戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  Staphylococcus aureus, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia).
2 zinc L1 beta-lactamase from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
3 negative bacilli, including Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
4 ygenase gene to a megaplasmid in cells of P. maltophilia.
5 d at least one sputum sample positive for S. maltophilia.
6 al microbiology laboratories were in fact S. maltophilia.
7 pportunistic human pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
8  Escherichia hermannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
9 AmpC-E, CRE, DTR P. aeruginosa, CRAB, and S. maltophilia.
10 AmpC-E, CRE, DTR-P. aeruginosa, CRAB, and S. maltophilia.
11 o-beta-lactamase (MBL) from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
12 cASTs) and use CLSI breakpoints (BPs) for S. maltophilia.
13 16S rRNA gene sequencing as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
14 acter baumannii (CRAB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
15 acter baumannii (CRAB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
16 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
17 ug resistant human pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
18 reus, A. xylosoxidans, D. acidovorans and S. maltophilia.
19 ident among other respiratory isolates of S. maltophilia.
20  from the emerging pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
21 osa and the human pathogen, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
22 lin-resistant S. aureus], 2 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae) and resulted in an
23 terobacter cloacae 1/4; and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 2/8.
24  and finally, pan-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (20%).
25 r baumannii (2/3, 67%), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (3/18, 17%).
26 erobacter aerogenes (4.4%), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (4.3%), Proteus mirabilis (4.0%), Klebsiella
27 dans (100%) followed by MDR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (46%), MDR Achromobacter xylosoxidans (33%),
28 us, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter spp., and Burkholderia spp. d
29 reus, Burkholderia cepacia, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxidans and atypical myc
30 rkholderia cepacia complex, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter baumannii and other rare path
31 552 genomes of the pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia across 23 sites of the lungs from a patient
32 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia--all major threats to our cancer patients.
33 ere, we investigated the pathogenicity of S. maltophilia alone and during polymicrobial infection wit
34                We have now confirmed that S. maltophilia also encodes a type IVA secretion system (Vi
35  the Gram-negative pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, an important cause of nosocomial infections
36 ring in 2 patients with MDR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and 2 patients with MDR Achromobacter xyloso
37  To examine the molecular epidemiology of S. maltophilia and A. xylosoxidans in CF, isolates from pat
38 ing can distinguish unique CF isolates of S. maltophilia and A. xylosoxidans, person-to-person transm
39                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Achromobacter (Alcaligenes) xylosoxidans
40 -negative ESKAPE pathogens, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and biothreat pathogens.
41  the Gram negative bacteria Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Escherichia coli.
42 thogen interaction between C. elegans and S. maltophilia and established a new animal model with whic
43 the opportunistic pathogens Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Ochrobactrum anthropi were detected in m
44 ruginosa, the T4SS promoted the growth of S. maltophilia and reduced the numbers of heterologous bact
45 romobacter xylosoxidans and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns
46 species, Proteus mirabilis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ) and Gram-positive bacteria ( Staphylococcu
47 in-resistant P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Achromobacter xylosoxidans but was less
48 tobacter baumannii complex, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Burkholderia cepacia complex were teste
49 rophomonas nitritireducens, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Comamonas testosterone.
50 ae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Enterococcus sp.
51 cies: Cupriavidus gilardii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Geovibrio thiophilus.
52          Cultures confirmed Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (160
53 niae, Enterobacter cloacae, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and the Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC)
54 epresents the first examination of T2S in S. maltophilia, and the data obtained indicate that Xps T2S
55         While ocular infections caused by S. maltophilia are documented, endogenous endophthalmitis (
56 biology references describe Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as oxidase negative and variable with respec
57 atories should use caution with cASTs for S. maltophilia, as a high rate of errors may be observed.
58 , we present the first documented case of S. maltophilia-associated EE in an immunocompetent adult in
59                                           S. maltophilia-associated EE is a rare clinical condition,
60 (non-baumannii complex) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia at this time, and, as such, antimicrobial su
61                                           S. maltophilia attaches to various mammalian cells, and we
62 ibitors reverse ceftazidime resistance in S. maltophilia because, unlike clavulanic acid, they do not
63 ine (MIN), and ceftazidime (CAZ) with 109 S. maltophilia bloodstream isolates.
64 pp, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Burkholderia cepacia, and Acinetobacter bau
65 ve the penetration of antimicrobials into S. maltophilia by conjugating them with TonB substrates wil
66 f CF patients with moderate lung disease, S. maltophilia can be cultured from respiratory tract secre
67                         Identification of S. maltophilia can be problematic, and analysis of isolates
68 eruginosa, 14 for A. baumannii, and 2 for S. maltophilia Categorical agreement (CA) was assessed usin
69                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia causes high-mortality infections in immunoco
70  ions in the dinuclear active site of the S. maltophilia Class B3 MbetaL move away from each other, b
71  extensively drug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolate expressing L1.
72 that smlt0009 mutants already exist among S. maltophilia clinical isolates and have reduced susceptib
73 ovel designation within the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex associated with isolates derived fro
74                          We show that the S. maltophilia complex is divided into 23 monophyletic line
75 stinct component within the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex.
76 y transducer TonB, encoded by smlt0009 in S. maltophilia, confer ceftazidime resistance and smlt0009
77 ll cases, the effect of the T4SS required S. maltophilia contact with its target.
78                            The extents of S. maltophilia contamination of environmental sites frequen
79  aeruginosa elicited significantly higher S. maltophilia counts in bronchoalveolar lavages and lung t
80          At the six centers with multiple S. maltophilia culture-positive patients and the seven cent
81 xty-one of 69 CF centers screened had 183 S. maltophilia culture-positive patients, and 46 centers ha
82 ients with > or =10 positive cultures (12 S. maltophilia cultures, 15 A. xylosoxidans cultures) had s
83 sequencing for identification and, unlike S. maltophilia, demonstrated susceptibility to most antibio
84 uginosa, the hazard ratio associated with S. maltophilia detection was 0.89 (95% confidence interval,
85 sted their utility to accurately identify S. maltophilia directly from sputum.
86 eruginosa afford a significant benefit to S. maltophilia during polymicrobial infections.
87 of biofilms formed in vitro revealed that S. maltophilia formed well-integrated biofilms with P. aeru
88 ant, opportunistic pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from 22 countries to infer population struct
89                           Recovery of SCV S. maltophilia from the sputum of CF patients has implicati
90 P. aeruginosa, live E. aerogenes, or live S. maltophilia gave good recovery of cysts.
91 acterization of contaminant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia habouring antibiotic resistance genes.
92  maltophilia, those patients positive for S. maltophilia had the following baseline characteristics b
93  the opportunistic pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has been determined at 1.7 A resolution by t
94 ic sarcosine oxidase (TSOX) from Pseudomonas maltophilia has been determined at 1.85 A resolution.
95                                           S. maltophilia has been isolated in association with nemato
96                             SXT-resistant S. maltophilia has been reported, but the mechanism of resi
97                  Background Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has increasingly become a significant hospit
98                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has plant growth-promoting potential, and in
99                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has recently emerged as an important nosocom
100     Although patients with CF who acquire S. maltophilia have more advanced disease than those who do
101 epidemiology indicates that patients with S. maltophilia have poorer diagnoses, its clinical signific
102 romobacter xylosoxidans and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia have similar posttransplant survival as comp
103                Nutritional studies of SCV S. maltophilia have suggested auxotrophy in hemin, methioni
104 ative carbapenem use as a risk factor for S. maltophilia in leukemia patients.
105 tility of the SS-PCR to directly identify S. maltophilia in sputum was examined.
106  Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia increased significantly during the same time
107 Of 90 included patients, 8 (9%) developed S. maltophilia infection (pneumonia, n = 6; skin-soft tissu
108 oral microbiome as a potential source for S. maltophilia infection and highlight cumulative carbapene
109 rs to be important in the pathogenesis of S. maltophilia infection as less than 20% of TNFR1 null mic
110 e bacteremic; and 7/8 (88%) patients with S. maltophilia infection had detectable levels of Stenotrop
111 umulative antibiotic use as predictors of S. maltophilia infection in AML patients receiving remissio
112                         No association of S. maltophilia infection with fecal relative abundance was
113 primary outcome, microbiologically proven S. maltophilia infection, was analyzed using a time-varying
114  as the inflammatory response elicited by S. maltophilia infection.
115  Little is known about factors that drive S. maltophilia infection.
116 avity might identify patients at risk for S. maltophilia infection.
117 plus aztreonam as combination therapy for S. maltophilia infections and confirm that aztreonam-like b
118 he optimal treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections are limited.
119  about the treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections.
120 acter baumannii (CRAB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.
121 s the therapeutic repertoire for managing S. maltophilia infections.
122 allo-beta-lactamase L1 from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a dinuclear Zn(II) enzyme that contains a
123                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a Gram-negative bacterium found ubiquitou
124                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a gram-negative bacterium that has been c
125                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a Gram-negative bacterium that is among t
126                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a multiple-antibiotic-resistant opportuni
127                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a ubiquitous bacterium and an emerging no
128                                           S. maltophilia is also a risk factor for lung exacerbations
129                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging opportunistic and nosocomial
130                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging opportunistic pathogen that p
131                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging, opportunistic nosocomial pat
132 omated in vitro susceptibility testing of S. maltophilia is challenging because commercial test syste
133                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is difficult to treat due to the production
134                                           S. maltophilia is highly resistant to most antibiotics, wit
135                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is increasingly common in patients with acut
136 The Gram-negative bacterium Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is increasingly identified as a multidrug-re
137                                           S. maltophilia is increasingly observed in patient sputa in
138                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is intrinsically resistant to many beta-lact
139 metallo-beta-lactamase from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is unique among this class of enzymes becaus
140 lass B3 enzyme expressed by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, is a significant contributor to the beta-la
141 romobacter xylosoxidans and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, is poorly characterized.
142 ngosepticum isolates, and 1 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolate) producing IMP-1, IMP-1-like, IMP-18
143                     We found that a local S. maltophilia isolate, JCMS, is more virulent than the oth
144 te, JCMS, is more virulent than the other S. maltophilia isolates (R551-3 and K279a) tested.
145 ulted in amplification of a band from all S. maltophilia isolates and was uniformly negative for all
146  that can rapidly and accurately identify S. maltophilia isolates and which can be used for the direc
147 veloped and tested against a panel of 112 S. maltophilia isolates collected from diverse geographic l
148            A diverse panel of 41 clinical S. maltophilia isolates collected through the SENTRY Antimi
149 s of suspected small-colony-variant (SCV) S. maltophilia isolates from the sputa of five CF patients
150 SCV S. maltophilia isolates were the only S. maltophilia isolates in these cultures, and none were cl
151           Analysis of a collection of 766 S. maltophilia isolates indicated that approximately 20% ar
152  relevant antimicrobials against clinical S. maltophilia isolates nonsusceptible to levofloxacin and/
153            Respiratory and nonrespiratory S. maltophilia isolates were highly immunostimulatory and e
154                                   The SCV S. maltophilia isolates were the only S. maltophilia isolat
155                                       The S. maltophilia isolates were weakly invasive, and low-level
156 , as multidrug resistance is common among S. maltophilia isolates, treatment options for these infect
157  baumannii isolates, and 11 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates.
158 i, Serratia marcescens, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates.
159 ficantly differentially expressed between S. maltophilia JCMS and avirulent bacteria (Escherichia col
160 ken together, these findings suggest that S. maltophilia JCMS evades the pathogen resistance conferre
161                                  However, S. maltophilia JCMS is virulent to normally pathogen-resist
162 ic bacteria also play a role in combating S. maltophilia JCMS.
163 aride lyase (Smlt1473) from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia k279a, which exhibited significant activity
164 ta-lactam hydrolysis by the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia L1 metallo-beta-lactamase.
165  Furthermore, these results indicate that S. maltophilia may have clinical significance in respirator
166  be P. aeruginosa (n = 10), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 1), and Burkholderia cepacia (n = 1).
167 as maltophilia (n = 5), MDR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 26), and CF patients without Achromobac
168 3), Serratia spp. (n = 10), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 43), Sphingobacterium spp. (n = 3), and
169 omonas aeruginosa (n = 25), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 46), and Myroides sp. (n = 1).
170 ans (n = 15), pan-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 5), MDR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n
171  n = 3, n = 17), and one of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 8).
172  who were older than 6 years of age, were S. maltophilia negative in the first year of enrollment, an
173 with live P. aeruginosa, E. aerogenes, or S. maltophilia offer optimal recovery of Acanthamoeba.
174 ndation Registry, to assess the effect of S. maltophilia on survival.
175 Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia or Bulkholderia cenocepacia (n = 131).
176 on of Burkholderia cepacia, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, or Alcaligenes xylosoxidans; however, isola
177 nt Acinetobacter baumannii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, or New Delhi metallo-B-lactamase-producing
178 wn to be highly unstable in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia P21 and Pseudomonas putida H2.
179 aminodeoxychorismate synthase activity of S. maltophilia PabB alone revealed that it is virtually ina
180 ss spectral analysis further suggest that S. maltophilia PabB, like Escherichia coli PabB, binds tryp
181 ies exhibited by StmPr1 may contribute to S. maltophilia pathogenesis in the lung by inducing tissue
182 Xps T2S likely plays an important role in S. maltophilia pathogenesis.
183 o antibiotics may select for both the SCV S. maltophilia phenotype and SXT resistance by interference
184        However, FAD in TSOX from Pseudomonas maltophilia (pTSOX) exhibits properties similar to those
185 st Acinetobacter baumannii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epide
186         Thus, we purified StmPr1 from the S. maltophilia strain K279a culture supernatant and evaluat
187  in the clinically relevant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain K279a demonstrates a wide range of pH
188                 We recently reported that S. maltophilia strain K279a encodes the Xps type II secreti
189 es of the Xps type II secretion system in S. maltophilia strain K279a.
190 ata from this study, we hypothesized that S. maltophilia strain ZL1 was able to convert E1 to amino a
191   To achieve the objective, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain ZL1 was used as a model estrogen degr
192  is a multicomponent enzyme from Pseudomonas maltophilia, strain DI-6, that catalyzes the conversion
193 /D4] T4SS) that is highly conserved among S. maltophilia strains and, looking beyond the Stenotrophom
194             The source of the majority of S. maltophilia strains colonizing the respiratory tracts of
195  confirmed that once established, the SCV S. maltophilia strains persisted.
196 nes xylosoxidans strains, 5 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains, and 5 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain
197 monas aeruginosa strains, 8 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains, and 9 isolates belonging to nine ot
198                                  Pseudomonas maltophilia, Strept, pneumoniae, and P. intermedia were
199 edicated pabA is evident in the genome of S. maltophilia, suggesting that another cellular amidotrans
200 ntain reliable activity against resistant S. maltophilia The role of minocycline in the treatment of
201       Despite the lack of invasiveness of S. maltophilia, the immunostimulatory properties of this or
202       With the exception of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, these organisms are infrequently implicated
203            Compared with patients without S. maltophilia, those patients positive for S. maltophilia
204 rain K279a, the first clinical isolate of S. maltophilia to be sequenced, encodes a functional type I
205 penemases are restricted to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, to a few Bacteroides fragilis, and to rare
206   The results of this study indicate that S. maltophilia transiently colonizes the lung accompanied b
207 overall virulence of clinical isolates of S. maltophilia using the well-characterized opportunistic p
208 la, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Vibrio cholerae, and Yersinia enterocolitic
209                                     Thus, S. maltophilia VirB/D4 T4SS appears to secrete multiple eff
210 oblem, the genetic and molecular basis of S. maltophilia virulence is quite minimally defined.
211 ine in the treatment of infections due to S. maltophilia warrants further clinical investigation give
212 A putative alginate lyase (Smlt1473) from S. maltophilia was heterologously expressed in Escherichia
213 35 home-use nebulizers, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was isolated from 4 of 35 home-use nebulizer
214                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was isolated from the respiratory tracts of
215 e phenotypic switch from wild-type to SCV S. maltophilia was reproducible in vitro by exposure to SXT
216 allo-beta-lactamase L1 from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was studied using rapid-scan and stopped-flo
217 lues for P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, and S. maltophilia were 94.1%, 92.7%, and 95.5%, respectively,
218 lues for P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, and S. maltophilia were 99.5%, 99.2%, and 100%, respectively.
219 lonization, persistence, and virulence of S. maltophilia were assessed in experimental respiratory in
220                    Eighty-two isolates of S. maltophilia were cultured from 67 different environmenta
221       The immunostimulatory properties of S. maltophilia were studied in vitro by stimulating airway
222 sence of fungal targets and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, which were detected in 26 and 4 of 200 spec
223         We compared patients who acquired S. maltophilia with those who did not, using survival analy
224 rcial susceptibility testing systems with S. maltophilia, with a focus on how to implement their use
225                             Stenotrophomonas maltophilia WR-C is capable of forming biofilm on polyst
226 sight into the virulence potential of the S. maltophilia Xps type II secretion system and its StmPr1

 
Page Top