戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 it more emotion from physicians than medical malpractice.
2  with personal injury tort cases and medical malpractice.
3 phic data, practice environment, and medical malpractice.
4 gists' experiences or perceptions of medical malpractice.
5 of teamwork and communication in exposure to malpractice.
6 stigating informed consent in spinal surgery malpractice.
7 ake them an attractive target for fraudulent malpractices.
8 Substantial barriers included concerns about malpractice (61.5%) and paperwork or bureaucracy (46.0%)
9 been involved in more than 300 other medical malpractice actions, and who had never performed any kin
10 ogists are extremely concerned about medical malpractice and report that this concern affects their r
11                                      Medical malpractice and the problems associated with it remain a
12           A distinction is made between this malpractice and the proper use of logarithmic plots in r
13  acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, medical malpractice, and the quality of care.
14 ncerns with scientific fraud and publication malpractice, and the stresses and strains (and opportuni
15 ncluded ophthalmology or ophthalmologist and malpractice anywhere in the retrieved documents.
16  database study analyzes the risk of medical malpractice associated with the use of telemedicine for
17  information they would share, and (c) their malpractice attitudes and experiences.
18 academic medical centers covered by a common malpractice carrier underwent 360-degree review in 2012
19 nrollee there was a narrative regarding each malpractice case from which, in most instances, a primar
20                       Working from an actual malpractice case involving serious injury but no apparen
21        Main Outcomes and Measures: Pediatric malpractice case outcomes and settlement amounts.
22 tain informed consent and associated medical malpractice case verdict.
23 teleradiology and nonteleradiology radiology malpractice cases and identify contributing factors unde
24           Results: Sixty-eight ophthalmology malpractice cases involving plaintiffs younger than 18 y
25 ert witnesses who espouse unfounded views in malpractice cases may fuel inappropriate litigation.
26 ive analysis, a national database of medical malpractice cases was queried to identify cases involvin
27                                Teleradiology malpractice cases were identified based on manual review
28                          Sixty-nine glaucoma malpractice cases were included.
29                                    Of the 51 malpractice cases, 46 had been closed as of December 31,
30 ncluded 135 teleradiology and 3474 radiology malpractices cases.
31 tional medicolegal database was searched for malpractice claim cases related to spinal surgery for al
32 ratio (IRR) for any payment as a result of a malpractice claim compared with the average of all 36 st
33 ing the degree of stress caused by a medical malpractice claim described the experience as very or ex
34              The cumulative risk of facing a malpractice claim is high in all specialties, although m
35 nt) who underwent spinal surgery and filed a malpractice claim were studied (mean [SD] age, 47.1 [13.
36 ysicians in low-risk specialties had faced a malpractice claim, as compared with 99% of physicians in
37 e study period, 7.4% of all physicians had a malpractice claim, with 1.6% having a claim leading to a
38 52.4%]) of the radiologists reported a prior malpractice claim, with 18 (14.8%) reporting mammography
39 f 8401) had been the subject of at least one malpractice claim.
40 ificantly associated with the risk of having malpractice claims (P < 0.05).
41 rican College of Surgeons (ACS) reviewed 460 malpractice claims against general surgeons.
42                          The distribution of malpractice claims among physicians is not well understo
43 ms has been associated with lower numbers of malpractice claims and costs.
44  discussions to protect spinal surgeons from malpractice claims and ensure that patients are better i
45 cians experience a disproportionate share of malpractice claims and expenses.
46 egression analysis adjusted for age and sex, malpractice claims and workplace physical violence were
47 ypt and their associations with experiencing malpractice claims and workplace physical violence.
48                  Previous work suggests that malpractice claims are associated with a poor physician-
49           Matched, de-identified reviews and malpractice claims data were available for 264 surgeons
50  the ASA Closed Claims Project suggests that malpractice claims for major damaging events are less co
51 informed consent as an allegation in medical malpractice claims for patients undergoing a spinal proc
52 ommunication behaviors associated with fewer malpractice claims for primary care physicians.
53 ians reviewed a random sample of 1452 closed malpractice claims from five liability insurers to deter
54 ewers analyzed 444 randomly sampled surgical malpractice claims from four liability insurers.
55                                              Malpractice claims generally declined in Michigan during
56 eported the proportion of physicians who had malpractice claims in a year, the proportion of claims l
57 ing on the proportion of physicians who face malpractice claims in a year, the size of those claims,
58        We reviewed the literature and closed malpractice claims in the American Society of Anesthesio
59 ing approximately 30% of all paid and unpaid malpractice claims in the United States, 4081 closed cla
60                                              Malpractice claims incidence was calculated by dividing
61  study the contributing factors and costs of malpractice claims involving the surgical management of
62                       Although the nature of malpractice claims is complex and multifactorial, the id
63            Case--control analysis of medical-malpractice claims may identify and quantify risk factor
64                          An analysis of paid malpractice claims may provide insight into the prevalen
65                   In 2009, there were 10,739 malpractice claims paid on behalf of physicians.
66                                     Rates of malpractice claims per state were calculated with a zero
67 To summarize the currently available data on malpractice claims related to ambulatory anesthesia and
68 wed a higher proportion of closed paediatric malpractice claims related to respiratory events than to
69                  In 2009, the number of paid malpractice claims reported to the National Practitioner
70 o promote patient safety and address risk of malpractice claims should continue to focus on surgeons'
71 yzed associations between the number of paid malpractice claims that physicians accrued and exits fro
72                                        Among malpractice claims that we reviewed independently in an
73                                    Among the malpractice claims we studied, the severity of the patie
74                     Physicians with multiple malpractice claims were no more likely to relocate geogr
75  patient safety incident reports, 403 closed malpractice claims, 24 ambulatory morbidity and mortalit
76 ent 20% of monitored anesthesia care-related malpractice claims, 95% of which involved head/neck surg
77 ated patient safety incident reports, closed malpractice claims, and ambulatory morbidity and mortali
78 en surgical adverse events, risk management, malpractice claims, and resulting indemnity payments to
79 s are associated with patient complications, malpractice claims, and well-being concerns, monitoring
80 tematic assessments of surgeon behavior with malpractice claims, to analyze the relationship between
81 n contributing factors among closed surgical malpractice claims.
82 ociated with significant harm and expense in malpractice claims.
83 60-degree review results are associated with malpractice claims.
84 d rank among the leading sources of surgical malpractice claims.
85 rimary care physicians with vs without prior malpractice claims.
86 n terms of specialties implicated in medical malpractice claims.
87 iation between 360-degree review results and malpractice claims.
88 sed by 360-degree review, is associated with malpractice claims.
89 rvations are associated with risk of medical malpractice claims.
90 or a disproportionately large number of paid malpractice claims.
91 agnosis and in expert testimony produced for malpractice claims.
92  identify these risks and reduce exposure to malpractice claims.
93                    Given the current medical malpractice climate, it is imperative that physicians un
94 ering additional tests/treatments because of malpractice concerns (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.20 to 2.93).
95 ing from mammogram interpretation because of malpractice concerns.
96 include the costs of injuries to patients or malpractice costs.
97 of procedures performed per year, additional malpractice coverage, and revenue generated per hour of
98                  A perennial concern during "malpractice crises" is that liability costs will drive p
99                                  We analyzed malpractice data from 1991 through 2005 for all physicia
100 se, a trauma registry, and a risk management/malpractice database.
101 sure that "doing no harm" comes first in the malpractice debate.
102               Resolving inadequate training, malpractice-driven test ordering, and preventive-care re
103 here were no consistent associations between malpractice environment and Medicare payments.
104                         Associations between malpractice environment and postoperative outcomes and p
105 represent a composite of work, practice, and malpractice expenditures.
106                             However, medical malpractice experience and concerns were not associated
107 39%]; P < .001) and less likely to feel that malpractice experience has decreased job satisfaction (5
108 pread and growing, little is known about the malpractice experience of practitioners who deliver thes
109 sed in number, not decreased." Radiologists' malpractice experiences were not consistently associated
110                    Attending physicians face malpractice exposure not only for the care they provide
111 xt and outcomes of lawsuits alleging medical malpractice for contrast-related imaging procedures.
112  radiologist who had been accused of medical malpractice for failing to communicate to a referring ph
113 s for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Medicare malpractice geographic practice cost index, and composit
114 ) expressed concern about the impact medical malpractice has on mammography practice, with over half
115 sation cases, were required to provide their malpractice history as part of their credentialing appli
116 nship between surgeon 360-degree reviews and malpractice history.
117 ch records state of residence, age, sex, and malpractice history.
118 ant issues such as physician culpability and malpractice implications for failure to collect or act o
119                               The very word "malpractice" implies guilt and immediately places the in
120                This perspective highlights a malpractice in handling calibration data sets.
121  decisions or settlements related to medical malpractice in patients who underwent contrast-related i
122 sial issues concerning possible experimental malpractice in the field, and propose ways to translate
123 ases were used to calculate and characterize malpractice incidence and risk: a surgical operation dat
124 fly addresses the substantive law of medical malpractice, informed consent, the law relating to resea
125                               In the current malpractice insurance crisis, physicians have focused th
126       Exposure measures included physicians' malpractice insurance premiums, state tort reforms, freq
127 risk was measured using mean general surgery malpractice insurance premiums; paid claims per surgeon;
128                                            A malpractice insurer convened a collaborative with 4 Harv
129 er a 10-year period to determine whether the malpractice insurer had closed the case.
130 ent filed between 1985 and 2001 with a large malpractice insurer representing one third of the physic
131                                              Malpractice insurers can use this information to guide m
132                              Using data from malpractice insurers, we analyzed the claims experience
133 ians, the prospect of being sued for medical malpractice is a singularly disturbing aspect of modern
134     The system of tort liability for medical malpractice is frequently criticized for poorly performi
135 al principles and case law to understand how malpractice law is likely to develop in this area.
136  to incorporate evidence-based medicine into malpractice law.
137                      During a recent medical malpractice lawsuit brought against me, I was forced to
138 ern (78.4%), more patient worry (57.6%), and malpractice lawsuit concern (50.9%).
139 o determine if there is an increased medical malpractice lawsuit rate when trauma patient cases are p
140                    We set out to compare the malpractice lawsuit risk and incidence in trauma surgery
141 or trauma patients, and the actual risk of a malpractice lawsuit was low.
142 ients are bringing and prevailing in medical malpractice lawsuits against physicians who conduct inde
143 study highlights the key reasons for medical malpractice lawsuits associated with use of contrast med
144                    Many believe that fear of malpractice lawsuits drives physicians to order otherwis
145                             The incidence of malpractice lawsuits using this denominator is 0.34 laws
146 ted with a lower rate of indemnity payments, malpractice lawsuits, including informed consent allegat
147  which the physician works, local hospitals, malpractice lawyers, and imaging centers.
148 terfactual thinking in the fields of medical malpractice, legal reasoning, and general diagnoses.
149  strategies to reduce the risk for potential malpractice liability include the following: 1) determin
150 uniform standards, and the advent of medical malpractice liability insurance.
151                             However, fear of malpractice liability is a barrier to physician disclosu
152 ork in which physicians can assess potential malpractice liability issues in counseling patients abou
153                         Physicians with poor malpractice liability records may pose a risk to patient
154 ies found no association between measures of malpractice liability risk and health care quality and o
155 ury awards, the presence of an immunity from malpractice liability, the Centers for Medicare & Medica
156 ortance: Understanding outcomes of pediatric malpractice litigation allows ophthalmologists to gain i
157                                      Medical malpractice litigation appeared in the United States aro
158                        The overhead costs of malpractice litigation are exorbitant.
159 formation regarding the long-term history of malpractice litigation can be found in the literature.
160                                      Medical malpractice litigation has since been sustained for a ce
161 rs associated with increased risk of medical malpractice litigation have been identified, including s
162 causes and outcomes of ophthalmology medical malpractice litigation involving patients younger than 1
163                   Conclusions and Relevance: Malpractice litigation involving pediatric patients was
164 es 2 questions: (1) when and why did medical malpractice litigation originate in the United States an
165  those seeking to reform the current medical malpractice litigation system.
166                     To assess the ability of malpractice litigation to make accurate determinations,
167    The WestLaw database was reviewed for all malpractice litigation with ophthalmologist defendants i
168 or their work as expert witnesses in medical malpractice litigation.
169 e most common clinical scenario resulting in malpractice litigation.
170 of mistrust often leads patients to consider malpractice litigation.
171 med consent is an important cause of medical malpractice litigation.
172 ven by both plaintiff and defense experts in malpractice litigation.
173  an effort to reduce the volume and costs of malpractice litigation.
174 f this technique, confirming the established malpractice of the use of bismethyl(dithio)methane in bl
175 iabilities (by reducing instances of medical malpractice or privacy invasions through improvements in
176 m payment, physicians' claims history, total malpractice payments, jury awards, the presence of an im
177 were compensated for lost operative time via malpractice premium discounts, continuing education cred
178 edicare and Medicaid, quality assurance, and malpractice reform).
179 ries mentioned quality assurance mechanisms, malpractice reform, or new public health initiatives.
180  case database for reported cases of medical malpractice related to DTC telemedicine services or thei
181 e of those claims, and the cumulative career malpractice risk according to specialty.
182  consistent associations between state-level malpractice risk and higher quality of care or Medicare
183 of negative physician behaviors may mitigate malpractice risk and ultimately result in the improved q
184 urgeons, and by implication may have a lower malpractice risk as a group.
185               When questioned, surgeons cite malpractice risk as a rationale for not providing trauma
186                      The perceived increased malpractice risk attributed to trauma patients discourag
187   Few associations between measures of state malpractice risk environment and outcomes were identifie
188 se to physicians' concerns about exposure to malpractice risk in direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicin
189                                           If malpractice risk is related in large measure to factors
190                         Associations between malpractice risk measures and health care quality and sa
191 e insurers can use this information to guide malpractice risk prevention and education for primary ca
192                     We hypothesized that the malpractice risk was equivalent between an elective surg
193                                  State-level malpractice risk was measured using mean general surgery
194 hat patients treated in states with greatest malpractice risk were more likely than those in lowest r
195      Radiologists' estimates of their future malpractice risk were substantially higher than the actu
196 tantiate or refute the perceived high trauma malpractice risk.
197 y seek to improve communication and decrease malpractice risk.
198 n has been shown to correlate with increased malpractice risk.
199 healthcare institutions at unacceptably high malpractice risk?
200 sing liability costs are overstated, but the malpractice situation is having demonstrable effects on
201  2005), enacted legislation that changed the malpractice standard for emergency care to gross neglige
202   Legislation that substantially changed the malpractice standard for emergency physicians in three s
203 ain subgroups, such as those disciplined for malpractice, substance use, or sexual abuse, have been s
204 re, by far, the most common generic cause of malpractice suits against radiologists.
205 s substantial variation in the likelihood of malpractice suits and the size of indemnity payments acr
206          Although major incidents leading to malpractice suits are less, new liability exposure may b
207 own that in New York State the initiation of malpractice suits correlates poorly with the actual occu
208 sed to determine the number and incidence of malpractice suits filed following full discussion at an
209 diologists in Alabama had the lowest rate of malpractice suits per 100 practice-years for men (0.95;
210  make accurate determinations, we studied 51 malpractice suits to identify factors that predict payme
211 erally against family wishes run the risk of malpractice suits, although such suits usually are unsuc
212 practice, specialty training, and history of malpractice suits.
213 ate over tort reform, critics of the medical malpractice system charge that frivolous litigation--cla
214                               The US medical malpractice system is designed to deter negligence and e
215 llide with fundamental tenets of the medical malpractice system.
216  ones, would not exceed the costs of current malpractice systems in the United States.
217  rule on futile treatment is the traditional malpractice test, which measures physician actions again
218 threats, such as illegal dumping and fishery malpractices that were visually documented during the su
219 endations will increase liability in medical malpractice, undermining the use of potentially benefici
220 cost indices for work, practice expense, and malpractice were sourced from the Centers for Medicare &
221  this, authorship is rife with injustice and malpractice, with women expressing concerns regarding th

 
Page Top