コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 provement of best-corrected visual acuity or macular edema.
2 age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema.
3 VO and HRVO patients receiving treatment for macular edema.
4 r leakage observed in patients with diabetic macular edema.
5 l coherence tomography detection of diabetic macular edema.
6 eration, vitreomacular traction, and cystoid macular edema.
7 retinopathy (DR) in the absence of diabetic macular edema.
8 age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema.
9 increased vascular permeability in diabetic macular edema.
10 ly lower in the DRL of subjects with uveitic macular edema.
11 measured by the incidence of POE and cystoid macular edema.
12 age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema.
13 reated with Dexamethasone implant 0.7 mg for macular edema.
14 eration, retinal vein occlusion and diabetic macular edema.
15 of spreading capillary loss with associated macular edema.
16 macotherapy for treatment of CRVO-associated macular edema.
17 er factors is an important cause of diabetic macular edema.
18 to treatment in severely affected eyes with macular edema.
19 illary nonperfusion in eyes without diabetic macular edema.
20 71 (38) microm in the 7 exposed eyes without macular edema.
21 e largest increases at the time of recurrent macular edema.
22 ce of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and macular edema.
23 ce of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and macular edema.
24 graphs gradable for diabetic retinopathy and macular edema.
25 growth factor for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.
26 betic retinopathy in the absence of diabetic macular edema.
27 erity scale score or development of diabetic macular edema.
28 ss in RP patients with no history of cystoid macular edema.
29 ior segment, especially in eyes with uveitic macular edema.
30 f the 61 eyes (29.5%) also developed cystoid macular edema.
31 early treatment-naive clinically significant macular edema.
33 and serum samples of patients with diabetic macular edema (1.6-fold) measured by Western blot and EL
34 Postoperative complications included cystoid macular edema (10%), corneal decompensation (6%), and ch
35 50.9%), posterior synechiae (21.7%), cystoid macular edema (16%), epiretinal membrane (13.2%), glauco
36 ferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) without macular edema, 20 eyes had proliferative diabetic retino
38 309 (78) microm in the 6 eyes with diagnosed macular edema, 279 (23) microm in the fellow eyes, and 2
39 face changes, or both (24 eyes); sequelae of macular edema (3 eyes); blunt trauma (2 eyes); retinal p
41 f 124 eyes analyzed, 60 (48.4%) had diabetic macular edema, 32 (25.8%) had neovascular age-related ma
42 rticipants; 95% CI, 36.6%-39.4%) followed by macular edema (7% of participants; 95% CI, 6.3%-7.7%).
44 retinal vascular permeability contributes to macular edema, a leading cause of vision loss in eye pat
45 subretinal fluid, subretinal hemorrhage, or macular edema after 4 anti-VEGF injections and anti-VEGF
50 es, new vessels, fibrous proliferations, and macular edema, agreement was substantial (weighted kappa
51 atment-naive patients with radiation-induced macular edema and a resulting decrease in visual acuity
53 mized trial data on 660 adults with diabetic macular edema and decreased VA (Snellen equivalent, appr
56 participants) with center-involved diabetic macular edema and no preexisting open-angle glaucoma, 26
59 patients with radiation retinopathy-related macular edema and prevent vision loss through 48 weeks o
61 sociated with presenting vision in eyes with macular edema and RVO, most eyes treated with ranibizuma
62 ing the search terms diabetic retinopathy OR macular edema AND stroke OR cerebrovascular disease OR c
63 having diabetic retinopathy without diabetic macular edema and underwent fluorescein angiography and
65 ibercept Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema) and VIVID (Intravitreal Aflibercept Injec
66 ibercept Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema) and VIVID (Intravitreal Aflibercept Injec
67 iferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) without macular edema, and 27 eyes had diabetic macular edema (D
68 previously combined, expands the section on macular edema, and adds several characteristics not prev
70 o 7 times for diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, and image gradability by a panel of 54 US
71 change, proportion of patients with resolved macular edema, and leakage on fluorescein angiography.
73 r age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal venous occlusive disease.
76 ative diabetic retinopathy, and incidence of macular edema as assessed via grading of color stereo fi
77 f nonproliferative DR, proliferative DR, and macular edema, as well as stereoscopic fundus photograph
78 reatment of decreased vision attributable to macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlu
79 treal aflibercept (IVA) for the treatment of macular edema associated with CRVO based on data from th
80 degradable implant approved for treatment of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion (RV
81 lateral synechiae, bilateral papilledema and macular edema associated with serous retinal detachment
83 50%) compared with eyes without subclinical macular edema at baseline (n = 39; 30%) (P = 0.005; haza
84 FAi-treated eyes had investigator-determined macular edema at month 36 compared with sham-treated eye
85 -VEGF treatment, but longer mean duration of macular edema before randomization (18 months vs. 1 mont
86 rative retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema, both of which require timely intervention
87 ti-VEGF therapy for center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) in a 2-year randomized clinical t
91 kness (2.9 mm vs. 3.2 mm; P = 0.01), cystoid macular edema (CME) involving the foveola (30% vs. 70%;
94 y (VA), complications, resolution of cystoid macular edema (CME), and anterior chamber and vitreous i
95 best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cystoid macular edema (CME), and the highest fluorescein angiogr
98 ar pressure (IOP) increase (n = 12), cystoid macular edema (CME; n = 3), and nonarteritic anterior is
99 al hemorrhage, infectious keratitis, cystoid macular edema [CME], retinal detachment [RD], or RD surg
100 ETDRS] of 55 letters or better); (2) cystoid macular edema (CMO), foveal thickness, and macular volum
103 oliferative DR (PDR), clinically significant macular edema (CSME), diabetic macular edema (DME), or o
104 nce of DME, including clinically significant macular edema (CSME), on monocular fundus photographs us
107 oliferative DR [PDR], clinically significant macular edema [CSME], or both who had evidence of retina
108 Patients with neovascular AMD and persistent macular edema despite fixed-interval intravitreous anti-
109 d hyperemia and swelling of the optic nerve, macular edema, diffuse intraretinal hemorrhages, and dil
110 tinopathy (n = 9) and patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) (n = 31) were compared with healthy
111 0.7) was approved for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) after demonstration of its efficacy
113 tive diabetic retinopathy (PDR), or diabetic macular edema (DME) and procedure codes for retinopathy
115 d characterization of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) are important for individualizing tr
116 (VA 20/32 or worse) center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME) at baseline were required to receive
117 a shorter duration of diabetes and diabetic macular edema (DME) at baseline, were less likely to hav
119 l aflibercept injections (IAIs) for diabetic macular edema (DME) during the phase III VISTA DME trial
120 anretinal photocoagulation rates in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes did not significantly differ fr
122 owth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME) favorably affects diabetic retinopat
125 r agents are effective for treating diabetic macular edema (DME) involving the center of the macula (
126 nibizumab (0.3 mg) for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) involving the center of the retina a
129 al dexamethasone implant therapy in diabetic macular edema (DME) is associated with long-term outcome
132 t, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME) might influence interpretation of st
133 potential effect of treatments for diabetic macular edema (DME) on driving should be of value to pat
134 e <75 years, absence of preexisting diabetic macular edema (DME) or postvitrectomy persistent cystoid
135 related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME) or retinal vein occlusion (RVO), rec
136 pro-permeability factors (PPFs) in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients before and after injection
137 ic fundus photographs, we evaluated diabetic macular edema (DME) progression and DR progression.
140 erity score (DRSS) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal ranibizuma
142 s and non-perfusion areas (NPAs) in diabetic macular edema (DME) using two different Optical Coherenc
145 tional characteristics in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) with subfoveal neuroretinal detachme
146 growth factor therapy in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) with vision loss after macular laser
147 growth factor therapy in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) with vision loss after macular laser
148 erative DR (NPDR), 51 with NPDR and diabetic macular edema (DME), and 18 with proliferative DR (PDR)-
149 Retinal hypoxia also contributes to diabetic macular edema (DME), and because of the absence of good
150 related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) we
151 retinopathy (NPDR), with or without diabetic macular edema (DME), and temporarily lost to follow-up.
153 herapeutic target for patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), perhaps in combination with current
154 elated macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion, choroidal n
173 acular degeneration (AMD, n = 400), diabetic macular edema (DME, n = 400), or retinal vein occlusion
174 2 diabetes and severe stages of DR (diabetic macular edema [DME] and proliferative diabetic retinopat
175 r visual-threatening complications (diabetic macular edema [DME] and proliferative diabetic retinopat
176 [NPDR], proliferative DR [PDR], or diabetic macular edema [DME]) or "any DR" (further subclassified
177 on (RVO), diabetic retinopathy (DR; diabetic macular edema, DME), or noninfectious uveitis (NIU).
178 age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema does not respond to an initial anti-vascul
179 age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema does not respond to an initial anti-vascul
180 nited States, and included 362 patients with macular edema due to central retinal or hemiretinal vein
182 d safety of aflibercept for the treatment of macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion.
185 th Intravitreal Aflibercept in Subjects with Macular Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusion (TANZANITE)
186 s not alter choroidal thickness in eyes with macular edema due to RVO, but may result in expansion of
187 38 eyes of 38 treatment-naive patients with macular edema due to RVO, enrolled in the prospective Su
188 5 pregnant women who presented with diabetic macular edema during pregnancy in the period from 2011 t
189 e processes, including postoperative cystoid macular edema, epiretinal membrane formation, macular fo
190 ) is effective for the treatment of diabetic macular edema, even in refractory cases that have failed
191 uring the Fluocinolone Acetonide in Diabetic Macular Edema (FAME) A and B Phase III clinical trials.
192 emorrhage, retinal detachment, retinal tear, macular edema, glaucoma, or choroidal detachment-and use
193 nterval {CI}, 2.15-4.35], P < .001), cystoid macular edema (HR = 2.87 [95% CI, 1.41-5.82], P = .004),
194 % CI, 0.99-3.17], P = .06), the incidence of macular edema (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.83-1.29], P = .74; OR
197 age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema in a 9-member retinal specialty private pr
199 ly on central subfield thickness to quantify macular edema in central and branch retinal vein occlusi
202 gnosis of cystoid macular edema or new-onset macular edema in patients with diabetes, recorded by a h
203 abetic retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema in patients with various initial retinopat
208 te key clinical observations of ischemia and macular edema in the posterior pole and ischemia in the
210 wn to prevent the recurrence or worsening of macular edema in uveitic patients with a history of CME
213 ults (mean age, 61+/-10 years) with diabetic macular edema involving the macular center to receive in
218 litis and low-grade vitritis with or without macular edema may have birdshot chorioretinopathy eviden
220 fficacy variables were: patients (%) in whom macular edema (ME) developed (>/=30% increase from preop
223 vacizumab to ranibizumab in the treatment of macular edema (ME) resulting from retinal vein occlusion
224 erapeutic alternatives for the management of macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occl
225 cteristic retinal vascular lesions including macular edema (ME), a leading cause of vision loss in DR
231 phthalmoscopic examination features included macular edema, mild intraretinal pigment migration, and
232 53 and/or presence of clinically significant macular edema; n = 95) using the modified Airlie House c
234 e not associated with clinically significant macular edema (NPA, P = 0.99; NPI, P = 0.67), nor correl
239 iss Meditec, Dublin, CA) OCTA images with no macular edema or significant motion artifact were acquir
240 rs in the macula following PRP, unrelated to macular edema or thickening, in line with the mathematic
241 mmonly associated with postoperative cystoid macular edema (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.14-0.91, P = 0.031)
243 rse diabetic retinopathy, referable diabetic macular edema, or both, were generated based on the refe
247 15), retinal detachments (P = 0.76), cystoid macular edema (P = 0.83), or timing of complications bet
249 n for the prevention of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) using a prospective, randomized, do
250 At 28 days postsurgery, pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) was reported in 8 eyes, of which 7
252 e best-corrected visual acuity, incidence of macular edema, posterior capsular opacification, epireti
254 f exudative macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema requiring bilateral anti-vascular endothel
255 avitreal ranibizumab injections either until macular edema resolved or until both macular edema and H
256 rovement can continue in some patients after macular edema resolves and CFT decreases stabilize.
258 changes in BCVA from baseline at 2 years by macular edema response status were: resolution, +10 lett
259 nstrated that VEGF is a major contributor to macular edema resulting from retinal vein occlusion, als
260 control, worsening of visual acuity, cystoid macular edema, retroprosthetic membrane formation, persi
263 f DEX implant treatment in 289 patients with macular edema secondary to branch or central RVO (BRVO,
264 ia in patients with visual impairment due to macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion
265 inferior to aflibercept for the treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal or hemiretina
266 Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), in patients with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusio
267 led observational case study of 30 eyes with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusio
268 gain in a broad population of patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO, including those with ma
269 nd safety of DEX implant in the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO)
271 the macular region, as epiretinal membrane, macular edema, subretinal fluid or alterations of the ou
272 ired blood-retinal barrier function leads to macular edema that is closely associated with the deteri
274 and mean number of months from diagnosis of macular edema to randomization was 6 (range, 0-104 month
278 abetic retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema was 1.0% over 5 years among patients with
281 oth central and branch occlusions, recurrent macular edema was detected in non-central macular fields
282 The risk for the development of cystoid macular edema was found to be associated with recurrence
284 abetic retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema was limited to approximately 5% between re
287 .001]), whereas an increased risk of cystoid macular edema was not identified for those who received
288 % CI, 3.0%-6.4%), and clinically significant macular edema was observed among 2.0% (95% CI, 1.1%-3.3%
292 which is increased in patients with diabetic macular edema, was capable of cleaving netrin-1 into the
293 sed by multiadjusted odds of retinal cystoid macular edema, was not increased for patients receiving
294 ompared with ACIOL, complications of cystoid macular edema were higher in 10-0 polypropylene iris-sut
296 nicity aged 18 years and older with diabetic macular edema who received intravitreal injections of be
297 20/40(+2), except in 1 patient with cystoid macular edema whose vision was 20/60(-) and 20/70(+1).
299 atment was associated with a reduced risk of macular edema with visual acuity of 20/40 or worse.