1 chool, in 1996-1998, the authors conducted a
medicolegal analysis of federal laws, state statutes, an
2 ive and patient-orientated care aspects, and
medicolegal and ethical issues.
3 ted States, Canada, and Europe, but existing
medicolegal and regulatory challenges necessitate furthe
4 ons for health-care workers, and ethical and
medicolegal aspects of extensively drug-resistant tuberc
5 DEP, information to pass on to patients, and
medicolegal aspects of these deaths.
6 SCDs were verified by
medicolegal autopsy to be because of acute coronary even
7 whose deaths and diagnosis were verified at
medicolegal autopsy, and (3) control subjects without he
8 ss in the medical team and did not result in
medicolegal claims.
9 the health care team, and the occurrence of
medicolegal claims.
10 In 2003,
medicolegal climate, workload, and reimbursement and/or
11 Ethical and
medicolegal concerns exist relating to data governance,
12 e personal beliefs about benefits and harms,
medicolegal concerns, patient expectations, resource con
13 siologists and other physicians - as well as
medicolegal concerns.
14 because of unsettled ethical, regulatory, or
medicolegal concerns.
15 stress in the health care team, or result in
medicolegal conflicts.
16 may have important medical, psychosocial, or
medicolegal consequences.
17 low prompt diagnosis of occult injuries, and
medicolegal considerations about the risk of early disch
18 sons behind these changes, the practical and
medicolegal constraints, and the effect of such changes
19 These studies, driven by
medicolegal constraints, have overwhelmingly failed to p
20 this retrospective cohort study, a national
medicolegal database was searched for malpractice claim
21 Heterogeneity in
medicolegal death investigation processes and data assur
22 s, injury mechanism, health care access, and
medicolegal death investigation system type.
23 ns and generally with training in pathology,
medicolegal death investigation, and performance of fore
24 In most
medicolegal facilities, dental age estimation is an oper
25 panning 3 thematic domains: data governance,
medicolegal implications, and equity and bias.
26 an accident, and the report has interesting
medicolegal implications.
27 strategy to implement molecular autopsies in
medicolegal investigations of young SD decedents.
28 The primary ethical and
medicolegal issues raised by neuromonitoring relate to s
29 To provide a general overview of
medicolegal issues that may arise before, during, and af
30 iterature with specific focus on ethical and
medicolegal issues.
31 Retrospective identification at CT raises
medicolegal issues.
32 laxis is still common and probably driven by
medicolegal issues.
33 use of the technology, 4) proactively assess
medicolegal liability, and 5) ensure access to the techn
34 at exposes the anesthesiologist to increased
medicolegal liability.
35 to as cancer will allow physicians to shift
medicolegal notions and perceived risk to reflect the ev
36 formation (81.4%), missed diagnosis (76.8%),
medicolegal problems (71.0%), and prescription errors (6
37 order presentations and the influence of the
medicolegal process is considered.
38 cates, and could therefore be acceptable for
medicolegal purposes.
39 ications of this report for staffing policy,
medicolegal risk management, and ethical practice remain
40 uding improved quality of care, reduction of
medicolegal risk, and the potential for reimbursement of
41 o follow basic principles that help decrease
medicolegal risk.
42 ncial rewards, is regarded as more common in
medicolegal settings.
43 This is relevant in clinical and
medicolegal settings.
44 Despite the clinical and
medicolegal significance attached to perinatal asphyxia,
45 horter period of time, but were unrelated to
medicolegal status, injury severity or length of time si