ライフサイエンスコーパス: maxillary

1 attachment areas of the antennal muscles and maxillary adductor muscles on the tentorium.

2 have agenesis of >/=1 third molars and that maxillary agenesis was 36% more likely than mandibular a

3 outcome and clinical performance of anterior maxillary all-ceramic implant crowns (ICs) based either

4 in the female gender and mostly involves the maxillary alveolar ridge.

5 In contrast, maxillary AMs appear to harbor more frequently RAS, FGFR

6 Twenty-eight maxillary and 31 mandibular first molars were embedded,

7 A total of 31 maxillary and 35 mandibular single-rooted human premolar

8 3D scanning technology was used to probe 36 maxillary and 35 mandibular single-rooted premolars.

9 how adult endites, the inner branches of the maxillary and labial appendages, are formed at metamorph

10 First, we tested the prediction that maxillary and labial palps are patterned using conserved

11 During analysis of CT studies we evaluated maxillary and mandibular alveolar processes for presence

12 m) to restore partially edentulous posterior maxillary and mandibular areas is limited.

13 tions and less precise axonal sorting of the maxillary and mandibular branches within the trigeminal

14 eural crest cells (NCCs) that develop in the maxillary and mandibular buds of pharyngeal arch 1 (PA1)

15 L) injected into the gingival tissue (GT) of maxillary and mandibular first molars and into the inter

16 ange in crestal bone levels (AvBL) for 5 x 8 maxillary and mandibular implants after 5.9 years of fol

17 Grem2(-/-) mice have small, malformed maxillary and mandibular incisors, indicating that Grem2

18 correlated with the dramatic differences in maxillary and mandibular molar phenotypes in Bmp4(f/f);W

19 ects of loss of activin or Bmp4 signaling on maxillary and mandibular molar tooth morphogenesis are m

20 Both maxillary and mandibular premolars demonstrated a nonsig

21 2, Dlx2, Msx1, Barx1, Foxc2 and Fgf8, in the maxillary and mandibular processes of the mutants, indic

22 sions arise along the sites of fusion of the maxillary and mandibular prominences early in facial dev

23 distribution along the line of fusion of the maxillary and mandibular prominences.

24 nduced by placing silk ligatures around both maxillary and mandibular teeth.

25 f Wnt antagonists, particularly Dkk2, in the maxillary and mandibular tooth mesenchyme.

26 vent plaque removal during brushing over one maxillary and one mandibular posterior dental sextant fo

27 ome conformation capture assay in developing maxillary and periocular tissues suggest that the DNA re

28 the developing mouse embryonic frontonasal, maxillary, and mandibular processes.

29 In mice, the ophthalmic, maxillary, and mandibular trigeminal nerve branches main

30 males were, in descending order, mandibular, maxillary, and sphenoid bones, while the sphenoid bone w

31 Each maxillary anterior area was photographed before and 3 mo

32 from four study centers, each with a single maxillary anterior Miller Class I or II recession defect

33 Forty participants with an unrestorable maxillary anterior or premolar tooth were randomized to

34 posterior non-pit and fissure surfaces, (C4) maxillary anterior surfaces, and (C5) mid-dentition surf

35 Maxillary anterior teeth (n = 306) were studied in 56 hu

36 n or absent buccal plate occur frequently at maxillary anterior teeth and necessitate careful treatme

37 Gingival recession was present at 32.9% of maxillary anterior teeth and was most common at canines,

38 A facial bone (<2 mm) overlying maxillary anterior teeth may be prone to resorptive proc

39 Within the limitations of this study, maxillary anterior teeth with pre-existing gingival rece

40 ts 1 to 5 mm from the bone crest for the six maxillary anterior teeth.

41 ominantly thin facial bone overlying the six maxillary anterior teeth.

42 ome-wide map of candidate enhancers from the maxillary arch (primordium for the upper jaw) of mouse e

43 essential for the expression of Lhx8 in the maxillary arch cells and that Lhx8_enh1 was a direct tar

44 had higher rates of dental anomalies in the maxillary arch than did controls for primary (21% vs. 4%

45 ssions affecting canines or premolars in the maxillary arch.

46 osition in arch), dental arch (mandibular or maxillary), arch location (anterior or posterior), smoki

47 lium, as well as the emerging mandibular and maxillary arches were sampled.

48 derlying neuroepithelium, the mandibular and maxillary arches, including both their mesenchymal and e

49 rmed at second-stage surgery in the premolar maxillary area with an ADM.

50 ere prominent in the ocular, mandibular, and maxillary areas.

51 vestigated peripheral axons of the zebrafish maxillary barbel (ZMB), an optically clear sensory appen

52 rol) were implanted into experimental rabbit maxillary bone defects.

53 years; mean age: 58 +/- 9.2 years) requiring maxillary bone reconstruction prior to implant placement

54 revealed that 2 lesions were situated in the maxillary bone, 2 in the frontal, and 1 in the zygoma, a

55 We have used a rat model of injury to the maxillary branch (V2) of the trigeminal nerve to produce

56 e subsequently underwent embolization of the maxillary branch of the left ECA using Embozene(R) Micro

57 oth recession defects, oral sites other than maxillary canine and premolar teeth, and Miller Class II

58 associated with a dental abnormality called maxillary canine-tooth mesioversion (MCM) (P = 1.53 x 10

59 ed at the bracket level (tipping) of a human maxillary canine.

60 the amount of root coverage achievable, with maxillary canines and incisors being associated with the

61 Twenty-five GRs in maxillary canines and premolars were treated with corona

62 ooth-bound implant-supported restorations in maxillary central incisor sites tends to exhibit an atro

63 phy-based finite element models comprising a maxillary central incisor socket and 4.5 x 13 mm outer-d

64 ular plane angle, and the inclination of the maxillary central incisor were significantly correlated

65 The changes of maxillary central incisors and palatal alveolar bone thi

66 issing the mandibular second molar and their maxillary central incisors are most susceptible to micro

67 us surface involvement being highest for the maxillary central incisors, followed by maxillary poster

68 using standardized periapical radiographs of maxillary central incisors.

69 able outcomes after regenerative therapy for maxillary Class III furcation defects are limited to cli

70 Evidence supporting regenerative therapy in maxillary Class III furcation defects in maxillary molar

71 ll have a modified piercing-sucking mandible-maxillary complex that allows them to drain fluids from

72 R defect was surgically induced on bilateral maxillary cuspids under general anesthesia.

73 uate and safe anesthesia for the majority of maxillary dental procedures.

74 Maxillary dental study casts were used to compare rugae

75 ere characterised in both the mandibular and maxillary dentition by a loss of the permanent canines,

76 nal implants to support the interim complete maxillary denture during the healing period.

77 ng does not result in significant changes in maxillary development.

78 mains potentially relevant to mandibular and maxillary development.

79 pulsed electrical currents to ophthalmic and maxillary divisions of the right trigeminal nerve and ce

80 shund, are required for metamorphosis of the maxillary endites.

81 hibited a significantly higher percentage of maxillary epithelium in contact with mandibular epitheli

82 ubmitted to orthodontic treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy.

83 Conventional treatment approaches use maxillary expansion techniques to develop normal speech,

84 Through maxillary explant culture assays, we demonstrate that th

85 Osteotomies were created in healed maxillary extraction sites 1) by drilling or 2) by drill

86 ogically and clinically for the treatment of maxillary facial or interproximal and mandibular facial

87 ed regenerative therapy for the treatment of maxillary facial, mesial, distal, and mandibular facial

88 ignificantly correlated with graft loss in a maxillary FFBA augmentation.

89 e-induced experimental periodontitis between maxillary first and second molars (M1-M2).

90 e of a lambdoidal junction (formed where the maxillary first arch meets the frontonasal processes) in

91 e, age-dependent expansion of the PDL at the maxillary first molar (M1) furcation area was observed.

92 ex was 89.3% and 100% in the MB roots of the maxillary first molars and in the M roots of the mandibu

93 n canals were located in the MB roots of the maxillary first molars and in the M roots of the mandibu

94 in the distal surface of the MB roots of the maxillary first molars and the M roots of the mandibular

95 tion about the mesiobuccal (MB) roots of the maxillary first molars and the mesial (M) roots of the m

96 us defects were created by extraction of the maxillary first molars in C57BL/6 mice, and the sockets

97 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of mouse maxillary first molars localized FAM20A in secretory-sta

98 The maxillary first molars of 30 male Sprague-Dawley rats we

99 the palatal gingival tissues adjacent to the maxillary first molars three times per week for 4 weeks.

100 Maxillary first molars were extracted at 21 days after s

101 The maxillary first molars were extracted, and a tooth-assoc

102 One month after extraction of maxillary first molars, a titanium mini-implant was inse

103 The treatment with a maxillary fixed orthodontic appliance was finished after

104 After 7, 15, 30, and 50 days, maxillary fragments were embedded in paraffin.

105 After 7, 15, 30, and 50 days, maxillary fragments were processed for paraffin embeddin

106 We found that, in the turtle, mandibular and maxillary ganglion neuron rostrocaudal segregation and t

107 AF) techniques in the treatment of localized maxillary gingival recession (GR) defects, 1 and 5 years

108 either CAF or TUN in the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession (GR) defects.

109 Maxillary gingival tissues were processed for real-time

110 We show that maxillary growth remodelling (bone formation and resorpt

111 Sixty patients with single maxillary GRs >/= 2 mm, without loss of interproximal so

112 d similar results in the treatment of single maxillary GRs.

113 history of periodontal disease received one maxillary implant each.

114 wenty-six patients treated with single-tooth maxillary implants were included in this study.

115 re and one with a V-shaped thread design, in maxillary incisor extraction sockets.

116 xty-four patients underwent therapy in their maxillary incisor region.

117 Ultrathin sagittal sections of maxillary incisors from 8-wk-old wild-type (WT), Mmp20-n

118 Cervical dentin areas of 6 maxillary incisors of 5 beagles were exposed to a class

119 incisive canal and the roots of the central maxillary incisors should be kept in mind during dental-

120 ed to a class V-like lesion, and 1 side of 3 maxillary incisors was adapted with recombinant CPNE7 pr

121 In vivo, rat maxillary incisors were atraumatically extracted (withou

122 Only maxillary incisors were included to eliminate any potent

123 olar bone caused by tooth movement after the maxillary incisors were retracted and intruded during or

124 phthalmic terminal fields, with only a small maxillary input ventrally.

125 Conversely, nonwounded maxillary interseptal bone was unaffected by clodronate

126 at FPD treatment in posterior mandibular and maxillary jaws with NDIs was as reliable as with SDIs, a

127 dentures (FPDs) in posterior mandibular and maxillary jaws.

128 ight central incisor was 1.41 mm and for the maxillary left central incisor was 1.45 mm.

129 two maxillary left second premolars and one maxillary left first molar occurs after sinus-augmentati

130 PD was induced by cotton ligature around the maxillary left first molars (PDSG and PDCimG).

131 Periodontal disease was induced in the maxillary left first molars (PDSG and PDCimG); maxillary

132 was induced by ligature placement around the maxillary left second molar of rats for 11 days.

133 were submitted to EP by ligature around the maxillary left second molars for 11 days.

134 is case series, loss of pulp vitality of two maxillary left second premolars and one maxillary left f

135 Among treated patients the CoA segment (the maxillary length) and the ANB angle (the antero-posterio

136 l base, short upper facial height, and short maxillary length.

137 mandibular arch-derived structures into more maxillary-like structures, indicating a loss of NCC iden

138 residual ridge height (RH), sex, and age on maxillary LWT.

139 We investigated an isolated maxillary M3 (SK 835) from the 1.5 to 1.8-million-year-o

140 Maxillary MAGRs showed greater mRC and CRC than mandibul

141 Bmp4 significantly reduced the penetrance of maxillary malformation in both Six1 (-/-) and Six1 (-/-)

142 it significantly increased penetrance of the maxillary malformation.

143 n addition to ectopic Dlx5 expression at the maxillary-mandibular junction as recently reported in E1

144 f Bmp4, Msx1, and Msx2 messenger RNAs in the maxillary-mandibular junction.

145 one impressions were taken of mandibular and maxillary master casts, and eight stone replicas of each

146 ar development arrested at the bud stage and maxillary molar development arrested at the bud-to-cap t

147 Msx1 heterozygosity enhanced maxillary molar developmental defects whereas Osr2 heter

148 to two study groups after healing from right maxillary molar extractions.

149 stilbamidine into the gingival sulcus of the maxillary molar in 14 rats.

150 Attachment of ligature to a second maxillary molar induced DC-STAMP messenger RNA and prote

151 abundantly expressed in the mandibular than maxillary molar mesenchyme in wild-type embryos and that

152 Rats (n = 22) had the right maxillary molar teeth extracted under local and general

153 the mandibular molar tooth germs while their maxillary molar tooth germs completed morphogenesis.

154 Runx2(-/-) mutant mice, both mandibular and maxillary molar tooth germs progressed to the early bell

155 ly higher levels of Dkk2 than the developing maxillary molar tooth mesenchyme, these data indicate th

156 opmental arrest at the bud stage but allowed maxillary molars and incisors to develop to mineralized

157 in maxillary Class III furcation defects in maxillary molars is limited to clinical case reports.

158 duced around the first mandibular and second maxillary molars using ligatures.

159 successfully induced, healing of extraction maxillary molars was examined in 40 female Sprague Dawle

160 Finite element (FE) models of the first maxillary molars were constructed from muCT scans to cal

161 The first maxillary molars were extracted 8 days before sacrifice.

162 Four weeks later, the second maxillary molars were extracted; sockets were allowed to

163 Gingival tissues of maxillary molars were subjected to real-time polymerase

164 In maxillary molars, the mesiobuccal root had a significant

165 gature at the fist mandibular and the second maxillary molars.

166 facial and interproximal Class I defects in maxillary molars; 2) facial and lingual Class I defects

167 interproximal Class II furcation defects in maxillary molars; 4) facial and lingual Class II furcati

168 ar molars; 5) Class III furcation defects in maxillary molars; 6) Class III furcation defects in mand

169 ectoderm covering the frontonasal (FNP) and maxillary (MxP) processes.

170 omeres (tritocerebrum, mandibular neuromere, maxillary neuromere, labial neuromere) of the SEZ at all

171 ar ganglion neurons are located rostrally to maxillary neurons, with some intermingling, supporting p

172 ts receiving single implant in a tooth-bound maxillary non-molar site were recruited.

173 Adults scheduled to receive bone grafting in maxillary, non-molar, single-tooth extraction sites were

174 Maxillary or mandibular left or right quadrants were ran

175 creened the olfactory sensory neurons of the maxillary palp (MP-OSNs) using a large number of natural

176 However, the functional significance of the maxillary palp remained unknown.

177 two peripheral olfactory organs, antenna and maxillary palp.

178 hemosensory receptor gene transcripts in the maxillary palp.

179 cluding the compound eyes, ocelli, antennae, maxillary palps and surrounding head capsule.

180 itors of the CO(2)-neuron were tested on the maxillary palps in these two species by single-sensillum

181 Ablation of the antennae and maxillary palps reduced, but did not eliminate, the resp

182 These neurons project from the antennae and maxillary palps to the antennal lobe (AL) and from the l

183 omonas gingivalis W50 (P. gingivalis) in the maxillary periodontium to induce periodontitis.

184 howed a trend for increased anomalies of the maxillary permanent dentition.

185 mandibular patterning defect resulting in a maxillary phenotype (i.e., homeotic transformation).

186 species, which, when disrupted, results in a maxillary phenotype.

187 y, genetic reduction of Fgf8 ameliorates the maxillary phenotypes.

188 the maxillary central incisors, followed by maxillary posterior premolars and molars.

189 Experimental gingivitis was induced in one maxillary posterior sextant in nine healthy individuals.

190 Maxillary posterior tooth region is an important area wi

191 furcation defects were surgically created in maxillary premolar teeth in adult, female, mini-pigs and

192 7) Class I, II, or III furcation defects in maxillary premolars.

193 ed in the anterior mandible or involving the maxillary premolars.

194 Rather, increased neural crest expands the maxillary primordia.

195 ateral and medial nasal processes and of the maxillary process of the first branchial arch are integr

196 est in the mandibular process but not in the maxillary process of the first branchial arch.

197 ficantly retarded outgrowth of the nasal and maxillary processes due to reduced proliferation of mese

198 growth and morphogenesis bring the nasal and maxillary processes into contact, and the epithelia co-m

199 ls (activates beta-catenin pathway) into the maxillary prominence or by knocking down endogenous WNT1

200 RCAS::WNT11 retrovirus was injected into the maxillary prominence, and the majority of embryos develo

201 which EDNRA is ectopically activated in the maxillary prominence, resulting in a maxillary to mandib

202 aled that WNT11 prevented lengthening of the maxillary prominence, which was due in part to decreased

203 shelves from the oral side of the embryonic maxillary prominences, elevation of the initially vertic

204 bilateral palatal shelves (PS), arising from maxillary prominences, fuse at the midline, forming the

205 elop as outgrowths from the medial nasal and maxillary prominences, respectively, remodel and fuse to

206 Maxillary PSAA was visualized in 36 patients (70%).

207 e percentage of TLR4-positive neurons in the maxillary region and among the neurons innervating infla

208 R4 was detected in 19% of the neurons in the maxillary region of TG and in 29% of neurons innervating

209 the skull and in the neck (e.g., 78% for the maxillary region).

210 ts received a single implant in the anterior maxillary region.

211 A is an important structure in the posterior maxillary region; the clinician should be aware of its l

212 Atrophic maxillary ridges present a challenge in the field of ora

213 For the maxillary right and left lateral incisors, the crestal b

214 bone thickness at 3 mm from the CEJ for the maxillary right central incisor was 1.41 mm and for the

215 was subperiosteally injected into the murine maxillary right diastema between the incisor and the fir

216 red-breeder rats underwent extraction of the maxillary right first molar and standard surgical defect

217 for 5 min/day on the occlusal surface of the maxillary right first molar at a very low magnitude of l

218 The maxillary right first molars of Sprague-Dawley rats were

219 ne hundred twenty male Wistar rats had their maxillary right incisor extracted.

220 xillary left first molars (PDSG and PDCimG); maxillary right molars were used as non-ligature control

221 patients without APE (control group) in the maxillary right quadrant.

222 In all groups, the maxillary right third molar was extracted.

223 Destruction of the ligated maxillary second and mandibular first molars were evalua

224 gatures were placed subgingivally around the maxillary second molars and remained there for 2 weeks b

225 o the subperiosteal palatal area adjacent to maxillary second molars every other day.

226 y placing ligatures around the cervix of the maxillary second molars for 21 days.

227 Silk ligatures were applied to the maxillary second molars in the presence or absence of li

228 atures (size 7-0) were tied around the mouse maxillary second molars on day 0, followed by the inject

229 Maxillary second molars were extracted in Sprague Dawley

230 In a second study, maxillary second molars were extracted, and PTH was admi

231 receiving silk ligature placement around the maxillary second molars.

232 In EP, a ligature was placed around maxillary second molars.

233 are the thickness of the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus (TLWMS) and the thickness of the Schneid

234 riptions of sinus involvement other than the maxillary sinus add to the variability of presentation.

235 All bioglass and/or allograft placed in the maxillary sinus after the osteotome technique underwent

236 al findings and mucosal abnormalities of the maxillary sinus among dental patients, using cone-beam c

237 distances from lower margin to the floor of maxillary sinus and alveolar crest in the 1(st) molar an

238 ior superior alveolar artery to the floor of maxillary sinus and alveolar crest.

239 ery (PSAA) is located on the lateral wall of maxillary sinus and may become injured during such surgi

240 s sites with <10 mm between the floor of the maxillary sinus and the alveolar crest were selected.

241 ourse of bone graft consolidation within the maxillary sinus are rare.

242 e meatus cannot be used as a surrogate for a maxillary sinus aspirate in children with ABS, although

243 A quantitative culture of a maxillary sinus aspirate is the gold standard for determ

244 ospective record review was performed of all maxillary sinus augmentation cases performed during the

245 Maxillary sinus augmentation is a routine procedure perf

246 The maxillary sinus augmentation procedure (SAP) using the l

247 rforation is the most common complication of maxillary sinus augmentation procedures and has been ass

248 nine perforations during 104 lateral window maxillary sinus augmentation procedures.

249 around implants placed in sites treated with maxillary sinus augmentation using anorganic bovine bone

250 saliva in a group of 30 patients undergoing maxillary sinus augmentation.

251 Maxillary sinus carcinoma (MSC) is a rare cancer of the

252 ient with radio- and chemotherapy refractory maxillary sinus carcinoma to gauge the progression of th

253 n 19 of 20 (all 14 patients) and ipsilateral maxillary sinus changes in 12 of 20 (11 patients).

254 Little is known about maxillary sinus compliance, i.e., the intrinsic potentia

255 Anatomic variations of the maxillary sinus determine the degree of difficulty in pe

256 of the present study, it was concluded that maxillary sinus elevation with 100% ABB gives predictabl

257 Maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) is a well-esta

258 resent study is to investigate the effect of maxillary sinus floor augmentation on sinus membrane thi

259 s in membrane thickness were evaluated in 65 maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedures via a late

260 The maxillary sinus lateral wall tends to increase in thickn

261 Periapical surgeries, implants and maxillary sinus lift are performed on routine basis.

262 ophic ridge, and age were shown to influence maxillary sinus LWT.

263 erative complication has been reported to be maxillary sinus membrane perforation (MSMP).

264 The results indicate that the maxillary sinus membrane, even in healthy clinical condi

265 rch on the effect of augmentation surgery on maxillary sinus physiology is recommended.

266 ivo were higher than the results in vitro in maxillary sinus volumes with a ratio of 1.05 +/- 0.01 (m

267 Only bilateral concha bullosa affects maxillary sinus volumes.

268 Mean volume of the right maxillary sinus was 17.794 cm(3), while for the left one

269 The mean distance between PSAA and floor of maxillary sinus was 9.96 mm.

270 mucosal thickening and mucosal cysts of the maxillary sinus was recorded.

271 artery that supplies the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus.

272 niation of the orbital soft tissues into the maxillary sinus.

273 ly associated with mucosal thickening of the maxillary sinus.

274 est to the sinus wall, and height of lateral maxillary sinus.

275 thickness (MT), and perforation rate of the maxillary sinus.

276 occus equi subspecies zooepidemicus from the maxillary sinus.

277 bullosa was connected with larger volume of maxillary sinuses (right sinus: p=0.005; left sinus: p=0

278 mplantitis in implants inserted in augmented maxillary sinuses and to analyze possible risk factors.

279 ifty-five implants were placed in 30 grafted maxillary sinuses in 24 patients.

280 s) with 315 implants inserted into augmented maxillary sinuses with a follow-up ranging from 1 to 18

281 Maxillary sinuses with acute-angled PNRs might present a

282 core-based model including the nasal cavity, maxillary sinuses, ethmoid air cells, sphenoid sinus and

283 used to evaluate 200 patients making up 400 maxillary sinuses.

284 =0,430) affected the asymmetry in volumes of maxillary sinuses.

285 did not influence the incidence of bilateral maxillary sinusitis (p=0.495).

286 There was higher incidence of bilateral maxillary sinusitis in patients with septal deviation (p

287 bullosa, has influence on the development of maxillary sinusitis.

288 Thirty-one studies that reported maxillary SMT were considered for qualitative analysis.

289 In addition, the maxillary teeth showed significantly greater mRC and CRC

290 ity of a nasal spray to induce anesthesia of maxillary teeth.

291 in the maxillary prominence, resulting in a maxillary to mandibular transformation, suggesting that

292 Following maxillary tooth injury, Smoc2(-/-) mutants had increased

293 healthy adults requiring restoration of one maxillary tooth were randomized in a 1:2 ratio to receiv

294 Soft tissue grafts from the maxillary tuberosity are rich in connective tissue fiber

295 s that a soft tissue graft obtained from the maxillary tuberosity has unique properties.

296 CTGs can be harvested from the maxillary tuberosity or from palate with different appro

297 , lateral-, superficial-, deep-palate or the maxillary tuberosity) can affect the graft shape and its

298 Of the 3 maxillary UAMs, only 1 revealed a BRAF V600E mutation.

299 In maxillary UAMs, the BRAF V600E mutation prevalence appea

300 /-) mice exhibited partial transformation of maxillary zygomatic bone into a mandibular condyle-like