ライフサイエンスコーパス: magnetic field strength

1 instrument or software tools and work at any magnetic field strength.

2 ected given the threefold difference in main magnetic field strength.

3 SS contribution significantly increases with magnetic field strength.

4 near relationship between the g(lum) and the magnetic field strength.

5 gnetic activity that increases with inferred magnetic field strength.

6 nsible for the observed antipodal decline in magnetic field strength.

7 e by exploiting the MRI signal phase at high magnetic field strength.

8 and dynamic range improve quadratically with magnetic field strength.

9 asurements of the local electron density and magnetic field strength.

10 relationship between the Deltag(lum) and the magnetic field strength.

11 tance distribution which is dependent on the magnetic field strength.

12 t to be produced by the decay of the coronal magnetic field strength.

13 t density (Jc) drops rapidly with increasing magnetic field strength.

14 ntal time, especially at high and ultra-high magnetic field strengths.

15 by laser-polarized (129)Xe gas at ultra-low magnetic field strengths.

16 ive contrast on T(1)-weighted images at high magnetic field strengths.

17 d Ca(2+)-loaded states of the protein at two magnetic field strengths.

18 ts of T1, T1rho, and steady-state NOE at two magnetic field strengths.

19 T(1)(rho), and the steady-state NOE at three magnetic field strengths.

20 ferent origins, and repeated at a variety of magnetic field strengths.

21 ance in dehydrated zeolite HY, by using high magnetic-field strengths.

22 esonance imaging (pMRI) acquired at very low magnetic field strength (0.064 T) is used to obtain acti

23 working electrode size (10 microm-3 mm), and magnetic field strengths (0-1.77 T) generated with elect

24 time constant of tissues over a range of low magnetic field strengths (0.2-200 mT) by rapidly switchi

25 tic resonance imaging (MRI) operates at high magnetic field strength (1.5-3 T), which requires an acc

26 Purpose To determine the impact of different magnetic field strengths (1, 1.5, 3, and 7 T) and the ef

27 dicular) ) diffusivity were measured at high magnetic field strength (11.7T) and analyzed relative to

28 o temperatures (29 and 34 degrees C) and two magnetic field strengths (11.7 and 14.1 T).

29 15N relaxation data at two magnetic field strengths, 11.74 T and 14.10 T, were used

30 the backbone amide group at three different magnetic field strengths (18.8, 14.1, and 8.5 T) and fou

31 ((2)H) metabolic imaging (DMI) at a clinical magnetic field strength (3 T) to detect and localize cha

32 lowing quantitative diffusometry even at low magnetic field strengths (30 MHz).

33 4H] (4+) species when employed under modest magnetic field strength (3T) and a data acquisition dura

34 The high magnetic field strength (4.9 T) employed in these 139.5

35 unctional magnetic resonance imaging at high magnetic field strength (7-Tesla), we were able to decod

36 nal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at high magnetic field strength (7-tesla).

37 teric and dipolar interactions, the external magnetic field strength and frequency, as well as the ra

38 lts show that the 207Pb T1 is independent of magnetic field strength and inversely proportional to th

39 measure the magnitude of rotation at a given magnetic field strength and material thickness, that exc

40 The magnetic field strength and not the magnet type is impor

41 ma flows in the heliosheath to determine the magnetic field strength and orientation in the interstel

42 o the appropriate experimental conditions of magnetic field strength and rotational speed of the capi

43 actor 2 reduction in near-Earth heliospheric magnetic field strength and solar wind speed, and up to

44 ets align progressively well with increasing magnetic field strength and that the alignment is effect

45 Additionally, the influence of magnetic field strength and the presence of a breathable

46 There is a stark boundary as a function of magnetic field strength and toggle frequency distinguish

47 ilies spanning a wide range of temperatures, magnetic field strengths and doping.

48 esis was achieved using clinically tolerable magnetic field strengths and frequencies.

49 Higher magnetic field strengths and improved signal detectors h

50 The experiment works well over a range of magnetic field strengths and is particularly useful when

51 several spectrometers operating at different magnetic field strengths and magic-angle spinning rates.

52 eling and experimental testing under varying magnetic field strengths and rotation frequencies, ident

53 R(2) approximately 1 mM(-1)s(-1)) at typical magnetic field strengths and so requires high levels of

54 nge of relaxation data measured at different magnetic field strengths and temperatures.

55 of biochemical reactions by using different magnetic field strengths and the potential to tune the s

56 neither head movement nor dynamic change in magnetic field strength) and directional (sensitive to m

57 ce, sequence parameters, spatial resolution, magnetic field strength, and image post-processing, emph

58 ct quantitative measurements of the evolving magnetic field strength are required to test this.

59 especially in larger phantoms and at a high magnetic field strength, are not necessarily applicable

60 quires the acquisition of images at variable magnetic field strength as provided by fast field cyclin

61 abase query of spectra measured at arbitrary magnetic field strengths, as is demonstrated for spectra

62 An estimate of the compression ratio of the magnetic field strength B (+/- standard error of the mea

63 The magnetic field strength B increased across this boundary

64 specific conditions of pH, temperature, and magnetic field strength, because changes in conditions c

65 ively, are observed for Gly residues at high magnetic field strengths, but even at much lower fields

66 s could be obtained in minutes at a moderate magnetic field strength by using dynamic nuclear polariz

67 ample volumes to be investigated at moderate magnetic field strengths, compared with conventional NMR

68 al spin labels are reported as a function of magnetic field strength corresponding to proton Larmor f

69 The results herein communicate the highest magnetic field strength data on active zeolite catalyst

70 enine residues, the 1H T2 values exhibited a magnetic field strength dependence for all adenosine H8

71 It is generally accepted that Earth's magnetic field strength drops to low levels during polar

72 itable planet, little is known about Earth's magnetic field strength during that time.

73 mproved significance, were achieved at lower magnetic field strengths (e.g., B0 = 3T) and shorter ech

74 stant, 1/T(1), was measured as a function of magnetic field strength for several dilute protein solut

75 We infer a surface magnetic field strength for the white dwarf in MV Lyrae

76 ntly strong to explain the observed range of magnetic field strengths for isolated, high-field magnet

77 75 cm and 20 cm respectively in the range of magnetic field strengths from 0 to 200 mT.

78 Higher magnetic field strength improves all performance charact

79 Obtaining estimates of Earth's magnetic field strength in deep time is complicated by n

80 onstraining secular variation of the Earth's magnetic field strength in the past is fundamental to un

81 isition of two-field COSY spectra at varying magnetic field strengths, including zero-field condition

82 ded (94+/-8%, N = 4, where B(r) = 0.41 T and magnetic field strength is 0.20 T) magnets, were similar

83 d (210+/-14%, N = 4, where B(r) = 1.23 T and magnetic field strength is 0.55 T) and bonded (94+/-8%,

84 ed closest to that region, where the coronal magnetic field strength is high (a few hundred Gauss), d

85 As the magnetic field strength is increased, more plasma is con

86 ds the threshold for dynamo activity and the magnetic field strength is similar to that observed in t

87 spectrometers with different configurations (magnetic field strength, manufacturer, age).

88 Low magnetic field strength MRI systems, however, offer the

89 MR spectroscopy and the availability of high magnetic field strengths now offer the possibility to re

90 determine the risks associated with MRI at a magnetic field strength of 1.5 tesla for patients who ha

91 mized study to assess the safety of MRI at a magnetic field strength of 1.5 Tesla in 1509 patients wh

92 mperature range of 290-320 K and at a static magnetic field strength of 14.1 T.

93 hem; for one source, we have inferred a high magnetic field strength of 5 x 10(13) G.

94 Oe) recorded on all three aporepressors at a magnetic field strength of 600 MHz ((1)H Larmor frequenc

95 At the largest tested magnetic field strength of beta = 371 +/- 1 mT, a 4.7% i

96 ils are compatible with MR imaging at static magnetic field strengths of 1.5 T or less.

97 axation data acquired at 310 K and at static magnetic field strengths of 11.7, 14.1 and 18.8 T are an

98 fect is demonstrated in glycogen phantoms at magnetic field strengths of 4.7 and 9.4 T, showing impro

99 their performance in DNP NMR experiments at magnetic field strengths of 9.4 T, 14.1 T, and 21.1 T.

100 esonance imaging systems operating at static magnetic fields strengths of 7 Tesla or higher have beco

101 rutinizes the density-weighted line-of-sight magnetic field strength, of individual bursts during the

102 correlated spin relaxation rates at multiple magnetic field strengths on the C-terminal domain of the

103 nce method and diffusion measurements at two magnetic field strengths on water and NAA phantoms in vi

104 ontinuously varying real parameters, such as magnetic field strength or pressure.

105 ons of bovine serum albumin as a function of magnetic field strength, oxygen concentration, and solve

106 lar ballooning, NASH diagnosis, fibrosis, or magnetic field strength (P = .65).

107 easurements performed over 310-140 K and two magnetic field strengths provide insights into conformat

108 At this magnetic field strength, R(2) relaxation rates are indic

109 singly rapid carbonyl relaxation at the high magnetic field strengths required by TROSY techniques re

110 s static (continuous, proportional to static magnetic field strength, requiring neither head movement

111 ((1)HMRS) studies conducted using a 7-Tesla magnetic field strength scanner, taking into account the

112 Small pockets of low magnetic field strength, small radius of curvature, and

113 cation year, functional MR imaging paradigm, magnetic field strength, statistical threshold, and anal

114 rimental phenomena, with the increase of the magnetic field strength, the magnetic transverse photocu

115 produced in a tokamak is proportional to its magnetic field strength to the fourth power.

116 on analysis, (b) avoid the need for multiple magnetic field strengths to extract dynamic parameters,

117 s are thought to have the requisite internal magnetic-field strengths to result in magnetars(11,12).

118 agnetization along the screw, c-axis for the magnetic field strength used in this study, together wit

119 MR techniques applied over the wide range of magnetic field strengths used in this study show that pr

120 s of chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) at high magnetic field strengths varies.

121 We found that magnetic field strength was nearly constant throughout t

122 measuring (15)N NMR relaxation at different magnetic field strengths, we are able to characterize th

123 on spin relaxation rate over a wide range of magnetic field strengths, we determine the populations o

124 s and structural parameters obtained at each magnetic field strength were compared in corresponding s

125 derable residue-by-residue variations in the magnetic field strengths where TROSY line narrowing is m

126 his structure collocated with an increase of magnetic field strength, which is also closely associate

127 range of available spectrometers of varying magnetic field strengths with a standard 5 mm probe setu

128 greement with experiment for three different magnetic field strengths without adjusting any parameter

129 vement is equivalent to doubling the applied magnetic field strength, without loss in signal-to-noise

130 Tesla, K(NAA) in the absence of any applied magnetic field strength would be 32.