ライフサイエンスコーパス: matched pair

1 date (incidence date of FI for case in each matched pair).

2 years) were also studied (1037 age- and sex-matched pairs).

3 antly higher in cases than controls (N = 476 matched pairs).

4 ents and healthy adults were studied (n = 10 matched pairs).

5 l hazards model with stratification for each matched pair.

6 the XDB from the door-to-needle time in each matched pair.

7 ropensity score matching resulted in 50 well-matched pairs.

8 oxon singed-rank test and Student t test for matched pairs.

9 ity score matching was used to identify 1745 matched pairs.

10 sed a risk set sampling method to select 788 matched pairs.

11 burden, and decade of diagnosis) yielded 221 matched pairs.

12 ar survival of 43% compared with 52% for 8/8 matched pairs.

13 ed with risk of colorectal cancer in the 455 matched pairs.

14 eline clinical variables yielded 1021 unique matched pairs.

15 onectomy patients identified, we derived 318 matched pairs.

16 1:1 propensity score matching resulted in 92 matched pairs.

17 cteristics, including diagnosis, yielded 140 matched pairs.

18 rol for baseline imbalances and yielded 3649 matched pairs.

19 model with PS, 0.69 (.29-1.65); and PS-based matched pairs, 0.98 (.76-1.26).

20 ith single-arterial CABG in 3,588 propensity-matched pairs (15.1% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.01).

21 aracteristics and after comparing propensity-matched pairs (2.5% vs 3.7%, P<.001).

22 Of 1563 eligible patients, 195 matched pairs (390 patients) were created.

23 This was significantly higher in DPB1-matched pairs (74%) as compared with DPB1-mismatched pai

24 In matched pairs, alloreactive helper T-lymphocyte precurso

25 -adjusted logistic regression analyses and a matched pair analyses by propensity scores were used to

26 city analyses for diagnostic performance and matched pair analyses were performed on vertebral fractu

27 Matched pairs analyses were performed using data from ea

28 Matched-pair analyses of patients who received six to ei

29 Matched-pair analyses revealed significant differences i

30 Recent retrospective matched-pair analyses support its use in appropriately s

31 culations for Gleason scores using iterative matched-pair analyses.

32 In matched-pairs analyses, the odds ratio in the highest ve

33 red precursor regions were evaluated through matched-pairs analyses.

34 Furthermore, a matched pair analysis was completed to determine structu

35 Matched pair analysis with open sublay repair revealed s

36 Here, using matched pair analysis, we find that junior researchers w

37 on by immunohistochemistry in a case-control matched pair analysis.

38 Statistical analysis was based on matched pairs analysis by t-tests, i.e. boxers and healt

39 We used a matched pairs analysis design.

40 A matched pairs analysis revealed that time on ventilator

41 d for total volume of emphysema and age, and matched pairs analysis was used to relate emphysema dist

42 Retrospective cohort analysis and matched pairs analysis with historic controls were perfo

43 Further survival analysis was performed by matched-pair analysis according to three prognostic vari

44 d and Marrow Transplantation, we performed a matched-pair analysis comparing those 2 strategies in a

45 Furthermore, matched-pair analysis demonstrated smoking was associate

46 In a matched-pair analysis of 81 pregnant women matched to 81

47 ned statistically significant (P=0.017) in a matched-pair analysis of n=336 IPAH patients.

48 A matched-pair analysis of NF-kappa B expression was perfo

49 terogeneity, favoring an ongoing prospective matched-pair analysis of patients with similar disease s

50 Matched-pair analysis of subtypes showed that 69% of sam

51 Matched-pair analysis of the 45 RetroNeph versus 45 LapN

52 Propensity scoring and matched-pair analysis resulted in 269 matched pairs of p

53 A matched-pair analysis showed that integrated MIEX and co

54 The differences were similar in a matched-pair analysis that adjusted for age, sex, transp

55 We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare the capacity for hypert

56 In matched-pair analysis, antibiotic prophylaxis for sponta

57 cant difference was preserved in the Gleason-matched-pair analysis.

58 ined using both direct risk adjustment and a matched-pairs analysis based on propensity for preoperat

59 The matched-pairs analysis found that the difference in mort

60 A matched-pairs analysis was performed and confirmed a hig

61 Where appropriate, a matched-pairs analysis was performed and these were comp

62 A separate matched-pairs analysis was used to assess the benefit of

63 A total of 205 commercially/Medicare-insured matched pairs and 136 Medicaid matched pairs were select

64 er than those of corresponding unsubstituted matched pairs and can be rationalized from increased hyd

65 econdary outcomes included agreement between matched pairs and predictors of agreement.

66 ld increase in potency relative to monomeric matched pairs and represent the most potent FimH antagon

67 ed genotype and haplotype frequencies in 455 matched pairs, and characterized the tumor characteristi

68 and brand-name initiators involved 1,313,161 matched pairs, and no differences in outcomes were noted

69 The first method used 70,040 matched pairs, and the other 2 techniques used the entir

70 comorbidities and demographics, allowing for matched pairs available for comparisons.

71 Among 16 169 matched pairs, average IOP after the index date was lowe

72 A matched-pair brain morphometry approach was used to cont

73 SRL had an equivalent effect in matched pairs but was associated with a significantly hi

74 TP53(+/-) matched-pair cell lines were used to determine if knockd

75 2 conditional knockout mouse, we established matched-pair cells with and without the Arp2/3 complex.

76 Using a matched-pair cluster randomized study design (ClinicalTr

77 We conducted a matched-pair, cluster-randomized, controlled trial in 60

78 patients by intention-to-treat analysis in a matched-pair cohort and in subsets defined by age, cardi

79 The matched-pair cohort included 5,480 patients (mean age 67

80 in a motorcycle crash can be estimated using matched-pair cohort methods.

81 A matched-pair cohort study of two-vehicle, head-on, fatal

82 In a retrospective matched-pair cohort study, 113 of 131 patients with AAVs

83 sing propensity score methods to construct a matched-pairs cohort to reduce baseline differences betw

84 Conditional Poisson regression for matched-pair cohorts was used to estimate risk ratios ad

85 lure for 7/8 and 6/8 (allele and/or antigen) matched pairs compared with 8/8 matched transplants was

86 However, the matched-pair comparison could have introduced a source o

87 Methods: This retrospective matched-pair comparison matched 160 (18)F-rhPSMA-7 with

88 Using a matched-pair comparison of villages in northern Benin (t

89 l was designed as an equivalence trial, with matched-pair comparisons between the cancer-detection ra

90 enesis, we compared the genes expressed in a matched pair composed of vascularized breast tumor and i

91 Compared to matched-paired controls, significant hypoadiponectinemia

92 mutation-based exact logistic regression for matched pairs data.

93 pective analysis of nearly 46,000 propensity-matched pairs demonstrated no statistically significant

94 Analysis of normal/tumor matched pairs derived from colon and rectum demonstrates

95 Using a matched pairs design in which each of 28 Caucasian schiz

96 annot be excluded, this was minimized by the matched-pair design, as remaining group differences afte

97 ts screened and genotyped, and compared in a matched-pairs design, in which each patient was matched

98 ses had higher NfL on POD2 and PO1MO (median matched pair difference = 16.2pg/ml and 13.6pg/ml, respe

99 d 38,522 singleton children and 92 twins (46 matched pairs) discordant in antibiotic exposure.

100 ust SEs that accounted for the clustering of matched pairs, DM was the strongest predictor of structu

101 In analysis of 1312 propensity score-matched pairs, early coronary angiography was associated

102 he effects of these environments, we apply a matched-pairs experimental design to career and producti

103 these changes nor the MS were present in age-matched, pair-fed MG(-) mice.

104 There were 634 age-matched pairs for a total sample of 1,268 MSM of 1,700 M

105 A case-control analysis of 284 matched pairs found no association between antiplatelet

106 rans-acyl transferase PKSs, exemplified by a matched pair from the virginiamycin (Vir) system.

107 The matched-pair Gehan rank test for censored survival was u

108 eyes of a reference collective (n = 30) and matched-pairs group (n = 8) after primary DMEK for Fuchs

109 In ALL, DPB1-matched pairs had a significantly worse overall survival

110 commended but not given chemotherapy (n=1884 matched pairs) identified improved overall survival with

111 s associated with higher mortality in 84 905 matched pairs in Ontario (hazard ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.

112 ic comparison of 1,2,4- and 1,3,4-oxadiazole matched pairs in the AstraZeneca compound collection.

113 estimated by paired testing in twins and in matched pairs in the cohorts, and by meta-analysis over

114 Propensity matching resulted in 678 matched pairs in the current vs never smoker grouping an

115 We genotyped 83 matched pairs, in which one or both members of the pair

116 We identified 75 251 matched pairs initiating ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II

117 missive HLA-DPB1 mismatches in otherwise HLA-matched pairs is indicated.

118 In 340 propensity score-matched pairs, IVUS was also associated with significant

119 However, in KALT patients receiving the matched-pair kidneys of the KTA recipients, patient mort

120 Among 115 propensity score-matched pairs <=65 years of age, no significant differen

121 re analyzed by using the Student t, Wilcoxon matched pair, Mann-Whitney, Spearman rank correlation, a

122 Among 12 584 propensity score-matched pairs (mean [SD] age, 58.3 [10.9] years; 48.2% m

123 Of 201 propensity score-matched pairs, mean age was 63 +/- 17 years, 51% were ma

124 e folding and hybridization models deal with matched pairs, mismatches, symmetric and asymmetric inte

125 In the 10 of 10 matched pairs (n = 282), the 3-year probability of relap

126 Both kidneys (matched pairs; n = 6 + 6) were preserved for 20 hours by

127 Matched cases and controls for AIDS (n = 50 matched pairs), non-AIDS-defining (n = 63) events and de

128 ancer specimens but little to no staining in matched-paired normal colon tissues.

129 iple 'omics' approach to investigate patient-matched, paired NSCLC tumor and non-malignant parenchyma

130 -1 RNA levels of >50 copies/ml than Monitor (matched-pair odds ratio [mOR] = 4.2; modified Obuchowski

131 ved from genetically unrelated embryos and a matched pair of colon tumor and adjacent normal colon ti

132 In this study, we established a matched pair of glioblastoma stem-like cell (GSC) cultur

133 l Fas status and malignant phenotype using a matched pair of naturally occurring primary (Fas-sensiti

134 son of gene expression profiles of a patient-matched pair of NPFs vs CAFs identified 671 transcripts

135 plicability of (44)Sc/(47)Sc as an excellent matched pair of nuclides for PET imaging and radionuclid

136 ial expression of small GTPase proteins in a matched pair of primary/metastatic CRC cell lines.

137 Oligoarray analysis of a matched pair of prostate cancer and normal cell lines de

138 tle or no differential in activity against a matched pair of vinblastine sensitive and resistant (Pgp

139 e (ACh) +/- L-arginine was carried out in 33 matched pairs of African American and white subjects wit

140 id; 79 096 tricuspid), 2691 propensity-score matched pairs of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic stenosis

141 Seven time-matched pairs of blood plasma (BP) and saliva samples we

142 ytes by generating "on-target" DNA breaks at matched pairs of bona fide recombination signal sequence

143 by real-time RT-PCR screening of a panel of matched pairs of breast tumors.

144 The number of matched pairs of cases and controls varied by veterinari

145 We inoculated tonsil histocultures with matched pairs of congenic viruses that differed only by

146 correlated with malignant phenotype between matched pairs of differentially aggressive malignant sub

147 A total of 10,089 propensity score-matched pairs of DPP-4 inhibitor users and sulfonylurea

148 By comparing matched pairs of duplex and junction species, we were ab

149 dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) of 22 matched pairs of elderly SCZ and comparison subjects.

150 rated randomisation sequence, we selected 12 matched pairs of eligible hospitals.

151 erence to 18 essential birth practices in 15 matched pairs of facilities at 2 and 12 months after the

152 w that the types of N-linked glycans between matched pairs of Fc mutants vary greatly and in particul

153 analysis, we compared the claims patterns of matched pairs of FEHB and control plans by examining the

154 isolates from each of 5 center A patients, 5 matched pairs of fluconazole-susceptible/resistant isola

155 ed HCV-infected persons.We identified 34,480 matched pairs of HCV-infected subjects and controls.

156 We randomly assigned treatment within 74 matched pairs of health clusters-ie, health facility cat

157 The two populations consisted of matched pairs of healthy individuals (n = 374), of which

158 Four matched pairs of hGFs and hPDLFs were cultured.

159 We analysed 12 matched pairs of histologically normal squamous mucosa a

160 b levels were compared in serum samples from matched pairs of HIV-positive rapid progressors (RPs) an

161 ignificantly varying miRNAs in a panel of 29 matched pairs of human cervical cancer and normal cervic

162 Using matched pairs of human myometrial and leiomyoma smooth m

163 responding outcomes based on iGFR using 9742 matched pairs of iGFR and serum creatinine measurements.

164 We compared six matched pairs of IMCs and PVs.

165 Identical EGFR genotypes were found in matched pairs of ISP and associated SNSCC, providing the

166 s for a set of 805 human miRs collected from matched pairs of migratory and migration-restricted cell

167 ospective cohort study, GH was identified in matched pairs of mothers with GDM or without GDM (matche

168 nes that were consistently different between matched pairs of normal and tumor specimens; a selected

169 long-term mortality between propensity score-matched pairs of PAH patients with and without beta-bloc

170 This resulted in 1519 well-matched pairs of patients (73%).

171 ng and matched-pair analysis resulted in 269 matched pairs of patients and demonstrated that patients

172 ubjects, a study population comprised of 198 matched pairs of patients and healthy controls (52 SZ/co

173 Matched pairs of patients receiving either balanced with

174 ensity score matching analysis identified 79 matched pairs of patients to compare outcomes.

175 After matching, 268 adequately matched pairs of patients were identified.

176 Across 8 products, 2,264,774 matched pairs of patients were included in the compariso

177 n a case-control analysis of a subset of 215 matched pairs of patients who did and did not undergo RH

178 We identified 39,966 matched pairs of patients who had undergone either open

179 Comparison of 287 prognostically matched pairs of patients who underwent immediate (after

180 We analyzed 103 propensity score-matched pairs of patients who underwent percutaneous PFO

181 In the 243 matched pairs of patients with end-stage renal disease o

182 The study population included 7877 matched pairs of patients with PD (65 women [0.8%] and 7

183 PNA concentration and UVA dose and required matched pairs of pcPNAs.

184 To test this hypothesis, we obtained matched pairs of peripheral blood lymphocytes and serum

185 Cox regression stratified on matched pairs of PH cases and control subjects confirmed

186 ltage signals and 314 epicardial/endocardial matched pairs of points were analyzed.

187 cinoma, where Fas expression was examined in matched pairs of primary and metastatic cell lines as we

188 We analyzed RNA expression in matched pairs of primary breast cancer biopsies before a

189 l carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, including five matched pairs of primary tumors and lymph node metastase

190 fficient for Ras-mediated radioresistance in matched pairs of RIE-1 rat intestinal epithelial cells e

191 Using the changes in ASE in matched pairs of samples we discover 71 genes with exces

192 Examining GABAAR subunit N-glycosylation in matched pairs of schizophrenia (N=14) and comparison (N=

193 was evaluated by in situ hybridization in 22 matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects a

194 PFC tissue sections from 20 matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects w

195 METHOD: In matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects,

196 In matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects,

197 delta subunits in prefrontal cortex from 23 matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects.

198 BDNF Val66Met genotyping was performed in 27 matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects.

199 al cortex layers 2 and 4, respectively, from matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects.

200 orsolateral prefrontal cortex area 9 from 62 matched pairs of schizophrenia and healthy comparison su

201 reaction in the prefrontal cortex from 1) 62 matched pairs of schizophrenia and unaffected comparison

202 Prefrontal cortex tissue sections from 20 matched pairs of schizophrenia and unaffected comparison

203 cortical regions in the vsWM network from 20 matched pairs of schizophrenia and unaffected comparison

204 containing prefrontal cortex area 9 from 10 matched pairs of schizophrenic and comparison subjects w

205 Simultaneous measurements of 10 matched pairs of sibling trees of the opposite sex but s

206 amination, we reviewed retrospectively 1,408 matched pairs of simultaneous catheter-drawn and venipun

207 of DLPFC deep layer 3 were collected from 56 matched pairs of subjects with schizophrenia and compari

208 e layers of prefrontal cortex area 9 from 20 matched pairs of subjects with schizophrenia and normal

209 the transcriptome of DLPFC L3 PV cells in 36 matched pairs of SZ and unaffected comparison subjects.

210 tegy for de novo peptide sequencing based on matched pairs of tandem mass spectra (MS/MS) obtained by

211 have been performed with a set of molecular matched pairs of tiotropium on a large variety of mutate

212 n assays), alongside cytotoxicity tests with matched pairs of topoisomerase II-resistant and topoisom

213 djusted and propensity-matched analyses (594 matched pairs of treated and untreated patients) were pe

214 ii) analysis of experimental data from three matched pairs of tumor and normal cell lines.

215 sues, we extended our analysis to additional matched pairs of tumor tissues obtained from breast, lun

216 Analysis of 107 matched pairs of vaccine and nonvaccine patients reveale

217 Three var. immuginata populations and three matched pairs of var. clausa populations, including both

218 gistic regression and an analysis using 2265 matched pairs of VHA and Medicare patients, there were n

219 Using a combination of sampling methods at matched-pairs of lit and unlit sites, we found significa

220 By estimating effects among naturally matched pairs on the same motorcycle, one can account fo

221 d a comparison of BMR of 13 phylogenetically matched pairs, one species from the tropics and one from

222 n ischemic tissue compared with non-ischemic matched pairs (p<0.001) and both TKR and VV controls, ho

223 p16-high cells from 17.9 to 6.1% (mean of 13 matched pairs; P < 0.001) and increased cleaved caspase-

224 In the matched pairs, patients exposed to TXA received less red

225 rthermore, in a Cox model of 3976 propensity-matched pairs, patients who received chemotherapy during

226 er clearance for the azetidines than for the matched-pair piperidines.

227 In propensity-matched pairs, placement of a DES compared with a BMS in

228 t between LOH identified in BM aspirates and matched-pair primary tumors.

229 Theranostic agents that incorporate the matched-pair radionuclides of scandium-(43)Sc/(47)Sc or

230 val, and death-censored graft survival among matched-paired recipients.

231 Propensity score-matched pairs showed a nonsignificant trend toward lower

232 model of conditional logistic regression for matched pairs showed that a history of intra-abdominal s

233 individual strains from each of two serovar-matched pairs showed that these pairs were very similar

234 Both Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test and the sign test of matc

235 Mann-Whitney, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank tests were performed.

236 The Wilcoxon test matched-pair signed ranks were used to analyze the outco

237 assessed by using the nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, and differences between

238 als, and CNR were compared with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.

239 urality, which were compared with a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.

240 ach scenario were tested by using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.

241 atched groups using the McNemar and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed ranks tests.

242 atistically significant (P = 0.125, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test).

243 xon Mann-Whitney U test, chi2 test, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test, life-table analysis, Kap

244 lts analyzed by Bonferroni-adjusted Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests found pain suppression s

245 Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests were used for pre-post c

246 The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test was used to compare pre-

247 LC (mean 24.5+/-11.4 mN) (P = 0.75, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test).

248 CCC mean 29.1+/-23.1 mN; P = 0.012, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test).

249 sibility were analyzed by using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test.

250 aser mean 26.1+/-6.8 mN; P = 0.012, Wilcoxon matched-pairs, signed-ranks test).

251 within-subjects analysis of each physician's matched-pair simulation encounters, adjusting for order

252 ential of (203)Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg(11))CCMSH as a matched-pair SPECT agent for (212)Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg(11))CCM

253 properties, highlighting its potential as a matched-pair SPECT agent for (212)Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg(11))CCM

254 Propensity score-matched pairs, subgroups, and sensitivity analyses did n

255 Matched-pair survival was compared using the Cox proport

256 We analyzed 112 patients with matched/paired synchronous metastases (SM#1 and SM#2) pr

257 icipants with and without glaucoma (P < .05, matched-pair t tests).

258 One-sided matched-paired t tests were performed to compare data fr

259 m each allocation scheme were compared using matched-pairs t tests.

260 m each allocation scheme were compared using matched-pairs t-tests.

261 were compared to the fellow eye by Wilcoxon matched pair test.

262 t test for parametric data and the Wilcoxon matched pairs test for non-parametric data.

263 t test, unmatched Student t test, Wilcoxon's matched pairs test, and the Mann Whitney U Test with P <

264 e of both methods as detectors was compared (matched-pair test design).

265 ts were analyzed with nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs test and Spearman correlation.

266 , followed by the Tukey test or the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test.

267 Friedman analysis of variance and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were performed for statistical compa

268 lts in four major histocompatibility complex-matched pairs that were mismatched for the porcine allel

269 According to analysis of matched pairs, the 2-year, risk-adjusted mortality rates

270 r the propensity score-matched groups (n=197 matched pairs), there was no difference in wait-list mor

271 Among 1680 propensity-matched pairs, there was a significantly higher risk of

272 In the matched pairs, there were no significant differences in

273 A matched-pair tissue array analysis demonstrated the sign

274 ation or a corresponding quarterly update in matched pairs to avoid immortal time bias.

275 ns using conditional logistic regression for matched pairs to calculate odds ratios (ORs).

276 ities in Thailand were randomly allocated in matched pairs to receive 36 months of community-based vo

277 uter-generated random numbers used to assign matched pairs to study groups.

278 pleen Tx in major histocompatibility complex-matched pairs treated with CsA+/-thymic irradiation resu

279 comes were compared among 1280 patients (640 matched pairs) treated with BioFreedom BES or Cre8 AES.

280 Three hundred sixty-seven matched pairs underwent RYGB; single-stage patients expe

281 Eight hundred seventy-five matched pairs underwent SG; single-stage patients experi

282 and 3215 psoriasis and spondyloarthropathies matched pairs using TNF-alpha antagonists and comparator

283 regular care (standard care; n = 13); no age-matched pairing was performed.

284 The mutational status of the matched pairs was highly concordant (> 90% concordance f

285 er, and a nested case-control study with 512 matched pairs was used for analysis of the association b

286 The resulting cohort of 933 matched pairs was used to compare mortality/myocardial i

287 Propensity scoring with matched pairs was used to perform Kaplan-Meier survival

288 Propensity matching (908 matched pairs) was used for balanced comparison of outco

289 Individuals in a matched pair were randomly assigned by computer-generate

290 by the four most significant covariates, 447 matched pairs were formed between patients seen before o

291 Using propensity score matching, 12,564 matched pairs were formed for comparison of Lichtenstein

292 Twenty-six matched pairs were identified.

293 Matched pairs were selected for the independent discover

294 icare-insured matched pairs and 136 Medicaid matched pairs were selected.

295 Fifty-two matched pairs were studied.

296 The 389 propensity-matched pairs were then used to analyze differences in r

297 pairs signed rank test and the sign test of matched pairs were used to compare estimated functional

298 A total of 2708 patients (1354 matched pairs) were included in the study.

299 Measurements were compared using matched-pairs Wilcoxon signed rank test.

300 lled, and masked contralateral comparison of matched-pair, within-patient recession defects, collagen