ライフサイエンスコーパス: lower limit of

1 riority (ie, meeting the prespecified 90% CI lower limit of 0.8) was then confirmed in stage 2, with

2 ntramolecular CH-pi interactions, provides a lower limit of 0.95 kcal/mol for each aryl CH-fullerene

3 Yeast eccDNAs ranged from an arbitrary lower limit of 1 kb up to 38 kb and covered 23% of the g

4 ~50 cells for statistical reasons, but at a lower limit of 1 receptor- and 1 reference-cell, specifi

5 s, respectively (absolute difference, -1.6%; lower limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval, -10.7%;

6 part-time patching group (difference, 5.4%; lower limit of 1-sided exact 95% confidence interval, 2.

7 orders of magnitude, from ~10(8) cm(-2) to a lower-limit of ~10(4) cm(-2) for 1.5 um thick Ge layer.

8 tion of cholesterol concentration provided a lower limit of 100 mM for their dissociation constant.

9 The lower limit of (13)C NMR detection under our experimenta

10 odium should be limited to 2300 mg/d, with a lower limit of 1500 mg/d for adults aged >50 y, non-Hisp

11 We reinvestigated the proposed lower limit of 2 microm for the diameters of neuronal so

12 A lower limit of ~300 s(-1) per cobalt atom for the cataly

13 A conservative estimate places a lower limit of 345 +/- 70 PgC year(-1) on the cycling fl

14 g variation from sample to sample, and has a lower-limit of 84 MW m(-2)K(-1), taking into considerati

15 1.7% in controls (absolute difference -0.6%; lower limit of 95% confidence interval [CI]: -9.3%; p =

16 from 2.0 to 7.0 log(10) copies/ml and had a lower limit of 95% detection of 57 copies/ml.

17 1.0 to 7.0 log10 cDNA equivalents/mul and a lower limit of 95% detection ranging from 1.7 to 7.6 cDN

18 ive slope that was more negative than the 5% lower limit of aging), 18% simulated normal eyes were st

19 investigated to obtain high sensitivity and lower limits of analyte detection (LoD).

20 optimal arterial blood pressure (ABPopt) and lower limit of autoregulation (LLA).

21 ns of mean arterial blood pressure below the lower limit of autoregulation (relative risk 1.02; 95% c

22 An identifiable lower limit of autoregulation was ascertained in 348 pat

23 en mean arterial blood pressure is below the lower limit of autoregulation, cerebral oximetry index a

24 the block co-oligomers, useful to study the lower limits of block copolymer phase segregation in det

25 n cerebral saturation >15%) and explored the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation at patient and po

26 The lower limit of cerebral autoregulation varied substantia

27 ormly without excess of saliva describes the lower limit of chewing frequency, scaling approximately

28 cessful quantitative analysis, which has its lower limit of chromatographic resolution Rs at some min

29 for high coherence) and random networks (the lower limit of coherence).

30 ng via SERS is used for greater accuracy and lower limit of detection (0.1 ppb) for quantitative dete

31 a wide range of concentration detection, and lower limit of detection (0.186 microM) than NiO nanoshe

32 a wide linear response range (7.5-300 muM); lower limit of detection (0.66 muM), excellent limit of

33 The lower limit of detection (1.2 ng/L) as well as cutoff co

34 wer platform achieved approximately the same lower limit of detection (1.25x10(-2) pg of C. difficile

35 d not oriented) were compared highlighting a lower limit of detection (5pg/ml) for the not oriented i

36 pg mL(-1)), reproducibility (R(2)=0.96), and lower limit of detection (98 pg/mL) first in purified sa

37 owever, tumor growth data are limited by the lower limit of detection (i.e., a measurable lesion) and

38 g parameter with analyte concentration), and lower limit of detection (i.e., minimum detectable conce

39 The 95% lower limit of detection (LLOD) for Aptima HCV on dried

40 The protein and peptide assay showed a lower limit of detection (LLOD) of 200 fM and 460 fM res

41 Our results show that the lower limit of detection (LLOD) of the colorimetric and

42 ntitative measurements, and sensitivity with lower limit of detection (LLOD) values of 7.2 pM (=90 pg

43 emonstrated excellent reproducibility at the lower limit of detection (LLOD).

44 inear from 50 to 1.2 x 10(4) cells/mL with a lower limit of detection (LLOQ) of 50 cells/mL.

45 her assay sensitivity and at least a 10-fold lower limit of detection (LOD) as compared to hydrated p

46 The lower limit of detection (LOD) for LPS was found to be 0

47 The lower limit of detection (LOD) measures the potential of

48 showed a response from 0.1 to 1000 ng/mL and lower limit of detection (LOD) of 0.03 ng/mL of CysC, wi

49 In this study, we determined the lower limit of detection (LOD) of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF

50 ns owing to better detection sensitivity and lower limit of detection (LOD) than colorimetric detecti

51 e PA immunoassay provided approximately 143x lower limit of detection (LOD) than observed with the go

52 three standards for quantitative linearity, lower limit of detection (LOD), and accuracy.

53 e signal, similar or better reproducibility, lower limit of detection (LOD), and the possibility of w

54 the sample but at a concentration below the lower limit of detection (LOD), or is present in the sam

55 earity, lower limit of quantification (LOQ), lower limit of detection (LOD), precision, accuracy, rec

56 rsive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was below the lower limit of detection (LOD).

57 ion of the membrane components resulted in a lower limit of detection (~1.6 microM) than previous rep

58 d BP biosensor showed both high sensitivity (lower limit of detection 10ng/ml) and selectivity toward

59 ad in semen was undetectable in both plasma (lower limit of detection [LLD] <12 copies per mL) and ce

60 el dengue immunoassay, we observed a 15-fold lower limit of detection and 4-fold higher fluorescence

61 Patients with total IgA levels below the lower limit of detection and IgG against tissue transglu

62 dence-filtering automatically determined the lower limit of detection based on the strength of the Pp

63 ument demonstrated an approximately 100-fold lower limit of detection compared to current automated m

64 1% (w/w), or 50 ng, OSCS in heparin and the lower limit of detection estimated at approximately 0.20

65 exchange extraction process, we improved the lower limit of detection for most of the apelin peptides

66 ed if they had 2 or more VLs measured with a lower limit of detection of <=50 copies/mL.

67 The AIF method achieved a lower limit of detection of 0.85 ng muL(-1) and a lower

68 This beacon yielded a lower limit of detection of 1 ng/mL in buffer using a sp

69 linear response range of 0.005-50 nM, and a lower limit of detection of 1.9 pM (S/N = 3), with a hig

70 m 6 countries across 5 continents, showing a lower limit of detection of 10 genomic copies per reacti

71 an detect glucose from 10 muM to 9 mM with a lower limit of detection of 10 muM.

72 " to a fluorescent detector molecule, with a lower limit of detection of 10(-7) M in unprocessed plas

73 Defining a lower limit of detection of 1000 copies/ml when includin

74 The sensors were found to have a lower limit of detection of 368 nM hydrogen peroxide.

75 assay exhibited a linearity of 7 logs with a lower limit of detection of 6.0 x 10(2) copies of molecu

76 The median lower limit of detection of all peptides was 71.5 amol/m

77 The lower limit of detection of both assays for all targets

78 The lower limit of detection of the assays was equal to the

79 sing performance in terms of sensitivity and lower limit of detection of the MOSPR biosensor with res

80 The sequential format had a 4- to 10-fold lower limit of detection than the premix format, dependi

81 The lower limit of detection was 1 mug/L (130 pmol/L).

82 The lower limit of detection was 10(3) CFU/mL.

83 The lower limit of detection was 10(3) genome copies per sam

84 m 2(-1) to 2(4) HAU/50 mul was found and the lower limit of detection was 2(-1) HAU/50 mul.

85 The lower limit of detection was 30pM Substance P (SP, 2pg/5

86 The lower limit of detection was 40 genomes/PCR; the sensiti

87 The lower limit of detection was 64 parasites/ml.

88 Using serial dilutions, the lower limit of detection was determined to be 1 CFU/mul.

89 The lower limit of detection was further improved from 0.4 t

90 dition, freebase guanidination allowed for a lower limit of detection when combined with another deri

91 d BP biosensor showed both high sensitivity (lower limit of detection ~10ng/ml) and selectivity towar

92 ignificant increase in sensitivity (that is, lower limit of detection).

93 Plasma viremia (lower limit of detection, <2 copies/mL), T-cell activati

94 This way, a higher sensitivity and lower limit of detection, compared to those of conventio

95 Taking into account the lower limit of detection, the fluorescence sensing repor

96 With a 700 zmol (420 000 copies) lower limit of detection, this trace-sensitive technolog

97 The low-coverage sensor has a lower limit of detection, wider optimal AC frequency ran

98 o give faster detection and in practice also lower limit of detection.

99 eted (discovery) proteomics with ca. 25 amol lower limit of detection.

100 d by a factor of ~2, which is coupled with a lower limit of detection.

101 most analytical techniques is to reduce the lower limit of detection; however, it is sometimes neces

102 anded dynamic ranges (0.09-136.56 ng L(-1)), lower limits of detection (0.007 +/- 0.001 ng L(-1)), an

103 and cyclic voltammetry transduction, showing lower limits of detection (0.24 ng mL(-1), S/N = 3) for

104 Lower limits of detection (2-20 ng/mL) were obtained usi

105 The lower limits of detection (at 1% quenching) vary with th

106 The lower limits of detection (LLD) were 9, 43, and 10 copie

107 mpared with 4,4'-o-BBV, 2-fold reductions in lower limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ)

108 al-to-noise ratio was improved, resulting in lower limits of detection and improved identification at

109 thus revealing that enhanced sensitivity and lower limits of detection are achieved with polar protic

110 The assay lower limits of detection for HRP2, pan LDH, P. vivax LD

111 Lower limits of detection may be further achieved if the

112 ted high sensitivity and applicability, with lower limits of detection of 12CFUmL(-1) in broth sample

113 s compared to the antibody based assay, with lower limits of detection of 3.54 x 10(7) and 1.34 x 10(

114 ve detection of different NS1 serotypes with lower limits of detection within the clinically relevant

115 -intensive and offers higher sensitivity and lower limits of detection would find great significance

116 The advantages of faster scan rates, lower limits of detection, and synchronous precursor sel

117 pound, Raman spectroscopy is shown to have a lower limit-of-detection and less day-to-day variability

118 mination of micromolar H(2)O(2) in milk, the lower limit of determination was 0.1 muM, and the recove

119 The lower limit of differentiation and detection were 0.1% (

120 cortical electric fields reach 0.8 V/m, the lower limit of effectiveness in animal studies.

121 From these data, we find a lower limit of [Formula: see text]% of the carbon atoms

122 ur purpose was to define a clinically useful lower limit of injected dose for (68)Ga-prostate-specifi

123 sal curve under shifting and rescaling and a lower limit of intrinsic noise for any mean expression l

124 nly E(0), Ru, and CDL being quantified and a lower limit of k(0) being reported; e.g., k(0) >/= 9 cm

125 h odds ratios for FEV1 and FVC less than the lower limit of normal (LLN) (defined as a z-score < -1.6

126 tipinhole SPECT/CT system and determined the lower limit of normal (LLN) SPECT-derived HMR and the co

127 1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) under the lower limit of normal (LLN), excluding individuals with

128 io (H/M; either in relation to the estimated lower limit of normal [1.60] or as a continuous variable

129 and Quanjer reference equation (FEV(1)/FVC < lower limit of normal [LLN]), and categorized by severit

130 onchodilation FEV1/FVC ratio of at least the lower limit of normal and FVC of <80% predicted) using m

131 d thresholds (0.75 to 0.65) or less than the lower limit of normal as defined by Global Lung Initiati

132 ion fraction dropped below the institutional lower limit of normal at week 12 in one (0.8%) of 130 pa

133 consistent in models of COPD defined as per lower limit of normal criteria.

134 Reaction time and K values were below the lower limit of normal in 43.8% of the population consist

135 COPD was defined as FEV(1)/FVC less than the lower limit of normal in individuals under 50 years of a

136 rmed after adjustments using the mean and 5% lower limit of normal rates of aging, respectively.

137 ricans had substantially lower predicted and lower limit of normal values for FVC and FEV1 than those

138 s may provide more appropriate predicted and lower limit of normal values, enabling more accurate dia

139 creases in hemoglobin level to less than the lower limit of normal were more frequent in group 1 (42.

140 ) subjects had a CD4 count </=441 cells/muL (lower limit of normal) and 11 (55%) had a CD4 count less

141 ) subjects had a CD8 count </=125 cells/muL (lower limit of normal).

142 ity (FVC) of less than 70% and less than the lower limit of normal, and FEV1 of less than 80% of the

143 FEV(1)/forced vital capacity ratio below the lower limit of normal, asthma as wheeze or medication us

144 Patients also had calcium at the lower limit of normal, high alkaline phosphatase, and hi

145 r VWF ristocetin cofactor activity below the lower limit of normal, whereas 36% had normal VWF levels

146 d disease status; cases had FEV(1) less than lower limit of normal, whereas control subjects had FEV(

147 We defined COPD as FEV1:FVC less than the lower limit of normal.

148 normal to as much as a factor of 3 below the lower limit of normal.

149 subjects had FEV(1) greater than or equal to lower limit of normal.

150 a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC less than the lower limit of normal.

151 erence equations for the predicted value and lower limit of normal.

152 ronchodilator spirometric (FEV1 /FVC) ratio <lower limit of normal.

153 (FEV(1)/FVC) both less than their respective lower limits of normal as determined by published refere

154 d 2.5 were calculated to establish upper and lower limits of normal.

155 Reference values (lower limits of normality) were as follows: 6-segment RV

156 ses were not accounted for, thereby posing a lower limit of particle sizes and limiting the accuracy

157 ven by this concept, this study examines the lower limit of perimetric sensitivity for reliable testi

158 Failure to defend the lower limit of plasma triglyceride levels was associated

159 correlation between the growth mode and the lower limit of precursor ions in the steady state of a s

160 te than surface diffusion by controlling the lower limit of precursor ions in the steady state.

161 The quantitative exploration of the lower limits of Pt cocatalyst loading reported here, and

162 All patients achieved HCV RNA below lower limit of quantification (<12 IU/mL) by end of trea

163 the aqueous VEGF concentrations to below the lower limit of quantification (<4 pg/mL) in all patients

164 dictive value (NPV) of HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantification (<LLOQ) at EOT for SVR12 w

165 ction and decision limit (0.008-0.070mg/kg), lower limit of quantification (0.02-0.2mg/kg), detection

166 ts with HCV RNA concentrations less than the lower limit of quantification (COBAS TaqMan HCV test, ve

167 py (SVR12), defined as HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantification (either target detected un

168 Recovery, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and imprecision wer

169 rm 2 with vRVR, defined as HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) from treatment week

170 Target DNA could be detected with the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 nM with a re

171 half-life (t(1/2app)) and estimated time to lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of long-acting inje

172 herent optimal hybridization conditions, the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was obtained as 148

173 ortion of participants with a GTVL below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) at week 48 (90%) and

174 istent viremia on ART is generally below the lower limit of quantification (LOQ) of current FDA-clear

175 The lower limit of quantification (LOQ) of MC-LR by SERS on

176 The selectivity, linearity, lower limit of quantification (LOQ), lower limit of dete

177 pray-MS method was employed to achieve a low lower limit of quantification (LOQ).

178 rimary endpoint was HCV viral load below the lower limit of quantification 12 weeks after completion

179 the aqueous humor were suppressed below the lower limit of quantification after intravitreal afliber

180 achieve titres equal to or greater than the lower limit of quantification at months 6 (57% [n=93/163

181 end point was SVR12 (HCV RNA level below the lower limit of quantification at posttreatment week 12).

182 y-three percent had HCV RNA levels below the lower limit of quantification at week 4.

183 inical matrices, (ii) assay sensitivity with lower limit of quantification goal of single-digit ng/ml

184 n CSF that accounted for censoring below the lower limit of quantification had similar findings, alth

185 itative gelatin species determination with a lower limit of quantification of 0.05%.

186 quantification over a 5 log(10) range with a lower limit of quantification of 0.1 picomoles.

187 rity over a range of 0.65-821 mBq/mL, with a lower limit of quantification of 0.65 mBq/mL (correspond

188 The assay had a lower limit of quantification of 0.8 ng/mL and a linear

189 -phase extraction from plasma, resulted in a lower limit of quantification of 10 pg/mL, while introdu

190 The LAM-ELISA had a lower limit of quantification of 15 pg/mL LAM, correspon

191 d EMA guidelines for assay validation with a lower limit of quantification of 2.5 ng/mL for the ERAs,

192 limit of detection of 0.85 ng muL(-1) and a lower limit of quantification of 2.54 ng muL(-1).

193 The final method has a lower limit of quantification of 20 ng/mL (ca. 350 pM) a

194 The lower limit of quantification of the HIV RNA assays was

195 IV RNA concentration in CSF greater than the lower limit of quantification over time included increas

196 ive hSBA titres equal to or greater than the lower limit of quantification to each test strain, compa

197 mean duration of VEGF suppression below the lower limit of quantification was >71 +/- 18 days.

198 The lower limit of quantification was 10 ng/mL.

199 he VEGF concentration recovered to above the lower limit of quantification was 55 days in 1 patient a

200 The lower limit of quantification was 94 and 90 amol for dG-

201 44, hSBA titres equal to or greater than the lower limit of quantification were shown in 37% (n=18/49

202 ), while C3-epi-25(OH)D3 (above versus below lower limit of quantification) was positively associated

203 RNA concentrations lower than 43 IU/mL (the lower limit of quantification).

204 mputed measures include; limit of detection, lower limit of quantification, linearity, carry-over, pa

205 stem was validated by testing the linearity (lower limit of quantification, LLOQ, 0.25-10 nM and uppe

206 tablished, with a Hct range of 0.19 to 0.63 (lower limit of quantification, LLOQ, to upper limit of q

207 t of variation (CV) was less than 15% at the lower limit of quantification.

208 41 patients had levels of HBV DNA below the lower limit of quantification.

209 ge RBT estimates often fell below the marker lower limit of quantification.

210 (11.6%) CSF specimens were greater than the lower limit of quantification.

211 dy spiked into monkey and human serum, where lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) of 0.78 and 1.56 n

212 with variable limits of detection (LOD) and lower limits of quantification (LLOQ).

213 The lower limits of quantification (LLOQs) for these analyte

214 re of the single-molecule regime to achieved lower limits of quantification (LOQ).

215 n of DHEA, E2, and T with 10, 10, and 5 fmol lower limits of quantification and linear ranges to 1 pm

216 The lower limits of quantification for E2, T, and DHT were 0

217 Lower limits of quantification were determined at or clo

218 us week, PrEP drugs were detected (above the lower limits of quantification) more frequently in women

219 Plasma JDTic levels were below the lower limit of quantitation (0.1 nM) in all subjects.

220 ad an AR-13503 concentration higher than the lower limit of quantitation (0.11 ng/mL).

221 ho had an hSBA titer at least as high as the lower limit of quantitation (1:8 or 1:16) for all 4 stra

222 tients (10 mg/kg) achieved HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantitation (25 IU/mL), one of whom (a p

223 tected HCV RNA level that is below the assay lower limit of quantitation (detectable/BLOQ) is compara

224 Extraction recovery was >/=87.9% at both the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) and the upper limit o

225 A lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) at 0.2 ng/mL with 50

226 The LC-MS/MS assay showed lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) at 5 mug/mL for mAb-A

227 testosterone in human serum (200 muL) with a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 1 pg/mL (3.47 pmol

228 2 pM (=90 pg/mL) and 4.5 pM (=210 pg/mL) and lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) values of 24 pM (=300

229 tiple-reaction-monitoring (MRM) mode, with a lower limit of quantitation at 1.00 nM.

230 se at 12 weeks (SVR12; HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation at 12 weeks after the end of

231 asma AR-13324 concentrations higher than the lower limit of quantitation at any time point in any sub

232 Most measurements in 2010 were less than the lower limit of quantitation for PFBS, PFPeA, PFHxA, and

233 d to the NBOMe concentration with an average lower limit of quantitation of 0.01 mg/mL for both of th

234 The assay is sensitive (lower limit of quantitation of 0.05 microM), selective,

235 d cynomolgus monkey serum and tissues with a lower limit of quantitation of 0.78 pg/mL based on the i

236 nd accuracy (97-118%) for all analytes and a lower limit of quantitation of 1 pg injected onto the co

237 parated peptides than SS-AMS, resulting in a lower limit of quantitation of 50 zmol (14)C/peak.

238 The method had a lower limit of quantitation of 7.5 pg/mL and was linear

239 toxin levels estimated to be higher than the lower limit of quantitation of the assay (4 EU/mL) throu

240 s/ml (HHV-6) to 191 copies/ml (BKV), and the lower limit of quantitation ranged from 442 internationa

241 ntage of patients with viral loads below the lower limit of quantitation rose from 29% in 1999 to 72%

242 12 eyes (58%) had ketorolac levels above the lower limit of quantitation.

243 The lower limits of quantitation were 3.8 and 2.7 mg/L for k

244 asensitive p24 assay (Simoa; Quanterix) with lower limits of quantitation.

245 We now aim to establish the lower limit of radioactivity that can be administered to

246 e with cerebral perfusion pressure less than lower limit of reactivity was associated with unfavorabl

247 essure below (%cerebral perfusion pressure < lower limit of reactivity), above (%cerebral perfusion p

248 e (odds ratio %cerebral perfusion pressure < lower limit of reactivity, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; p <

249 The lower limit of reliable quantification of the assay was

250 Therefore, the lower limit of sensitivity for the substrate is limited

251 l, whereas others continue growing until the lower limit of soil-available water.

252 We determined the imaging sensitivity (lower limit of T cell detection) of each reporter using

253 erior to PEP after pertussis exposure if the lower limit of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval (CI)

254 The lower limit of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval was -

255 p (absolute risk difference 15.9%, one-sided lower limit of the 95% CI -2.1%; p(non-inferiority)=0.00

256 n (absolute risk difference 17.8%, one-sided lower limit of the 95% CI 0.4%; p(non-inferiority)=0.005

257 of solithromycin was to be concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI for the between-group differen

258 Noninferiority was defined as the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference in success

259 95% CI = -0.41 to 0.43): i.e., less than the lower limit of the 95% CI of -0.5 days predetermined to

260 eved, superiority was to be concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI was greater than 0%.

261 Noninferiority was defined by the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the d

262 Noninferiority of WC2031 was inferred if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the d

263 Noninferiority required the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the d

264 Noninferiority was to be declared if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) on the d

265 ia (HGG) was defined as IgG levels below the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for age.

266 Noninferiority was considered met if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for between-g

267 Noninferiority would be shown if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the betwe

268 ference, -0.17 hours per 24 hours; one-sided lower limit of the 95% confidence interval, -0.45 hours;

269 values for both the effect estimate and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval.

270 the end of therapy (SVR12) (based on a -11% lower limit of the 95% lower confidence interval for the

271 fficacy were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96.2% CI around the point estimate wa

272 s, data were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96.2% CI was greater than 0%.

273 The lower limit of the 97.5% CI was above the prespecified n

274 Within each age stratum, the lower limit of the 98.3% confidence interval for the day

275 ntage points (95% CI, -9.6 to 6.5), thus the lower limit of the CI exceeds the noninferiority margin

276 Noninferiority of EGP-437 was defined if the lower limit of the confidence interval (CI) for the diff

277 gh this mechanism is ill constrained, as the lower limit of the electron energy distribution, or low-

278 This lower limit, parametrized by the lower limit of the electron momentum - pmin - is critica

279 (123/123) with a GCK mutation were above the lower limit of the HbA1c age-appropriate reference range

280 repancies arise for metabolites far from the lower limit of the mass scan range, due to the weaker co

281 ime (GMRT) of total lymphocyte counts to the lower limit of the normal range (LLN; >/=1.0x10(9) cells

282 metry (FEV1:FVC >/=0.70 and an FVC above the lower limit of the normal range after bronchodilator use

283 Cone density was reduced to 70% of the lower limit of the normal range at the foveal center (78

284 r more, and had NCC concentrations above the lower limit of the normal reference range (>/=0.8 mumol/

285 The lower limit of the one-sided 90% CI for RR was 31.2%.

286 hich is retained at a significantly extended lower limit of the operation window from conventional 0

287 number of available sites on the seed if the lower limit of the steady state is below a critical valu

288 rity of ceftaroline fosamil was defined as a lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference i

289 e non-inferior to that of active yaws if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference i

290 Non-inferiority was concluded if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the treatment di

291 CT-P13 was non-inferior to infliximab if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the treatment di

292 between the two groups and was shown if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI was greater than -12

293 eriod; noninferiority was established if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was

294 eriod; noninferiority was established if the lower limit of the two-sided 97.5% confidence interval w

295 The upper and lower limits of the curve are the k of biofilm-free medi

296 inal segmentation schemes in which upper and lower limits of the heart were determined from CT and th

297 otyledons, whereas YABBY seemed to be at the lower limit of their sensitivity.

298 We hypothesized that targeting the lower limit of this range would improve outcomes in pati

299 able low moduli from 1 to 100 kPa, below the lower limit of traditional elastomers; moreover, the sol

300 he full coalescence, however, constrains the lower limit of volume delivery because reproducible drop