ライフサイエンスコーパス: meta-analyses

1 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses).

2 endation is based on few clinical trials and meta-analyses.

3 ed within cohort, followed by random-effects meta-analyses.

4 t estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses.

5 entially eligible studies contributed to the meta-analyses.

6 ata suitable for pooling in 2 random-effects meta-analyses.

7 mption with the proposed framework in future meta-analyses.

8 elected, of which, five were included in the meta-analyses.

9 r genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and meta-analyses.

10 white adults aged 40-75 years with published meta-analyses.

11 omes and variably handled in contemporary HF meta-analyses.

12 as reported for 422 outcomes (68.9 %) in 108 meta-analyses.

13 nduct of high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

14 Forty-four studies were included for meta-analyses.

15 Random effects models were used for meta-analyses.

16 Eligible studies were included in meta-analyses.

17 to fill this gap by conducting dose-response meta-analyses.

18 results across countries with random-effects meta-analyses.

19 We performed two categorical network meta-analyses.

20 ficities were calculated using random-effect meta-analyses.

21 tive synthesis of new evidence with existing meta-analyses.

22 l-study effects in the results of univariate meta-analyses.

23 rting of heterogeneity in heart failure (HF) meta-analyses.

24 vidual cohorts were combined in fixed-effect meta-analyses.

25 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

26 atio (HR) were obtained using random-effects meta-analyses.

27 l available data of sufficient quality using meta-analyses.

28 trol: n=1409) were included in random-effect meta-analyses.

29 esis (evidence integration), often involving meta-analyses.

30 ) for change in symptoms, via random-effects meta-analyses.

31 studies, 125 articles were eligible for the meta-analyses.

32 ly 4 were examined >=5 times and included in meta-analyses.

33 generalized linear models and random effects meta-analyses.

34 n criteria, and we included 9 in our primary meta-analyses.

35 ere extracted from studies included in these meta-analyses.

36 obabilities between states were derived from meta-analyses.

37 led hazard ratios (HRs) using random-effects meta-analyses.

38 ch 32 were eligible and 21 were suitable for meta-analyses.

39 agnostic tests with bivariate random-effects meta-analyses.

40 rs and 11 interventions were included in the meta-analyses.

41 , including clinical effectiveness data from meta-analyses.

42 review and 119 studies were included in the meta-analyses.

43 s used and the choice of studies included in meta-analyses.

44 mend against using Hedges' g in biodiversity meta-analyses.

45 ion models and then pooled by random-effects meta-analyses.

46 6) and have shown an association with T1D in meta-analyses(4).

47 Of 126 HF meta-analyses (612 outcomes), heterogeneity was reported

48 To identify all relevant meta-analyses, a literature search was performed.

49 y novel BP loci, we performed multi-ancestry meta-analyses accounting for gene-educational attainment

50 tively blood or brain) tissues/cell-types in meta-analyses across all (respectively 11 blood or 8 bra

51 otal of 6,158 participants, were included in meta-analyses across the primary and secondary outcomes;

52 e inclusion criteria and 56 were included in meta-analyses after exclusion of randomised controlled t

53 limits of agreement show that for individual meta-analyses, agreement was much more variable.

54 cancer systematic reviews that included IPD meta-analyses: all of those completed and published by t

55 onstructed with random-effects dose-response meta-analyses and a spline model.

56 k ratios were obtained through random effect meta-analyses and adjusted for publication bias.

57 nt omega-3 FA randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses and discuss possible reasons for controver

58 on quantitative data obtained from published meta-analyses and from our current level of understandin

59 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies

60 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

61 Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were undertak

62 Random-effects meta-analyses and mixed-effects meta-regression analyses

63 nificant study heterogeneity observed in the meta-analyses and possible under-publishing of smaller n

64 Meta-analyses and prospective comparisons of different f

65 ut and Preferred Reporting Items for SRs and Meta-Analyses and rating by A MeaSurement Tool to Assess

66 However, recent meta-analyses and reviews converge to suggest that emoti

67 Consistent with previous large-scale meta-analyses and reviews, results supported the causal

68 prevalence were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses and were 0.32% (95% confidence interval [C

69 A total of 3 systematic reviews, 2 with meta-analyses, and 28 primary trials for prevention of C

70 gar-sweetened beverage-related diseases from meta-analyses, and industry reformulation and health-rel

71 ted in this review included clinical trials, meta-analyses, and retrospective analysis of surgical re

72 tive synthesis of new evidence with existing meta-analyses, and studies had several methodological sh

73 transdiagnostic effects reported in previous meta-analyses, and support a continued research focus on

74 irst, a widespread scan of published trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews; second, expert op

75 actors associated with the reliability of AD meta-analyses, and we cannot be sure that our results ar

76 dy mass index-disease effects from published meta-analyses; and policy effects on industry reformulat

77 ied and reported, but systematic reviews and meta-analyses are limited.

78 Meta-analyses are presented showing that aspects of plan

79 of the pulmonary embolism and major bleeding meta-analyses are uncertain and no clear conclusion can

80 ts continuous data utilization and automated meta analyses at scale, and serves as a catalyst for res

81 rs should use prospectively designed network meta-analyses based on existing and future randomised tr

82 rom a large cohort of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual participant data (IPD)

83 Systematic reviews and meta-analyses based primarily on observational data have

84 cacy is not "class-related," as derived from meta-analyses, but restricted to each specific product.

85 We stratified meta-analyses by participant age group, geographical reg

86 Conventional meta-analyses can only provide direct comparison evidenc

87 Large-scale datasets and meta-analyses, combined with recently developed analytic

88 We conducted meta-analyses comparing complex I and IV in each disorde

89 Prior meta-analyses comparing these operative approaches in te

90 Furthermore, the results from the large meta-analyses conducted by the CKD Prognosis Consortium

91 luate confidence in the results from network meta-analyses, Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINe

92 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria.

93 coccus aureus isolates, gut metagenomes, and meta-analyses demonstrate the ability of PhyloPhlAn 3.0

94 tial tag effects on small birds, as previous meta-analyses did not evaluate unpublished data and impa

95 In this systematic review and meta-analyses, Embase, PubMed, and the Web of Science we

96 We conducted mixed effect model-based meta-analyses evaluating incidence of anal SCC (standard

97 Meta-analyses examined associations between these disord

98 In trans-ethnic meta-analyses for 15 hematological traits in 746,667 par

99 Finally, where possible, we report meta-analyses for each result.

100 Finally, we report meta-analyses for each result.

101 Finally, we report meta-analyses for each results where possible.

102 lenge limits the usefulness of observational meta-analyses for inferences about etiology and treatmen

103 Meta-analyses for pooled estimates were performed using

104 We also performed European-ancestry meta-analyses for smoking status in the MVP and GWAS & S

105 Meta-analyses found significant associations between vio

106 s and psychiatric patients from 11 mega- and meta-analyses from the ENIGMA (Enhancing Neuro Imaging G

107 d Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline for systematic reviews was used,

108 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and is registered on PROSPERO,

109 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to assess observational and ran

110 d Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed.

111 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, including observational studie

112 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

113 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

114 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

115 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

116 Many systematic reviews and meta-analyses have assessed the efficacy of dietary patt

117 Although meta-analyses have confirmed this relationship, there is

118 l-performed randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated statistically insignific

119 Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported epidemiological associations

120 l established in the adult population, where meta-analyses have shown early introduction of enteral f

121 Meta-analyses have suggested that initiating pulmonary r

122 Despite being an essential component of meta-analyses, heterogeneity was not reported for nearly

123 estimates were obtained using random-effects meta-analyses; heterogeneity was examined using I2 stati

124 effect estimates across component studies of meta-analyses, highlighting overly influential outlier s

125 meeting a P < 10(-4) cutoff, while previous meta-analyses identified 3,042 in newborn blood, and 8,8

126 esults demonstrate the utility of microbiome meta-analyses in identifying robust and reproducible fea

127 novel variants in ancestry-specific, non-EUR meta-analyses, including an IL7 missense variant in Sout

128 As meta-analyses increase across HF science, interpreting a

129 Systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating the efficacy and safety of m

130 Meta-analyses involving endpoints of interest were perfo

131 Assessment of heterogeneity in meta-analyses is critical to ensure the consistency of p

132 The heterogeneity in meta-analyses is usually assumed to follow a normal dist

133 s been ascertained by systematic reviews and meta-analyses, its pathophysiology is not lucid.

134 nce is not entirely consistent, and previous meta-analyses mainly included case-control studies, whic

135 ons, and based on the systematic reviews and meta-analyses, makes recommendations for the clinician w

136 icant number of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) have evaluated the effect of periodo

137 ide association study (GWAS) hits from large meta-analyses (meta-GWAS) in diverse clinical settings,

138 tive synthesis of new evidence with existing meta-analyses, methodological shortcomings of studies, h

139 servation and management, the conclusions of meta-analyses need to remain stable for at least some ye

140 Clinical trials and meta-analyses now provide an evidence base for the treat

141 Meta-analyses of 2 RCTs showed no effect on child cognit

142 were pooled using random-effects models for meta-analyses of binomial data.

143 ASCVD among young and middle-age adults, but meta-analyses of cohort studies suggest that IBD is an i

144 r more rigorous methodology to be applied in meta-analyses of ecological data.

145 d on the strength of the evidence, primarily meta-analyses of epidemiologic studies of acceptable sci

146 More generally, our study highlights meta-analyses of experimental infections as a tractable

147 In meta-analyses of FHS and HUNT, 6 of these proteins were

148 The authors therefore compared meta-analyses of functional neuroimaging studies of indu

149 Meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies (GWAS)

150 ummary statistics from the largest available meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies (GWAS)

151 k for ADHD across the lifespan by conducting meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies on pers

152 Meta-analyses of host-associated bacterial communities h

153 ed Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data Statement.

154 Although meta-analyses of intervention studies differ in their fi

155 ta, reproducibility of published studies, or meta-analyses of large diverse datasets.

156 th albuminuria and slightly increased GFR in meta-analyses of large population-based cohorts.CONCLUSI

157 Meta-analyses of low-dose aspirin to prevent pre-eclamps

158 Meta-analyses of mainly cross-sectional studies confirm

159 We observed similar effect sizes in separate meta-analyses of non-socioeconomic-position-tailored int

160 vidence arising from systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies and physical heal

161 for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (

162 Two meta-analyses of observational studies reported no signi

163 from inception to Dec 31, 2018, to identify meta-analyses of observational studies that examined the

164 ies in Epidemiology guidelines for reporting meta-analyses of observational studies.

165 Meta-analyses of one-sample proportions were done in all

166 lications will be discussed here, along with meta-analyses of papers published in various subfields o

167 Original systematic reviews and meta-analyses of prevalence/incidence of cardiovascular

168 Meta-analyses of prevention programs reveal reliable but

169 Meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to pool the

170 A systematic review and dose-response meta-analyses of prospective studies was conducted to cl

171 ell-imputed genetic markers from large-scale meta-analyses of psoriasis (11,024 cases and 16,336 cont

172 ed on individual participant data (IPD) with meta-analyses of published AD, to establish when the lat

173 Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) wer

174 erimental work in human pancreas to multiple meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials for hypoth

175 Most recent meta-analyses of randomized trials and observational stu

176 Evidence from meta-analyses of randomized trials indicates that self-m

177 a substantially lower risk of cancer than in meta-analyses of randomized trials.

178 lude randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs published between June 1, 2016, an

179 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs published from August 1, 2014, thr

180 Fifty systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCTs were eligible for review.

181 Meta-analyses of real-world data suggested a doubling of

182 Meta-analyses of regression results indicated that gFA a

183 tics consortium, we performed epigenome-wide meta-analyses of school-age asthma in relation to CpG me

184 mbined using joint 2 degree-of-freedom (2df) meta-analyses of SNP associations and their interactions

185 Through combined meta-analyses of Stages 1 and 2, we identified 84 known

186 Additionally, single-arm meta-analyses of the available reports of SUNCT and SUNA

187 Random-effects meta-analyses of the effect of SMI on inpatient admissio

188 Meta-analyses of the present results and those from two

189 , and vascular disease, and summarize recent meta-analyses of the randomized trial evidence on these

190 expand upon existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the rates of detention for BAME populat

191 Meta-analyses of these trials have established the safet

192 Quantitative meta-analyses of this literature, however, have failed t

193 ble, and I describe results from large-scale meta-analyses of twin data and new methods for estimatin

194 n, we report the first systematic review and meta-analyses on effects of food texture (form, viscosit

195 Users can perform meta-analyses on LCE to gain a quick overview of the res

196 dividual studies with the aim to perform two meta-analyses on nonadditive effects.

197 Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the efficacy of probiotics in the treat

198 Pairwise and network meta-analyses on the relationship between the efficacy o

199 Thus, large-scale meta-analyses only tackle single terms that occur freque

200 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, or PRISMA, guidelines were followed.

201 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, or PRISMA, guidelines.

202 Study level meta-analyses pertaining to HF were selected from Januar

203 d Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist guided the reporting of

204 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for Scoping Reviews.

205 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

206 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations.

207 Our two meta-analyses provide a systematic evaluation of nonaddi

208 Study-level meta-analyses provide high-certainty evidence that hepar

209 election criteria sought systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and

210 We reviewed systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and observa

211 e search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospec

212 e search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospec

213 tect obesity with body mass index (BMI), the meta-analyses rendered a sensitivity of 51.4% (95% CI 38

214 We tabulated the overall proportion of the meta-analyses reporting statistical heterogeneity and sp

215 -language systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses, reports of rigorously conducted phase III

216 Meta-analyses revealed no significant association betwee

217 Meta-analyses revealed that patients with FND displayed

218 Meta-analyses revealed that patients with SMI were more

219 We conducted summary meta-analyses separately for reviews of randomized contr

220 eity across studies, meaning that results of meta-analyses should be interpreted with caution, and th

221 ing according to Preferred Items for SRs and Meta-Analyses should be mandatory for publication.

222 GVD meta-analyses show highly personalized viromes, reveal t

223 Meta-analyses showed minimal difference in CBL around II

224 Meta-analyses showed that individuals with BD have lower

225 Our pooled meta-analyses showed that nonsedating second-generation

226 o the inadequacies of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) published in the ophthalmology lit

227 osely a previous one, precluding substantial meta-analyses, such that the latter were all limited to

228 RCTs and meta-analyses suggest that programmes combining impact e

229 Meta-analyses suggest that providing agricultural inform

230 Recent data from multiple meta-analyses suggest that the combination increases the

231 Meta-analyses summarized association results for common

232 of exercise prevent falls and bone loss, and meta-analyses support the anti-fracture effectiveness of

233 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review was conducted through Se

234 gh June 2020 for randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and observational stu

235 , test systems are difficult to integrate in meta-analyses/systematic reviews since there is a lack o

236 sis by reanalysing four previously published meta-analyses that came to contradictory conclusions reg

237 Updated meta-analyses that include VITAL and other recent trials

238 ical trials are in melanoma and lung cancer, meta-analyses that pool multiple cancer types have limit

239 unclear when standard systematic reviews and meta-analyses that rely on published aggregate data (AD)

240 were, however, enough studies to combine by meta-analyses that showed that chronic cocaine use is as

241 ow, by combining a series of experiments and meta-analyses, that whereas eCO(2) strongly increased CH

242 In secondary meta-analyses, the data were grouped across primary cate

243 idal ideation were analyzed using multilevel meta-analyses to accommodate the non-independence of eff

244 We did random-effects meta-analyses to assess the effects of risk factors for

245 e used two-stage individual participant data meta-analyses to calculate pooled-effect sizes.

246 We used meta-analyses to combine county-specific effects and est

247 in FA were entered into univariate mega- and meta-analyses to differentiate patients with BD from HC.

248 This database allows to perform meta-analyses to extract global trends about the living

249 rich and largely unexploited data source for meta-analyses to identify the host and pathogen determin

250 We did frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses to investigate treatment-induced changes i

251 We did random-effects meta-analyses to produce summary relative risk (RR) esti

252 We performed an umbrella review of meta-analyses to summarize available epidemiologic evide

253 We used meta-analyses to test for correlations between community

254 a, and relative risk estimates from previous meta-analyses, to calculate PAFs for each risk factor.

255 ographical regions, followed by fixed-effect meta-analyses, to identify susceptibility loci.

256 Network meta-analyses using a bayesian framework to derive risk

257 We conducted separate meta-analyses using a random-effects model for mortality

258 Meta-analyses using random-effects models were performed

259 effect of corticosteroids by random-effects meta-analyses using the generic inverse variance method.

260 s and the methodological quality of included meta-analyses was assessed using 'the assessment of mult

261 where Preferred Reporting Items for SRs and Meta-Analyses was mandatory (OR [95% confidence interval

262 atic comparison with functional neuroimaging meta-analyses, we establish a statistically significant

263 In phylogenetically corrected meta-analyses, we find that elevated temperatures, CO(2)

264 In this systematic review and two meta-analyses, we searched the online databases PubMed,

265 Random-effects meta-analyses were carried out generating pooled standar

266 Activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analyses were conducted on peak voxel coordinates t

267 Random effects meta-analyses were conducted thoroughly.

268 techniques were narratively synthesized, and meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize results from

269 Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects mode

270 Linear and nonlinear dose-response meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models

271 Meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate.

272 n at least 3 similar studies were available, meta-analyses were conducted.

273 One-stage meta-analyses were done by hierarchical mixed-effects re

274 e Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and random-effects meta-analyses were done to examine heterogeneity using t

275 d Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were followed.

276 Meta-analyses were indicated for the efficacy of baricit

277 Standard fixed-effects meta-analyses were performed for each comparison, and a

278 Meta-analyses were performed for quantitative outcomes a

279 Network meta-analyses were performed to compare EBRT plus ADT ve

280 Network meta-analyses were performed to compare mesh types and l

281 Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the association

282 s: Systematic reviews and, when appropriate, meta-analyses were performed to summarize the best avail

283 Twenty-one meta-analyses were performed using effect sizes.

284 Meta-analyses were performed using effect-size- and p-va

285 Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models

286 Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models

287 Adjusted logistic regression models and meta-analyses were performed.

288 cytokine were evaluated, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed.

289 Single-arm random effects meta-analyses were performed.

290 Meta-analyses were presented as odds ratios and standard

291 Random effects dose-response meta-analyses were used to estimate summary relative ris

292 Random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool data.

293 zed methodological approaches, and conducted meta-analyses where appropriate.

294 ttawa Scale for cohort studies and performed meta-analyses where possible.

295 geneity was explored in different additional meta-analyses where studies were grouped according to le

296 adding 1959 external controls and performing meta-analyses with 2 independent EoE genome-wide associa

297 Meta-analyses with a fixed- and random-effects model wit

298 Here, we conducted meta-analyses with four different classification systems

299 Meta-analyses with global datasets associate the activat

300 nd examine its performance in random-effects meta-analyses with simulation studies and real examples.