ライフサイエンスコーパス: manometry

1 otting represents an evolution in esophageal manometry.

2 with chronic constipation evaluated by colon manometry.

3 (EGJ) pressure segment using high-resolution manometry.

4 al spasm, achalasia and patients with normal manometry.

5 apy, ambulatory pH monitoring, or esophageal manometry.

6 ic findings of achalasia had aperistalsis at manometry.

7 loss) were correlated with LES relaxation at manometry.

8 e used to guide treatment without a need for manometry.

9 lic blood pressure by computerized tail-cuff manometry.

10 ital Anxiety and Depression scale), and anal manometry.

11 esophageal pH and lower esophageal sphincter manometry.

12 tatus was assessed by questionnaire and anal manometry.

13 aired and achalasia was confirmed in vivo by manometry.

14 agnetic resonance defecography and anorectal manometry.

15 ction outflow obstruction on high-resolution manometry.

16 timed barium esophagram, and high-resolution manometry.

17 physiology was assessed with high-resolution manometry.

18 ns have been found between bio-impedance and manometry.

19 Patients received continuous esophageal manometry.

20 diagnostics with high-resolution esophageal manometry.

21 pump goggles on IOP using continuous direct manometry.

22 trasonography, and high-resolution impedance manometry.

23 geal contractions not observed with standard manometry.

24 d patients through high-resolution anorectal manometry.

25 onents analysis of high-resolution anorectal manometry.

26 geal function was assessed by pH testing and manometry.

27 re calibrated bi-weekly via anterior chamber manometry.

28 e reproducible and in close concordance with manometry.

29 vals by pneumotonometry, tonometry, WIT, and manometry.

30 re likely to change the clinical practice of manometry.

31 of achalasia when compared with conventional manometry.

32 episcleral venous pressure (Pe) measured by manometry.

33 High-resolution pH-metry (12 sensors) and manometry (36 sensors) were performed in upright and sup

34 Participants underwent 3D high-resolution manometry (3DHRM) with a catheter equipped with 96 trans

35 cuation i.e., abnormal evacuation pattern on manometry, abnormal balloon expulsion test or impaired r

36 g (off PPIs), and high-resolution esophageal manometry analyses.

37 pH/manometry analysis demonstrated acute elevations of the

38 six patients with complete LES relaxation at manometry and 10 with incomplete relaxation.

39 hma without reflux symptoms using esophageal manometry and 24-h esophageal pH testing.

40 Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring were done in 52, 47

41 ients (50%) agreed to functional evaluation (manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring); 90 patients (85%)

42 Patients were also assessed by esophageal manometry and a timed barium esophagogram.

43 erwent stationary esophageal high-resolution manometry and ambulatory 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring

44 Along with the anal manometry and balloon expulsion tests, magnetic resonanc

45 the initial work-out with a barium swallow, manometry and endoscopy was suggestive for primary achal

46 Manometry and esophageal pH were recorded for 30 minutes

47 Anorectal manometry and imaging are useful for evaluating anal and

48 were monitored by concurrent high-resolution manometry and intraluminal impedance.

49 Newer diagnostic tools (eg, high-resolution manometry and magnetic resonance defecography) provide a

50 An improvement in diagnostic esophageal manometry and mini-invasive surgical infrastructure and

51 and anti-diarrhoeal agents) fail, anorectal manometry and other tests (endoanal imaging, defecograph

52 derwent fasting and post-prandial concurrent manometry and pH for detailed analysis of reflux events.

53 d underwent objective assessment for reflux (manometry and pH/impedance).

54 position using concurrent UES and esophageal manometry and polysomnography.

55 High-resolution manometry and recently described analysis algorithms, su

56 Respiratory measurements using esophageal manometry and respiratory inductance plethysmography wer

57 rograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with manometry and sphincterotomy.

58 ents were prospectively evaluated using anal manometry and subjective functional results.

59 High-resolution manometry and the Milan Score numerically quantify the d

60 Postoperative manometry and timed barium swallows showed significant i

61 They were submitted to esophageal manometry and to pH-metric examination with two pH-metri

62 Simultaneous manometry and ultrasound imaging reveal that, during per

63 l clip movement was assessed with concurrent manometry and videofluoroscopy during swallowing to exam

64 ary with assessment of colonic motility with manometry and/or a barostat, can identify colonic dysmot

65 ructural causes, followed by high-resolution manometry and/or barium radiography.

66 w limitation (measured by RIP and esophageal manometry) and classified as subglottic or supraglottic

67 L questionnaire, upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour impedance pH (24-hour MII-pH) mon

68 questionnaires, upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring before an

69 Endoscopy, stationary esophageal manometry, and 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring off PPIs

70 ients with BE underwent RFA, high-resolution manometry, and 24-hour impedance-pH testing; they receiv

71 d questionnaire, upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour pH monitoring before and 24 month

72 ent included physical examination, anorectal manometry, and anal endosonography.

73 ng myoelectric complexes on small intestinal manometry, and by presence of tachygastria on cutaneous

74 underwent symptomatic assessment, esophageal manometry, and esophageal pH monitoring (using a probe w

75 diagnosis is unclear, endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and esophageal pH monitoring are recommended.

76 a major technological tweak on conventional manometry, and impedance pH monitoring yields informatio

77 ent endoscopy, esophageal biopsy, esophageal manometry, and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH mo

78 results of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), manometry, and pH monitoring were collected and analyzed

79 res, measured with high-resolution anorectal manometry, and rectal balloon expulsion time in 62 healt

80 ements by scintigraphy, gastroduodenojejunal manometry, and surface electrogastrography in humans.

81 ry and its correlation to baseline anorectal manometry (ARM) parameters and physiotherapy with anorec

82 he symptom pattern supplemented by anorectal manometry (ARM), the balloon expulsion test (BET), and e

83 Further investigation of intratracheal manometry as a biofeedback tool to improve TEP voicing i

84 ed and high-resolution colonic and anorectal manometry as well as the barostat, despite their technic

85 arable to those of commercial devices for GI manometry, as we show for the sensing of GI motility in

86 In two protocols an endoluminal ultrasound-manometry assembly was drawn through the human gastro-oe

87 ns could consider combining loperamide, anal manometry-assisted biofeedback, and a standard education

88 plus education only, placebo plus anorectal manometry-assisted biofeedback, loperamide plus educatio

89 compare different combinations of anorectal manometry-assisted biofeedback, loperamide, education, a

90 ducation only, and loperamide plus anorectal manometry-assisted biofeedback.

91 Incontinence Quality of Life, and anorectal manometry at 3, 6, and 12 months compared to baseline.

92 tients were studied via 24-hour pH study and manometry at 6 months postoperatively.

93 y at 1, 6, and 12 months and venography with manometry at 6-month intervals after the procedure.

94 symptoms only (control) or by symptoms plus manometry at timepoints based on volume drained.

95 nt 24-hour ambulatory esophageal monitoring, manometry, autonomic function testing and GER symptom as

96 Esophageal high-resolution manometry before and after laparoscopic or endoscopic my

97 minutes after extubation, RIP and esophageal manometry better identified patients who subsequently re

98 a radiographic esophagram and intratracheal manometry between September 9, 2019, and December 4, 201

99 Anodermal blood flow was measured during manometry by laser Doppler flowmetry.

100 Esophageal contractility not observed with manometry can be detected in patients with achalasia usi

101 The high-resolution manometry can help to distinguish each specific motility

102 RIP and esophageal manometry can objectively identify subglottic UAO after

103 r relaxations (tLESRs) using high-resolution manometry coupled with simultaneous fluoroscopy.

104 ractions (n = 186 [17.4%] using conventional manometry criteria; n = 85 [7.9%] using EPT criteria) we

105 Esophageal pretreatment manometry data were collected from 176 patients who part

106 osition, 9.1% (10/110) of patients had their manometry diagnosis change from EMDs to a normal result

107 ssure patterns using High Resolution Colonic Manometry during a baseline period and in response to a

108 Measurement of pleural pressure by manometry during large-volume thoracentesis does not alt

109 ients (67%) had incomplete LES relaxation at manometry during swallowing, and seven (33%) had complet

110 whether monitoring of pleural pressure with manometry during thoracentesis could protect against com

111 Objective testing (manometry, endoscopy, timed-barium swallow) was performe

112 ted peroral placement or SC after esophageal manometry (ESM).

113 number of novel techniques - high-resolution manometry, esophageal electrical impedance and intra-lum

114 All had esophageal manometry, esophageal evoked potentials to electrical st

115 atients underwent small intestinal motility (manometry; fasted and fed contraction frequency, phase I

116 y (n = 141) or sham (n = 73) irrespective of manometry findings.

117 cation patients were studied with concurrent manometry, fluoroscopy, and stepwise controlled barostat

118 d underwent motility testing with esophageal manometry, functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panomet

119 All patients underwent esophageal manometry, gastric emptying study, and sham-feeding test

120 umothorax ex vacuo compared with none in the manometry group (p=0.01).

121 In the manometry group, an additional criterion for stopping wa

122 High-resolution esophageal manometry has improved the sensitivity for detecting ach

123 Systematic use of esophageal manometry has the potential to improve ventilator manage

124 n it shows entirely normal findings, because manometry helps in part to exclude dysmotility as a caus

125 ents who underwent high resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET) for

126 High-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) and fluoroscopic defecography, which

127 The utility of high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) for diagnosing defecatory disorders (

128 High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) has been developed to improve measureme

129 aluate CMP activity, high-resolution colonic manometry (HRCM), remains expensive and not widely acces

130 stinal endoscopy, esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and 24-hour MI-pH monitoring (Laborie).

131 Both high-resolution manometry (HRM) and impedance-pH/manometry monitoring ha

132 medical center who underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) between 2007 and 2018 were included.

133 High-resolution manometry (HRM) coupled with high-resolution esophageal

134 High resolution manometry (HRM) has substantially redefined the actual a

135 Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is considered the gold standard modality

136 y swallow studies (VFSS) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) methods complement to ascertain mechanis

137 s pressure (IBP) recorded by high-resolution manometry (HRM) portrays the compartmentalized force on

138 and Classification allied to high-resolution manometry (HRM) technological evolution has updated and

139 The use of high-resolution manometry (HRM) to diagnose oesophageal motility disorde

140 With the introduction of high-resolution manometry (HRM), esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) ar

141 stalsis are discernable with high-resolution manometry (HRM).

142 Manometry identifies patterns suggestive of myopathy, ne

143 di dysfunction; pancreatic sphincter of Oddi manometry identifies which high-risk patients may benefi

144 oplication, using high-resolution esophageal manometry impedance (HRMZ) catheter as well as with the

145 lity and flow were measured using a combined manometry-impedance catheter and small intestinal transi

146 g probe, and high-resolution antral duodenal manometry in characterizing the abnormal motor functions

147 ting a direct spatio-temporal correlation to manometry in evaluating colonic motility.

148 frequently suggested in IBS-C and anorectal manometry in FC.

149 esistive catheters may broaden the use of GI manometry in low-resource settings.

150 terns of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract via manometry is essential for the diagnosis of GI motility

151 However, manometry is expensive and relies on complex and bulky i

152 inically useful when expertise in esophageal manometry is not available or not tolerated and when eso

153 High-resolution manometry is the gold standard for diagnosis, while cork

154 SO manometry is valuable to select patients with sphincter

155 Pleural manometry is widely used to safeguard against pressure-r

156 namic gallbladder scintigraphy and sphincter manometry) is controversial.

157 Patients who underwent manometry mainly due to dysphagia or reflux symptoms bet

158 adiographic findings are equivocal, however, manometry may be required for a more certain diagnosis.

159 ignificant results pertain to transit tests; manometry may contribute importantly to the diagnostic p

160 The concordance between the WIT and direct manometry measurements was high.

161 gnificant changes were detected in anorectal manometry measurements.

162 We compared the manometry metrics and the final diagnosis of EMDs betwee

163 re distinct or overlap is unclear; anorectal manometry might be used in diagnosis, but healthy person

164 nuous surface electromyography and footplate manometry monitored task performance.

165 -resolution manometry (HRM) and impedance-pH/manometry monitoring have established themselves as rese

166 o-impedance scheme simultaneous with luminal manometry monitoring.

167 intravascular ultrasound (US) (n = 35), and manometry (n = 56).

168 Manometry (n = 86), endoscopy (n = 101), pH monitoring (

169 our esophageal pH monitoring, and stationary manometry (n=143) to characterize reflux patterns.

170 ith biopsy), barium swallow, and oesophageal manometry, no obstructive cause may be found.

171 ailable or not tolerated and when esophageal manometry or barium videofluoroscopy results are equivoc

172 018 and 2019, of adults undergoing esophagal manometry or transnasal panendoscopy was carried out in

173 tional study of adults undergoing esophageal manometry or transnasal panendoscopy, patients with lary

174 or animals, for open versus closed stopcock manometry, or for increasing versus decreasing manometri

175 agnosis, prior anal pathology, abnormal anal manometry, patient comorbidity, pouch-perineal or pouch-

176 piration, laryngitis, GERD, GORD, endoscopy, manometry, pH monitoring, proton pump inhibitors, and Ni

177 piration, laryngitis, GERD, GORD, endoscopy, manometry, pH monitoring, proton pump inhibitors, open f

178 It can be combined with manometry, pH, and impedance measurement techniques to d

179 GERD was confirmed by gastroscopy, manometry, pH-metry and barium swallow.

180 concurrent fluoroscopic barium proctography/manometry (proctomanometry).

181 egree of soiling/incontinence, and anorectal manometry profile(s).

182 A search of radiology and manometry records identified 21 patients (12 men, nine w

183 Manometry reports were reviewed for presence or absence

184 dition of solid swallows to the test changed manometry results in 43 patients (43.4%) (P<0.005).

185 Continence and anal manometry results were improved in incontinent patients

186 Manometry results were not associated with the outcome.

187 f esophageal motor disorders, and esophageal manometry retains its position as the diagnostic gold st

188 nal endoscopy; subsequently, high-resolution manometry revealed an esophago-gastric junction outflow

189 Manometry should be performed if achalasia is suspected.

190 one and/or nonachalasia spastic disorders on manometry should undergo a comprehensive evaluation with

191 Esophageal manometry showed a high prevalence of a hypotensive lowe

192 GROUND & AIMS: The role of sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) in the management of patients with idiop

193 n after cholecystectomy undergoing ERCP with manometry, sphincterotomy vs sham did not reduce disabil

194 Esophageal manometry studies revealed a decrease in lower esophagea

195 patients with normal antroduodenal and colon manometry studies that were performed simultaneously.

196 e performed using the ISOLAB high-resolution manometry system.

197 rent esophageal infusion and high-resolution manometry to determine UES, lower esophageal sphincter,

198 In this retrospective study, we used manometry to evaluate the effects of carbonated water on

199 uctance plethysmography (RIP) and esophageal manometry to identify clinically significant post-extuba

200 al abnormalities, esophageal high-resolution manometry to rule out major motor disorders, and pH moni

201 We used colon manometry to study the effect of intravenous erythromyci

202 Intraluminal manometry using a customized micro-sized catheter assemb

203 Esophageal manometry was associated with small but statistically si

204 Anal manometry was performed 3 and 12 months after treatment

205 Manometry was performed by using a sleeve catheter passe

206 Pyloric sphincter manometry was performed in wild-type controls, neuronal

207 bands were surgically placed, and esophageal manometry was performed prebanding, at 2-week intervals

208 Direct manometry was performed via an anterior chamber cannula

209 ld standard diagnostic method via esophageal manometry was unavailable.

210 Synchronized videofluoroscopy and manometry was used in 8 volunteers (5 men and 3 women) t

211 nographies (New York, NY) without esophageal manometry was used to assess the night-to-night variabil

212 ge 1 sleep were no different when esophageal manometry was used.

213 n patients with carditis whose sphincter, on manometry, was structurally defective.

214 erexpressing, and wild-type mice using still manometry; we analyzed defecation induced by acute parti

215 naires, balloon expulsion test and anorectal manometry were done for reference.

216 Electrogastrography and antroduodenal manometry were performed in 9 nonsmokers and 9 smokers d

217 Combined high-resolution pH measurement and manometry were performed in fasted state for 20 minutes

218 ts (Solingen, Germany), both with esophageal manometry, were used to develop P(obs) and validate it a

219 hic abnormalities, the diagnosis may rely on manometry, which is the most sensitive test for the dise

220 Continuous perfusion manometry with a low-compliance machine was performed in

221 ce portion of the high-resolution esophageal manometry with impedance (HREMI) studies.