戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              Manometric abnormalities were seen in 32 cases (68.1%) o
2 pendent variable controlling for independent manometric and clinical variables.
3                                              Manometric and endoscopic video-recording times were syn
4 tients with UES dysphagia using a concurrent manometric and video endoscopic technique.
5 ion are separately extracted from concurrent manometric and videofluoroscopic data.
6 me relationships were assessed by a barostat manometric assembly in 35 healthy women and 111 women wi
7 ressures were measured using a miniaturized, manometric assembly in decerebrate, unanaesthetized ferr
8 ressures were measured using a miniaturized, manometric assembly in decerebrate, unanaesthetized ferr
9                     A 36-channel solid-state manometric assembly was placed spanning from stomach to
10                                A solid-state manometric assembly with 36 circumferential sensors spac
11 th pharyngeal dysphagia underwent a detailed manometric assessment of the upper esophageal sphincter
12                                            A manometric catheter equipped with a high-compliance bag
13                                High-fidelity manometric catheters and respirometry were used to study
14 ssure was measured in anesthetized mice with manometric catheters, and echocardiography was performed
15 tive case control study (n = 121) evaluating manometric changes after MSA.
16                                           No manometric changes occurred in both groups; 24-hour MII-
17                              To evaluate the manometric changes, function, and impact of magnetic sph
18                                              Manometric changes, pH testing, and proton pump inhibito
19 he impact of opioid exposure on clinical and manometric characteristics, and (2) the association of o
20 of this study was to critically evaluate the manometric criteria in a population of patients with idi
21 nufacture catheter-like device for capturing manometric data across the dynamic range observed in the
22 deotaped fluoroscopy and was correlated with manometric data.
23 s established with clinical, radiologic, and manometric data.
24 ed, accurate and reproducible recognition of manometric diagnoses by HRM will allow the clinician to
25        Particularly in older patients with a manometric diagnosis of achalasia, additional investigat
26                                          The manometric diagnosis of distal esophageal spasm (DES) us
27                Treatment naive patients with manometric diagnosis of primary achalasia were included.
28 ange) follow-up of 8.9 years (5.8-10.4) post manometric diagnosis with median PROMIS-GI swallowing do
29 d waves detected in 18 subjects referred for manometric evaluation of unexplained symptoms.
30 nts with pharyngeal swallowing disorders and manometric evidence of defective sphincter opening and i
31                     Seventy-eight tLESRs had manometric evidence of flow and the majority had evidenc
32 ed on barium esophagograms who had undergone manometric examinations and met the inclusion criteria.
33                         No other clinical or manometric features differed between groups.
34 ariants of achalasia were defined by finding manometric features that significantly differed from the
35 ith a well defined pathology, characteristic manometric features, and good response to treatments dir
36 e recognition that these sometimes confusing manometric findings are consistent with achalasia when c
37                  Evidence for POEM for these manometric findings are limited and should only be consi
38                         Intravascular US and manometric findings clarify the mechanisms of branch-ves
39 sorder which has clinical, radiographic, and manometric findings that are often indistinguishable fro
40                               Radiologic and manometric findings were correlated with clinical findin
41 patient comorbidity, preoperative diagnosis, manometric findings, and prior anal pathology).
42                   MSA results in significant manometric improvement of the LES without apparent delet
43 lope of the relationship between TonoLab and manometric IOP in all the mice was 0.998, with an interc
44       The relation of the TonoLab reading to manometric IOP was evaluated in multivariate linear regr
45 nometry, or for increasing versus decreasing manometric IOP.
46  was monitored by optical, amperometric, and manometric kinetic techniques, and the results were math
47 y 18% of patients with a normal preoperative manometric LES deteriorated to a lower category.
48                                              Manometric measures were equivalent prior to banding in
49     * Novel 3D and deepening the analysis of manometric parameters before the London Classification a
50                  However, certain measurable manometric parameters could potentially aid in identifyi
51                                Additional 3D manometric parameters were: pressure-volume (PV) 10(4)mm
52 er, without a disease-specific biomarker, no manometric pattern is absolutely specific.
53                                     Although manometric patterns have been defined for these disorder
54 motility disorders comprise various abnormal manometric patterns which usually present with dysphagia
55       to confirm that non-endoscopic peroral manometric placement of WC is as effective and better to
56  of all the TP readings from one eye at each manometric pressure setting, showed a slope 0.692 +/- 0.
57                                Intratracheal manometric pressures during sustained phonation, convers
58          Linear regression analysis of TP on manometric readings for grouped data from all six eyes,
59  topography plots compared with conventional manometric recordings are (1) accurately delineating and
60                       Clinical histories and manometric recordings of 58 patients with idiopathic ach
61           The histological studies validated manometric results with the regeneration of a well-organ
62 ant differences among the groups relative to manometric results, frequency of bowel movements, incont
63                                          The manometric signature of opening was pressure equalizatio
64 PT) has dramatically changed the paradigm of manometric studies.
65                         We evaluated whether manometric subtype was associated with response to treat
66 ed mice, LES pressures were recorded using a manometric technique and response to electrical stimulat
67 d mouse strains by a larger bore microneedle manometric technique.
68 py and barium esophagram until the advent of manometric techniques in the 1970s, which provided the f
69                                              Manometric tracings were classified according to the 3 C
70 of patients with type II achalasia (based on manometric tracings) are treated successfully with PD or
71 ed by comparing the measurements against the manometric (true) IOP determined in cannulated mouse eye
72                                              Manometric values of "gastroesophageal junction" signifi
73                                 Clinical and manometric variables including treatment response were c