1  which bancroftian filariasis is endemic, 29 microfilaremic and 16 "endemic normal" (EN) subjects ini

2 ltiparameter flow cytometry on PBMCs from 25 microfilaremic filarial-infected (Inf) and 14 filarial-u

3 clinical filariasis than in the asymptomatic microfilaremic individuals (geometric means, 22.1 versus

4                        When the asymptomatic microfilaremic individuals and antigenemic individuals w

5  chemokines and cytokines were studied in 15 microfilaremic individuals in south India by sequential

6 cantly different among groups; however, more microfilaremic individuals produced IL-5 mRNA in respons

7 roups; however, there was a subpopulation of microfilaremic individuals who did not make detectable l

8 Brazil were classified as being asymptomatic microfilaremic individuals, antigenemic individuals with

9 -)CD123(lo)) in peripheral blood of infected microfilaremic individuals.

10 erging from skin snips collected from highly microfilaremic Loa loa-infected individuals were largely

11 -specific hyporesponsiveness in asymptomatic microfilaremic (MF) individuals.

12 ific hyporesponsiveness seen in asymptomatic microfilaremic (MF) patients, parasite antigen (PAg)- an

13 nflammation was investigated in asymptomatic microfilaremic (MF; n = 16) and in patients with filaria

14 i is endemic were classified as asymptomatic microfilaremic or having clinical filariasis with active

15  subject with active infection (asymptomatic microfilaremic or with clinical filariasis and active in

16  versus 11.1%, P < 0.001) and more common in microfilaremic participants after IDA than after DA (39.

17 iduals with history of eye worm migration to microfilaremic patients, indicating a comparatively pron

18             These findings suggest that, for microfilaremic persons, complete clearance of infection

19                      Eleven persons remained microfilaremic, whereas 18 had cleared both microfilarem