戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 with valgus thrust were disease severity and malalignment.
2 femoral cartilage score, with adjustment for malalignment.
3 n lead to growth abnormalities and potential malalignment.
4 ield development, resulting in arterial pole malalignment.
5 (OA) differs depending on the degree of limb malalignment.
6  some contribution from slightly more severe malalignment.
7 nship is reduced after controlling for varus malalignment.
8                        Both valgus and varus malalignments affect forces at the PF joint and may pred
9                    Dynamic knee valgus (DKV) malalignment affects the biomechanical characteristic du
10 edial tibiofemoral OA was explained by varus malalignment, after controlling for sex.
11                                    Improving malalignment and altering the dynamic forces on the invo
12 niscal extrusion; other factors include knee malalignment and cartilage damage.
13 blation of the CNCC results in arterial pole malalignment and failure of outflow septation, resulting
14 y because of the combined focus of load from malalignment and the excess load from increased weight.
15 BMI is correlated with the severity of varus malalignment, and 4) the BMI-medial tibiofemoral OA seve
16              Medially, meniscal tears, varus malalignment, and cartilage damage were associated with
17            Laterally, meniscal tears, valgus malalignment, and cartilage damage were associated with
18 whether meniscal damage, meniscal extrusion, malalignment, and laxity each predicted tibiofemoral car
19 cal characteristics such as joint laxity and malalignment, and radiographic severity are discussed.
20 ting for baseline age, sex, body mass index, malalignment, and vitamin D treatment.
21 tibia angle, and examine the relationship of malalignment by each approach with osteoarthritis (OA) t
22 ee of 75 knees with lateral PF OA had valgus malalignment compared with only 5 of 21 patients with me
23  increases overall loading of the knee, limb malalignment concentrates that loading on a focal area,
24 on of the truncus arteriosus, leading to OFT malalignment defects including double-outlet right ventr
25 stly in malaligned limbs, on the side of the malalignment (e.g., new medial BMLs in varus-aligned kne
26 d joint of mild OA may be less vulnerable to malalignment effects than the more-damaged joint of mode
27 of BMI is limited to knees in which moderate malalignment exists, presumably because of the combined
28 gression (OR 1.00), and in those with severe malalignment (> or =7 degrees ), the effect was similarl
29                                              Malalignment has been shown to have an impact on the dev
30 ic predisposition, aging, obesity, and joint malalignment; however have been unable to conclusively d
31 ispanic black adults had the least amount of malalignment in mandibular incisors.
32 ve percent and 22% of persons had zero mm of malalignment in maxillary and mandibular incisors, respe
33                          BMI correlated with malalignment in those with varus knees (r = 0.26) but no
34        In both studies, all strata of valgus malalignment, including 1.1 degrees to 3 degrees valgus,
35 unknown, lesions on bone scan and mechanical malalignment increase risk for radiographic deterioratio
36                             Varus and valgus malalignment increase the risk of medial and lateral ost
37                                       Valgus malalignment increases the risk of knee OA radiographic
38 ographic OA at baseline to determine whether malalignment is a risk factor for incident disease or si
39 ore common than medial PF OA, whether valgus malalignment is more frequent in lateral PF OA than in m
40                   These results suggest that malalignment is not a risk factor for OA, but rather is
41 cedes or follows the onset of disease, varus malalignment is one local factor that may contribute to
42                                          The malalignment may be a consequence of a defect in the coa
43                               Forefoot varus malalignment may be associated with ipsilateral hip pain
44 Initiative (OAI) to define limbs with valgus malalignment (mechanical axis of >/=1.1 degrees valgus)
45 ss included medial meniscal damage and varus malalignment (medially) and lateral meniscal damage (lat
46               However, with the exception of malalignment, no risk factors for knee osteoarthritis pr
47 um from the secondary heart field leading to malalignment of the arterial pole with the ventricles.
48 tion to expand to the right, with subsequent malalignment of the atrioventricular endocardial cushion
49  cause conotruncal anomalies associated with malalignment of the cardiac outflow tract (OFT).
50 ing early heart development, with subsequent malalignment of the cushions relative to the muscular ve
51 ical strain on the hip can result from varus malalignment of the foot.
52                                          The malalignment of the great vessels described in this anim
53 tic ventricular septal defect and associated malalignment of the outflow tract.
54 ether knees with progression showed expected malalignment on full-limb films.
55 e OA examined, the impact of varus or valgus malalignment on the odds of OA progression over the ensu
56 vely, in certain joint environments, such as malalignment or laxity, greater strength may translate i
57  patients required reintervention for device malalignment or significant shunt.
58 limited to knees in which there was moderate malalignment (OR per 2-unit increase in BMI 1.23, 95% CI
59 d femoral denuded bone increase, while varus malalignment predicted medial tibial cartilage volume an
60 sk of lateral OA progression, that burden of malalignment predicts decline in physical function, and
61  neuromuscular factors (varus-valgus laxity, malalignment, proprioceptive inaccuracy, quadriceps stre
62  factors such as leg-length inequalities and malalignment require further study.
63 knee pain severity, physical activity, varus malalignment severity, hip OA presence, and hip OA sympt
64 olated PF OA were more likely to have valgus malalignment than those with isolated TF OA (P = 0.0002)
65 ciations of severity of meniscal tears, knee malalignment, tibiofemoral cartilage damage, knee effusi
66          To examine the relationship of knee malalignment to the occurrence of knee osteoarthritis (O
67           Two of 6 patients with a posterior malalignment type ventricular septal defect (PMVSD) and
68 24 (P = 0.002) to 0.04 (P = 0.42) when varus malalignment was added to the model.
69                                        Varus malalignment was examined as a possible local mediator t
70                            Conversely, varus malalignment was more likely in the medial PF OA group.
71                         While some effect of malalignment was suggested at almost all stages of knee
72 rm associations of leg-length inequality and malalignment with incident knee osteoarthritis.
73 3]).We found a strong relationship of valgus malalignment with progressive lateral meniscal damage.