コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s in the broad-band event-related potential (mismatch negativity).
2 ded to the N200, P300/N400, and phonological mismatch negativity.
3 nt-related potentials (LF-ERPs), such as the mismatch negativity.
4 ollowed by P300 amplitude, P300 latency, and mismatch negativity.
6 similar cortical processing to the auditory mismatch negativity (aMMN), with the posterior sMMR refl
10 tions at left frontal electrodes and between mismatch negativity amplitude and passive-apathetic soci
11 enic patients showed significantly decreased mismatch negativity amplitude but normal latency and top
13 nificantly increased after gene therapy, and mismatch negativity amplitudes at T2 and T3 were statist
14 The mismatch stimuli are used to elicit the mismatch negativity, an early auditory event-related pot
19 y events is associated with the magnitude of mismatch negativity and, critically, is impaired in heal
20 ctroencephalography (EEG) paradigms-resting, mismatch negativity, and 40-Hz auditory steady-state res
21 rated mainly in frontal regions, an auditory mismatch negativity, and a visual mismatch response.
23 picture N300, the word P2, the phonological mismatch negativity, and the word midline frontal negati
25 igned to assess prefrontal function, whereas mismatch negativity assesses functioning of the auditory
26 drug discovery are emphasized, including the mismatch negativity, auditory steady state, and time-fre
28 pothesis, we found that the amplitude of the mismatch negativity elicited by sound omissions varied o
29 ng magnetoencephalographic recordings of the mismatch negativity elicited in a large cohort of human
30 udy, we investigated the electrically evoked mismatch negativity (eMMN) brain potential as a mainly p
32 eviance detection (the latter indexed by the mismatch negativity event-related potential) relies on p
33 0.50, -0.29), automatic auditory processing (mismatch negativity), g = -0.44, 95% CI (-0.66, -0.22),
34 a human auditory-evoked potential (AEP), the mismatch negativity, generated in the auditory cortex 10
35 uditory sensory measures, including impaired mismatch negativity generation (r=0.62, N=51, p=0.0002).
36 eta-frequency response (P < 0.05); and (iii) mismatch negativity generation to trained versus untrain
37 suppression, P300 amplitude and latency, and mismatch negativity--have been proposed as potential end
38 f ERPs was unaffected in Nrg1(+/-) mice, but mismatch negativity in response to novel stimuli was att
39 dy was to examine the topography of auditory mismatch negativity in schizophrenia with a high-density
40 is late single neuron activity and EEG-based mismatch negativity in terms of their common sensitivity
41 ce processing was associated with the visual mismatch negativity independently of consciousness and t
43 ity to a monotonous input stream triggered a mismatch negativity-like local signal which decayed quic
45 association between functional outcomes and mismatch negativity (MMN) activity in participants with
46 erved a nominally significant improvement in mismatch negativity (MMN) and a statistical trend to imp
47 ed in event-related potential studies as the mismatch negativity (MMN) and has been observed in sever
48 identified on the level of EEG recordings as mismatch negativity (MMN) and on the level of single neu
49 e of late auditory evoked potentials (AEPs): mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3, alongside other progno
54 uditory steady-state stimulation, as well as mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a event-related potentia
57 iant-evoked event-related potential known as mismatch negativity (MMN) and provides a potential link
60 phonetic change responses, as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) component of the auditory even
67 luated the target engagement of CVN058 using mismatch negativity (MMN) in a randomized, double-blind,
69 ormation processing: prepulse inhibition and mismatch negativity (MMN) in SZ patients and healthy sub
83 sure of automatic auditory change detection [mismatch negativity (MMN) magnetoencephalography (MEG)]
85 itory processing deficits as measured by the mismatch negativity (MMN) response of the auditory event
86 sented with Mandarin Chinese tones while the mismatch negativity (MMN) response was elicited using a
89 approximately 200 ms, with the multisensory mismatch negativity (MMN) significantly different from t
90 ric comparison subjects (NCSs) who underwent mismatch negativity (MMN) testing via their participatio
94 independent auditory brain potential, termed mismatch negativity (MMN) while subjects performed a vis
96 We dissociated the two systems using the mismatch negativity (MMN), a well studied EEG effect evo
97 ept study was conducted to determine whether mismatch negativity (MMN), an event-related potential in
100 showed no difference between groups for the mismatch negativity (MMN), but the late discriminative n
101 ignature of prediction error, the visual (v) mismatch negativity (MMN), for a fundamental property of
102 ients who had developed PTSD showed enhanced mismatch negativity (MMN), increased theta power (5-7 Hz
103 entive measure of auditory change detection, mismatch negativity (MMN), is one of the most consistent
104 ological signatures of neurodynamics, namely mismatch negativity (MMN), P300, and contingent negative
106 nvestigating how first impressions shape the mismatch negativity (MMN), reflecting early sensory pred
107 fy the different theoretical accounts of the mismatch negativity (MMN), there is still an ongoing deb
108 e measured an automatic brain potential, the mismatch negativity (MMN), when listeners did not attend
109 d oddball paradigms were presented to derive mismatch negativity (MMN), which reflects the ability to
115 and cortical sensitivity to acoustic change [mismatch negativity (MMN)] were measured in a group of c
116 index of cortical auditory change detection (mismatch negativity [MMN]) was used to assess whether se
117 est that this is probably equivalent to the 'mismatch negativity' (MMN), reflecting a pre-perceptual,
118 cy in a spatial memory task and EEG indexes (mismatch negativity-MMN) of implicit perceptual learning
119 hese disruptions on auditory discrimination (mismatch negativity; MMN) responses to phoneme and tone
121 (8-12 years; n = 23) showed age-appropriate mismatch negativities (MMNs) to sounds, but older childr
123 ent was demonstrated by significantly larger mismatch negativity (p = .049, d = 1.0) for the 100 mg/k
129 relatively rare (e.g., in oddball blocks of mismatch negativity paradigms, or in repetition suppress
133 f sensory stimulation eliciting the cortical mismatch negativity potential demonstrate deficits in ea
134 he hypothesis that the system upon which the mismatch negativity relies processes stimuli in an holis
135 peated stimulation and (ii) elicitation of a mismatch negativity response (MMN) by changes in repetit
137 stablished index of auditory perception, the mismatch negativity response, tested whether the therapi
138 rontotemporal networks, including an evoked 'mismatch negativity' response and transiently induced os
143 tudied using sequences of unmodulated tones (mismatch negativity; stimulus-specific adaptation).
144 siological response shares similarities with mismatch negativity, suggesting the involvement of anter
145 easures include task-based fMRI (RISE task), mismatch negativity, the Scale for the Assessment of Neg