1 on by immunohistochemistry in a case-control
matched pair analysis.
2 e led to false inference using the standard,
matched-pair analysis.
3 alized prostate cancer in this retrospective
matched-pair analysis.
4 cant difference was preserved in the Gleason-
matched-pair analysis.
5 Further survival analysis was performed by
matched-pair analysis according to three prognostic vari
6 mpared with matched controls using McNemar's
matched-pair analysis and conditional logistic regressio
7 ts justify confirmation with real-world data
matched-pair analysis and further clinical trials to ref
8 We used Cox regression models,
matched-pairs analysis,
and logistic regression models t
9 In
matched-pair analysis,
antibiotic prophylaxis for sponta
10 ined using both direct risk adjustment and a
matched-pairs analysis based on propensity for preoperat
11 Statistical analysis was based on
matched pairs analysis by t-tests, i.e. boxers and healt
12 related donor UCB versus bone marrow (BM), a
matched-pair analysis comparing the outcomes of recipien
13 d and Marrow Transplantation, we performed a
matched-pair analysis comparing those 2 strategies in a
14 Furthermore,
matched-pair analysis demonstrated smoking was associate
15 We used a
matched pairs analysis design.
16 The
matched-pairs analysis found that the difference in mort
17 By
matched-pair analysis,
LCC conveyed a moderately increas
18 In a
matched-pair analysis of 81 pregnant women matched to 81
19 ned statistically significant (P=0.017) in a
matched-pair analysis of n=336 IPAH patients.
20 A
matched-pair analysis of NF-kappa B expression was perfo
21 terogeneity, favoring an ongoing prospective
matched-pair analysis of patients with similar disease s
22 Matched-pair analysis of subtypes showed that 69% of sam
23 Matched-pair analysis of the 45 RetroNeph versus 45 LapN
24 According to a
matched-pair analysis,
pancreas graft survival for SPK r
25 In a
matched-pair analysis,
PFS differences in targeted thera
26 Propensity scoring and
matched-pair analysis resulted in 269 matched pairs of p
27 A
matched pairs analysis revealed that time on ventilator
28 A
matched-pair analysis revealed that, compared with stand
29 A
matched-pair analysis showed that integrated MIEX and co
30 The differences were similar in a
matched-pair analysis that adjusted for age, sex, transp
31 In this paper, we use molecular
matched-pair analysis to better understand the effects o
32 We performed a
matched-pair analysis to compare our institution's exper
33 We did a
matched-pair analysis to compare outcome in MMF versus a
34 We performed a
matched-pair analysis to compare the capacity for hypert
35 Furthermore, a
matched pair analysis was completed to determine structu
36 d for total volume of emphysema and age, and
matched pairs analysis was used to relate emphysema dist
37 To assess the benefit of NAAD, a
matched-pair analysis was performed.
38 A
matched-pairs analysis was performed and confirmed a hig
39 Where appropriate, a
matched-pairs analysis was performed and these were comp
40 A separate
matched-pairs analysis was used to assess the benefit of
41 Here, using
matched pair analysis,
we find that junior researchers w
42 Matched pair analysis with open sublay repair revealed s
43 Retrospective cohort analysis and
matched pairs analysis with historic controls were perfo