low-carbohydrate diets.

15 logical, nutritional and clinical aspects of low-carbohydrate diets.

16 m protein; moderate glycemic load), and very low-carbohydrate diet (10% from carbohydrate, 60% from f

17 14 taxonomic changes specific to the healthy low-carbohydrate diet, 12 taxonomic changes specific to

18 27 to -106] kcal/d), and least with the very low-carbohydrate diet (-138 [-198 to -77] kcal/d; overal

19 10 g polyfructans/d), or 3) soy foods with a low-carbohydrate diet (26% carbohydrate).

20 arbohydrate diet; (3) a high-glycemic index, low-carbohydrate diet (40% energy); and (4) a low-glycem

21 es, also improved more among subjects on the low-carbohydrate diet (6+/-9 percent vs. -3+/-8 percent,

22 inimally processed, animal-based, ketogenic, low-carbohydrate diet (75.8% fat, 10.0% carbohydrate) wi

23 the largest weight loss was associated with low-carbohydrate diets (8.73 kg [95% credible interval {

24 For low-carbohydrate diets, a public health approach has foc

25 mic control were still more favorable with a low-carbohydrate diet after adjustment for differences i

26 arbohydrate diet significantly outperforms a low-carbohydrate diet alone in adequately suppressing ca

27 tistically (0.04 mmol/L [1.6 mg/dL] with the low-carbohydrate diet and -0.19 mmol/L [-7.4 mg/dL] with

28 Data on the long-term association between low-carbohydrate diets and mortality are sparse.

29 states that include starvation, adherence to low carbohydrate diets, and the neonatal period.

30 r weight loss than participants' usual diet, low-carbohydrate diets, and other higher-fat dietary int

31 A low-GI diet, not a low-carbohydrate diet, appears to be beneficial in reduc

32 Derived from these outcomes, high-protein, low-carbohydrate diets are also being examined for treat

33 at and protein sources may influence whether low-carbohydrate diets are associated with type 2 diabet

34 These findings suggest that low-carbohydrate diets are at least as effective as low-

35 Low-carbohydrate diets are popular for weight loss, but

36 Thus, low-carbohydrate diets are predicted to reduce ad libitu

37 High-fat, low-carbohydrate diets are widely used for weight reduct

38 ngs indicate little support for the value of low-carbohydrate diets as therapies for insulin resistan

39 reduce calorie intake with either low-fat or low-carbohydrate diets as well as limit intakes of fruct

40 A low-carbohydrate diet based on animal sources was associ

41 that occurs during the shift to a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet by increasing energy expenditure o

42 fusion (by +535%, n=9) and a 5-day high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet (by +48%, n=14).

43 Weight loss with either low-fat or low-carbohydrate diets can improve IHTG; however, specif

44 imary diet contrast, the low-glycemic index, low-carbohydrate diet, compared with the high-glycemic i

45 of three high-fat (55.2% of total calories), low-carbohydrate diets containing isocaloric amounts of

46 Low-carbohydrate diets could be recommended to obese per

47 Ad libitum, low-carbohydrate diets decrease caloric intake and cause

48 Low-carbohydrate diets decrease hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) a

49 t because feeding mice a very high-fat, very low-carbohydrate diet did not affect cell proliferation.

50 with baseline, consumption of the high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet did not affect triacylglycerol con

51 overweight males consumed 9 d of a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet during which time they either unde

52 Low-carbohydrate diets, either animal-based (emphasizing

53 th participants on low-fat diets, persons on low-carbohydrate diets experienced a slightly but statis

54 After 5 d of an isoenergetic high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet, fasting DNL was measured in normo

55 lyceridemia had been kept under control by a low carbohydrate diet for 6 to 26 months, and on eight h

56 -fat and high-carbohydrate or a high-fat and low-carbohydrate diet for 10 wk.

57 ndomized to eat a healthy low-fat or healthy low-carbohydrate diet for 6 months then switched to the

58 The low-carbohydrate diet group had greater increases in hig

59 During the first 6 months, the low-carbohydrate diet group had greater reductions in di

60 After 3 months, participants in the low-carbohydrate diet group increased their carbohydrate

61 The low-carbohydrate diet group received dietary counseling.

62 At 24 weeks, weight loss was greater in the low-carbohydrate diet group than in the low-fat diet gro

63 A greater proportion of the low-carbohydrate diet group than the low-fat diet group

64 or adverse effects were more frequent in the low-carbohydrate diet group.

65 tissue acylglyceride glycerol in mice fed a low carbohydrate diet had significantly higher values of

66 rd diet, subjects who consumed the high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet had 44% higher plasma free fatty a

67 ients of the low-fat diet, recipients of the low-carbohydrate diet had greater decreases in serum tri

68 At 12 months, participants on the low-carbohydrate diet had greater decreases in weight (m

69 Subjects on the low-carbohydrate diet had lost more weight than subjects

70 Participants on a low-carbohydrate diet had more favorable overall outcome

71 Low-carbohydrate diets had no significant adverse effect

72 evation of circulating ketones via high-fat, low-carbohydrate diets has been used for the treatment o

73 impact on total and LDL cholesterol, whereas low carbohydrate diets have been shown to significantly

74 High-protein, low-carbohydrate diets have also been investigated for t

75 Low-carbohydrate diets have been advocated for weight lo

76 High-protein, low-carbohydrate diets have been found to have positive

77 Low-carbohydrate diets have been popularized without det

78 Low-carbohydrate diets have been reported to significant

79 While low-carbohydrate diets have been suggested to partially

80 Low-carbohydrate diets have been used to manage obesity

81 Recently, low-carbohydrate diets have regained popularity, with pr

82 high carbohydrate diet (LFD) and a high fat, low carbohydrate diet (HFD) fed ad libitum for 14 weeks.

83 n = 140) consumed for 4 wk each a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet (HFLC; 40% fat, 45% carbohydrate)

84 A score representing a low-carbohydrate diet high in animal protein and fat was

85 A low-carbohydrate diet, high in saturated fat, improved i

86 With the high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet, hyperinsulinemic obese subjects h

87 Patients were prepared with a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet in a period of 24 h before the exa

88 r-duration trials studying the efficacy of a low-carbohydrate diet in the treatment and prevention of

89 The use of low-carbohydrate diets in weight loss is an area of grea

90 Low-carbohydrate diet (initially, <20 g of carbohydrate

91 icipants [59%]) and randomized to either the low-carbohydrate diet intervention (75 participants) or

92 Participants were randomized to a low-carbohydrate diet intervention (target <40 net grams

93 Compared with the usual diet group, the low-carbohydrate diet intervention group had significant

94 y explain why low glycemic index or load and low-carbohydrate diet interventions have mixed weight lo

95 A low-carbohydrate diet is associated with favorable chang

96 High-fat, low-carbohydrate diets, known as ketogenic diets, have b

97 DL) cholesterol change with consumption of a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) is highly variable.

98 titude) influencing the decision to follow a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) or not in a sample of the UK

99 t their food preferences and 2 diet options (low-carbohydrate diet [LCD] or low-fat diet [LFD]) befor

100 Low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) have been vastly popular f

101 The associations of low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) with long-term weight mana

102 Very-low-calorie diets and low-carbohydrate diets lead to greater initial weight lo

103 For instance, starvation and low-carbohydrate diets lead to the accumulation of beta-

104 erns regarding high saturated fat content of low-carbohydrate diets limit widespread adoption.

105 studies demonstrate that subjects following low carbohydrate diets lose more weight over the first 3

106 who dropped out, showed that subjects on the low-carbohydrate diet lost more weight than those on the

107 of this study was to compare the effect of a low-carbohydrate diet (< or =20 g/d) with a high-carbohy

108 The effects of low-carbohydrate diets (</=45% of energy from carbohydra

109 Low carbohydrate diets may be effective in helping peopl

110 ggest that the higher fat content of typical low-carbohydrate diets may exacerbate insulin resistance

111 Low-carbohydrate diets may promote greater weight loss t

112 Potential therapies including low-carbohydrate diet, niaspan and incretins will be con

113 Studies demonstrating long-term effects of low-carbohydrate diets on cardiovascular events were war

114 However, evidence on the effects of low-carbohydrate diets on HbA1c among individuals with H

115 comprehensively examined the effects of very-low-carbohydrate diets on type 2 diabetes (T2D).

116 n obese adults randomly assigned to either a low-carbohydrate diet or a conventional weight loss diet

117 e (43 percent) to a carbohydrate-restricted (low-carbohydrate) diet or a calorie- and fat-restricted

118 genesis can be up-regulated in adipose (e.g. low carbohydrate diet) or down-regulated in liver (e.g.

119 strict carbohydrate intake to <30 g per day (low-carbohydrate diet) or to restrict caloric intake by

120 89 73 kcal d(-1) less energy intake than the low-carbohydrate diet over 2 weeks (P < 0.0001) and 544

121 weight lost (P<0.001) and assignment to the low-carbohydrate diet (P=0.01) were independent predicto

122 ke recommendations for or against the use of low-carbohydrate diets, particularly among participants

123 cutive scans per group): 6-h fast (group 1), low-carbohydrate diet plus 12-h fast (group 2), and low-

124 bohydrate diet plus 12-h fast (group 2), and low-carbohydrate diet plus 12-h fast plus intravenous he

125 The low-carbohydrate diet produced a greater weight loss (ab

126 Compared with a low-fat diet, a low-carbohydrate diet program had better participant ret

127 ntion of weight gain, and proponents of some low-carbohydrate diet regimens have suggested that the i

128 Low-carbohydrate diets remain popular despite a paucity

129 hese more favorable metabolic responses to a low-carbohydrate diet remained significant after adjustm

130 n of the SREBP transgene in the liver with a low carbohydrate diet resulted in a 3-fold increase in p

131 contrast, induction of TAg by feeding mice a low carbohydrate diet resulted in massive hepatomegaly t

132 mpared with the baseline diet, the high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet resulted in positive fat and prote

133 Both intralipid infusion and a low-carbohydrate diet resulted in reduced abdominal AD (

134 plasma free fatty acids by using a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet results in alterations in heart an

135 arbohydrate intake (P = 0.019) and, with the low-carbohydrate diet, SCD expression was inversely corr

136 ospectively examined the association between low-carbohydrate-diet score (based on percentage of ener

137 risk of ER- cancer and the vegetable-based, low-carbohydrate-diet score (corresponding relative risk

138 ctive was to examine the association between low-carbohydrate-diet score and risk of type 2 diabetes

139 The association between the low-carbohydrate-diet score and the risk of coronary hea

140 RR for the comparison of extreme deciles of low-carbohydrate-diet score based on total carbohydrate,

141 16; P for trend = 1.0), whereas the RR for a low-carbohydrate-diet score based on total carbohydrate,

142 sk comparing highest and lowest deciles of a low-carbohydrate-diet score on the basis of the percenta

143 comparing highest and lowest deciles of the low-carbohydrate-diet score was 0.94 (95% confidence int

144 es, in a comparison of the highest decile of low-carbohydrate-diet score with the lowest was 0.90 (95

145 m the questionnaire were used to calculate a low-carbohydrate-diet score, which was based on the perc

146 Cumulative averages of 3 low-carbohydrate diet scores (high total protein and fat

147 jective was to compare the associations of 3 low-carbohydrate diet scores with incident T2D.

148 , overall, animal-based, and vegetable-based low-carbohydrate-diet scores, and major plant food group

149 Those who wish to follow a low-carbohydrate diet should be encouraged to follow a n

150 Low-carbohydrate diets should obtain protein and fat fro

151 Low carbohydrate diets show short-term beneficial effect

152 ration before (18)F-FDG PET in addition to a low-carbohydrate diet significantly outperforms a low-ca

153 In mice, either very low-fat or low-carbohydrate diets significantly slow tumor growth i

154 lance effects on RQ erroneously suggest that low-carbohydrate diets substantially increase energy exp

155 ntrations were greater among subjects on the low-carbohydrate diet than among those on the convention

156 4.28 kg; P = 0.07) more on the high-fat and low-carbohydrate diet than on the low-fat and high-carbo

157 in cholesterol level increased more with the low-carbohydrate diet than with the low-fat diet.

158 ogenic diet is a high-fat, adequate protein, low carbohydrate diet that has been used for the treatme

159 The ketogenic diet (KD) is a high fat and low carbohydrate diet that produces ketone bodies throug

160 A ketogenic diet (KD) is a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet that leads to the generation of ke

161 ry interventions to reduce weight, including low-carbohydrate diets that are generally high in protei

162 higher sustained weight loss, whereas on the low-carbohydrate diet those with higher plasticity over

163 perfusion defects (PD), following a high-fat/low-carbohydrate diet to suppress normal myocardial gluc

164 For persons on the low-carbohydrate diet, triglyceride levels decreased mor

165 and 38 subjects who completed an 8-week very low carbohydrate diet (VLCD) intervention study.

166 ally more fat mass (change, -9.4 kg with the low-carbohydrate diet vs. -4.8 kg with the low-fat diet)

167 ean (+/-SD) weight change for persons on the low-carbohydrate diet was -5.1 +/- 8.7 kg compared with

168 The low-carbohydrate diet was associated with a greater impr

169 oth men and women, whereas a vegetable-based low-carbohydrate diet was associated with lower all-caus

170 The low-carbohydrate diet was more effective for weight loss

171 studies, participant weight loss while using low-carbohydrate diets was principally associated with d

172 tary inflammatory pattern, Western diet, and low-carbohydrate diet were associated with 24% (15%-33%)

173 tterns (alternate Mediterranean diet [aMED], low-carbohydrate diet, Western diet) and indices (plant-

174 oss can be achieved with either a low-fat or low-carbohydrate diet when coupled with behavioral treat

175 ed with the fat balance during the high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet, whereas f1.gif" BORDER="0">O(2)ma

176 A low-carbohydrate diet, which consisted of limited carboh

177 We compared 2 low-carbohydrate diets with 3 key similarities (incorpor