コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 experimenter's goal-directed acts (canonical-mirror neurons).
2 the perceiver, these cells have been called mirror neurons.
3 y expressed in striatal-projecting forebrain mirror neurons.
4 endent structural and synaptic plasticity in mirror neurons.
5 comparative research into the development of mirror neurons.
6 imate imitation and the explanatory value of mirror neurons.
7 vides a viable explanation for the origin of mirror neurons.
8 ion of action understanding in relation with mirror neurons.
9 hat is currently known (and not known) about mirror neurons.
10 to functionally interrogate these aggression-mirroring neurons.
14 also a negative association between putative mirror neuron activity and self-reported social-relating
15 thm (8-13 Hz) has been considered to reflect mirror neuron activity because it is attenuated by both
16 equally well, children with autism showed no mirror neuron activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (pa
17 he validity of the mu rhythm as a measure of mirror neuron activity, we used crossmodal pattern class
24 sponses is consistent with that predicted by mirror neurons and is evidence of mirror neurons in the
25 a comprehensive understanding of the role of mirror neurons and related hormone modulators, such as o
26 study and should be part of the debate about mirror neurons and the neurological mechanisms of social
27 sensorimotor integration phenomena including mirror neurons and vocal learning, and mechanisms of hor
28 rsus learning accounts of the development of mirror neurons, and instead suggest a more parsimonious
29 between genetic and associative accounts of mirror neurons, and to challenge it with additional poss
30 rning as the underlying mechanism generating mirror neurons, and to the sensorimotor learning as evid
31 s involved in movement perception, including mirror neurons, and, as such, these findings argue again
38 observation-related neuronal responses of F5 mirror neurons are indeed modulated by the value that th
39 ion, and that current evidence suggests that mirror neurons are more specialized than the authors' ac
45 ociative learning: Through Hebbian Learning, mirror neurons become dynamic networks that calculate pr
46 charge during observation (facilitation-type mirror neuron), but a substantial number (27 of 65) exhi
47 system, that demonstration of modulation of mirror neurons by associative learning does not imply ab
48 neurons ("wealth of the stimulus"); and (4) mirror neurons can be changed in radical ways by sensori
49 t reliable information about the function of mirror neurons can be obtained only by research based on
50 connectivity defines the types of processes mirror neurons can participate in while allowing for ext
52 evious evidence suggested that canonical and mirror neurons could be anatomically segregated in diffe
56 cation, we found that at most time points F5 mirror neurons did not encode observed actions with the
58 evidence supporting this view shows that (1) mirror neurons do not consistently encode action "goals"
61 ng approach of Cook et al. at explaining why mirror neurons fire or do not fire - even when the stimu
63 tern recognition and computational learning, mirror neurons form an interesting multimodal representa
65 among parent-infant dyads and in examples of mirror neuron function that involve abnormal motor syste
66 rule out an adaptive or genetic argument for mirror neuron function, and that current evidence sugges
67 gs suggest that during action observation F5 mirror neurons have access to key information needed to
72 These data provide general support for the mirror neuron hypothesis of autism; researchers now must
77 verlook evidence for the reliable develop of mirror neurons in biological and cultural traits evolved
81 ence supporting their associative account of mirror neurons in humans: most studies do not address a
89 circuitry also accounts for a sub-class of 'mirror neuron' in motor cortex--whose activity is suppre
90 lopmental neuroscience that the evolution of mirror neurons is most likely driven simultaneously and
92 uncovered the key properties of visuo-motor mirror neurons located in monkey premotor cortex and par
96 et al.'s attack of the genetic hypothesis of mirror neurons misses its target because the authors mis
101 ted the activity of ventral premotor area F5 mirror neurons (MNs) while monkeys observed an experimen
102 be so important that it has been argued that mirror neurons must be a result of selective pressure.
104 nce is not only driven by the putative human mirror neuron network consisting of the primary motor an
105 to the mirror mechanism the discharge of F5 mirror neurons of a monkey observing another individual
110 ociative learning explains the full range of mirror neuron properties; (3) human infants receive enou
116 findings, we propose that during observation mirror neurons represent the process of a goal pursuit f
117 I explore the implications this has for mirror neuron research and the arguments building upon t
120 We also found that during action execution, mirror neurons showed consistent patterns of co-modulati
121 an alternative perspective on the origin of mirror neurons, stressing the necessity to abandon the d
122 In the final part, we analyze the claim that mirror neurons subserve action understanding by mapping
124 l information suggests that two systems--the mirror neuron system (MNS) and mental state attribution
125 with some research implicating the putative mirror neuron system (MNS) and some a mentalizing system
126 most interesting claims regarding the human mirror neuron system (MNS) is that its activity reflects
127 associated with cigarette use in the frontal mirror neuron system (MNS) of the human brain, as reflec
128 simulation tasks engage the fronto-parietal mirror neuron system (MNS) which includes the inferior f
129 ivated a parietofrontal network known as the mirror neuron system (MNS), whereas subjective desirabil
131 e intermodal matching " (AIM) mechanism or a mirror neuron system - that functions from birth to auto
133 vious research suggested that EEG markers of mirror neuron system activation may differ, in the norma
136 (p < .05), which indicates reduced putative mirror neuron system activity within ventral premotor co
138 is that the development of imitation and the mirror neuron system are driven by correlated sensorimot
140 recent study has shown, using fMRI, that the mirror neuron system does not mediate action understandi
142 While numerous theoretical models for the mirror neuron system have been proposed, the computation
149 g (n = 9) the inferior frontal gyrus, a core mirror neuron system region, and compared their performa
150 chewing) in others, we hypothesized that the mirror neuron system related to orofacial movements coul
151 lation is a widely used measure of the human mirror neuron system that has been used to make importan
152 depended on (i) structures within the human mirror neuron system thought to be involved in shared se
156 ial domain, suggesting that a dysfunctional 'mirror neuron system' may underlie the social deficits o
157 rising the superior temporal sulcus and the 'mirror neuron system', which consists of the posterior i
158 the minds of others, involves the so-called mirror neuron system, a network comprising the inferior
159 t linked to motor learning in regions of the mirror neuron system, and tested the effect of this poly
160 as "automatic imitation" and attributed to a mirror neuron system, but there is little direct evidenc
161 en attributed to increased activation of the mirror neuron system, but there is no neural model to ex
162 eld to be a homologue of the monkey parietal mirror neuron system, is critical for encoding object-re
163 f regions, including those implicated in the mirror neuron system, such as premotor cortex (BA 6) and
164 vert behavioral imitation is mediated by the mirror neuron system, which is somatotopically organized
165 mptoms may arise from dysfunction within the mirror neuron system, while a recent neuroimaging study
166 ental processes are key to understanding the mirror neuron system, yet neglects several bodies of dev
174 t it is linked to disinhibition of the human mirror-neuron system [1-4] and hyper-excitability of cor
175 processing social information, the cortical mirror-neuron system may sometimes adaptively compensate
176 l lobule are both implicated in the cortical mirror-neuron system, which mediates learning of observe
177 l connectivity involving the mentalizing and mirror neuron systems, largely reflecting greater cross
178 responses to food images, cues, and smells; mirror neurons that cause people to imitate the eating b
179 associated with self-conscious emotions, and mirror neurons that have recently been shown to activate
181 h within and between sessions, but other non-mirror neurons that were modulated only during action ex
182 ocial communication, including insights into mirror neurons, the function of auditory feedback, and g
183 l findings typically cited in support of the mirror neuron theory of action understanding, one of the
184 ng to bridge the gap, and the application of mirror neuron theory to a range of problems in psycholog
185 onstrate the additional circuitry needed for mirror neurons to display the range of properties that t
186 ypothesis, if strictly interpreted, requires mirror neurons to exhibit an action tuning that is share
187 Paying more attention to recent work linking mirror neurons to language acquisition and evolution wou
188 s because of the alluring surface analogy of mirror neurons to the Motor Theory of speech perception,
189 arify the precise functional significance of mirror neurons to truly understand their role in the neu
190 xperience to support associative learning of mirror neurons ("wealth of the stimulus"); and (4) mirro
195 visuomotor transformation for grasping, and "mirror" neurons, which respond during the observation of