戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ing an estimated incidence of 9.2 per 10,000 maternities.
2 ong women, pregnancy (27 of 108 [25.0%]) and maternity (12 [11.1%)] were the most frequently cited ba
3 e sepsis was 4.7 (95% CI 4.2-5.2) per 10,000 maternities; 71 (19.5%) women developed septic shock; an
4                                  We examined maternity admissions using hospital administrative data
5 astewater treatment plant (Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Fuzhou, China) as the
6 ula vulgaris, the pheromone that signals egg maternity and enables the workers to selectively destroy
7                 Nursing and medical staff in maternity and gynaecological settings regularly care for
8 ab, Bukan in Iran, using routinely collected maternity and health data on pregnancies.
9 earch of Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and Ovid Maternity and Infant Care from each database's inception
10               Data sources (Medline, Embase, Maternity and Infant care, Cochrane, Web of Science, Pop
11 pairs were recruited from the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, China, between January 1(
12 oach to supporting residents through written maternity and lactation policies, structured mentorship
13   High-quality evidence is now needed on how maternity and mental health services should address dome
14 g of multiple offspring and assess offspring maternity and needs during development.
15  among 68,571 mother-child dyads of Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank, Scotland.
16 pulation-based cohort study conducted in all maternity and neonatal units in France in 2011.
17 el to characterize health system quality for maternity and newborn services.
18 ve, observational study was undertaken at 11 maternity and obstetric care facilities based in Ethiopi
19 hospitals] and Karachi, Pakistan [one public maternity and one children's hospital]).
20 ol countries without) and that provided paid maternity and parental leave (seven intervention and 15
21  (OR 1.46 for tuition-free and 1.45 for paid maternity and parental leave) as a proxy indicator of ge
22 study, we used data compiled by the National Maternity and Perinatal Audit, based on birth records fr
23  a fundamental difference between the sexes: maternity and the opportunities it creates for transmiss
24 plet-care for the mother-newborn dyad during maternity and/or neonatal care.
25 dence of AFE ranged from 0.8-1.8 per 100,000 maternities, and the proportion of women with AFE who di
26  with peers, adjusting for sociodemographic, maternity, and comorbidity confounders.
27 ere adjusted for potential sociodemographic, maternity, and comorbidity confounders.
28 d, with subthemes on access to primary care, maternity, and mental health services (eg, "Vast unmet n
29 outcomes were compared between patients with maternity-associated and nonmaternity-associated IE and
30                                              Maternity-associated IE does not appear to confer additi
31 th patients with nonmaternity-associated IE, maternity-associated infection was associated with young
32 h 382 (weighted national estimate, 748) were maternity-associated.
33  was constructed by linking together health (maternity, birth, and health visitor records) and educat
34 %; difference, 2.9% [95% CI, 0.3% to 5.5%]), maternity care (69.7% vs 73.6%; difference, 3.8% [95% CI
35 tudies document the extent of person-centred maternity care (PCMC)-ie, responsive and respectful mate
36                                              Maternity care access by maternal county residence.
37 and 2023 was attributable to improvements in maternity care and 38.8% was attributable to fertility r
38       Accelerated efforts should be given to maternity care and family planning interventions for ach
39     Our analysis suggests that both improved maternity care and fertility reduction, primarily throug
40             Improving access to high-quality maternity care and reducing maternal morbidity and morta
41 nces [POPPIE] group) or standard care group (maternity care by different midwives working in designat
42 asible interventions to improve neonatal and maternity care could save many lives.
43  as a complement to care that is provided by maternity care facilities, but there is limited evidence
44 ich aimed to co-produce solutions to improve maternity care for migrant women in the UK, by working w
45            First, we measured the effects of maternity care improvement and fertility reduction on ma
46           We aimed to examine the effects of maternity care improvement, fertility reduction, and inc
47 n 2011, we also examined equity in access to maternity care in 42 poor counties in western China.
48 quitous experience for refugee women seeking maternity care in high income countries.
49 he specific needs of refugee women accessing maternity care in high income countries.
50 health facilities-eg, professionalisation of maternity care in large hospitals, effective referral sy
51 ducation package into community and facility maternity care in low-resource settings could reduce a c
52 he 2YoungLives intervention as an adjunct to maternity care in rural and urban communities served by
53 reassurance that the current organisation of maternity care in the UK allows for good planning and ri
54              Public health and obstetric and maternity care interventions are needed to address what
55 d Jane Sandall discuss research on models of maternity care led by midwives.
56                           Lack of respectful maternity care may be a key factor associated with dispa
57 .8 to 6.2); 0.7-percentage point decrease in maternity care quality (95% CI, -6.4 to 5.0]); and a 0.6
58  the problem of obstetric violence in the US maternity care system with signboard messages posted fro
59  experiences of obstetric violence in the US maternity care system.
60 ation between infant mortality and access to maternity care was assessed using multivariable log-bino
61 ve analysis of free text responses regarding maternity care was performed.
62 t was obtained, and all women presenting for maternity care were eligible for inclusion.
63 those cluster communities and presenting for maternity care were eligible.
64  Whether China's highly medicalised model of maternity care will be an answer for these populations i
65 r the experience of obstetric violence in US maternity care with a healthcare systems approach that i
66 stern Uganda at facilities that provide 24-h maternity care with at least 200 births per year.
67  sign device and training package in routine maternity care with the aim of reducing a composite outc
68 o prioritise safe, accessible, and equitable maternity care within the strategic response to this pan
69 ng intervention use and improving quality of maternity care worldwide.
70 er, social vulnerability index, and level of maternity care), and clinical factors (maternal comorbid
71 e care, chronic disease care management, and maternity care).
72 1% for chronic disease management, 65.5% for maternity care, and 80.8% for patient experience.
73 reduction is possible through improvement in maternity care, which reduces the risk per birth, and a
74 ty care (PCMC)-ie, responsive and respectful maternity care-in low-income and middle-income countries
75 ctive and enhances women's satisfaction with maternity care.
76 ded to improve the quality of facility-based maternity care.
77 d Haiti, introducing the device into routine maternity care.
78  both positive and negative experiences with maternity care.
79  redefine norms and practices for respectful maternity care.
80 ated the meaning of obstetric violence in US maternity care: 1) pregnancy and birth as a battle with
81 rovided evidence favouring a community-based maternity-care delivery system.
82             Although the introduction of the maternity-care programme coincided with declining trends
83 87-89 in the northern MCH-FP area, where the maternity-care programme was initiated in 1987 (0.50 [0.
84 48 [0.26-0.83]) in the absence of an intense maternity-care programme, and remained stable thereafter
85 ented the effects of the introduction of the maternity-care programme.
86 enter had a tertiary level neonatal unit and maternity center.
87 ission cohort who delivered in some selected maternity centers in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
88  was conducted at 6 coronavirus disease 2019 maternity centers in Lombardy, Northern Italy.
89 h-Eastern Italy, collecting data from its 11 maternity centres (coded from A to K) during 2005-2015.
90 data we contrasted the performance of the 11 maternity centres (coded with an alphabetic letter A to
91 financial penalties and rewards to efficient maternity centres could also be considered.
92 .1%), the variability of DM rates across FVG maternity centres could be targeted by policy interventi
93            We did a feasibility study in two maternity centres in Kinshasa: Binza and Kingasani.
94 e services within the catchment areas of the maternity centres of FVG should be improved to implement
95 ur adjusted regression models confirmed that maternity centres were the main explanatory factor for L
96         By contrast, the discrepancy between maternity centres with highest and lowest adjusted mean
97 to-child transmission programme at these two maternity centres, we screened pregnant women for HBV in
98  who received prenatal care at an inner-city maternity clinic between 1990 and 2000 and analyzed by u
99    The intervention was delivered by trained maternity clinicians.
100 trimester of pregnancy from low-risk, public maternity clinics in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia.
101 rimester from low-risk, metropolitan, public maternity clinics over a period of 12 months.
102 ive nested case-control study in the Finnish Maternity Cohort (FMC) with serum samples from >800,000
103 n a nested case-control study in the Finnish Maternity Cohort (N = 484 cases 1:1 matched to controls)
104 r 31, 2009, whose mothers are in the Finnish Maternity Cohort and had an available serum sample from
105 e recipients were retrieved from the Finnish Maternity Cohort biobank and type-specific anti-HPV anti
106 ve, nested case-control study in the Finnish Maternity Cohort conducted in May 2011.
107                     Linkage with the Finnish Maternity Cohort found that they donated >2500 serum sam
108  controls) nested within the Northern Sweden Maternity Cohort included women who had donated a blood
109                        Data from the Finnish Maternity Cohort were linked to Finnish malformation and
110 and date at blood collection) in the Finnish Maternity Cohort, a cohort with serum samples from 98% o
111 n a nested case-control study in the Finnish Maternity Cohort.
112 hived in the national biobank of the Finnish Maternity Cohort.
113 tal Hg (THg) in fur from 10 little brown bat maternity colonies across Nova Scotia, and assessed rela
114 d and then adjusted for sociodemographic and maternity confounders.
115               Specialty, rehabilitation, and maternity facilities were excluded.
116 ific SEN, adjusting for sociodemographic and maternity factors.
117 e [NMR]) and mean time taken to complete the maternity history section of the questionnaire.
118           A census was done which included a maternity history to determine under-5 mortality.
119  birth in the context of universal LABT in a maternity hospital and describe our implementation exper
120 g based on the randomisation status of their maternity hospital at the time point of enrolment.
121 the immediate postnatal period at a referral maternity hospital between April and October 2012.
122 al hypoglycemia and took place at a tertiary maternity hospital in Auckland, New Zealand.
123 ospective birth cohort conducted in a single maternity hospital in Cambridge, United Kingdom.
124 een January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014, at a maternity hospital in Helsinki, Finland, at the 60th nor
125 ntenatal unit at Bwaila District Hospital, a maternity hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi.
126 tress MCPM technology in neonates at Pumwani Maternity Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya.
127 monitoring technology in neonates at Pumwani Maternity Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya.
128 ton babies were born to married mothers at a maternity hospital in Sheffield, UK, between 1922 and 19
129 177 historical birth records from University Maternity Hospital of Lausanne, it was estimated whether
130 uited from antenatal clinics at the National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
131 -preterm neonates in a large, urban Nigerian maternity hospital.
132 igh-volume prenatal clinic system and public maternity hospital.
133 is a tertiary center and Australia's largest maternity hospital.
134           We linked national UK databases of maternity-hospital discharges, perinatal deaths, and dea
135  acute stress and to have no visitors during maternity hospitalization than COVID negative women; the
136                                   During the maternity hospitalization, women were offered screening
137 7027 of 47124 births (99.8%) at surveillance maternity hospitals (mean [SD] age of mothers, 26.86 [6.
138 phase 3, noninferiority trial conducted in 9 maternity hospitals across Spain.
139 nfant pairs were enrolled from 31 Belarusian maternity hospitals and affiliated polyclinics (16 inter
140                                   Belarusian maternity hospitals and affiliated polyclinics (the clus
141           The dataset collected from various maternity hospitals and clinics subjected to nineteen tr
142 t study performed in five Brazilian referral maternity hospitals and enrolling nulliparous women at 1
143 rolled between March 2012 and June 2018 from maternity hospitals in 6 countries worldwide who were fo
144 S: Randomized clinical trial conducted in 31 maternity hospitals in 6 countries.
145 their first trimester at two major Singapore maternity hospitals in an on-going birth cohort study.
146 th in 2011 in a representative sample of 320 maternity hospitals in mainland France.
147                Infants were recruited from 9 maternity hospitals in New Zealand and assessed at home
148  We did a case-control study in eight public maternity hospitals in Recife, Brazil.
149 from April to November 2020 from 3 different maternity hospitals in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
150 cal practices in 12 general, paediatric, and maternity hospitals in southwest Nigeria.
151 e), randomised controlled trial, done at two maternity hospitals in the UK.
152 ontrolled trial performed across 24 tertiary maternity hospitals.
153 eks' gestation were recruited from 27 French maternity hospitals.
154                                           28 maternity hut clusters were randomly assigned-14 to the
155 asked cluster-randomised controlled trial at maternity huts in three districts in Senegal.
156                                              Maternity huts that had been included in a previous stud
157 n delivered by the auxiliary midwives in the maternity huts were eligible for the study.
158                                              Maternity huts with auxiliary midwives located 3-21 km f
159 rugs when delivered by auxiliary midwives at maternity huts.
160 nd overall 1412 women delivered in the study maternity huts.
161     A multicentre prospective cohort in five maternities in Brazil between 2015 and 2018.
162 0 maternities overall; 2.1 and 0.3 per 1,000 maternities in women with a previous caesarean delivery
163                                          The Maternity in Migori and AIDS Stigma Study (MAMAS Study)
164 mong pregnant individuals attending a single maternity in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil before and during th
165 e review genetic appraisals of paternity and maternity in wild fish populations.
166 outcome through UKOSS (n = 2,232), St Mary's Maternity Information System (n = 554,319), and Office f
167 Perinatal Audit, based on birth records from maternity information systems used by 132 National Healt
168 lihood of experiencing discrimination during maternity leave (2 children: odds ratio, 1.62 [95% CI, 1
169 011, Chile added 12 mandatory extra weeks of maternity leave (ML).
170 ly to report negative impact on referrals by maternity leave [odds ratio (OR) 1.78, 95% confidence in
171 sonal, professional, and financial impact of maternity leave and its relationship to career satisfact
172  Perspectives of program directors regarding maternity leave and postpartum support were categorized
173 le physicians lose significant income during maternity leave and report high rates of career dissatis
174 nt from coresidents who are asked to provide maternity leave coverage varies based on the prepregnanc
175 mechanisms that explain the benefits of paid maternity leave for infant mortality.
176    We estimated the effect of an increase in maternity leave in the prior year on the probability of
177 Women cardiologists report wide variances in maternity leave in the United States, with many experien
178                                              Maternity leave is highly variable in the United States
179 ND DATA: Little is known about the impact of maternity leave on early career female physicians or how
180                       However, the impact of maternity leave on infant health has not been rigorously
181 ifferences approach to evaluate whether paid maternity leave policies affect infant mortality in LMIC
182                          All reported having maternity leave policies allowing a duration of leave of
183       These include perceptions of different maternity leave policies among institutions, lack of men
184                           More generous paid maternity leave policies represent a potential instrumen
185 itudinal information on the duration of paid maternity leave provided by each country.
186                                              Maternity leave reduces neonatal and infant mortality ra
187                                              Maternity leave was included in only 28.9% of female phy
188 g cardiologist, extra service or call before maternity leave was required in 37.2%.
189 iated with increases in the duration of paid maternity leave were concentrated in the post-neonatal p
190 ing factors associated with family planning, maternity leave, and discrimination were included.
191 r breaks for any reason, a common example is maternity leave, and the importance of mentoring to aid
192 otential solutions to the issues surrounding maternity leave, radiation exposure during pregnancy, an
193 ive contraception, postpartum follow-up, and maternity leave-and result in excess rates of myocardial
194 bout their experiences while pregnant and on maternity leave.
195 r time on maternity leave; 23.2% had no paid maternity leave.
196 imination during pregnancy and/or for taking maternity leave.
197 iables for discrimination experienced during maternity leave.
198 d they experienced discrimination for taking maternity leave.
199 e even greater than that facing women taking maternity leave; (4) paternity leave has little to no im
200 ir relative value units prorated for time on maternity leave; 23.2% had no paid maternity leave.
201  mental health needs and mothers with longer maternity leaves.
202 aphic (sex, age, ethnicity, deprivation) and maternity (maternal age, maternal smoking, sex-gestation
203 es, interview transcripts, policy documents, maternity notes and clinical guidelines were analysed us
204 d by means of a structured questionnaire and maternity notes.
205                Data were abstracted from the maternity obstetric record (a record of antenatal care)
206 ses were reported (prevalence 1.7 per 10 000 maternities), of whom 42 underwent band deflation and 54
207 dness (e.g. because of multiple paternity or maternity), or among heterospecifics or unrelated conspe
208 ancy is crucial to addressing disparities in maternity outcomes, service provision is far from routin
209 cidence of uterine rupture was 0.2 per 1,000 maternities overall; 2.1 and 0.3 per 1,000 maternities i
210  accreta/increta/percreta was 1.7 per 10,000 maternities overall; 577 per 10,000 in women with both a
211 sidency to have a child (P < 0.0001), taking maternity/paternity leave during residency (P < 0.0001),
212 udied in the Neonatal Unit, Simpson Memorial Maternity Pavilion, Edinburgh, UK.
213 e postpartum LARC separately from the global maternity payment.
214 traception (LARC) separately from the global maternity payment.
215  women in western Scotland with databases of maternity, perinatal death, and birth and death certific
216 ehaviour, environmental exposure, changes in maternity practice, or reduced staffing levels.
217 m 3 studies reporting cases by the number of maternities (pregnancies resulting in live/still birth),
218 being of the workforce, in addition to other maternity professionals with similar roles and responsib
219 arriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual ori
220 6 Scottish School Pupil Censuses to Scottish maternity records and to sunshine hours and antenatal ul
221 missions to acute and psychiatric hospitals, maternity records, annual pupil census, examinations, sc
222 ispensed prescriptions, hospital admissions, maternity records, death certificates, annual pupil cens
223                      All facilities received maternity register data strengthening and a modified WHO
224                      We abstracted data from maternity registers for maternal and birth outcomes.
225 and maternal malnutrition and the low use of maternity-related services.
226 ding breastfeeding, and by the inadequacy of maternity rights protection across the world, especially
227 tion capacity) within an 8 km radius of each maternity roost showed strong negative associations with
228 ration, as cave use transitioned from summer maternity roost to autumn migratory stopover sites.
229 nkage of education (annual pupil census) and maternity (Scottish Morbidity Record 02) databases for 8
230 en at increased risk of PTB in an inner-city maternity service in London (UK), but there is no impact
231  parallel-group pilot trial at an inner-city maternity service in London (UK), in which pregnant wome
232 men's experiences negotiating motherhood and maternity services in a new country with a view to ident
233 S and at 238 nonmilitary hospitals providing maternity services in California.
234 l conflict experienced by refugees accessing maternity services in their host country; 2) "Understand
235 h meaningful survival gains where quality of maternity services is higher.
236          The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted maternity services worldwide and imposed restrictions on
237 ith feasible interventions, such as improved maternity services, folate supplementation, and improved
238 All women should have access to high quality maternity services-but what do we know about the health
239 pregnancy in their subsequent utilization of maternity services.
240 ns, potentiating significant cost-saving for maternity services.
241  after obtaining parental consent during the maternity stay.
242 A (AFB1-DNA) adducts in a group of Taiwanese maternity subjects (n = 120); and (b) somatic glycophori
243                  EUC included engagement and maternity support services.
244 rth within minutes of each other in the same maternity unit 2 days earlier.
245 onducted a multicentre randomised trial in 5 maternity units (4 in London and 1 in Birmingham) betwee
246 copic adjustable gastric band, booking in UK maternity units (Nov 1, 2011, to Oct 31, 2012).
247 ntre, randomised controlled trial done in 46 maternity units across England and Wales, we compared pl
248 ity, randomised controlled trial, done in 22 maternity units across England, Scotland, and Wales, we
249                     Data were collected from maternity units and birthing centers throughout Pennsylv
250 tem (UKOSS) covers all 194 consultant-led UK maternity units and included all pregnant women admitted
251 s of Birth in Brazil study, conducted in 266 maternity units between 2011 and 2012.
252 nd 757 controls from all UK obstetrician-led maternity units from June 1, 2011, to May 31, 2012.
253                                         Most maternity units have good practice protocols, advising t
254 onal, INTERBIO-21st fetal study conducted at maternity units in Brazil, Kenya, Pakistan, South Africa
255 ised placebo-controlled trial at 33 hospital maternity units in England and Wales.
256 mean of 20 weeks' gestation from 15 hospital maternity units in England between November 2018 and Oct
257                                              Maternity units in England were eligible to participate
258 st-trimester ultrasound protocols in all NHS maternity units in England with congenital anomaly regis
259 ember 2018 and September 2019 in 15 hospital maternity units in England.
260 osed and unexposed groups was conducted in 7 maternity units in France from February 4, 2016, to June
261                     These women, admitted to maternity units in the Americas, sub-Saharan Africa, Sou
262                                       In six maternity units in the UK, asymptomatic newborn babies (
263 ge cluster-randomised controlled trial in 11 maternity units in the UK, which were each responsible f
264 was higher for individuals who gave birth in maternity units with fewer than 3000 annual births (adju
265 tly defined events in all the consultant-led maternity units within Scotland.
266 en who gave birth in participating clusters (maternity units) during the year prior to randomisation
267                 Antenatal services at two UK maternity units, one in the Midlands and one in the Nort
268                    We randomly allocated the maternity units, representing the clusters, to blocks.
269 inform clinical practice within the Scottish maternity units.
270 ed to explore practice at two contrasting UK maternity units.
271 sultant presence, and a non-random sample of maternity units.
272 erms related to: 1) maternal health care; 2) maternity units; 3) barriers, and 4) developing countrie
273 rica reported reductions in stillbirths with maternity waiting home interventions, with one statistic
274 ale partners' knowledge and attitude towards maternity waiting homes (MWH) in rural Ethiopia.
275 lighted, as is the paucity of information on maternity waiting homes and transport as mechanisms to l
276 reduction in stillbirth rates resulting from maternity waiting homes needs further study.
277 y hospitals who had been discharged from the maternity ward after delivery were invited to participat
278  infrared spectroscopy were conducted at the maternity ward and family home.
279                  Infants were matched 1:1 by maternity ward discharge date, sex, gestational age, and
280 neonates who were not sick but stayed in the maternity ward for routine postnatal care.
281                         Thirty antenatal and maternity ward health workers were interviewed about PMT
282  project was launched in September 2022 in a maternity ward of a public hospital in the Liege area, B
283 BCG-Denmark; n = 2089) at discharge from the maternity ward or at first contact with the health cente
284 procedures, on the day of discharge from the maternity ward, maternal BCG scar status was evaluated b
285 s National Hospital, Guinea-Bissau's largest maternity ward.
286       Healthy nonadmitted term newborns from maternity wards at 3 hospitals in the Capital Region of
287 tine surface cultures of the neonatology and maternity wards facilities, and systematic ward cleaning
288                Each additional month of paid maternity was associated with 7.9 fewer infant deaths pe
289 cues during the transition from virginity to maternity, while the responsiveness of the mating-specif
290 injections to manipulate the distribution of maternity within groups, triggering hidden threats of in

 
Page Top