コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 es that viewers attributed to the triangles (mentalizing).
2 al cortex and the angular gyrus (involved in mentalizing).
3 rstanding the mental states of others (i.e., mentalizing).
4 cessing of biological motion as well as with mentalizing.
5 e task taps on higher inferential processing/mentalizing.
6 izer tasks: language, logical reasoning, and mentalizing.
7 inked to higher cognitive functions, such as mentalizing.
8 ivity with frontal brain regions involved in mentalizing.
9 istress in regions associated with cognitive mentalizing.
10 ments in social-cognitive tasks that require mentalizing.
11 of a neural system reliably associated with mentalizing.
12 esponded more to other-mentalizing than self-mentalizing.
13 rges as a consequence of the adaptiveness of mentalizing.
14 to compare 33 BAP and 26 non-BAP mothers on mentalizing abilities, autistic traits, compensation and
15 predicted relationship between unique human mentalizing abilities, tolerance, and the domestication
16 linked to self-referential thought, whereas mentalizing about a dissimilar other engaged a more dors
17 We observed a double dissociation such that mentalizing about a similar other engaged a region of ve
18 y engage in self-referential processing when mentalizing about particular individuals, vMPFC response
19 cortex made the largest distinction between mentalizing about self and other were least socially imp
20 cortex made little to no distinction between mentalizing about self and other were the most socially
21 ons for surprising information involves more mentalizing about the target than nonrational discountin
24 okes slower and longer activations than self-mentalizing across successive DMN regions, implying leng
26 suasiveness for Heroic videos, while ISCs in mentalizing and default networks, especially in dmPFC, p
27 y we investigate four key cognitive domains (mentalizing and emotion perception, executive function,
30 l comparison, TD children used components of mentalizing and language networks [bilateral inferior fr
31 circumscribed network that is active during mentalizing and links medial prefrontal regions with pos
33 ot typically involve the amygdala (i.e., the mentalizing and mirror networks), and were behaviorally
34 reased functional connectivity involving the mentalizing and mirror neuron systems, largely reflectin
37 hlight the role of brain regions involved in mentalizing and positive valuation in recommendation pro
39 arity to one's peers in neural processing in mentalizing and reward regions is important for understa
40 nt of neural nodes possibly reflecting hyper-mentalizing and ruminations over the distressing stimuli
41 core the importance of contexts for implicit mentalizing and the need to profile mentalizing and ment
42 ng the political debate, neural synchrony in mentalizing and valuation networks was modulated by one'
43 earch into cognitive processes (specifically mentalizing) and social understanding (nonliteral langua
44 temporal sulcus, two regions associated with mentalizing, and in the lateral OFC, known to represent
45 is an inherent element of simulation-driven mentalizing, and introjection (using target representati
46 processing have largely focused on emotion, mentalizing, and reward networks, without integration of
47 ical self," "stimulus independent thought," "mentalizing," and most recently "self-projection." Howev
54 sociations existed specifically for maternal mentalizing behavior and were not evident for more gener
55 that engagement of the reward circuit and of mentalizing brain regions predicts preferences and persu
56 risingly, BAP mothers showed better implicit mentalizing but worse mental health than non-BAP mothers
57 when examining the same function (attention/mentalizing) but not when comparing different functions.
59 the empirical evidence for the arguments on mentalizing, cognitive biases, and religious belief is c
60 ate intrinsic brain networks-associated with mentalizing, cognitive control, motivational relevance,
61 the specific function of these components in mentalizing come from single cell recording studies: STS
62 ward and reinforcement, pain and punishment, mentalizing, delaying gratification, and emotion regulat
65 nding suggests a physiological cause for the mentalizing dysfunction in autism: a bottleneck in the i
66 eward valuation (e.g., ventral striatum) and mentalizing (e.g., temporal pole) to a greater extent th
68 overlap between autobiographical memory and mentalizing evoked brain activity found in past studies.
70 as desires and beliefs, to self and others (mentalizing) explains the social and communication impai
73 ization followed by 18 months of maintenance mentalizing group therapy remain better than those recei
74 identified in psychological tasks requiring mentalizing, has a specific role in encoding the uncerta
75 s account and even the existence of implicit mentalizing have been challenged because the replication
76 ively) encoded in the region associated with mentalizing (i.e. the left superior temporal gyrus) than
78 evaluative contexts can facilitate implicit mentalizing in BAP and non-BAP populations, and thus imp
81 provide further support for the key role of mentalizing in the forgiveness of accidental harms and c
84 cognition engages brain networks supporting mentalizing, intentionality, empathic concern and evalua
87 Overall, the present findings indicate that mentalizing is generalized to humanoid robots by prescho
89 ediction of others' changeable dispositions, mentalizing is required, i.e., tracking of intentions, d
92 mendation propagation, and further show that mentalizing may be particularly key in processing negati
93 y for inferring others' mental states (i.e., mentalizing) may be to use one's own thoughts, feelings,
94 erms, a highly desirable product of explicit mentalizing mechanisms that promote adaptive forms of so
96 recuneus, which is also a region involved in mentalizing, more strongly tracked the varying amount of
97 reased activation in a previously identified mentalizing network (medial prefrontal cortex, superior
98 lance, salience, reward, and motivation, and mentalizing network involving frontopolar-medial-prefron
99 able contributions of different parts of the mentalizing network to the computations underlying highe
100 ation and highlight a role of the so-called 'mentalizing network' as important in this distinction.
102 ed component correlated with activity in the mentalizing network, including the MPFC, the temporopari
103 associated with increased activation of the mentalizing network, visual areas, and precuneus, with l
104 n the functionally defined theory of mind or mentalizing network, was associated with the degree to w
105 unctional connectivity with key nodes of the mentalizing network, while adults show stronger reliance
109 explained activation in a key region of the mentalizing network: the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex
110 he findings suggest that both simulation and mentalizing networks contribute to multiple components o
114 eurotypical males while they made reflective mentalizing or physical judgements about themselves or t
115 s as playing a critical role in a dedicated 'mentalizing' or 'Theory of Mind' network in human brains
121 to infer other people's mental states (i.e., mentalizing) predicts prosocial giving and may be suscep
128 First, we find that patterns of activity in mentalizing regions contain information about subtle emo
129 role of affective salience over traditional mentalizing, regulatory, and motivational processes.
131 of benefactor-intention and benefit-value in mentalizing-related (e.g. precuneus, temporo-parietal ju
132 so distinct, located in somatosensory versus mentalizing-related circuits for somatic and vicarious p
133 TPJ reduces behavioral and neural indices of mentalizing-related computations, as well as functional
134 an impact of the stress hormone cortisol on mentalizing-related neurocognitive processes, which in t
135 regulation of these neural circuits supports mentalizing, reminiscence and imagination to fill the so
137 ctive when watching animations that elicited mentalizing, showed the same amount of increased activat
138 n regions associated with social rewards and mentalizing-showed a stronger, positive association betw
140 exhibit stronger functional specificity for mentalizing, stronger associations with behavioral respo
141 ated with inhibition, perspective taking and mentalizing, such as the inferior and middle frontal gyr
142 al conflict regulation, decision making, and mentalizing, suggesting more similar engagement of such
143 tative mirror neuron system (MNS) and some a mentalizing system (MZS) for inferring mental states.
144 a set of regions previously identified as a mentalizing system during exclusion relative to inclusio
145 This comparison-related activity within the mentalizing system has a parsimonious interpretation, i.
146 itive, recommendations, with activity in the mentalizing system scaling with the negativity of the re
147 ity in both the brain's valuation system and mentalizing system was associated with greater likelihoo
148 d greater changes in connectivity within the mentalizing system when socially excluded by peers had l
149 unctional connectivity between valuation and mentalizing systems was associated with opinion change.
150 ted in item-level performance on an explicit mentalizing task tapping ability to read complex emotion
151 on or "mirroring." Prior evidence shows that mentalizing tasks engage a neural network which includes
152 ain regions consistently engages more during mentalizing than during carefully controlled comparison
154 fic task-independent age-related deficits in mentalizing that are localizable to changes in circumscr
155 n neurocognitive pathway for self- and other-mentalizing that follows a complex spatiotemporal gradie
156 e transmission of culture and the relational mentalizing that underpins social and emotional function
157 from two separate regions key to memory and mentalizing, the left hippocampus and right temporal par
158 bout what brain regions are activated during mentalizing, the question of how this function is implem
159 eflection on another person's mental state ('mentalizing'versus 'non-mentalizing') in a 2 x 2 design.
160 d mental states such as desires and beliefs (mentalizing) when explicitly prompted to do so, despite
162 ovation and conformity, and arises from poor mentalizing, which generates difficulties in identifying
163 Classic developmental studies have examined mentalizing within minimally social contexts, in which a