戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 on a learned internal model to prospectively make decisions.
2 ctivity data to better understand how people make decisions.
3 y which neurons coordinate their activity to make decisions.
4 ation we receive and how we form beliefs and make decisions.
5 ntion and in the gathering of information to make decisions.
6 ans and machines to classify information and make decisions.
7 ion is chosen and ultimately how all animals make decisions.
8 tures are combined in intermediate layers to make decisions.
9      Animals rely on learned associations to make decisions.
10 s into the dorsal striatum when participants made a decision.
11 ow exactly subjective values are compared to make a decision.
12 uietly but in another way if one is asked to make a decision.
13  for each option and compare those values to make a decision.
14 ing the amount of sensory evidence needed to make a decision.
15 red for a fast point-of care information and making decisions.
16      Humans employ different strategies when making decisions.
17  benefits and harms across these events when making decisions.
18 e relationship between energy and water when making decisions.
19 nd other animals use multiple strategies for making decisions.
20 how much evidence subjects accumulate before making a decision.
21 ess on the motives that drive individuals to make these decisions.
22 on capabilities that typically allow them to make better decisions.
23 tionalizations allow us to reason better and make better decisions.
24  relative levels of BMP and WNT signaling in making fate decisions.
25 ateral prefrontal cortex and precuneus while making hard decisions.
26 invisible temperature patterns on flowers to make foraging decisions.
27 ormation from surrounding electric fields to make foraging decisions.
28 g environmental managers and policymakers to make informed decisions.
29 te illness understanding enables patients to make informed decisions.
30        We find that in most cases C. elegans make rational decisions.
31 a given input, whereas imprecise judges will make different decisions.
32 he frequency of return visits and, possibly, make treatment decisions.
33 e course of clinical care for the purpose of making therapy decisions.
34 vide a decision tree for researchers to help make monitoring decisions.
35 approaches to explore how rodents and humans make perceptual decisions.
36 sened and gives policymakers better data for making informed decisions.
37 eproductive health services and empowered to make independent decisions.
38  efficient, and well-received by faculty for making selection decisions.
39 90%) and past experiences of care (71%) when making treatment decisions.
40 erience of receiving care over outcomes when making treatment decisions.
41  directionally moving prey perceive risk and make antipredator decisions.
42  processes, suggesting a hippocampal role in making consistent decisions.
43 ered to be a reliable source of evidence for making healthcare decisions.
44  ethnicity should be taken into account when making management decisions.
45 ltaneously from recent stimulus history when making perceptual decisions.
46 ces networks that enable living organisms to make sophisticated decisions.
47 t into unchartered waters and forced them to make unprecedented decisions.
48 or cortex (PMd) is thought to be involved in making somatomotor decisions.
49 t importantly, is necessary as the basis for making therapeutic decisions.
50 eir practice when advising women with HIV in making reproductive decisions.
51 grate information from all these outcomes to make decisions?
52        and (5) Who are the stakeholders that make the decision?
53  behaviours from directing attention(1-4) to making complex decisions(5).
54 pectancy violation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT To make good decisions, a person must observe the environme
55 in a morph categorisation task, participants made binary decisions about faces drawn from a morph con
56 tentials in hungry human subjects while they made decisions about expending physical effort for appet
57                In this study, human subjects made decisions about the orientation of grating stimuli
58 hen subjects evaluated artificial agents and made decisions about them.
59 rea V5/MT while two monkeys (Macaca mulatta) made perceptual decisions about the rotation direction o
60  when humans evaluated artificial agents and made personal decisions about them.
61 the two Senders and uses an EEG interface to make a decision about either turning the block or keepin
62  a product if a QRA process had been used to make a decision about whether to include 'may contain'.
63 Patients expressed trust in their surgeon to make decisions about additional treatments if a serious
64 and speak to broader questions of how humans make decisions about how to behave.
65 als to build models of their environment and make decisions about how to govern resources.
66 eed for greater understanding of how centers make decisions about organs offered to wait-listed patie
67 tions of success in one's future behavior or make decisions about strategies to solve future problems
68                                    Companies make decisions about the safety of some food contact che
69 tial to facilitate risk stratification, help make decisions about when to use imaging, and inform sta
70 , including denial of adolescents' rights to make decisions about whether, when, and with whom to hav
71 , patients and clinicians frequently have to make decisions about which there is uncertainty.
72 complex, chronic illness management and must make difficult decisions about their own health, particu
73 al study can help researchers and publishers make informed decisions about how to incorporate preprin
74 to help clinicians, patients, and the public make informed decisions about statin therapy for the pre
75 Accurate food labelling enables consumers to make informed decisions about the food they buy.
76 , as well as how prevalent it is so they can make informed decisions about treatment.
77               We asked human participants to make perceptual decisions about the net direction of dyn
78 oundation for modern understanding of how we make perceptual decisions about what we see or where to
79 hologies and use justification essentials to make their decisions about the selection of the appropri
80              Detecting deficits are vital in making a decision about the treatment plan as it can per
81 iable evidence that can serve as a basis for making decisions about clinical or population-health int
82  the preparation of patients with cancer for making decisions about clinical trial enrollment.
83 nding the printing practices, as well as for making decisions about display, conservation, and preser
84 ia (AUC) assist health care professionals in making decisions about procedures and diagnostic testing
85   These results can serve as a benchmark for making decisions about study design for rare variant ana
86 oring, and updating cues that predict it, to making decisions about the optimal course of action.
87       Our findings may be of importance when making decisions about treatment and evaluating potentia
88 ween ESRD patients and their clinicians when making decisions about treatment options.
89 is and regeneration and thus are continually making decisions about whether to remain quiescent, prol
90 mportant parameter to take into account when making decisions about which action to undertake and how
91 tal cortex plays a key role in inferring and making explicit decisions about the causal structure tha
92 consider this potential benefit of RYGB when making informed decisions about obesity treatments.
93 oaccumulation provide useful information for making informed decisions about the bioavailability of H
94 tion, this study can assist policy makers in making informed decisions about the speed and scope of g
95                While it is clear that people make decisions according to rules, intuitions and habits
96 ing proteins to process this information and make decisions accordingly.
97 ironment where it is not legally possible to make decisions against patient or surrogate wishes.
98         These data should be considered when making treatment decisions, alongside existing evidence
99 ies on the output of later cortical areas to make decisions, although neurons in earlier areas can pr
100 sting and how genetic information is used to make treatment decisions among women who test positive v
101 tion of the processes by which anxious youth make avoidant decisions and how these choices are reinfo
102 efits of this method for helping individuals make better decisions and the potential pitfalls related
103                                           To make educated decisions and design new combination treat
104 required to allow clinicians and patients to make informed decisions and optimize dental implant trea
105 te intensive research on (a) how individuals make social decisions and (b) how social structure shape
106 rmine 1) what it means for family members to make the decision and to take responsibility, 2) how the
107 tality prediction models can help clinicians make treatment decisions and researchers conduct observa
108 ect the underlying computations required for making decisions and preparing actions.
109 a timely and precise manner is important for making treatment decisions and informing public health p
110  ('a', amount of evidence accumulated before making a decision) and drift rate ('v', information proc
111 e humans rely on most to navigate the world, make decisions, and perform complex tasks.
112 mber of gaps between making a prediction and making a decision, and underlying assumptions need to be
113 ng pieces of information against each other, making decisions, and helping the animal respond to unex
114 y would incorporate patient preferences when making treatment decisions, and outline options for pati
115 to the decision, and active participation in making the decision; and (3) better patient and health s
116                                           To make appropriate decisions, animals need to accumulate s
117 ed to be combined, requiring the approach to make arbitrary decisions at substep levels of data analy
118 lem with assuming that experimental subjects make their decisions at the same prescribed time.
119 r findings suggest that individual lions are making social decisions at both the subgroup level and t
120 eas: (a) trainee confidence and knowledge to make career decisions, (b) influence of this added activ
121                            Gazelle and zebra made decisions based on current light levels and lunar p
122            By contrast, control participants made moral decisions based on the integration of an adve
123 allmark of human cognition is the ability to make adaptive decisions based on information garnered fr
124      Model-free learning enables an agent to make better decisions based on prior experience while re
125 -19 is a new disease that has required us to make complex decisions based on scant evidence, the pand
126                Overall, the bees' ability to make decisions based on both personally acquired and soc
127 nsduction networks allow eukaryotic cells to make decisions based on information about intracellular
128 avioral economic theory suggests that people make decisions based on maximizing perceived value; howe
129 on function allows the model-based system to make decisions based on projected future states, while t
130                       Prey evaluate risk and make decisions based on the balance between the costs of
131 e-based decision-making tasks is that agents make decisions based on the feature dimension that rewar
132                                 Humans often make decisions based on uncertain sensory information.
133 d researchers are increasingly interested in making conservation decisions based on scientific eviden
134                                              Making decisions based on choice-outcome history is a cr
135    Organisms face the cognitive challenge of making decisions based on imperfect information.
136   Animals often face situations that require making decisions based on quantity.
137 ch is unlikely to yield optimal results when making programmatic decisions based on model predictions
138                                   In monkeys making saccadic decisions based on motion cues and asymm
139                  This can lead to physicians making treatment decisions based on an incomplete diagno
140 tentor roeselii shows that a single cell can make decisions, based on the ability to switch between s
141                      In many daily tasks, we make multiple decisions before reaching a goal.
142                                     However, making decisions before conducting analyses requires pra
143                      Here we show that, when making decisions between more than two alternatives, the
144 equential sampling models assume that people make speeded decisions by gradually accumulating noisy i
145                                         When making treatment decisions, clinicians should be a aware
146                                 Every day we make decisions critical for adaptation and survival.
147 s (Loxodonta africana) are most effective at making decisions crucial to herd survival, and old post-
148  R software package called DecisionCurve for making decision curves and related graphics.
149                               The ability to make optimal decisions depends on evaluating the expecte
150  responders and other government agencies to make decisions during a complex and tense volcanic crisi
151 eral surgeons discussed their experiences in making entrustment decisions during laparoscopic cholecy
152 ehensive framework to guide practitioners in making informed decisions during the admission, discharg
153 EMENT Adapting to changing contingencies and making decisions engages the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC).
154       Beyond choosing an appropriate action, making good decisions entails the ability to choose the
155 egrate disparate sources of information when making decisions, especially in social contexts.
156 ven that the primary purpose of an EIA is to make planning decisions evidence-based, our results indi
157  their choices, strongly not-groupy subjects made allocation decisions faster.
158 ests that this approach can enable people to make better decisions faster, procrastinate less, comple
159 se of decision analysis and Markov models to make contemplated decisions for surgical problems.
160 om an ability, shared with other animals, to make decisions for action that are related to future goa
161 appropriately to clinicians at the time they make decisions for individual patients.
162 FICANCE STATEMENT Would you trust a robot to make decisions for you?
163                                    Why do we make hasty decisions for short-term gain?
164 ast as 5 min, allowing physicians to quickly make their decision for infected patients.
165 ere is considerable controversy about how to make treatment decisions for these patients, and there i
166 isperceptions about prognosis by individuals making decisions for incapacitated critically ill patien
167  mean age was 55.5 (SD, 11.8), and they were making decisions for their parent (47%), spouse (28%), s
168 rtance of accounting for road mortality when making management decisions for Ohio's recovering bobcat
169 gical residents in training and to assist in making progress decisions for residents.
170  investigate its statistical significance in making the decision for biopsy with SWV values.
171 reatment utilities important information for making treatment decisions for DBP regulation compliance
172 mation to help individuals and policy makers make prudent decisions (for example, increasing mask-wea
173 ssess an exceptional aptitude to efficiently make decisions from high-dimensional sensory observation
174 has been a surge of interest into how people make intertemporal decisions, given that such decisions
175  raises the urgency for regulating bodies to make informed decisions, guidance, and policy on these p
176 benefited from our use of animals trained to make decisions guided by either visual or auditory evide
177                              How individuals make decisions has been a matter of long-standing debate
178  (which flowers are chosen by other bees) in making foraging decisions; however, the two types of inf
179                                           To make good decisions, humans need to learn about and inte
180 c MR imaging soon after STEMI enables one to make a decision in the prediction of reverse remodeling.
181                         This enables them to make adaptive decisions in a complex natural environment
182 es in extracellular signals enables cells to make decisions in constantly fluctuating environments.
183                     Humans and other animals make decisions in order to satisfy their goals.
184                     Coupled with the need to make decisions in real time, these factors rule out the
185 at human-like machines should be designed to make decisions in transparent and comprehensible ways, w
186 cious reliance on measurement of ADAMTS13 to make management decisions in suspected thrombotic thromb
187                          When humans fail to make optimal decisions in strategic games and economic g
188 theory of how decision makers could learn to make optimal decisions in this context.
189    This framework should help the process of making decisions in close-in analogue work.
190                     However, to guide policy making decisions in conservation and management, the con
191                                              Making decisions in environments with few choice options
192                                         When making decisions in groups, the outcome of one's decisio
193                                              Making decisions in more complex environments, where the
194                                              Making decisions in uncertain environments often require
195 cement strategy (to replace liver biopsy) in making key decisions in the management of patients with
196 get article, an animal forages continuously, making sequential decisions in a world where the amount
197 ue discussed by patients and clinicians when making treatment decisions in a clinical setting.
198 Furthermore, it could be a valuable tool for making treatment decisions in daily clinical practice.
199 ully consider the risk-to-benefit ratio when making treatment decisions in these subgroups.
200 s the potential to risk stratify patients to make clinical decisions, including timing for surgical t
201 s children grow, they gradually learn how to make decisions independently.
202                                           In making their decisions, individuals attempt to maximize
203  this purpose, agents use Deep Q-Networks to make decisions inspired on the rules of the Schelling Se
204                                              Making a decision involves computations across distribut
205 ion-discrimination decision-making task, but made decision-irrelevant saccades before registering the
206 y that can be used to improve our ability to make decisions is to identify the causes of our ignoranc
207 ut how ensembles of neurons work together to make decisions is unknown.
208 e past experience and sensory information to make perceptual decisions is unknown.
209 ne of the numerous foibles that prompt us to make poor decisions is known as the "Banker's fallacy,"
210                               The ability to make rapid decisions is dependent on the information tha
211 argue that a strong but neglected motive for making collective decisions is minimizing the material a
212 usal can significantly affect our ability to make optimal decisions, judgments, and actions in real-w
213 ing implementation barriers, the argument is made that decision-makers focus on avoiding permit viola
214 uction relationships through which knowledge making and decision making shape one another in social-e
215 event CVD and have even increased mortality, making clinical decision making difficult.
216                   However, replicating human-made decisions may inherently be biased by the fallible
217 f possible outcomes could enable subjects to make decisions more easily and quickly.
218               By doing so, they were able to make decisions more easily and quickly.
219 ng; the ability of patients with dementia to make decisions must be considered when providing this in
220 ll policies) require or recommend that those making triage decisions not be involved in direct patien
221 ng the physical environments in which people make decisions ("nudging") holds promise for achieving s
222 e, rapid risk stratification is necessary to make decisions of appropriate management strategies.
223 ting this strategy requires support tools to make the decision of stopping and restarting PrEP that c
224 telligence (AI) describes systems capable of making decisions of high cognitive complexity; autonomou
225 ers at the state, federal, and tribal levels make decisions on a weekly to quarterly basis, and fishe
226 roach to mitigate herding by helping workers make joint decisions on task sub-delegation, task accept
227  this should be carefully evaluated prior to making a decision on the use of tri- or di-enzyme treatm
228 nanodevices has attracted much attention for making accurate decisions on molecular diagnosis.
229 ession and matched healthy controls (n = 34) making decisions on a two-armed bandit task.
230                                              Making decisions on how best to treat cancer patients re
231 to assist patients and their physicians when making decisions on whether to select palliative care an
232 ral history of keratoconus is fundamental in making informed decisions on when their benefits outweig
233                                              Making rapid decisions on the basis of sensory informati
234                                           To make adaptive decisions, organisms must appropriately fi
235 cular apical aneurysm) used prospectively to make ICD decisions proved to be 95% sensitive for identi
236          Why should we care about how people make their decisions, rather than just focus on the deci
237 icient to detect glaucoma progression and to make decisions regarding its treatment.
238 brain spatiotemporal dynamics while subjects make decisions regarding the type of object they see in
239 , citizen-science surveys where participants make individual decisions regarding sampling strategies
240 about the effects of cannabis, people cannot make informed decisions regarding its use.
241                                          For making decisions regarding adjuvant therapy, nodal statu
242 ected improvements in angina symptoms and in making decisions regarding the need for coronary angiogr
243 med, evidence-based opinion is critical when making decisions regarding which operative approach to p
244 probability thresholds, to aid clinicians in making individualised decisions regarding, for example,
245  preferences, and alternative therapies when making transfusion decisions regarding an individual pat
246 g children to assist health policy makers in making decisions related to resource allocation for inte
247 icrocystis-dominated communities, and aid in making management decisions related to harmful algal blo
248 power of harnessing the value of Pedimap for making breeding decisions relies on the availability of
249 tion of the total future reward when animals made decisions relying on uncertain sensory and temporal
250                                              Making good decisions requires people to appropriately e
251 dicine, finance, and criminal justice, where making informed decisions requires clear understanding o
252                                         When making decisions, should one exploit known good options
253 ir choice, precisely when they felt they had made a decision, supports the idea that conscious awaren
254                   In a social group, animals make behavioral decisions that fit their social ranks.
255 , and we show that children (aged 5-7 years) make decisions that are consistent with the model's pred
256 global policy interventions to help the poor make decisions that could alleviate poverty.
257       As a result, anxious individuals often make decisions that favor harm avoidance.
258                                       How we make decisions that have direct consequences for ourselv
259 egulatory networks to gather information and make decisions that take time and cost energy.
260 pate their future motor performance so as to make decisions that will improve their expected future r
261 Rule of Three forces selection committees to make difficult decisions that increase the likelihood of
262 uenza outbreaks help public health officials make informed decisions that may help save lives.
263 behavior in two treatments in which subjects make pairwise decisions that determine own and others' i
264 t disconnect between knowing facts and, yet, making decisions that seem contrary to those facts.
265 humans are faced with difficult choices when making decisions, the ability to slow down responses bec
266 confidence in the accuracy of decisions they made or decisions they observed.
267 e in decision science: explaining why people make the decisions they do.
268   However, some animal and most human groups make collective decisions through particular individuals
269  variant of the game 'chicken' in which they made decisions to cooperate or not cooperate to obtain r
270             Twenty congenitally deaf readers made lexical decisions to target words and pseudowords.
271 nclusions cannot be drawn, and therefore has made the decision to issue a retraction of the manuscrip
272 cate that C. elegans are able to judiciously make a decision to stay on stiffer regions.
273                                 How patients make decisions to have surgery may contribute to this pr
274 d task, based around theories of how animals make decisions to move on when foraging for food.
275  their future, improved performance so as to make optimal decisions to maximize reward.
276 ents, or their surrogates, and clinicians to make healthcare decisions together, taking into account
277                 Humans are often required to make decisions under time constraints and to adjust spee
278                                  The need to make fast decisions under risky and uncertain conditions
279                                           To make optimal decisions under risk, one must correctly we
280 neral react to full decisional autonomy when making difficult decisions under uncertainty.
281                                   Our agents make decisions using automatic (e.g., reflexive) versus
282             Many animals, including insects, make decisions using both personally gathered informatio
283                Organisms appear to learn and make decisions using different strategies known as model
284                                         When making decisions we combine previously acquired knowledg
285                                         When making decisions we often face the need to adjudicate be
286                                           In making decisions, we often choose from among options wit
287         Our results showed that participants made better decisions when facing predictive partners an
288 jections to VS and BLA enables the animal to make appropriate decisions when faced with competing dri
289             Our aim is to help clinicians to make informed decisions when considering testosterone re
290            These findings may help consumers make informed decisions when purchasing shark deterring
291 with only a single SK are not well suited to making complex decisions where multiple different stimul
292 ion 6: ACP recommends that clinicians should make the decision whether to treat osteopenic women 65 y
293  rigid, centralized electronic components to make decisions, which limits complexity and scaling.
294 ow agents use knowledge about uncertainty to make better decisions while ignoring mere expectancy vio
295 service providers, and the public can use to make decisions will enhance views of the value of scient
296 eived either AVP or placebo intranasally and made decisions with financial consequences in the "Stag
297                                              Making difficult decisions with others shields individua
298 hod and to demonstrate how it can be used to make decisions within a curriculum or for bioinformatics
299                   During embryogenesis cells make fate decisions within complex tissue environments.
300 AI systems in healthcare are AI systems that make clinical decisions without human oversight.

 
Page Top