ライフサイエンスコーパス: microbiologic

1 Microbiologic analyses were restricted to Staphylococcus

2 mitations of traditional histopathologic and microbiologic analyses.

3 intracellular polysaccharides (IPS), and for microbiologic analysis by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridiza

4 ternative to subgingival plaque sampling for microbiologic analysis in both AgP and CP.

5 ese methods will (or should) have in routine microbiologic analysis of CF respiratory specimens is un

6 likely raise expectations for more in-depth microbiologic analysis of CF respiratory specimens.

7 Real-time RT-PCR and microbiologic analysis revealed the presence of a dual i

8 up studies coupling PTX3 concentrations with microbiologic analysis would better clarify its role in

9 in 57% (8/14) of eyes by either cytologic or microbiologic analysis.

10 Patient-level microbiologic and AMU data were obtained from October 20

11 aque and sulcus fluid samples were taken for microbiologic and biochemical analysis.

12 d novel analytical strategies that integrate microbiologic and genetic data for improved and accurate

13 less severe pulmonary disease and more rapid microbiologic and histologic resolution.

14 more severe pulmonary disease and less rapid microbiologic and histological resolution.

15 few studies on periodontal status related to microbiologic and immunologic profiles among individuals

16 nfected macaques and is defined by clinical, microbiologic and immunologic signs, whereas the remaini

17 demographic information, comorbidities, and microbiologic and laboratory findings.

18 Microbiologic and medical records were reviewed retrospe

19 Microbiologic and molecular analyses indicate that this

20 reated with vancomycin and characterizes the microbiologic and molecular features of the bloodstream

21 the species, we examined the distribution of microbiologic and molecular traits between collections o

22 recent knowledge in this area and propose a microbiologic and pathological algorithm for endocarditi

23 Correlations among immunologic, microbiologic, and clinical data were determined using t

24 nctive to SRP, promotes additional clinical, microbiologic, and immunologic benefits in the treatment

25 of the present study is to assess clinical, microbiologic, and immunologic benefits of amoxicillin/m

26 All clinical, microbiologic, and immunologic parameters were assessed

27 Clinical, microbiologic, and immunologic parameters were statistic

28 Clinical, microbiologic, and laboratory safety were assessed.

29 dose M. tuberculosis; clinical, immunologic, microbiologic, and pathologic events were assessed 3 to

30 cipient and review the significant clinical, microbiologic, and therapeutic aspects of infection with

31 stablished medical criteria, after physical, microbiologic, and/or radiographic examination.

32 988-2006) and, afterwards, with the use of a microbiologic assay (2007-2010).

33 Of the 6 studies that used the microbiologic assay (MA) to measure serum or plasma (S/P

34 ay-mismatched cutoffs (e.g., with the use of microbiologic assay cutoff with RPBA data) for risk of d

35 ration <305 nmol/L derived with the use of a microbiologic assay), possible deficiency on the basis o

36 ration <906 nmol/L derived with the use of a microbiologic assay).

37 This paper describes the rationale for the microbiologic assays chosen and methodologies used to ac

38 Rapid and sensitive microbiologic assays for many of the common viruses afte

39 ulated for the primary analysis (PA) and the microbiologic assessable (MA) populations.

40 SN) ensures the reliable epidemiological and microbiologic assessment of disease prevalence in the Eu

41 Microbiologic assessments of eight putative periodontal

42 udy is to evaluate the possible clinical and microbiologic association between PAD and periodontitis

43 s assessed the global response (clinical and microbiologic) at the end of intravenous therapy in pati

44 Physical, immunologic, and microbiologic (bacterial, fungal, archaeal, viral, and p

45 resistance profile of tedizolid provides the microbiologic basis for considering this molecule as an

46 unct to the FMUD protocol added clinical and microbiologic benefits to GAgP treatment (P <0.05).

47 The microbiologic causes of protracted diarrhea include dete

48 aim of this study was to evaluate long-term microbiologic changes following locally delivered doxycy

49 resent study is to evaluate the clinical and microbiologic changes resulting from non-surgical period

50 f this case-control study is to compare oral microbiologic characteristics of patients with healthy p

51 We examined the clinical and microbiologic characteristics of systemic shigellosis in

52 tball team and examined the transmission and microbiologic characteristics of the outbreak strain.

53 ing problem in pediatrics, with clinical and microbiologic characteristics that differentiate it from

54 area-based CRKP prevalence and clinical and microbiologic characteristics were described.

55 mplant surface, and presence of plaque) with microbiologic characteristics.

56 ious patient- and implant-related factors on microbiologic characteristics.

57 ed control measures; outbreak detection; and microbiologic characterization to improve understanding

58 For GNI, the time to microbiologic clearance (51.13 versus 34.51 h; P < 0.001

59 antimicrobial periodontal therapy and tested microbiologic, clinical, and biologic markers as prognos

60 This study determined which microbiologic, clinical, demographic, and behavioral fac

61 ral hygiene index-simplified (OHI-S); and 4) microbiologic colony counts were recorded at baseline an

62 Based on microbiologic concerns, the safety of a 24-month regimen

63 marrow imaging, and had histopathologic and microbiologic confirmation of the final diagnosis, forme

64 Children were categorized as Confirmed TB (microbiologic confirmation on IS), Unconfirmed TB (clini

65 Microbiologic contamination of containers with autologou

66 patients with normal CD4 counts who achieved microbiologic control.

67 We measured clinical and microbiologic correlates of infection with M. tuberculos

68 gingival and plaque index scores as well as microbiologic counts compared with placebo dentifrice.

69 h respect to reduction in PI, GI, OHI-S, and microbiologic counts in group I compared with groups II

70 modification of the Quigley-Hein index, and microbiologic counts were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks,

71 from CSF; and (4) more frequently fulfilled microbiologic criteria for established borrelial infecti

72 not, or did, meet American Thoracic Society microbiologic criteria for NTM disease (3 +/- 1, 3 +/- 2

73 ia-which include clinical, radiological, and microbiologic criteria-should be considered for treatmen

74 th infection based on published clinical and microbiologic criteria.

75 ed for trachoma and swabs were collected for microbiologic culture (blood and chocolate agar) and C.

76 e for UTI included self-reports confirmed by microbiologic culture and medical record review.

77 Although microbiologic culture is a standard method for detecting

78 A final diagnosis of infection was based on microbiologic culture of fluid aspirated from the collec

79 e 57.1 and 93.8%, respectively, for standard microbiologic culture of tracheal wash fluid and 62.5 an

80 ns, visual outcomes, complication rates, and microbiologic culture results.

81 ificantly lower in patients who had positive microbiologic culture than those who were culture negati

82 Multiplex quantitative PCR and routine microbiologic culture were applied to clinical specimens

83 riate tissue for microscopic examination and microbiologic culture.

84 Quantitative microbiologic cultures have been used previously to defi

85 Microbiologic cultures of fungi are routinely incubated

86 In patients who did not demonstrate positive microbiologic cultures, a higher number of components of

87 cal and electron-microscopical examinations, microbiologic cultures, and molecular assays were perfor

88 Microbiologic cultures, the current gold standard diagno

89 pected cases often fail to grow Mucorales in microbiologic cultures.

90 thral symptoms and absence of discharge) and microbiologic cure (negative tests for CT, MG, and/or UU

91 Among 441 patients, 237 experienced microbiologic cure and 204 experienced microbiologic fai

92 Secondary outcomes included microbiologic cure at 6 days, rate of re-epithelializati

93 clinical cure did not differ by arm, nor did microbiologic cure differ for CT (86% vs 90%, P = .56),

94 Microbiologic cure is a common outcome in pneumonia clin

95 Microbiologic cure merits further study as a metric to g

96 Microbiologic cure occurred in 73 of 77 MRM-negative inf

97 To determine whether microbiologic cure of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

98 Clinical and microbiologic cure rates for NGU were somewhat low and t

99 ailure) and those with pathogen eradication (microbiologic cure).

100 h following clinical cure than patients with microbiologic cure, controlling for comorbid conditions,

101 h following clinical cure than patients with microbiologic cure, controlling for comorbid conditions,

102 ions for beta-lactams and staphylococci, and microbiologic data and clinical data supporting the elim

103 loped a computer-based tracking system using microbiologic data as an aid in detecting potential outb

104 ntervals with symptomatic, radiographic, and microbiologic data collected, including semiquantitative

105 Clinical and microbiologic data for A. calidoustus cases from 2008 to

106 mation, comorbidities, FARP results, and all microbiologic data from BAL fluid were collected.

107 2009 through 2016 utilizing demographic and microbiologic data on inpatients aged <19 years using th

108 Microbiologic data were obtained by means of culture of

109 Cross-sectional clinical and microbiologic data were obtained from 66 patients (33 in

110 symptoms of sepsis, cell markers, cytokines, microbiologic data, and coagulation parameters.

111 , anthrophometric, functional, clinical, and microbiologic data.

112 els were generated by using the quantitative microbiologic data.

113 may provide additional, clinically relevant microbiologic data.

114 ll observers were masked to the clinical and microbiologic data.

115 pectively reviewed and cross-referenced to a microbiologic database of positive fungal blood cultures

116 We aimed to assess clinical and microbiologic determinants of mortality and to character

117 Clinical and microbiologic determinants of mortality included dissemi

118 equests were rejected because an alternative microbiologic diagnosis had been established.

119 al fluid, tissue, and sonicate fluid for the microbiologic diagnosis of PJI.

120 s more sensitive than tissue culture for the microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic hip and knee infec

121 tional periprosthetic-tissue culture for the microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic hip and knee infec

122 nal culture of periprosthetic tissue for the microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection am

123 c tissue is the standard method used for the microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection, b

124 tained from the prosthesis would improve the microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection.

125 spp. (1/17; 6%); 1 patient had no confirmed microbiologic diagnosis.

126 and cerebral vasculitis cannot be assigned a microbiologic diagnosis.

127 lular bacterium escapes detection by routine microbiologic diagnostic methods such as blood culture l

128 understood in part because of limitations of microbiologic diagnostic methods.

129 Microbiologic differences were found in subgingival plaq

130 al was designed to evaluate the clinical and microbiologic effects of a commercially available dentif

131 This study assesses the microbiologic effects of a two-phase antimicrobial perio

132 resent study is to evaluate the clinical and microbiologic effects of the adjunctive use of metronida

133 al agents for treatment of BV have differing microbiologic effects on the vaginal microflora.

134 We collected data for 15 covariates (microbiologic, epidemiologic, and laboratory variables)

135 A significant increase of microbiologic eradication rate was observed in the colis

136 oints were composite cure (clinical cure and microbiologic eradication) at day 5 and at the test-of-c

137 ary end points were infection-related death, microbiologic eradication, and hospitalization length.

138 an in the meropenem group were found to have microbiologic eradication, including eradication of Ente

139 patients demonstrated documented or presumed microbiologic eradication.

140 efore admission, underlying comorbidity, and microbiologic etiology (OR: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.13-1.17]).

141 We investigated the microbiologic etiology of these infections, rates of rec

142 udy to estimate the population-based burden, microbiologic etiology, and adverse clinical consequence

143 This minireview focuses on the microbiologic evaluation of patients with asymptomatic b

144 Dental examinations and sampling for microbiologic evaluation were performed, and a history o

145 lining the importance of prompt surgical and microbiologic evaluation.

146 investigation, subsequent epidemiologic and microbiologic evidence implicated jalapeno and serrano p

147 We provide pathophysiological and microbiologic evidence to support the clinical findings

148 erican hospitals had greater availability of microbiologic examination and more 24-hour emergency dep

149 erapy; evidence of complications; results of microbiologic examination of specimens; and success rate

150 the 19th century, the utility of postmortem microbiologic examinations has been a topic of controver

151 he contributions of autopsies and postmortem microbiologic examinations in the discovery of novel inf

152 evidence regarding the utility of postmortem microbiologic examinations together with some practical

153 Clinical and microbiologic examinations were performed at baseline an

154 is was performed to identify any clinical or microbiologic factor predictive of a poor clinical outco

155 e time regression analysis demonstrated that microbiologic factors, including time until notification

156 Overall, 34 patients had microbiologic failure and 25 died during hospitalization

157 m model of tuberculosis, we hypothesize that microbiologic failure and acquired drug resistance are p

158 Patients with microbiologic failure experienced significantly higher r

159 Patients with microbiologic failure experienced significantly higher r

160 In 6 of the 19 patients with microbiologic failure in the daptomycin group, isolates

161 with greater 30-day all-cause mortality and microbiologic failure in this cohort.

162 predictors of poor long-term outcome such as microbiologic failure or death, or relapse.

163 Microbiologic failure rate was 27% (10/37).

164 ; RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.32; P = .014) and microbiologic failure rates (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18

165 therapy was associated with a higher rate of microbiologic failure than was standard therapy (19 vs.

166 r DOT vs SAT, the pooled risk difference for microbiologic failure was .0 (95% confidence interval [C

167 index pathogen at the time of clinical cure (microbiologic failure) and those with pathogen eradicati

168 , 1.3%-1.8%) vs 1.7% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.2%) for microbiologic failure, 3.7% (95% CI, 0.7%-17.6%) vs 2.3%

169 dministered therapy (SAT) in decreasing ADR, microbiologic failure, and relapse in meta-analyses.

170 l failure, defined compositely as mortality, microbiologic failure, and/or recurrence of infection, w

171 The primary outcome was microbiologic failure, defined as clearance of bacteremi

172 Endpoints were microbiologic failure, relapse, and ADR in patients on e

173 significantly better than SAT in preventing microbiologic failure, relapse, or ADR, in evidence-base

174 enced microbiologic cure and 204 experienced microbiologic failure.

175 P = .028) were significantly associated with microbiologic failure.

176 osite of (1) 30-day all-cause mortality; (2) microbiologic failure; and (3) 60-day VRE-BSI recurrence

177 Thirty-five percent of patients had microbiologic failures within 90 days.

178 tam resistance was detected in 30% (3/10) of microbiologic failures.

179 ed immunohistochemical analysis to correlate microbiologic findings and pathologic changes with local

180 s study evaluates periodontal conditions and microbiologic findings and their influence on rheumatolo

181 groups is not completely discarded, negative microbiologic findings in clinically suspected ICU-acqui

182 and to compare epidemiologic, clinical, and microbiologic findings in patients with and without cere

183 etails of percutaneous catheter drainage and microbiologic findings were recorded.

184 aging and histopathologic, cytologic, and/or microbiologic findings were reviewed.

185 ding to the clinical, echocardiographic, and microbiologic findings.

186 infected with A. phagocytophilum and is the microbiologic gold standard, few studies have evaluated

187 osis have provided valuable insight into the microbiologic, histologic, and clinical features of Myco

188 t included different clinical, radiographic, microbiologic, histologic, and patient-reported outcomes

189 Gram-negative antibiotic, the antibiotic and microbiologic history for each patient was electronicall

190 induction of AM apoptosis contributes to the microbiologic host defense against pneumococci.

191 aralleled our research in food preservation, microbiologic identification techniques, and our underst

192 ically significant reductions in the time to microbiologic identification.

193 rium tuberculosis and subjected to clinical, microbiologic, immunologic, and radiographic examination

194 ented statistically significant clinical and microbiologic improvements.

195 ng assigned treatment for reasons other than microbiologic ineligibility were similar across groups (

196 We evaluated the effects of IL-12 therapy on microbiologic, inflammatory, and pulmonary function indi

197 We evaluated the microbiologic, inflammatory, and pulmonary function indi

198 Logistic regression analysis with microbiologic information was performed for various risk

199 However, a BAL FARP may provide new, useful microbiologic information when performed within 7 days a

200 a subsequent BAL FARP is unlikely to add new microbiologic information.

201 nts for each infection type) in the modified microbiologic intent-to-treat (mMITT) population (qualif

202 importance of rapid, accurate, and thorough microbiologic investigation) and measures that can be ta

203 is a critical but poorly understood area of microbiologic investigation.

204 Clinical settings, microbiologic isolates, BCVA.

205 andardization, and traditional and molecular microbiologic methods lack sensitivity, particularly in

206 s diagnosed with clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic methods per contemporary guidelines.

207 placed stool cultures and other conventional microbiologic methods with the FilmArray Gastrointestina

208 ing of bacterial pathogens with conventional microbiologic methods, isolates that lacked a definitive

209 ant women in an effort to develop predictive microbiologic models for PTD.

210 In the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (m-MITT) populati

211 19 days after initiation of therapy) in the microbiologic modified intention-to-treat population.

212 gnosis of an infectious process was based on microbiologic or pathologic data as well as on clinical

213 ory arthritides are more prevalent, although microbiologic organisms have been reported in some cases

214 e long-term association between clinical and microbiologic outcomes after such strategies.

215 lack of a meta-analysis, the variability in microbiologic outcomes and the limited number of studies

216 xamine the relationship between clinical and microbiologic outcomes of four different treatment strat

217 Long-term microbiologic outcomes of periodontal therapy with adjun

218 up to August 4, 2015, for studies comparing microbiologic outcomes of subgingival biofilm samples fr

219 reported on the obstetric, periodontal, and microbiologic outcomes of women participating in the Obs

220 other clinical, immunologic, virologic, and microbiologic outcomes, as well as adverse events, were

221 .9), and no reductions in overall costs and microbiologic outcomes.

222 be shifted to identify other causes of poor microbiologic outcomes.

223 aling and root planing (SRP) on clinical and microbiologic parameters and compare this method with ch

224 surgical periodontal therapy on clinical and microbiologic parameters and gingival crevicular fluid (

225 fferences were detected among the groups for microbiologic parameters at any time points after treatm

226 Periodontal therapy improved clinical and microbiologic parameters but did not influence the level

227 ctive study was to characterize clinical and microbiologic parameters of early soft tissue healing ar

228 their positive correlation with clinical and microbiologic parameters strengthen the association of t

229 Microbiologic parameters were analyzed by quantitative r

230 Clinical and microbiologic parameters were evaluated at baseline and

231 and significant improvement in clinical and microbiologic parameters, especially in the FMD protocol

232 Clinical characteristics, microbiologic parameters, prior vancomycin therapy, and

233 study aims to evaluate, through clinical and microbiologic parameters, the systemic use of azithromyc

234 EP in rats, modifying immunoinflammatory and microbiologic parameters.

235 study, we systematically compared clinical, microbiologic, pathologic, immunologic, and molecular pa

236 hol consumption was observed on clinical and microbiologic periodontal parameters, as well as a sligh

237 aptomycin-resistant enterococci and evolving microbiologic, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic, and clin

238 Significant microbiologic predictors of increased charges included t

239 Analyses were used to evaluate clinical and microbiologic predictors of long-term sputum conversion

240 Twenty-one of these articles evaluated the microbiologic profile of peri-implantitis versus healthy

241 This systematic review assesses microbiologic profiles of peri-implantitis, periodontiti

242 There is little information about the microbiologic profiles of periodontal lesions in Papillo

243 should be limited to patients with specific microbiologic profiles, especially those testing positiv

244 of records of patients with surgical and/or microbiologic proof of infected aortic aneurysm obtained

245 compare teeth and implants and to correlate microbiologic, radiographic, and clinical parameters.

246 At baseline and 3 and 6 months, clinical, microbiologic (real-time polymerase chain reaction analy

247 omicin group than in the meropenem group had microbiologic recurrence (3.7% vs. 8.1%) or clinical rel

248 However, microbiologic relapse was observed after 11/12 treatment

249 lation at end of treatment (EOT) and EOS and microbiologic response in the PP and mITT populations at

250 those who are unable to achieve a sustained microbiologic response.

251 is to evaluate the periodontal clinical and microbiologic responses and possible adverse effects of

252 Therefore, microbiologic responses to antibiotic treatment were eva

253 Clinical, immunologic, and microbiologic responses were evaluated.

254 itney U or chi(2) tests were used to compare microbiologic results according to periodontal diagnosis

255 Demographics, treatment, microbiologic results and outcomes were examined.

256 xicillin/metronidazole improves clinical and microbiologic results of FMUD in GAgP treatment.

257 Microbiologic results of the control sites indicated tha

258 However, microbiologic results were not unanimous among the studi

259 Medical records and cytologic and microbiologic results were reviewed from December 2011 t

260 Microbiologic results were reviewed to determine the rat

261 Regarding the microbiologic results, a slight benefit seemed to derive

262 Demographics, treatment, microbiologic results, and outcomes were examined.

263 clustered according to positive or negative microbiologic results.

264 pted guideline compliance, demographics, and microbiologic results.

265 Incidence of and clinical/microbiologic risk factors for nonhome discharge were as

266 It may be possible to predict PTD by using microbiologic risk factors measured once the gestation p

267 between pig and human organs, as well as the microbiologic safety aspects of xenotransplantation.

268 ingle-rooted tooth with PD >/= 6 mm, whereas microbiologic samples were collected from two single-roo

269 Microbiologic samples were taken from implants, contrala

270 communities and used an algorithm combining microbiologic, serologic, and sequential multiplex PCR (

271 patients with DG and to compare it with the microbiologic status of individuals affected by plaque-i

272 may elucidate specific components of innate microbiologic stimulants that lead to contrasting effect

273 Molecular microbiologic studies may elucidate specific components

274 Clinical and microbiologic studies of 50 cases of viridans streptococ

275 r were used as regular culture media for the microbiologic studies, whereas Sabouraud agar with chlor

276 even unrelated families volunteered for this microbiologic study.

277 imal care often highly depends on diagnostic microbiologic support.

278 Numerous microbiologic techniques have been advocated for screeni

279 age system through radiologic, clinical, and microbiologic techniques.

280 implants or periodontitis using conventional microbiologic techniques.

281 replace current culture-based and molecular microbiologic techniques.

282 ferences in the clinical presentation and in microbiologic test results according to CSF findings.

283 ere unaware of the treatment assignments and microbiologic test results.

284 n between a computerized risk calculator and microbiologic testing is examined in patients with perio

285 Routine microbiologic testing is often insufficient to detect al

286 a and blood was collected, and comprehensive microbiologic testing performed.

287 th a periodontitis risk assessment tool, and microbiologic testing was performed.

288 Periodontitis risk assessment and microbiologic testing were examined for a possible assoc

289 l-viral LRTI (n = 25) based on comprehensive microbiologic testing.

290 IOP and rule out APE owing to B cereus with microbiologic testing.

291 Importantly, rapid microbiologic tests are considered "game changers" and r

292 Rapid microbiologic tests provide opportunities for antimicrob

293 ed on the basis of clinical observations and microbiologic tests, was assessed at 14 days and at 2, 6

294 ) that were negative by traditional clinical microbiologic tests: (i) presence of bacterial gene sequ

295 Microbiologic treatment failure was independently associ

296 planing significantly enhances clinical and microbiologic treatment outcomes.

297 We sought to describe clinical and microbiologic variables present on the index admission t

298 adiographic, and pleural-fluid chemistry and microbiologic variables.

299 Microbiologic workup precluded known enteropathogens, bu

300 Microbiologic yield and corrected visual acuity (VA) at