ライフサイエンスコーパス: main effect

1 ffering) or generally throughout daily life (main effects).

2 Gender modified this main effect.

3 , possibly due to the small magnitude of the main effect.

4 le, the proposed method can estimate the PRS main effect.

5 erformed using maternal and paternal PTSD as main effects.

6 tions can have important implications beyond main effects.

7 fication of important G x E interactions and main effects.

8 orphisms, not just those showing significant main effects.

9 ne association approach used to test genetic main effects.

10 for estimating the genetic and environmental main effects.

11 ions and correlation patterns in addition to main effects.

12 ey tended to be small compared with stimulus main effects.

13 pproach could detect epistatic QTL with weak main effects.

14 increased risk of breast cancer with ERCC6 (main effect: 1.29 <= OR <= 2.91, 0.005 <= p <= 0.04, 11.

15 ) or are proportional to respective exposure main effects (a variant of Tukey's one-degree test).

16 5g.L(-1) lecithin showed its main effects after 16days of storage: highest SSC, highe

17 1g.L(-1) lecithin showed its main effects after 8days of storage by reduction in tota

18 10g.L(-1) lecithin showed its main effects after 8days of storage with highest SSC, ch

19 Main effects analysis of sensory experience revealed les

20 By main effects analysis, peak VO2 was increased significan

21 these, 61 were previously published through main-effect analysis of BP traits, 37 were recently repo

22 (ESR1) emerges as key TF with the strongest main effect and as the most frequently included TF inter

23 plication of this method illustrates mapping main effect and interacting QTLs for heading time in the

24 10(-8)) loci by using joint tests of the SNP main effect and SNP-age interaction.

25 e-based approach to jointly test the genetic main effect and SNP-treatment interaction effect for SNP

26 Eight markers showed significant main effects and 18 markers showed significant Q x E int

27 netic values while incorporating both marker main effects and epistatic effects.

28 ds the Katz bias to be a gene-wise vector of main effects and extends the Katz attenuation constant p

29 trol and analytical procedures for measuring main effects and for evaluating environmental exposure m

30 actions and cell-based assays to confirm the main effects and found that blood responded with a great

31 thors also compared 2 joint tests of genetic main effects and G-E interaction.

32 puting platform that can systematically scan main effects and interaction effects among all possible

33 tions whereas many statistically significant main effects and interaction effects were shown for all

34 ed) over the 4-year treatment period in both main effects and interaction models.

35 dels were created with stepwise selection of main effects and interactions and their validity assesse

36 Main effects and interactions between lifetime asthma, a

37 peated-measures design allowed assessment of main effects and interactions of light level, viewing co

38 Interpretation of the main effects and interactions subsequently enables the s

39 sition at 6 and 24 mo were obtained for gene main effects and interactions with a low-fat diet (20% f

40 esting algorithm that identifies biomarkers' main effects and interactions.

41 cision and recall in identifying biomarkers' main effects and interactions.

42 cted in real gene expression data, including main effects and network interaction effects.

43 to test single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) main effects and SNP x education interaction effects on

44 On simulated data with main effects and statistical interactions, we compare ac

45 can that may have been conducted for genetic main effects, and thus has the potential to uncover new

46 els slightly overestimate genetic variances, main effects are assessed accurately and precisely.

47 Two main effects are proposed to explain biodiversity-ecosys

48 The main effects are represented by the means of QTL effects

49 ar, quadratic, and cubic BSA terms and a sex main effect as independent variables.

50 esearch in Transplantation Network to detect main effect association signals across regions such as t

51 cold storage and subsequent shelf life, the main effect being observed for those fruits coated with

52 Analyses of variance revealed main effects, but not an interaction, for apolipoprotein

53 A significant main effect comparing the two groups (F (1, 43)=21.90, p

54 We use simulated data with main effects, correlation and interactions to compare th

55 hat responded to soil drying and hundreds of main-effect eQTLs.

56 For most scenarios, main-effect estimates for cadmium and lead with increasi

57 The main effects examined were microbiological sputum conver

58 LHF total score with exercise and with diet (main effect: exercise, -1 unit [95% CI, -8 to 5], P = .7

59 dy Short Form 36 Physical Component Summary) main effect: F(1, 172) = 9.87, P < 0.01].

60 R-E group than for the NR-E group (treatment main effect: F1,68 = 5.4, P = .02, d = 0.50, and Delta =

61 r than stage-wise strategies (i.e. selecting main effects first, and interactions second, from those

62 balance scores were different, with a large main effect for age and a small effect for sex.

63 analysis showed that there was a significant main effect for DHT exposure, but not for genotype, indi

64 There is some evidence of a main effect for genotype and some evidence for a gene by

65 ificant in the women (P < 0.05); there was a main effect for method but not race-ethnicity.

66 89, p<0.001, Partial Eta Squared=0.57) and a main effect for time (F (2, 43)=3.76, p=0.03, Partial Et

67 (CON group) and by 10% +/- 10% (LEU group) (main effect for time, P < 0.05), but no differences betw

68 We found main effects for diagnostic group in FA, MD, subcortical

69 One can also estimate main effects for exposures and now flexibly assess model

70 population-based controls are not included, main effects for exposures cannot be estimated, and cons

71 Findings revealed significant main effects for individual and neighborhood predictors

72 miodarone was tested using a Cox model, with main effects for randomized treatment and amiodarone and

73 Results revealed main effects for the executive attention and orienting n

74 rtional odds logistic regression model, with main effects for three readers, two techniques, and four

75 Main effects for understanding were found for processabi

76 The main effects found were that explicitness and reassuranc

77 In contrast, a main-effect genetic risk score for LDL cholesterol was n

78 monstrated using single genetic variants and main-effect genetic risk scores, little investigation ha

79 statistically significant associations from main-effect genome-wide association studies may be more

80 mong patients treated with aprotinin, with a main-effects hazard ratio for death of 1.32 (95% confide

81 % CI, 0.96-1.45; P = 0.12; lutein/zeaxanthin main effect HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.85-1.28; P = 0.71).

82 significantly different (omega-3 fatty acids main effect HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.96-1.45; P = 0.12; lutei

83 These results support the main effects hypothesis and indicate that hypothalamic-p

84 mary objective in inference, rather than the main effect in a model with gene-environment interaction

85 affirm transition state stabilization as the main effect in enhancing chemical rates and provide a un

86 al divergence of Scr roles during embryonic (main effect in labium) and post-embryonic (main effect i

87 (main effect in labium) and post-embryonic (main effect in prothorax) development.

88 However, phonological priming main effects in both the N2 and P3 ranges were indisting

89 Results also revealed significant group main effects in the amygdala and insula bilaterally, ref

90 Latinos exhibited significant haplotype main effects in two blocks even after adjusting for admi

91 ots for SNPs in ALOX5AP, TNF, and KCNJ11 for main effects; in LPL and TUB for glycemic index interact

92 Lower prices have two main effects: increasing overall energy consumption, and

93 high computational cost, do not respect the "main effect, interaction" hierarchical structure, or use

94 Instead, the main effect is seen in legs.

95 ifies their behavior to varying extents, its main effect is to regulate the function of AMPAR subunit

96 ns, especially when the marginal strength of main effects is weak.

97 Locomotion had two main effects: it increased spontaneous activity, and it

98 dy tissues triggered by DvSnf7 RNAi were the main effects leading to the death of WCR.

99 We report 58 significant main effect loci and 24 significant epistatic interactio

100 The PS is frequently estimated using main-effects logistic regression.

101 Fully adjusted main effect models resulted in hazard ratios of 1.01 (95

102 en BC and blood markers were not observed in main effects models or when stratified by obesity status

103 Synergism was the main effect observed among the tested mixtures, mainly f

104 The main effects observed were lowering of total blood lipid

105 The main effects observed were reduced body size, edema, and

106 IL-6 (main effect odds ratio [OR] 1.72; 95% confidence interva

107 No main effect of ACEs on average BP levels was found.

108 There was a main effect of ADM over CBT on the HAM-D (beta = -0.88;

109 olume-corrected [(11)C]PBR28 data revealed a main effect of alcohol dependence (P=0.034), correspondi

110 In a subsample of normal controls, both the main effect of amyloid deposition of worse memory perfor

111 We observed a main effect of anxiety levels on fullness and bloating (

112 By either mechanism, the main effect of both MTAs is to effectively stabilize the

113 There was a significant main effect of breakfast condition (P = 0.04) on total d

114 There was no significant main effect of breakfast condition on energy intake at l

115 Kinetic experiments show that a main effect of BRICHOS is to prolong the lag time in a c

116 Thus, a main effect of Ca(2+) on E-Syt1 is to reverse an autoinh

117 A significant main effect of calorie (high compared with low; P < 0.00

118 There was a significant main effect of castration and social context.

119 production in the liver, we suggest that the main effect of central insulin on hepatic glucose metabo

120 The main effect of circadian misalignment, either phase adva

121 Although there was no beneficial main effect of citalopram, it reduced Stop-Signal Reacti

122 The results revealed a main effect of COMT genotype in the ventral striatum and

123 f distribution values revealed a significant main effect of condition (SHS vs control) (F(1,22) = 42.

124 om the unaffected limb [PSS = -18 +/- 13 ms; main effect of condition F (1, 9) = 98.6, P < 0.001].

125 rror rate that the authors observed when the main effect of continuous body mass index was misspecifi

126 The stop signal reaction time showed a main effect of cPAS condition when controlling for age (

127 The main effect of DAT1 genotype was seen in robust blood-ox

128 During successful inhibition, a main effect of diagnosis emerged in the right nucleus ac

129 In both the PET and fMRI studies, a main effect of diagnosis was observed, with PMDD patient

130 s a repeated measure indicated a significant main effect of diagnosis, F(1,24)=8.38, P=0.008, with si

131 respective age-matched controls (ACC; ANOVA main effect of diagnosis: F(1,58) = 0.407, p = 0.526).

132 Analysis of covariance showed a main effect of diagnostic group, with the CHR group show

133 There was a significant main effect of encoding, showing superior recall perform

134 ed over the ensuing year, such that only the main effect of fire was evident after 16 months.

135 The main effect of genotype was significantly greater activa

136 ted measures analysis of variance revealed a main effect of group (OCD < CONT; F([1,87]) = 5.3; P = 0

137 y significant activation associated with the main effect of group for the comparison of correct no-go

138 /fMRI indicated that there was a significant main effect of group on task-related BOLD responses in t

139 hole-brain analysis, there was a significant main effect of group on task-related BOLD responses in t

140 A main effect of group revealed elevated response in the m

141 A main effect of group, distinguishing cocaine from sucros

142 ive supranuclear palsy relative to controls [main effect of group, F(2,41) = 17.5, P < 0.0001; region

143 ression analysis was applied to test for the main effect of HapA and its interaction with dietary pro

144 We found a main effect of haplotype on ADRB2 density (P = 0.03) wit

145 In the mental stress trial, there was a main effect of haplotype on cardiac output (P = 0.04), a

146 There was partial evidence to suggest a main effect of haplotype on the change in SVR (P = 0.06)

147 There was a main effect of HCMV serostatus but not diagnosis that re

148 There was a decreasing trend in the main effect of heat on childhood diarrhea in Brisbane ac

149 for age of onset and hyperglycemia exposure (main effect of hypoglycemia category, F [2,88] = 6.4, P

150 The main effect of IL-7 was an expansion of effector memory

151 ls based on these results suggested that the main effect of increasing odor concentration was to recr

152 Repeated-measures ANOVAs indicated a main effect of intensity for both anodal and cathodal tD

153 linear mixed model was used to determine the main effect of interventions and interaction term to ass

154 Our results argue that the main effect of intramolecular disulfide bond formation i

155 The main effect of LA addition is that it allows performing

156 on, a 1-factor ANOVA was run to discover any main effect of lifestyle.

157 weight that are similar in magnitude to the main effect of litter size on weight.

158 There was a significant main effect of LoR in the frequencies of 0.073-0.198 Hz

159 Post hoc analyses also revealed a main effect of MAOA genotype on having a disposition tow

160 This main effect of maternal status suggests a general differ

161 Rather, the main effect of mEC lesions was an extensive spatial codi

162 A 2-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of method as well as a significant interacti

163 Collectively, the main effect of microcracks is not to slow down fracture

164 Finally, while there was no main effect of number of optimal solution paths, this pa

165 Importantly, the activation of the main effect of pain and the nocebo effect spatially over

166 The model predicts that the main effect of peg-IFN is to reduce HDV production/relea

167 a decreased independent of diet composition (main effect of phase, P < 0.01; between diets, P = NS).

168 lled experimental conditions, data support a main effect of prenatal nutrition on highly translatable

169 on in PTSD symptoms in all 4 groups, but the main effect of prolonged exposure therapy was not statis

170 variance revealed a significant multivariate main effect of PTSD symptom trajectory class membership

171 A main effect of reduced BOLD signal in bilateral occipita

172 We used a twin model that allowed for a main effect of SES on intelligence, as well as a moderat

173 ight status, race, and meal instruction, the main effect of sex (P < 0.001) remained significant, but

174 There was no main effect of sex on W(b) (P = 0.59).

175 gained weight during the study; there was a main effect of sex, but not BPA treatment on body weight

176 Nevertheless, no main effect of stimulus type was found, on either proact

177 nt learning (session 2), though there was no main effect of stress on RPE.

178 We observed a main effect of task on left vOT activity but not stimulu

179 ects of task in dorsal PAG and right LC; and main effect of temperature in RVM and a task x temperatu

180 ag non-linear model was used to quantify the main effect of temperature on emergency department visit

181 Moreover, on neuroimaging measures with a main effect of the AKT1 genotype, there was significant

182 There was also a dose-dependent, main effect of the epsilon2 allele (p<0.0001), suggestiv

183 The main effect of the exposure was a shift in the response

184 No main effect of the GABRA6 rs3219151 was detected, but in

185 In comparison with the LC-CONV diet, the main effect of the LC-P-LGI diet was a greater decrease

186 The magnitude of the main effect of the SNP increased with increasing levels

187 a 2-factor analysis, there was a significant main effect of the TB (P < 0.0001) but not CC (P = 0.128

188 Furthermore, there was a significant main effect of the TB on increasing apolipoprotein A-I (

189 o be the skeletal subspaces that receive the main effect of the treatment.

190 In contrast, the main effect of the V1300F mutation was a depolarizing sh

191 ROI analysis of FA yielded no main effect of time in any of the conditions.

192 Repeated measures ANOVA showed a main effect of time-point (F = 4.59, df = 1, P = 0.035)

193 esidual mass decreased in both groups by 6% (main effect of time: P = 0.021), with no effect of alloc

194 Univariate analyses showed a significant main effect of trajectory class membership on plasma con

195 A significant main effect of treatment condition on pupil diameter was

196 The main effect of treatment did not reach conventional leve

197 tes did not differ significantly either as a main effect of treatment or as an interaction with sever

198 57% +/- 0.11%/d; placebo, 1.48% +/- 0.08%/d; main effect of treatment: P < 0.001) and REX (pooled mea

199 .87% +/- 0.09%/d; placebo, 1.71 +/- 0.10%/d; main effect of treatment: P < 0.001) legs.

200 There was no main effect of vitamin D level on overall survival in th

201 The main effect of Y208T, Y208S, and Y208A mutations is to c

202 linear mixed-effects models to estimate the main effects of air pollutants and effect modification b

203 There were no main effects of any of the intervention groups on any me

204 We find the main effects of both environmental fluctuations and vari

205 Furthermore, the significant main effects of castration and social context were the r

206 analysis of variance was performed examining main effects of condition and group and group-by-conditi

207 The main effects of D treatment, but not of E treatment, on

208 In the DLPFC, there were no main effects of diagnosis or gender on Glx/W or GABA/W.

209 We tested the main effects of drug (placebo vs Nicorette gum) and time

210 ce of gene-gene interactions (epistasis) and main effects of genes.

211 Main effects of genotype and diagnosis on activation and

212 Main effects of Group (p<0.005 height threshold, familyw

213 Significant main effects of Group (p<0.05) revealed decreased fALFF

214 have significant confounding effects on the main effects of interest in comparative models and may r

215 In contrast, our findings for the main effects of life stressors (strong risk factor) and

216 are influenced by many factors including the main effects of many quantitative trait loci (QTLs), the

217 he rights of others (p < .05), there were no main effects of MAOA genotype, and MAOA genotype was not

218 Region-of-interest analyses indicated no main effects of medication or A118G genotype.

219 Thus, the main effects of metamorphosis on insect chemistry were l

220 Main effects of noxious thermal stimulation were observe

221 rge number of effects, including covariates, main effects of numerous loci, and gene-gene (epistasis)

222 ion that most genetic variance is due to the main effects of QTL.

223 The genetic main effects of QTLs, QE interaction effects and the cor

224 Main effects of sex were not detected.

225 While we revealed significant main effects of sex, there were no significant effects o

226 Main effects of smoking status and PTSD symptom severity

227 Main effects of smoking, snus, and the rs1051730 variant

228 r among all species and substrates, with few main effects of species or substrate observed throughout

229 ential abundance analysis, we found that the main effects of stressors increased the abundance of opp

230 Main effects of study group were not significant in judg

231 the brainstem nuclei revealed the following: main effects of task in dorsal PAG and right LC; and mai

232 Univariate GLM exploring the main effects of the independent variables on physical an

233 rom extracellular ATP is responsible for the main effects of the latter in human cervical cancer cell

234 ysis was used to compare BOLD activation for main effects of the PS, ED, and their interaction.

235 There were no main effects of the SNPs on PTSD symptoms and no signifi

236 sis-generating observations suggest that the main effects of ticagrelor may not relate to the rapidit

237 There were main effects of time (indicating improvement across the

238 Significant main effects of time by group interaction for fractional

239 The main effects of time were observed in the total and subs

240 od and beverage intakes, we investigated the main effects of time, treatment, and the treatment-by-ti

241 Cox proportional hazards models showed no main effects of treatment (P=0.61) or AS (P=0.72) for ti

242 The main effects of treatment demonstrated no overall improv

243 While there were no main effects of treatment, venlafaxine treatment was ass

244 The main effects of treatments and their interaction were as

245 In this review, the main effects of vitamin E on enzymes involved in signal

246 Somatization levels had a main effect on all 5 symptoms (P < .0001), independent o

247 Paternal depression did not have a main effect on any psychiatric disorder in adolescents a

248 Heat had a main effect on executive functioning and verbal reasonin

249 In support of our hypothesis, L-DOPA had no main effect on impulsive choice, but reduced risk-seekin

250 We found that acute stress had a main effect on mtRNA expression and that expression of N

251 Conversion of Gly-336 to valine has its main effect on the Kd of serine binding to one form of t

252 Installation of information signage had no main effect on visitor attitudes or learning.

253 CRF produced three main effects on dLGN stimulus evoked activity: (1) incre

254 disrupts this activated form and causes two main effects on hMLKL conformation: (1) locking of the r

255 TPD did not exert main effects on mood or on task behavior, but affected b

256 ntrols, we found that rs3782206 genotype had main effects on the 1-back task (P=0.005), the 2-back ta

257 e, and physical properties of emulsions with main effects on their quality and stability.

258 The rs1344706 genotype produced significant main effects on total, frontal, and parietal lobe WM vol

259 interval [95% CI] 1.12, 2.66) and TNFalpha (main effect OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.16, 1.90) concentrations w

260 Each of the other markers had either a main effect or a Q x E interaction effect but not both.

261 rrespective of whether it is mostly due to a main effect or due to some interaction effect(s), via an

262 P investigated and risk of PCOS, either as a main effect or in interaction with vitamin D status.

263 th time to a suicidal event and no treatment main effect or treatment x time interaction on suicidal

264 No other main effects or sex-by-group interactions were found for

265 tivity index (SIT 56 +/- 15%, ET 29 +/- 12%; main effect P < 0.05).

266 ilt: 49 +/- 14 vs. 40 +/- 10 bursts min(-1); main effect, P < 0.05).

267 8.6 +/- 3.6 ml min(-1) (100 g)(-1)) men (age main effect, P = 0.001).

268 (-1); old men: 25.1 +/- 15.4 ml min(-1); age main effect, P = 0.77) as blood flow per unit mass of mu

269 pports conventional hypothesis tests for QTL main effect, pleiotropy, and QTL-by-environment interact

270 Main effect plots showed total FAAs extraction was favou

271 sent study, a heritability-adjusted genotype main effect plus genotype x environment (HA-GGE) biplot

272 e (ANOVA) and heritability adjusted-genotype main effect plus genotype-environment interaction (HA-GG

273 alyses examining candidate gene polymorphism main effects, polymorphism-by-environment interactions,

274 In the first stage, main effect QTL are searched and mapped.

275 The search for main effect QTL is robust and does not bias the search f

276 In all, 44 main effect QTL were detected above a 5% genome-wide sig

277 Thus by first mapping those main-effect QTL, the statistical power for the second an

278 A total of 78 main-effect QTLs (M-QTLs) and 10 E-QTLs have been detect

279 This study identified a total of 78 main-effect QTLs (M-QTLs) with up to 42.33% phenotypic v

280 -age interactions only in whites but had DBP main effects replicated (p = 8.3 x 10(-4)) in 8,682 Asia

281 able logistic regression controlling for the main effects revealed that previous cardiac surgery, chr

282 Analysis of main effects revealed that training induced 33, 105 and

283 s first, and interactions second, from those main effects selected) in finding true interactions, esp

284 nt of Framingham risk score and DM, and such main effects significantly differed from controls (P = 0

285 olol augmented the interaction between these main effects such that behavior was influenced more by p

286 on was primarily due to selection on genetic main effects tailored to temperature-dependent plasticit

287 Crystal structures revealed their main effect to be a weakening of interactions with the C

288 However, no main effect was found for shared attention between prese

289 Parametrically, no main effect was found for TICV when predicting a dementi

290 A statistically significant main effect was found for time (F1,198 = 75.92; P = .001

291 The main effect was observed in prothorax of Scr-RNAi adults

292 effects of group according to sex on GMV and main effects were analyzed throughout the whole brain by

293 .19 and OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36-0.83], but no main effects were found among African-Americans.

294 ions were significant (P < 0.05) in the men; main effects were nonsignificant.

295 required analysis of 16 samples in which the main effects were not confounded by two-factor interacti

296 Significant group main effects were observed for both response (odds ratio

297 Within men, group main effects were observed involving these same regions,

298 d early degenerative mechanisms, because the main effects were seen at 7 d and lasted beyond the trea

299 be underestimated or even go undetected as a main effect when it is hidden in gene-by-environment (Gx

300 ction being driven by a significant genotype main effect (wildtype>heterozygote>null mutant).