戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ol (80 times faster than the slowest case in methanol).
2 6 +/- 0.07/0.86 +/- 0.06 eV (dichloromethane/methanol).
3 and 710 +/- 20/680 +/- 20 K (dichloromethane/methanol).
4  the blockage of unwanted pathways by adding methanol.
5 a polyurethane to produce diol, diamine, and methanol.
6 erated from renewables with CO(2) to produce methanol.
7 s subsequently used as a reactant to produce methanol.
8 erted by the addition of 4-methoxyindol-3-yl methanol.
9 tant of (4.1 +/- 0.6) x 10(6) M(-1) s(-1) in methanol.
10  milk and fresh milk is feasible with acidic methanol.
11 at the substrate and eluting the sample with methanol.
12 ydrogenation of in situ formed formamides to methanol.
13 90 bar H(2)/20 bar CO(2)) in the presence of methanol.
14 -C couplings of dienes or CF(3)-allenes with methanol.
15 enters are involved in converting methane to methanol.
16 oduction from hydrogen-stored liquid carrier-methanol.
17  C, 50 bar) carbon monoxide hydrogenation to methanol.
18 ldehyde, and not formate, during growth with methanol.
19 2) (CZZ) catalyst for CO(2) hydrogenation to methanol.
20 rogen/deuterium (H/D) exchange in deuterated methanol.
21 llent performance for CO(2) hydrogenation to methanol.
22 bited hydroalkoxylation-like reactivity with methanol.
23 en demonstrated by tuning isotopic water and methanol.
24 catechin carbocation and the methyl group of methanol.
25 orms the challenging oxidation of methane to methanol.
26 CO(2) hydrogenation and producing high-grade methanol.
27 nvestigation on the sensing mechanism toward methanol.
28 s for the selective conversion of methane to methanol.
29                    Enantiopure aziridin-2-yl methanols 3-7 are used as highly effective sensors for e
30 % (w v(-1)) AE solubilized in chloroform and methanol (3:1).
31 ed the highest membrane integrity (V2; 1.5 M methanol + 5.5 M Me(2)SO + 0.5 M sucrose + 10% egg yolk
32               Plant leaves were extracted in methanol (80%), then the phyto-metabolites were separate
33                                            A methanol acceptor phase is flowed through a probe-mounte
34 ased on reversed-phase chromatography with a methanol-acetone gradient and coupling to the ICP-sfMS v
35                                      Hexane: methanol: acetone: glacial acetic acid (8:2:0.5:0.1, by
36 est that the AA formation mechanism involves methanol activation on ReO(4), followed by CO insertion
37                     The loading of different methanol, alkene, and aromatic species in the cages may
38 te was captured in protic polar nucleophilic methanol alone or methanol-HCl extracts.
39 dependent, anaerobic oxidation of methane to methanol; alternatively, 'Ca.
40 from polymers like pectin and xylan, forming methanol and acetate, the availability of which could ex
41  pericarp were extracted using two solvents (methanol and acetone).
42 bserved for all parameters except for TPC in methanol and aqueous extracts.
43 modified by core and bridge substituents, in methanol and aqueous solutions are reported in this work
44 in excess of 20 kcal/mol when the solvent is methanol and by over 30 kcal/mol for [EMIM][BF(4)].
45 tually new approach, high selectivity toward methanol and catalyst turnover numbers (up to 3170) was
46 imized extraction solvents consisting of 10% methanol and chloroform were evaluated under dynamic and
47 ents at atmospheric pressure with 30 mbar of methanol and CO (1:1 molar ratio) showed that bulk Re(2)
48 used to increase the reaction selectivity to methanol and encourages further detailed investigations
49 of methanol, favourably oxidising water over methanol and enhancing the selective CO(2) reduction to
50               Turnover rates (per H(+) ) for methanol and ethanol dehydration increase with the fract
51 X and Oasis) and activation/elution solvent (methanol and ethanol).
52 er and CO(2) with nearly 100% selectivity to methanol and internal quantum efficiency of 2.1% in the
53 0) precatalysts, and protic solvents such as methanol and isopropanol were identified as optimal.
54    The corresponding ciders presented higher methanol and lower 2-phenylethanol contents than those o
55 drated or prehydrated Zr-nodes showed higher methanol and methane formation rates over the dehydrated
56 defects increase the formation rates to both methanol and methane.
57 ion kinetics are retarded in the presence of methanol and natural organic matter as sulfate radical s
58                                              Methanol and paraformaldehyde incubation of infected cel
59 nt-secreted metabolites, 4-methoxyindol-3-yl-methanol and S-(4-methoxy-indol-3-yl-methyl) cysteine we
60                Hair samples were washed with methanol and subjected to clean up via liquid/liquid and
61 nd three anilines have been measured in both methanol and toluene.
62 is related to competitive adsorption between methanol and water.
63  homogeneous (cyclohexane, acetonitrile, and methanol) and micellar (SDS) solution was investigated b
64 n of an outer-sphere redox couple (ferrocene methanol) and two inner-sphere redox couples (potassium
65 of different solvents, including 2-propanol, methanol, and acetonitrile, pure or as mixture with dime
66 O(2) to fuels and chemicals such as methane, methanol, and C(2+) hydrocarbons or syngas are still far
67                       Three solvents: water, methanol, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were investigate
68  Efficient electro-oxidation of formic acid, methanol, and ethanol is challenging owing to the multip
69 tion reactions of liquid fuels (formic acid, methanol, and ethanol).
70 different hydroxyl compounds, such as water, methanol, and ethanol, and the concentrations of their m
71 resence of various liquid adsorbates: water, methanol, and ethanol.
72 urface towards electro-oxidation of ethanol, methanol, and formic acid, with mass activities of 1.55
73 n, these results highlight the importance of methanol, and solvents in general, in biomembrane and pr
74 ane), refrigerant R-125 (pentafluoroethane), methanol, and water] and a range of model potentials (ha
75  in cell-free extracts from wild-type strain methanol- and lanthanum-grown cultures.
76 hosphane probe (2-(diphenylphosphanyl)phenyl)methanol as a C-terminus activator has been demonstrated
77 indicate that ethanol can be used to replace methanol as an activation, extraction/elution solvent.
78 c-balanced) material as a binding agent, and methanol as an eluent.
79 derivatives of SCFA were only detected using methanol as solvent.
80 ablish a strain that can efficiently utilize methanol as the sole carbon source.
81 he presence of 5 mol % RuCl(2)(PPh(3))(3) in methanol at 100 degrees C.
82 active for selectively converting methane to methanol at 150-200 degrees C.
83 pors, yielding an uptake of ca. 4 mmol/g for methanol at 293 K.
84 socratic elution using n-octylamine in 20.0% methanol at pH 6.60.
85 oxy or ethoxy groups on a benzene or benzene-methanol backbone were clustered into one group with sim
86 mesin glycosides (4) from Micromelum minutum methanol bark extract.
87                                              Methanol, being electron rich and derivable from methane
88 ogenous lanthanum increases growth rate with methanol by 9-12% but does not correlate with changes to
89 tep in the anaerobic oxidation of methane to methanol by methanotrophic archaea.
90                                        Also, methanol can be determined by using ZnS:Mn(2+) QDs/NMPPy
91                                 The produced methanol can be easily separated by distillation.
92                                 Importantly, methanol can be used as a C1 source and the chemoselecti
93                                              Methanol carbonylation to acetic acid (AA) is a large-sc
94  is not favorable for CO(2) hydrogenation to methanol, causing low activity and poor methanol selecti
95 environment - comprising urea and chloroform/methanol (CHCl(3)/MeOH) mixture.
96 m can provide quantitative information about methanol concentration in the liquid phase of microbial
97  included analytes extraction with acidified methanol, concentration by evaporation and filtration of
98                                       Breath methanol concentrations were quantified accurately withi
99                             Under increasing methanol concentrations, isotopically distinct 1,2-dimyr
100 ith natural methylotrophs in a wide range of methanol concentrations, this synthetic methylotrophic s
101 9-12% but does not correlate with changes to methanol consumption or formaldehyde accumulation.
102                  The pH, alcoholic strength, methanol content, acetaldehyde content, ethyl acetate co
103 n pool species are essential to catalyze the methanol conversion but may also clog the pores.
104 opene selectivity and increased lifetime for methanol conversion over zeolites is obtained.
105  elementary steps of the catalytic cycle for methanol coupling, using scaling methods augmented by de
106 here the source of deuterium is the solvent, methanol- d(4).
107            Herein, the reaction mechanism of methanol decomposition over Pt(1)/CeO(2) was carefully i
108 group has shown a 40-fold higher activity of methanol decomposition over single-site Pt(1)/CeO(2) cat
109 ns AM1, the periplasmic lanthanide-dependent methanol dehydrogenase XoxF1 produces formaldehyde, whic
110 oloquinoline quinone (PQQ) in bacterial XoxF methanol dehydrogenases (MDHs) and ExaF ethanol dehydrog
111 ized as cofactors for catalysis by XoxF-type methanol dehydrogenases (MDHs).
112 Ln(3+) ) have emerged as enzyme cofactors of methanol dehydrogenases of the XoxF type.
113 e alternative, calcium-dependent, MxaFI-type methanol dehydrogenases, when Ln(3+) are available.
114 t, and as we show here, lanthanide-dependent methanol dehydrogenases, which are more prevalent in the
115 (BN) nanosheet (Ni/BN) catalysts with higher methanol dehydrogenation activity and selectivity, and g
116 hough addition of water was found to promote methanol desorption, water does not change the methanol
117       Methanol is highly toxic for human, so methanol detection is valuable especially in water and e
118  the "differentiating effect" of the solvent methanol, deuterations of electron-rich aromatic systems
119 P) cycle used by methylotrophs to assimilate methanol differs from the typical sugar metabolism by on
120                                  The ease of methanol dissociative adsorption on nanoceria support an
121                                          For methanol electrooxidation in an acid electrolyte, due to
122 xhibit excellent catalytic activities in the methanol electrooxidation reaction (MEOR).
123 ion concerns the adaptation of bacteria to a methanol environment.
124 ongitudinal differences mainly attributed to methanol, ethanol and acetone.
125 and 10.5 ppm was obtained in exposure to the methanol, ethanol and propanol vapours, respectively, in
126                  The carbon sources included methanol, ethanol, acetate, and their ternary mixture.
127    In alloxan-induced diabetic mice, the AFS methanol extract (AFSE) rich in caffeoylquinic acids and
128                         The DPPH activity of methanol extract and its fraction present the IC(50) val
129 content were found in ethyl acetate extract, methanol extract possessed the strongest DPPH and ABTS r
130 method involving sequential basic and acidic methanol extractions was developed and evaluated for rec
131 In the current work, the phenolic profile of methanol extracts obtained from the inflorescences and f
132                                       Eluted methanol extracts of all of the isolates showed activity
133 om CN and prevents the surface adsorption of methanol, favourably oxidising water over methanol and e
134  pair, such as ferrocenemethanol/ferrocenium methanol (FcMeOH/FcMeOH(+)), which acts as the cosubstra
135                            Methanotrophs use methanol for energy conservation, whereas toxic hydroxyl
136  configuration, accounting for the excellent methanol formation activity observed.
137 anic frameworks (MOFs), key intermediates in methanol formation are adsorbed at open Zr-sites at the
138  functional theory (DFT) modeling, targeting methanol formation from CO(2)/H(2) feeds at 170 degrees
139                                              Methanol formation is mechanistically separated from the
140 90% of Cu exhibits the highest mass-specific methanol formation rate of 524 g(MeOH)kg(cat)(-1)h(-1) a
141                 The wines made from FSS were methanol free and contained higher levels of terpenes (i
142 d readily by first responders to distinguish methanol from ethanol poisoning and monitor in real time
143 CN stably produces stoichiometric oxygen and methanol from water and CO(2) with nearly 100% selectivi
144 grated in the electrical circuit of a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC), working in passive mode and u
145 . RHE and suggests the operability in direct methanol fuel cell configuration.
146  performance and durable non-platinum direct methanol fuel cell.
147 lyst is critical for a cost-effective direct methanol fuel cell.
148 tyl hydroperoxide and KOH in dichloromethane/methanol gave a benzocarbachlorin and two related aldehy
149         A 30-min extraction with 65% aqueous methanol gave a total isoflavone yield of 345 mg/100 g s
150 for designing high performance catalysts for methanol generation from CO(2).
151        Transcriptomics analysis of lanthanum methanol growth shows upregulation of xox1 and downregul
152 d system for CO(2) capture and conversion to methanol has been established.
153     Highly selective oxidation of methane to methanol has long been challenging in catalysis.
154  protic polar nucleophilic methanol alone or methanol-HCl extracts.
155 xture significantly influenced the levels of methanol (higher in mono-varietal ciders), 2-phenylethan
156                                              Methanol ice is present along with organic material, whi
157 tes for direct air capture and conversion to methanol in a scalable process.
158 alyzed by a manganese pincer complex, yields methanol in addition to amine and alcohol, which makes t
159 w fluorescence probe for direct detection of methanol in aqueous and ethanol medium based on the ZnS:
160 so catalyze the reaction from CO(2) or CO to methanol in aqueous electrolytes at ambient conditions o
161 rrent increase for the redox probe ferrocene-methanol in comparison with the same surface treated by
162 e calculations revealed weaker adsorption of methanol in defective or dehydrated nodes, in agreement
163 essfully utilized to determine the amount of methanol in real alcoholic beverage samples.
164 ostic capability for accurate measurement of methanol in spiked breath, promising for rapid screening
165 asurement of the permittivities of water and methanol in the D-band.
166 , the formamides are hydrogenated in situ to methanol in the presence of a commercially available rut
167 nzoic and 2,2'-pyridil to picolinic acids in methanol in the presence of air.
168 sound amplitude 47%, solvent composition 80% methanol in water at pH 4.25, and sample to solvent rati
169 10-70 degrees C), solvent composition (0-50% methanol in water), cycle (0.2-0.7 s(-1)), ultrasound am
170 ary, albeit highly selective, reaction-based methanol indicator.
171 apidly and easily with mass production after methanol induction.
172 Water adsorption also displaced the produced methanol into the gas phase.
173 rnative route for the conversion of CO(2) to methanol, involving a base-metal catalyst.
174                                              Methanol is a common solubilizing agent used to study tr
175               Direct oxidation of methane to methanol is a long-standing challenge in the heterogeneo
176                                  Ultimately, methanol is capable of influencing the structure-functio
177                      The study revealed that methanol is formed at the interface between the Pt NPs a
178 erall, the study provides firm evidence that methanol is formed at the interface of Pt NPs and linker
179                                              Methanol is highly toxic for human, so methanol detectio
180 sisted homogeneous hydrogenation of CO(2) to methanol is one of the most effective approaches to inte
181 d (ii) upon addition of 3% vol/vol methanol; methanol is thought to act as a substrate water analog.
182  efficiencies into chloroform (CHCl(3)) with methanol (MeOH) as cosolvent, consistent with MeOH compe
183 esence of amines to formate, formamides, and methanol (MeOH) is a promising approach to streamlining
184 solvents, such as trifluoroethanol (TFE) and methanol (MeOH), indicating a lower propensity of the ox
185 oligosaccharide mixtures were compared using methanol (MeOH)-, isopropanol (IPA)-, and acetonitrile (
186 hat both are essential for Ln(3+) -dependent methanol metabolism.
187 methyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol (GLY), and methanol (METH; listed in order from least to most toxic
188 factor; and (ii) upon addition of 3% vol/vol methanol; methanol is thought to act as a substrate wate
189 -)/CH(3)O(-) transport pathway for all water/methanol mixing ratios investigated.
190  photoacid 7-hydroxyquinoline (7HQ) in water/methanol mixtures.
191 nzene) monolithic columns and carbon dioxide/methanol mobile phase.
192                     A gradient from 2 to 40% methanol modifier containing 0.1% TFA as an acidic addit
193 m formate and ammonium acetate in water-rich methanol modifier, the ammonium hydroxide in water addit
194                                              Methanol molecules were dissociatively adsorbed on nanoc
195                                    Real-time methanol monitoring was achieved by reading the intensit
196 duction, water splitting, CO(2) reduction to methanol, nitrogen fixation, and water depollution.
197 t with the larger gas phase concentration of methanol observed experimentally.
198 required to selectively hydrogenate CO(2) to methanol on catalysts containing Cu and ZrO(2).
199  MPa) reveal that the CO(2) hydrogenation to methanol on the CZZ catalysts follows the formate pathwa
200 ion, oxygen reduction reaction, and alcohol (methanol or ethanol) oxidation reaction.
201 nase, which converts methane or ammonia into methanol or hydroxylamine, respectively.
202 C, weighed, dried, and redissolved in acidic methanol or water.
203 L were extracted with hexane, diethyl ether, methanol, or butanol, but activity was observed with dim
204 duced in the partial oxidation of methane to methanol over Cu-SSZ-13 in a continuous-flow reactor.
205 re (NR-Ni(OH)(2)) is able to show remarkable methanol oxidation activity with an onset potential of 0
206 l and durable non-platinum group metal-based methanol oxidation catalyst is critical for a cost-effec
207   While Ni(OH)(2) has been widely studied as methanol oxidation catalyst, the initial process of oxid
208 hanced electrocatalytic performance for both methanol oxidation reaction (MOR) and ethanol oxidation
209 bine the catalytic activity of Pd toward the methanol oxidation reaction (MOR) and the visible-light
210 on is that XoxF enzymes produce formate from methanol oxidation, which could impact organisms that re
211 ution is characterized using electrochemical methanol oxidation.
212 ked breath, promising for rapid screening of methanol poisoning and assessment of severity.
213                                              Methanol poisoning outbreaks after consumption of adulte
214  a noninvasive and rapid diagnostic tool for methanol poisoning.
215 the main source of the oxygen present in the methanol produced in the partial oxidation of methane to
216 gh yield, selectivity, and TONs obtained for methanol production at low reaction temperature (145 deg
217 dsorption properties to the intermediates of methanol production is presented.
218 ed to surface methoxy groups and accelerated methanol production.
219 nd methanol yield in CO(2) hydrogenation for methanol production.
220 ic excitation that can cooperatively promote methanol-production at the copper-zinc oxide interfacial
221 a heterogeneous catalyst system for enhanced methanol productivity in methane oxidation by in situ ge
222 ient gas flow and shows the best competitive methanol productivity under industrially applicable cond
223 ol selectivity reached 92%, corresponding to methanol productivity up to 91.6 millimoles per gram of
224                                          The methanol-promoted conversion is accompanied by a readily
225                                    Then, the methanol promotion of the reaction was demonstrated, inc
226 o the four tested alcoholic vapors (ethanol, methanol, propanol, and isopropanol).
227 hrough two leading hydrogenation mechanisms: methanol reaction and Fischer-Tropsch based carbon dioxi
228 was completed within 50 min and stripping in methanol required less than 35 min.
229              At 17.3% conversion of methane, methanol selectivity reached 92%, corresponding to metha
230 n to methanol, causing low activity and poor methanol selectivity.
231 dependent ethanol dehydrogenase ExaF reduces methanol sensitivity in the fae mutant strain when lanth
232 n of the singlet alpha-carbonyl carbene with methanol shows that the enol forms without a barrier and
233 exogenous application of 4-methoxyindol-3-yl methanol slightly elevated cytosolic Ca(2+) levels and e
234  identification of CM inhibitors (chloroform/methanol soluble proteins) as main contributors of tryps
235        The films were made by spin coating a methanol solution of the IL on silica substrates that we
236 cules, leads to significant ordering of bulk methanol solvent and the ionic liquid [EMIM][BF(4)].
237 ed from frozen sperm in 1:2 (v/v) chloroform-methanol solvent, fractionated into neutral and polar fr
238 ) P)(2) NH) has N(2) O reductase activity in methanol solvent, mediating 2 H(+) /2 e(-) reduction of
239         The structural transformation during methanol sorption is monitored by in-situ grazing incide
240 erformance of the detector is validated with methanol-spiked breath of 20 volunteers (105 breath samp
241 thanol desorption, water does not change the methanol steady state reaction rate, while it has a subs
242 trially important as well as the key step in methanol steam reforming on gold catalysts.
243 tegy opens up the feasible avenue to develop methanol-storable solar H(2) fuel with facile chemical r
244    Selective partial oxidation of methane to methanol suffers from low efficiency.
245 etallic composition, from which a convenient methanol synthesis based on flexible feedstock compositi
246  The Rh-In catalyst can effectively catalyze methanol synthesis but inhibit the reverse water-gas shi
247 d space time yield of Cu based heterogeneous methanol synthesis catalysts through CO(2) hydrogenation
248                                              Methanol synthesis from syngas (CO/H(2) mixtures) is one
249 bility to turn into a selective catalyst for methanol synthesis in CO(2) hydrogenation which exhibits
250     The proposed general catalytic cycle for methanol synthesis is supported by model studies and det
251 hances CO dissociation and also stabilizes a methanol synthesis pathway not present in the unpromoted
252 model nanocrystalline In(2)O(3) catalyst for methanol synthesis via CO(2) hydrogenation (300 degrees
253 activity and selectivity for low-temperature methanol synthesis.
254 , that more readily undergo hydrogenation to methanol than the C-O dissociation associated with hydro
255 vents (water, ethanol, and a small amount of methanol that could be reused), the developed method pro
256 n polar NOM fractions (which elute with <50% methanol) the TIC intensity and number of assigned molec
257  copper sites are able to convert methane to methanol, the copper oxyl sites with much lower free ene
258                                         From methanol to 1-hexnaol, the intercalation rate peaks in 1
259  the halide-free, gas phase carbonylation of methanol to AA.
260 phs make a living from oxidizing methane via methanol to carbon dioxide.
261 ion pathway for H-SSZ-13: dehydrogenation of methanol to CO is followed by CO-methylation leading to
262 formate and acetate ligands by reaction with methanol to form esters, interior active sites in UiO-66
263 ed with silver(I) acetate in dichloromethane-methanol to give stable nonaromatic structures with two
264 ia the base-catalyzed reversible addition of methanol to styrenes in DMSO -d(6) solvent.
265 oted by an intermolecular hydrogen bond from methanol to the carbonyl oxygen atom.
266  was applied after extraction with acidified methanol, to determine 12 bioactive phenolic compounds i
267                        The initiation of the methanol-to-olefins (MTO) process is investigated using
268                                          The methanol-to-olefins process over H-SAPO-34 is characteri
269 re reached, while showing long stability and methanol tolerance.
270  of 0.89 V), outstanding stability, and good methanol tolerance.
271 ing silk layering, water vapor annealing and methanol treatment to stabilize the protein cargo and im
272 t from carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide to methanol under a reaction environment with methane, oxyg
273 quiv of [2,2'-bithiophene]-5,5'-diylbis(aryl)methanol under mild acid-catalyzed conditions in CH(2)Cl
274 n dioxide, including atmospheric CO(2), into methanol, under ambient conditions.
275 catalyze the partial oxidation of methane to methanol using only oxygen and water at low temperatures
276 -Robinson buffer (pH 4) containing 10% (v/v) methanol using square-wave voltammetry when five differe
277  pai-extended 3-hydroxyflavone photoCORM, in methanol using steady-state and transient absorption spe
278 d excellent repeatability in exposure to the methanol vapour.
279                Then, 5 and 20% (v/v) aqueous methanol was applied as the washing mobile phase.
280 rformance for removing vapors of toluene and methanol was assessed.
281 dition reaction of S,S-dioxobenzothiophene-2-methanol was explored in microcrystalline powders and it
282 l (Ac) were synthesized, and KHSO(5)/AcCl in methanol was identified as an easy, mild, selective, and
283 lity concerning the volatile composition and methanol was not detected in any sample.
284  microsome-based assays, 4-methoxyindol-3-yl-methanol was transported in a PEN3-dependent manner, sug
285  gradient elution using phosphate buffer and methanol was used for their optimal separation.
286 raction was accomplished using acetonitrile, methanol, water, ammonia, 50:40:9:1 (v/v/v/v) as the sol
287  cm(-1) for cyclohexane, DMSO, acetonitrile, methanol, water, benzene, and toluene using broadband SR
288 lvents; p-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) in 1:1 methanol-water gave a >20:1 stereoselectivity favoring t
289 ium hydroxide in water; C, ethyl acetate; D, methanol: water (1:1, v/v); and E, acetonitrile: water (
290 mm x 4.6 mm, 3.5 um) as stationary phase and methanol: water (98:02, v/v) as mobile phase.
291                                              Methanol:water (70:30) showed the best extraction capaci
292  are then reacted to form the energy carrier methanol, which is conveniently shipped to the end consu
293 e, and it directly converted this species to methanol, while oxygen reoxidized the reduced surface.
294 is and extraction method was developed using methanol with 2 M sulfuric acid with incubation at 65 de
295 cule-based electrocatalyst converts CO(2) to methanol with considerable activity and selectivity and
296 trated by the simultaneous quantification of methanol with H(3)O(+), acetone with NO(+), and dimethyl
297 onate and formate salts were hydrogenated to methanol with high yields in a solution of ethylene glyc
298 udy compared extraction yields using UAE and methanol with soxhlet.
299 ase in carbon dioxide (CO(2)) conversion and methanol yield in CO(2) hydrogenation for methanol produ
300  and the amines that are critical for a high methanol yield.

 
Page Top