戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 , discontinuation, or follow-up of new start midodrine.
2 hypotension may respond to erythropoietin or midodrine.
3 f placebo, the alpha1-adrenoreceptor agonist midodrine (5 to 10 mg), the alpha2-adrenoreceptor agonis
4 those discharged from the ICU or hospital on midodrine, 50% were concomitantly prescribed antihyperte
5 e randomized to receive a nonpressor dose of midodrine (5mg) or placebo on day 1 and the opposite on
6 ossover trial to investigate the efficacy of midodrine, a selective alpha-1 adrenergic agonist that d
7 with albumin (TERLI group) and 22 to receive midodrine and octreotide plus albumin (MID/OCT group).
8 albumin is significantly more effective than midodrine and octreotide plus albumin in improving renal
9 tiveness of terlipressin plus albumin versus midodrine and octreotide plus albumin in the treatment o
10 n is not available, as in the United States, midodrine and octreotide with albumin are used as an alt
11                              The efficacy of Midodrine and Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors is currently u
12 period, 1,010 patients were newly started on midodrine and survived to ICU discharge.
13 -up tilt were significantly different on the midodrine and the placebo day: on the placebo day, 67% (
14 03 (2), ST-1059 (3, the active metabolite of midodrine), and phenylpropanolamine (4).
15               The combination of octreotide, midodrine, and albumin (triple therapy) is used to treat
16  available and generally fludrocortisone and midodrine are the drugs of first choice.
17  reflect underlying conditions, the need for midodrine before kidney transplantation is a risk marker
18 istory of congestive heart failure predicted midodrine continuation at hospital discharge (odds ratio
19 d medical/surgical ICU was a risk factor for midodrine continuation at ICU discharge (odds ratio, 3.9
20  This study established a high prevalence of midodrine continuation in transitions of care.
21 s developed neurally mediated syncope on the midodrine day (p < 0.02).
22                                              Midodrine decreased both supine and upright HR (all HR v
23 ine to 99+/-2 mm Hg at 2 hours, P<.001), and midodrine decreased supine systolic BP mildly.
24 or factors, as well as for the propensity of midodrine exposure, pretransplant midodrine use was inde
25 ogistic regression, including propensity for midodrine exposure.
26 concomitant vasoactive medications (3 in the midodrine group, 6 in the placebo group).
27 st, patients discharged from the hospital on midodrine had a higher risk of 1-year mortality (hazard
28                                              Midodrine hydrochloride, an alpha-agonist, could improve
29                                              Midodrine is an alpha1-agonist approved for orthostatic
30                                              Midodrine is efficacious and safe in the treatment of ne
31                                              Midodrine is prescribed to prevent symptomatic hypotensi
32                                   Adjunctive midodrine may decrease ICU length of stay (LOS) and ther
33                                   Adjunctive midodrine may decrease ICU LOS, duration of IV vasopress
34                                              Midodrine may decrease IV vasopressor support duration,
35                                              Midodrine may increase risk of bradycardia.
36                                        While midodrine may provide benefit for patient-centered outco
37                                The effect of midodrine+octreotide (67.8 reversals per 1,000 [95% CI,
38  be more appropriate than initial trial with midodrine+octreotide.
39 cy of active vasoactive drugs (terlipressin, midodrine, octreotide, noradrenaline, and dopamine; alon
40 ome; albumin; vasoconstrictor; terlipressin; midodrine; octreotide; noradrenaline; and norepinephrine
41      Finally, vasoconstrictor agents such as midodrine offer promise and remain the subject of clinic
42      They were randomized to a 10-mg dose of midodrine or placebo 3 times per day in a 6-week study,
43                   The MID/OCT group received midodrine orally at an initial dose of 7.5 mg thrice dai
44 ine over placebo (4.17, 1.37-12.50) and over midodrine plus octreotide (10.00, 1.49-50.00) for this o
45 dence supported the use of terlipressin over midodrine plus octreotide (OR 26.25, 95% CI 3.07-224.21)
46 adrenaline with albumin are both superior to midodrine plus octreotide with albumin for reversal of h
47 evidence supported the use of noradrenaline, midodrine plus octreotide, and dopamine plus furosemide
48 ion were associated with a decreased odds of midodrine prescription at both ICU and hospital discharg
49  2006 to 2008, of whom 308 (1.9%) had filled midodrine prescriptions in the year before transplantati
50               At 3 months, patients who used midodrine pretransplant had significantly (P < 0.05) hig
51                      In the supine position, midodrine produced no significant change in blood pressu
52                   In the evaluable patients, midodrine resulted in improvements in standing systolic
53 inephrine, and combination of octreotide and midodrine) should be used in the treatment of HRS-AKI, b
54                  These results indicate that midodrine significantly improves orthostatic tolerance d
55 (1) and ST-1059 (2, the active metabolite of midodrine), supporting the hypothesis that greater alpha
56 e response of patients to the alpha1-agonist midodrine supports the hypothesis of partial dysautonomi
57 with the selective alpha1-adrenergic agonist midodrine, the inappropriate heat loss over their tail s
58 were performed in the ICU, 3) evaluated oral midodrine therapy compared with placebo or usual care, a
59  34% (311/909) of patients were continued on midodrine therapy.
60 incidence of continuation of newly initiated midodrine upon ICU and hospital discharge and identify r
61                         We hypothesized that midodrine use before kidney transplantation may be a nov
62 pensity of midodrine exposure, pretransplant midodrine use was independently associated with risks of
63       Adjusted associations of pretransplant midodrine use with complications at 3 and 12 months post
64                                    Safety of midodrine was assessed as a secondary outcome.
65                    Discharge from the ICU on midodrine was associated with a significantly shorter IC
66                                              Midodrine was continued in 67% (672/1,010) of patients a