ライフサイエンスコーパス: maxilla

1 in the mandible, and 27% were placed in the maxilla.

2 ed vertical height is available at posterior maxilla.

3 ales and more often in the mandible than the maxilla.

4 ere gingival overgrowth on both mandible and maxilla.

5 wo complex bony structures: the mandible and maxilla.

6 er success rates than implants placed in the maxilla.

7 tic restorations in the edentulous posterior maxilla.

8 neither could induce Dlx5 expression in the maxilla.

9 ectopic Meckel's cartilage, in place of the maxilla.

10 ion and removal from bone substitute and pig maxilla.

11 and then to osteomyelitis of the mandible or maxilla.

12 tribute to the enhanced wound healing in the maxilla.

13 patients had a restoration of the posterior maxilla.

14 he restoration of single ICs in the anterior maxilla.

15 omo rudolfensis and with the A.L. 666-1 Homo maxilla.

16 loss (MBL) around implants in the posterior maxilla.

17 erized by bony fusion of the mandible to the maxilla.

18 implants had a higher BIC% in the posterior maxilla.

19 ing dental-implant treatment in the anterior maxilla.

20 ntulous anterior maxilla compared to dentate maxilla.

21 greater bone loss was detected in SP/ON-null maxilla.

22 control was injected into the contralateral maxilla.

23 number and distribution along the edentulous maxilla.

24 ed implant rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla.

25 r (P = 0.05) in the mandible compared to the maxilla.

26 different (P >0.05) between C3H mandible and maxilla.

27 dictors for implant failure in the posterior maxilla.

28 alveolar process of the mandible than in the maxilla.

29 -three implants were placed in the posterior maxilla.

30 received dental implant(s) in the posterior maxilla.

31 was greater in the C3H mandible than in the maxilla.

32 A total of 73 dental implants (57 in the maxilla, 16 in the mandible) were placed.

33 mandible is more commonly affected than the maxilla (2:1 ratio), and 60% of cases are preceded by a

34 3 mm (PM), and 1.04 mm (A) in the edentulous maxilla; 2.06 mm (M), 1.78 mm (PM), and 1.36 mm (A) in t

35 0 mm (PM), and 1.36 mm (A) in the edentulous maxilla; 2.39 mm (M), 1.88 mm (PM), and 1.66 mm (A) in t

36 Bone loss was more severe in the maxilla, 30.9% (SD 13.8) compared with 26.6% (SD 14.0) i

37 ll orbital region and proportionally slender maxilla, a feature documented in the early 20(th) centur

38 nty-seven patients receiving implants in the maxilla and 15 receiving implants in the mandible were i

39 Forty-seven (47) were placed in the maxilla and 24 in the mandible.

40 as followed for 18 months postloading in the maxilla and 24 months postloading in the mandible.

41 The mean API was 83.6% (SD 20.2%) for the maxilla and 94.9% (SD 15.6%) for the mandible.

42 akely is composed of an expansive edentulous maxilla and a small tooth-bearing premaxilla.

43 aluation of an incisional biopsy of the left maxilla and genotypic characterization confirmed the dia

44 in mice, including a bony fusion between the maxilla and hypoplastic mandible, resembling the bony sy

45 placement, success rates were similar in the maxilla and in the mandible as was the case for hydroxya

46 d to homeotic transformation of the proximal maxilla and labium, joint formation required the action

47 he ventromedial sensory center (VMSC) in the maxilla and labium.

48 , were bilaterally inserted in the posterior maxilla and mandible in 4 Macaca mulatta monkeys.

49 cal bone thickness in various regions of the maxilla and mandible is largely missing.

50 , but intraosseous sarcoidosis affecting the maxilla and mandible is rare.

51 Twelve dental implants were placed in the maxilla and mandible of a patient who smoked.

52 The buccal plate of the dentate maxilla and mandible ranged from 1.6 to 2.2 mm in thickn

53 enting anterior and posterior regions of the maxilla and mandible were obtained from 6 mature male be

54 t mutants display a round skull, hypoplastic maxilla and mandible, and cleft palate resulting from a

55 ydrogels were placed at 4 sites in each dog: maxilla and mandible, right and left.

56 ranged from 1.0 to 2.1 mm in the edentulous maxilla and mandible, with the thinnest area in the ante

57 mmetrical, but differences exist between the maxilla and mandible.

58 sed root surface area (mm2) in the defleshed maxilla and mandible.

59 mas and multiple fibro-osseous tumors of the maxilla and mandible.

60 n periodontal wound healing efficacy between maxilla and mandible.

61 ckness, MBL, and BIC among the groups in the maxilla and mandible.

62 Loss of the maxilla and midfacial structures after tumour removal ha

63 The discovery of haramiyid dentaries, a maxilla and other skeletal remains in the Upper Triassic

64 bone was larger in width and volume, and the maxilla and palatine bone were hypoplastic, compared to

65 ically informative morphology of the canine, maxilla and temporal bone.

66 lated bone remodeling, mostly limited to the maxilla and the mandible, with loss of bone in the jaws

67 ible, with the thinnest area in the anterior maxilla and the thickest area in the posterior mandible.

68 mon facial features that include a prominent maxilla and upper lip that readily reveal the upper ging

69 leukin-1beta (IL-1beta) were measured in the maxillas and spleens from mice infected with periodontal

70 ontal pathogens and compared to those in the maxillas and spleens from sham-infected controls.

71 an avian beak (absence of teeth and reduced maxilla) and brain shape (hyperinflated cerebrum and ven

72 n of primitive (e.g., aortic canal; immobile maxilla) and derived (e.g., differentiated occipital oss

73 tis of peripheral bone, osteomyelitis of the maxilla, and infected endoprostheses.

74 vault, extension of the mandible beyond the maxilla, and kyphosis.

75 of the anterior and posterior cranial base, maxilla, and mandible in healthy children and adolescent

76 tition ankylosed to the apex of the dentary, maxilla, and premaxilla; the presence of 'secondary bone

77 flap adaptation, especially in the posterior maxilla, and to the potential use of the mandibular and

78 ys in the ontogeny of the cranial vault, the maxilla, and, most notably, the mandible.

79 gular; and (2) on the bucco-caudal face of a maxilla; and (3) between teeth as islets in the alveolar

80 1.62 mm (PM), and 1.59 mm (A) in the dentate maxilla; and 1.98 mm (M), 1.20 mm (PM), and 0.99 mm (A)

81 2.0 mm (PM), and 1.95 mm (A) in the dentate maxilla; and 2.51 mm (M), 1.92 mm (PM), and 1.24 mm (A)

82 t animals have normal incisors which, in the maxilla, are flanked by a supernumerary pair of incisor-

83 w consists of the destruction of part of the maxilla as a consequence of these antiresorptive drugs.

84 delayed eruption of left second premolar in maxilla, as well as persistent deciduous teeth: right se

85 A partial maxilla assigned to H. habilis reliably demonstrates tha

86 nt dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla at the University of Connecticut Health Center t

87 .3% to 68.3%, P < 0.0001) higher than in the maxilla, but we did not detect any difference in the odd

88 us floor augmentation in a severely atrophic maxilla can be performed in a 1- or 2-stage surgical pro

89 r classified as complete edentulous atrophic maxilla (CEM) and partial edentulous atrophic maxilla (P

90 length was shortened in edentulous anterior maxilla compared to dentate maxilla.

91 ble, and, finally, on implants placed in the maxilla compared to implants placed in the mandible.

92 e bone mineral density (BMD) of mandible and maxilla compared to the conventional CBCT.

93 ad significantly higher success rates in the maxilla compared to the mandible and, in cases of single

94 ssue heal faster and more efficiently in the maxilla compared with the mandible.

95 The animals were killed and fragments of maxilla containing the right molars were processed for p

96 erial from this ancient snake, including the maxilla, dentary and additional vertebrae.

97 retains numerous plesiomorphies including a maxilla-dominated rostrum, an akinetic palate, a diapsid

98 lla suture, smaller premaxilla and malformed maxilla during midface development.

99 nasal passages, abnormal development of the maxilla, exencephaly and anophthalmia.

100 g the decision to rehabilitate the posterior maxilla following surgical closure of OAC/OAF.

101 iable procedure to reconstruct the posterior maxilla for implant therapy.

102 rchaeological data, that a fragment of human maxilla from the Kent's Cavern site, UK, dates to the ea

103 rates seen in cetaceans, concentrated in the maxilla, frontal, premaxilla, and nasal; second, the lat

104 Dental implant surgery on atrophied maxilla has many risks; in some patients, simultaneous s

105 The posterior maxilla has traditionally been one of the most difficult

106 Compared to the mandible, the maxilla heals quicker and more efficiently.

107 e diversity and disparity of the abelisaurid maxilla in a macroevolutionary context.

108 rged from the mandibular arch instead of the maxilla in the mutants.

109 CS as a homeotic transformation (mandible to maxilla) in humans.

110 e study included 27 jaws (23 mandibles and 4 maxillas) in patients who refused to wear a denture or w

111 10 mm) implants in the mandible and 6 in the maxilla, in addition to other requirements.

112 Five human maxillas, including teeth numbers 6 to 11, provided 90 s

113 nt hybridization in the developing mandible, maxilla, intestine, and mesencephalic ventricle.

114 flaps used for reconstruction of mandible or maxilla is a technique that has been previously reported

115 However, the maxilla is firmly united with the skull, indicating an a

116 rance where the mandible is enlarged and the maxilla is foreshortened.

117 more often encountered in the mandible than maxilla, it affects mostly canines.

118 t of 0.52, and buccal furcation sites in the maxilla, kappa = 0.38.

119 The maxilla (KC4), which was excavated in 1927, was initiall

120 cal B.P. and the IUP-associated modern human maxilla known as "Ethelruda" before approximately 45,900

121 meotic transformation of the mandible into a maxilla-like structure.

122 e of antidepressants (OR = 4.285), posterior maxilla location (OR = 2.911), mild systemic disease (OR

123 l wall thickness (LWT) of atrophic posterior maxilla (<10 mm) of patients with complete and partial e

124 Data were compared with calvaria, maxilla, lumbar vertebra, femoral neck, and iliac crest.

125 associated with quantitative changes in the maxilla, mandible, and palatine bone shape that are conc

126 .001) in the indentation moduli of the jaws (maxilla/mandible), location (anterior/posterior), and bo

127 factors, namely tooth type, tooth location (maxilla/mandible), number of roots, involvement of the r

128 ion for gender, age, tooth type or location (maxilla/mandible), or surgical procedure.

129 A set of fully dentate anatomic maxilla models was implemented, using 2 types of soft-ti

130 terior region: mandible (n = 12/14; 86%) and maxilla (n = 2/14; 14%).

131 ofacial development, specially affecting pre-maxilla, nasal bone, mandible, tibia, and clavicle.

132 n in the mandible and Dlx2 expression in the maxilla, neither could induce Dlx5 expression in the max

133 igh levels of morphological disparity in the maxilla occurred shortly after the Cenomanian-Turonian f

134 articles (test) were placed in the posterior maxilla of 15 patients.

135 de possible the discovery of mandibles and a maxilla of a new genus and species of late Eocene elepha

136 thological findings of PGCG diagnosed in the maxilla of a young male, as well as the successful treat

137 ted tomography (muCT), in the premaxilla and maxilla of Neovenator, a mid-sized allosauroid theropod

138 crestal incision in the anterior edentulous maxilla of Sprague-Dawley rats.

139 ed at the osteogenic initiation stage in the maxilla of Tgfbr2 mutant mice.

140 However, the broader maxilla of the new species suggests a more durophagous d

141 Dental implant surgery in the posterior maxilla often involves the maxillary sinuses.

142 Finds included a dentally complete Homo maxilla (OH 65) with lower face, Oldowan stone artifacts

143 bia (eight), mandible (five), mastoid (one), maxilla (one), zygomatic arch (one), rib (one), clavicle

144 implant surface were placed in the anterior maxilla or anterior mandible and restored with fixed res

145 her for the overall evaluated sites, nor the maxilla or mandible separately.

146 rare, benign neoplasm which develops in the maxilla or mandible, arising from the dental lamina or b

147 mass arising from the gingival mucosa of the maxilla or mandible, presenting in neonates.

148 tient received two implants in the posterior maxilla or mandible.

149 s had one dental implant placed in posterior maxilla or mandible.

150 ll locations, on implants placed only in the maxilla or the mandible, and, finally, on implants place

151 on of all teeth except #6 through #11 in the maxilla, oral rehabilitation was accomplished with the u

152 the highest Ca and Pi contents in femur and maxilla (P < 0.05).

153 Cranial (mandible, maxilla, parietal, and frontal) bones and ulnae were ana

154 axilla (CEM) and partial edentulous atrophic maxilla (PEM).

155 ored the expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) in maxillas (periodontium) and spleens isolated from ApoE(-

156 implants in edentulous areas of the anterior maxilla poses a unique challenge due to variations in th

157 ke facial anatomy despite the retention of a maxilla-premaxilla organization that is similar to that

158 sing occipital bone) and a fragmentary right maxilla preserving part of the nasal floor and two fragm

159 maxillary impacted canines' position and the maxilla's morphological features in an Iranian populatio

160 The anterior maxilla (second sextant) was associated to the highest m

161 number and distribution along the edentulous maxilla seemed to influence the prosthodontic survival r

162 Implant placement in the maxilla short implant length (<=10 mm), and smoking were

163 ut causes premature fusion of the premaxilla-maxilla suture, smaller premaxilla and malformed maxilla

164 ilateral enlargement of the mandible and the maxilla that presents with varying degrees of involvemen

165 had postextraction implants in the anterior maxilla that were inserted in the period from December 2

166 ocesses, olfactory pit, palatal shelf of the maxilla, the eye, the lens of the eye, otic vesicle, pre

167 re, we use the morphology of the abelisaurid maxilla to test the inclusion of the Lower Cretaceous Sp

168 angle (the antero-posterior relation of the maxilla to the mandible) seem to be the skeletal subspac

169 ence that Hand2 is sufficient for upper jaw (maxilla)-to-mandible transformation by regulating the ex

170 s BMP-2-induced bone formation in the murine maxilla using an injectable gelatin hydrogel (GH) carrie

171 ntifying the annual transverse growth of the maxilla using skeletal landmarks in three different regi

172 es between mesial and distal surfaces or the maxilla versus the mandible.

173 root resorption in the anterior teeth of the maxilla visible on panoramic images during orthodontic t

174 The junctional epithelium (JE) in the maxilla was 1.3 +/- 0.4 mm, whereas in the mandible, it

175 The connective tissue (CT) in the maxilla was 2.5 +/- 1.3 mm, whereas in the mandible, it

176 The sulcular epithelium (SE) in the maxilla was 2.7 +/- 0.8 mm, whereas in the mandible, it

177 The BW in the maxilla was 6.5 +/- 2.5 mm, whereas in the mandible, it

178 n, formation of the palatal processes of the maxilla was blocked while formation of the palatal proce

179 The alveolar bone of the maxilla was evaluated by microcomputed tomography (micro

180 The gingival tissue of the left maxilla was used for the analysis of lipid peroxidation

181 ts were euthanized, and samples of the right maxilla were defleshed and used for histologic and morph

182 alateral partial edentulism in the posterior maxilla were enrolled and 38 osteotomies were prepared.

183 rs; mean age: 39.9 years) of intact anterior maxilla were randomly selected and evaluated by two cali

184 and cancellous bones of the mandible and the maxilla were segmented.

185 theast Asians and compaction of the European maxilla, were reconfirmed.

186 the external surfaces of the premaxilla and maxilla where they are associated with foramina.

187 ed, SMO) are common in ameloblastomas of the maxilla, whereas BRAF mutations are predominant in tumor

188 Six implants were placed in the posterior maxilla with a conventional two-stage approach.

189 species by a unique combination of: a broad maxilla with an extensive triturating surface, a neural

190 ed using a 3D-printed model of an edentulous maxilla with CVI and ZI digitally planned and placed.

191 d and randomly located in the upper anterior maxilla with no grafting material.

192 is defined based on an incomplete but unique maxilla, with a premaxillary ramus higher than long prio

193 er success rates than implants placed in the maxilla, with only a few exceptions noted.

194 nd marked bony expansion in the mandible and maxilla, with sparing of the mandibular condyles.