ライフサイエンスコーパス: melting temperature

1 layer that is already stable above the bulk melting temperature).

2 10-30 mus for complete dissociation near the melting temperature.

3 They are strongest near the charge-stripe melting temperature.

4 r, as indicated by a 9 degrees C increase in melting temperature.

5 from an extrapolation of our results to the melting temperature.

6 of the duplex, linearly correlating with the melting temperature.

7 same temperature difference with the model's melting temperature.

8 s convert to the WZ lattice above a critical melting temperature.

9 ompromised for long strands, except near the melting temperature.

10 terms of the reduction in binding energy and melting temperature.

11 ut 17 kcal/mol in enthalpy or 6 degrees C in melting temperature.

12 elting occurs at temperatures much below the melting temperature.

13 ding was found to increase notably the ds-ON melting temperature.

14 previous studies that were performed at the melting temperature.

15 e from nanorod-based complexes below the DNA melting temperature.

16 ient solution temperature well below the DNA melting temperature.

17 8)-fold increase in the reaction rate at the melting temperature.

18 ture that is 22 degrees C lower than the DNA melting temperature.

19 d abnormal electrophoretic migration and low melting temperature.

20 ization temperature but keeping it below the melting temperature.

21 lifiable target length, the sequence, or the melting temperature.

22 and one of the highest cohesive energies and melting temperatures.

23 scence-based measurement of the "on-surface" melting temperatures.

24 adiogenic heat production to achieve crustal melting temperatures.

25 econdary structures like hairpins and higher melting temperatures.

26 ng of the energy landscape at the respective melting temperatures.

27 t an unusual confluence of exceptionally low melting temperature (175 degrees C) and inhibited crysta

28 20 carbons providing the maximal increase in melting temperature (~20 degrees C) while completely abo

29 We determined its melting temperature (68.2 +/- 0.6 degrees C) and thermos

30 conductivity, (2) greatly increases the ice melting temperature(7-13) to several thousand kelvin, an

31 and catalyst is semicrystalline with a T(m) (melting temperature) = 87 degrees C.

32 ed of ternary mixtures of a lipid with a low melting temperature, a lipid with a high melting tempera

33 though different solvents modify the protein melting temperature, a unique dynamical regime is attain

34 ode made from a refractory metal which has a melting temperature above the melting point of boron.

35 tle silicates and core metal have comparable melting temperatures above 500 to 700 gigapascals, which

36 up to a 14 degrees C decrease in the protein melting temperature after toremifene binding, while ibup

37 e, double-nested PCR approach allowed robust melting temperature analysis with enhanced limits of det

38 A-conjoined copolymers were characterized by melting temperature analysis, circular dichroism spectro

39 e duplex structures were characterized by UV melting temperature analysis, fluorescence spectroscopy,

40 me PCR assays followed by electrophoresis or melting temperature analysis, respectively.

41 the duplex part possess the highest value of melting temperature and a 2-fold higher anticoagulant ef

42 moduli, Vickers hardness, Debye temperature, melting temperature and a possible superconductivity of

43 In particular, the sudden drop of the melting temperature and appearance of the dip at N = 56

44 plementary pairs above the oligonucleotides' melting temperature and attaching new bioreceptors.

45 The survey reveals a correlation between melting temperature and downhill folding previously obse

46 croscopy, sugars content by HPLC and sucrose melting temperature and enthalpy by DSC.

47 n, the Hp53 and Dmp53 proteins had a similar melting temperature and generally showed a similar energ

48 aracterized with dTm/dP < 0, where Tm is the melting temperature and P is pressure, above a high thre

49 Cl) crystals, a well-studied sample with low melting temperature and quantum super-shells of clusters

50 able predictions of water properties such as melting temperature and temperature of maximum density.

51 The melting temperature and the heat flow reflect the type a

52 Changes in melting temperature and transitional pH depended on both

53 rolactone), affording independent control of melting temperature and Young's modulus by concurrently

54 y are highly stable structures with enhanced melting temperatures and cooperative melting behavior.

55 formation resulted in solids with different melting temperatures and crystallinities, photochemical

56 tion of type I amylose-lipid complexes, with melting temperatures and enthalpies ranging from 82 to 1

57 The melting temperatures and latent heat of CPCMs are in the

58 decreasing differences between the polyester melting temperatures and the experimental temperatures,

59 ween predicted and experimentally determined melting temperatures and unfolding denaturant concentrat

60 low melting temperature, a lipid with a high melting temperature, and cholesterol.

61 slope of the correlation, coincides with the melting temperature, and duplex unfolding occurs at that

62 tabilization may be responsible for the high melting temperature, and hints at residual structure or

63 oil reduced the crystallisation temperature, melting temperature, and melting enthalpy of tristearin.

64 are identified by differences in the duplex melting temperature, and the use of short hybridization

65 sociation constant of 140 muM and raised its melting temperature, and we have determined the binding

66 oil-loaded particles shifted to lower onset melting temperatures, and major polymorphic form transfo

67 The cluster core melting temperatures are significantly greater than pred

68 he structural transitions that occur at each melting temperature, are used to propose that the relati

69 We obtain the same melting temperature (around 45 degrees C) using the bulk

70 previous experiments showed nearly constant melting temperature as a function of pressure, in large

71 These proteins have probe-dependent melting temperatures as high as 80 degrees C and exhibit

72 fluence of small molecular species on, e.g., melting temperature, as well as routes to induce order i

73 Sodium exhibits a pronounced minimum of the melting temperature at approximately 118 gigapascals and

74 l explains this correlation and predicts the melting temperature at which downhill folding becomes po

75 useful tool for designing primers at various melting temperatures at good target coverage.

76 A dispersion of melting temperatures at pH5.3 for individual residues of

77 f the folding transition, dispersions in the melting temperatures at the residue level, and timescale

78 is, at temperatures below their equilibrium melting temperatures, before eventually crystallizing.

79 Ionic liquids form a class of solvents with melting temperatures below 100 degrees C and, due to ver

80 The shared ancestor has a melting temperature between those of ttRNH and ecRNH; th

81 2), The melting temperature, both in the bulk and at surfaces, d

82 The beta L82E variant had a reduced melting temperature but dimerized and complemented growt

83 d they not only bind when cooled below their melting temperature, but also rearrange so that aggregat

84 that insertion mutations lower mt-tRNA(Ser) melting temperature by 6-9 degrees C and increase the fo

85 -carbon increases the peptide's triple helix melting temperature by 8.6 degrees C.

86 axially compressed solid state, reducing the melting temperature by 80% or 4,000 K.

87 y of both ALR forms: e.g., by decreasing the melting temperature by about 10 degrees C, by increasing

88 forms of the quadruplex structures differ in melting temperatures by approximately 8 degrees C (60 an

89 binds a relatively small hapten, reduce the melting temperature compared with its germ-line precurso

90 indicated by an 8 degrees C increase in the melting temperature compared with unliganded form and pp

91 The interruptions had little effect on melting temperature, consistent with the high thermal st

92 The complete melting temperature, crystallization onset temperature a

93 The melting temperatures decrease linearly as the concentrat

94 the temperature of maximum stability and the melting temperature decreased on encapsulation.

95 ght about a significant increase in apparent melting temperature (DeltaT(m) >= +3 degrees C).

96 We attribute a major role to post-melting temperature-dependent diffusion of hydrogen occu

97 ative hybridization but have distinguishable melting temperatures depending on their positions.

98 However, transition melting temperatures derived from the differential scann

99 , and electron microscopy showed that capsid melting temperatures differed by more than 20 degrees C

100 l analysis of c-Met mutants revealed minimal melting temperature differences indicating that the muta

101 emarkable suppression of crystallization and melting temperatures (down to -80 degrees C from 15 degr

102 an that of the unfolded RNA, the increase in melting temperature due to the two components is additiv

103 RNA/RNA, DNA/RNA and provided corrections to melting temperatures due to the presence of sodium.

104 ucleic acid probes by recording nucleic acid melting temperature during ISH.

105 ability of target structure in the ensemble, melting temperature, etc.

106 Furthermore, a melting temperature experiment carried out with an STV-d

107 restricted to temperature ranges around the melting temperature for a pseudoknot.

108 tal temperatures appear to be below the bulk melting temperature for a single protein, but above the

109 perature for a single protein, but above the melting temperature for concentrated protein solutions.

110 curve analysis revealed significantly higher melting temperatures for DNA in the presence of oxidized

111 parameters, to facilitate the calculation of melting temperatures for perfectly matching sequences, m

112 Acetylation decreased onset and peak melting temperatures for the insoluble complexes, wherea

113 sequences, which exhibit large deviations in melting temperature from predictions made by additive th

114 The melting temperatures from the specific heat profiles are

115 Probe length, melting temperature, GC content, SNP location in the pro

116 es C but with a conspicuous twist: While the melting temperature goes down the cold unfolding moves i

117 stability; five of six mutants analyzed have melting temperatures >89 degrees C.

118 personic vehicles because of their very high melting temperatures (>4000 K) among other properties.

119 Computing accurate nucleic acid melting temperatures has become a crucial step for the e

120 with experimentally measuring high pressure melting temperatures has motivated the use of ab initio

121 torically eluded researchers due to its high melting temperature, high reactivity and unfavorably hig

122 triplexes formed from three G-triads exhibit melting temperatures higher than 37 degrees C, especiall

123 me digital LAMP (dLAMP) with high-resolution melting temperature (HRM) analysis and use this single-m

124 As this represents ~90% of their melting temperature, if higher-temperature engines are e

125 The power law dependence of the melting temperature increase (DeltaT(m)) on the volume f

126 The apparent CD melting temperatures indicated that the introduction of

127 All serogroups were found to display unique melting temperatures, indicating that mutations have acc

128 ing T, and at high-pressure we show that the melting temperature is only 5000 K at 120 GPa, a value l

129 experiments in which pressurized ice at its melting temperature is slid over a water-saturated till

130 It was found that the melting temperature is very similar for KGE and KGD pept

131 ences have identical length, GC content, and melting temperature; (iv) the identity of each standard

132 lipid bilayers composed of a high and a low melting temperature lipid and cholesterol represent a mo

133 ayers composed of a ternary mixture of a low-melting temperature lipid, a high-melting temperature li

134 e of a low-melting temperature lipid, a high-melting temperature lipid, and cholesterol.

135 ion by eliminating spilling because its high melting temperature means it is solid at room temperatur

136 approximately 0.3 kcal/mol) calculated from melting temperature measurements comparing matched vs. m

137 A combination of chemical ON synthesis, melting temperature measurements, cyclic voltammetry (CV

138 na (like surface melting, size dependence of melting temperature, melting of few nm-size particles an

139 (Ni, Pt, Pd), when dissolved in inactive low-melting temperature metals (In, Ga, Sn, Pb), produce sta

140 on in beta-Sn, unlike grain rotation in high melting temperature metals which undergo displacive defo

141 tool ensures consistent oligomer overlapping melting temperatures, minimizes the likelihood of misann

142 304 bp amplicon, which compared well to the melting temperature obtained using a conventional PCR sy

143 and maintains good thermal stability with a melting temperature of 37 degrees C.

144 The FSD-1 apparent melting temperature of 41 degrees C may be a reflection

145 e peptide forms a stable triple helix with a melting temperature of 41 degrees C.

146 However, E2 has a high melting temperature of 84.8 degrees C, which is more aki

147 rated using IR heating, and this indicated a melting temperature of 85 degrees C for the 304 bp ampli

148 icles into superstructures, we show that the melting temperature of a 10-base DNA sequence is depende

149 We find that for a given CDK, the melting temperature of a CDK/cyclin/inhibitor complex co

150 When the agarose-GUVs are heated above the melting temperature of agarose for 2 h before use, vesic

151 Phonon density of states, entropy and melting temperature of aluminum were calculated using th

152 terpreted as melting, it would be the lowest melting temperature of any material at these high pressu

153 milar to each other and should not reach the melting temperature of any of the matched hybrids.

154 E3330-amide has no effect on the melting temperature of APE1, suggesting that it does not

155 However, this interaction lowers the melting temperature of APE1, which is consistent with a

156 PPO, isotactic PPO is semicrystalline with a melting temperature of approximately 67 degrees C.

157 We find that crowders can increase the melting temperature of both an 8-mer DNA duplex and a ha

158 The model describes the melting temperature of DNA as a function of composition

159 The melting temperature of ice in the aerosols decreases mon

160 arth rely critically on the knowledge of the melting temperature of iron at the pressure conditions o

161 Here we report new data on the melting temperature of iron in a laser-heated diamond an

162 Our results show a melting temperature of iron in agreement with most previ

163 pG methylation on the basis of the increased melting temperature of methylated DNA, termed denaturati

164 emperatures more than 30 degrees C above the melting temperature of naked DNA.

165 The melting temperature of nanoparticles can be designed to

166 es below unacetylated fibrils, and below the melting temperature of native Cu2,Zn2-SOD1 (e.g., fibril

167 otein that lacks cysteine residues and has a melting temperature of nearly 100 degrees C.

168 are which computes the enthalpy, entropy and melting temperature of nucleic acids.

169 thermal stability, up to more than half the melting temperature of one of the constituents.

170 There is a correlation in the apparent melting temperature of p53 with the body temperature of

171 , the same backbone heterogeneity lowers the melting temperature of RNA duplexes that would otherwise

172 nprecedented conditions and showing that the melting temperature of SiO2 rises to 8300 K at a pressur

173 Tpm3.1 dimers, show that ATM-3507 shifts the melting temperature of the C-terminus and the overlap ju

174 length and in each case is close to the bulk melting temperature of the capping molecules.

175 n step, the solution can be heated above the melting temperature of the capture sequence to release t

176 The melting temperature of the ClU-G mispair is not experime

177 shows dependence on casting temperature and melting temperature of the crystalline segment.

178 These additional interactions increase the melting temperature of the DBD by up to 2 degrees C and

179 temperatures between 0.5 and 0.64 times the melting temperature of the matrix (1,356 kelvin) under a

180 ture stabilizers, BMVC and BMVC4, raises the melting temperature of the oligonucleotide formed by the

181 the more stable, while being lower than the melting temperature of the original orange, or final yel

182 tween solid and L(o) phases occurs below the melting temperature of the phospholipid (T(m)).

183 Upon heated over the melting temperature of the polymer, the pores of the nan

184 alamide compound crystallizes just below the melting temperature of the polymer.

185 ntary-DNA-modified nanoparticles through the melting temperature of the system gives the thermodynami

186 iscriminatory power comes from the decreased melting temperature of the tL.C mismatched hybrid as com

187 e, cooperative unfolding transition having a melting temperature of Tm = 71 +/- 2 degrees C, in agree

188 om temperature, a temperature well below the melting temperature of type I collagen, by collagenase d

189 energies per basepair with the experimental melting temperatures of 60 oligonucleotides, yielding a

190 thalate (PET) which has glass transition and melting temperatures of 76 and 250 degrees C, respective

191 ion of type II amylose-lipid complexes, with melting temperatures of about 100-120 degrees C.

192 First, melting temperatures of all mismatched hybrids should be

193 ncorporated into the probes to normalize the melting temperatures of all target miRNA hybrids allowin

194 lexed with actinomycin D are stabilized with melting temperatures of approximately 79 degrees C.

195 Melting temperatures of duplexes containing cationic or

196 orithms were developed to accurately predict melting temperatures of nanoparticles of various composi

197 The melting temperatures of slightly hypostoichiometric TaC,

198 currently considerable uncertainty over the melting temperatures of the high-pressure mantle mineral

199 The melting temperatures of the hydrates are very similar to

200 of these interactions is reflected in higher melting temperatures of the protein-ligand complexes.

201 that of the t.C mismatched hybrid, while the melting temperatures of the tL-A, tL.G and tL.T hybrids

202 By calculating the melting temperatures of the TM strands, our method can a

203 due to easily discernable differences in the melting temperatures of the two species along this mini

204 The thermodynamic equilibrium melting temperatures of these phases differ as much as ~

205 nd subsequent cooling to a point between the melting temperatures of unnicked substrate and nicked pr

206 We provide evidence that the wide-ranging melting temperatures of zeolitic MOFs are related to the

207 Stabilization, measured as an increase in melting temperature, of approximately 20 degrees C and a

208 to maximize population coverage, matching of melting temperatures, optimizing de novo sequence length

209 itive specimens with an atypical PCR result (melting temperature outside of the expected range) by se

210 show this inference is incorrect for the low melting temperature phosphatidylcholines abundant in mam

211 hickness and the corresponding variations in melting temperature, polymer crystals allow for self-see

212 The optimal melting temperatures, positions and concentrations of bl

213 erall structure but displayed differences in melting temperatures possibly arising from C-terminal co

214 ue biomarker probe pairs with characteristic melting temperatures; post-amplification melting curve a

215 ty of PCR primers is further evaluated using melting temperature, primer dimer, hairpin structure and

216 linked copolymer networks exhibiting a broad melting temperature range (DeltaT(m)) are presented, whi

217 hybridize to a siRNA within a user-specified melting temperature range.

218 re assessed; six unfolded cooperatively with melting temperatures ranging from <11 to >50 degrees C.

219 e crystal growth inhibition concomitant with melting temperature reduction.

220 hylene polymers possess essentially the same melting temperature, regardless of the size of the branc

221 in frozen medium at a temperature below the melting temperature; relaxation is monitored by periodic

222 A decrease in melting temperature resulted from the interesterificatio

223 ntrinsic lack of strength, ductility and low melting temperature severely restricts practical applica

224 idize, as evidenced by an unusually large MB melting temperature shift observed on bridge formation,

225 The cluster surface melting temperatures, show evidence of size-dependent me

226 ed 24-fold mutant to be stably folded with a melting temperature similar to that of the wild-type pro

227 -BG505 SOSIP.664 complex displayed increased melting temperature stability and reduced V3 recognition

228 r, even at temperatures close to the thermal melting temperature T(m).

229 The melting temperatures T(m) of the nanoparticles are not a

230 region (RRDR) of the rpoB gene by the use of melting temperature (T(m) ) information from 4 rpoB prob

231 is results in a tunable wavelength-dependent melting temperature (T(m) ) window (4.5-15 degrees C) an

232 ting in an 490 bp amplicon with a consistent melting temperature (T(m) = 87.8 degrees C).

233 urves show that the double mutant exhibits a melting temperature (T(m)) 16 degrees C lower than that

234 symmetric PCR of the M. tuberculosis RRDR by melting temperature (T(m)) analysis.

235 rimination is the relationship between probe melting temperature (T(m)) and the temperature at which

236 he protein stability of EftM is tuned with a melting temperature (T(m)) around 37 degrees C such that

237 MSP amplicon, and measures the difference in melting temperature (T(m)) between the two probes (Delta

238 cRNH) share similar structures but differ in melting temperature (T(m)) by 20 degrees C. ttRNH's grea

239 allows us to decouple the distinct gas phase melting temperature (T(m)) from the temperature at which

240 le, monomeric, and remarkably stable, with a melting temperature (T(m)) of 82.6 degrees C, which is a

241 ulfonamide modification caused a decrease in melting temperature (T(m)) of both hybrids, it was lower

242 The melting temperature (T(m)) of DNA is affected not only b

243 the DeltaG degrees (37), DeltaH degrees and melting temperature (T(m)) of duplexes containing these

244 an increase of more than 11 degrees C in the melting temperature (T(m)) of the antigen-binding fragme

245 ly stable closed-loop structure, raising the melting temperature (T(m)) of the hybrid by >30 degrees

246 Mutations are detected by melting temperature (T(m)) shifts that occur when the SM

247 The moderately thermophilic protein has a melting temperature (T(m)) similar to that of the mesoph

248 Just below the melting temperature (T(m)) the profiles showed a sharp i

249 ds provides a characteristic set of amplicon melting temperature (T(m)) values that identify which sp

250 lted in about a 30 degrees C increase in the melting temperature (T(m)), as compared to that obtained

251 g times that correspond well with the duplex melting temperature (T(m)).

252 Based on the calculated melting temperatures (T(m) values), however, poly(A)/oli

253 containing U(2'F(ara)) have slightly higher melting temperatures (T(m)) than those containing U(2'F(

254 ntiate the four SNP alleles by four distinct melting temperatures (termed the "4Tm probe").

255 ts, alpha1alpha1alpha2 demonstrated a higher melting temperature than the other two.

256 porcine dermis materials exhibiting a higher melting temperature than their non-crosslinked counterpa

257 relative measure based on apparent simulated melting temperatures that is independent of simulation l

258 -methylamino phosphorodiamidate linkages had melting temperatures that were either comparable or redu

259 concentration tested, formed gel phases with melting temperatures that were equal to, or slightly hig

260 Below the melting temperature the threshold for Al44(-) is smaller

261 When relaxation occurs at the melting temperature, the kinetics at both wavenumbers ar

262 Below the melting temperature, the ordered layer initiates crystal

263 s transition temperature Tg, and the crystal melting temperature, TL.

264 d iron (hcp-Fe) at 360 gigapascals up to its melting temperature Tm.

265 e at pH 8 but a ca. 50 degrees C drop in the melting temperature (Tm ) was observed at pH 2.5: DeltaD

266 Both methods have little effect on the melting temperature (Tm) although some differences were

267 Here, we demonstrate that both the melting temperature (Tm) in a subsection of siRNA non-se

268 We herein report the novel "melting temperature (Tm) mapping method" for rapidly ide

269 -Gly-Lys(Dnp)- Ser-(Gly-Pro-Hyp)4-NH2] had a melting temperature (Tm) of 36.2 degrees C and was hydro

270 Leishmania spp., followed by analysis of the melting temperature (Tm) of the amplicons on qPCR platfo

271 mplate walking mechanism using a pair of low-melting temperature (Tm) solid-surface homopolymer prime

272 a significant negative shift in NBD1 thermal melting temperature (Tm), pointing to direct VX-809 inte

273 ismatches and the overall sequence-dependent melting temperature (Tm).

274 ng a ssNMR-observed reduction in the lipids' melting temperature (Tm).

275 different temperatures, we obtained relative melting temperatures (Tm) for RNA structures in over 400

276 Amplifiable beta-globin (melting temperature [Tm], 87.2 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees

277 lternation in exactly the same manner as the melting temperature, Tm.

278 ed significant changes on beta-lactoglobulin melting temperature, unfolded conformation and subsequen

279 temperature of solid will not rise above the melting temperature unless all solid is molten, thus nan

280 rationally engineered antagonists exhibited melting temperatures up to approximately 64 degrees C, a

281 useful and very flexible tool for predicting melting temperatures using approximative formulae or Nea

282 s, allowing genotype discrimination based on melting temperature values.

283 However, the absolute melting temperatures vary with the selected thermodynami

284 temperature for the Al plane surface and on melting temperature versus particle radius.

285 LEDGF1-326 was 3.3 +/- 0.5 kcal mol(-1), and melting temperature was 44.8 +/- 0.2 degrees C.

286 hibited superheating, the enhancement of the melting temperature was far smaller than the depression

287 The DSC melting temperature was lowered by 6 degrees C and the c

288 This increase in melting temperature was more appreciable for hyperactive

289 in were also generated, and the experimental melting temperature was not significantly different from

290 o undergo an exceptionally steep increase in melting temperature when compressed.

291 rmal stability (up to 29 degrees C increased melting temperature) when compared to that of the linear

292 tability of the duplex (as measured from the melting temperature), where a greater noise in the measu

293 Tropomyosins displayed different melting temperatures, which did not correlate with amino

294 kers are uniformly distributed above the DNA melting temperature, while visibly accumulating at the i

295 mino modified PMO was found to have a higher melting temperature with either complementary DNA or RNA

296 on properties by using accurate estimates of melting temperature with mismatches, computed based on t

297 ordered layer that forms well above the bulk melting temperature with thickness that increases on app

298 fected both the gelling rate and the network melting temperature, with the beta-glucan itself giving

299 eriments reveal that DAP substitution raises melting temperatures without diminishing sequence-depend

300 both states of RC(L), increasing their half-melting temperature, without affecting enthalpy changes.