コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ell as germ-line mutations in several of the mismatch repair genes).
2 uanine-DNA methyltransferase gene, and hMLH1 mismatch repair gene.
3 MLH1 methylation failed to express the MSH2 mismatch repair gene.
4 ctivation of both copies of the hMSH6 (GTBP) mismatch repair gene.
5 an homologs of the Escherichia coli mutL DNA mismatch repair gene.
6 4741, has an additional mutation in the MSH3 mismatch repair gene.
7 nts with pathogenic germline variants in DNA mismatch repair genes.
8 r etiology: oncogenes, suppressor genes, and mismatch repair genes.
9 s a surrogate marker for the inactivation of mismatch repair genes.
10 ic variant in the BRCA1/2, PTEN, TP53 or DNA mismatch repair genes.
11 individuals with germ-line mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes.
12 ld-type cells is mainly caused by functional mismatch repair genes.
13 lso be a valuable tool in the search for new mismatch repair genes.
14 cluding tumor suppressor, mitochondrial, and mismatch repair genes.
15 results from defects in one of several base mismatch repair genes.
16 r defect does not reside in these five known mismatch repair genes.
17 somatic hypermethylation or mutations in the mismatch repair genes.
18 l cancer is caused by inherited mutations of mismatch repair genes.
19 linked to germline defects in at least four mismatch repair genes.
20 ologous to members of the mutS family of DNA mismatch repair genes.
21 and human tumor cell lines with mutations in mismatch repair genes.
22 usually attributed to mutations of critical mismatch repair genes.
23 (n = 98), and 8 (0.4%) had mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes.
24 d genotype-phenotype associations within the mismatch repair genes.
25 conferred by germline or somatic variants in mismatch repair genes.
26 ype that harboured inactivating mutations in mismatch repair genes.
27 t a young age, due to inherited mutations in mismatch repair genes.
28 he role of microRNAs and epimutations in DNA mismatch repair genes.
29 appears to be lower than that for the other mismatch repair genes.
30 ancer is caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes.
31 Lynch syndrome, which is due to mutations in mismatch repair genes.
32 is due to a mutation in one of at least five mismatch repair genes.
33 ses harbored unique somatic mutations in MLH mismatch-repair genes.
34 from nonmutators, often due to mutations in mismatch-repair genes.
35 MSI is caused by the dysfunction of mismatch repairs genes.
37 adults with pathogenic germline variants in mismatch repair genes (60% women; mean age, 47 +/- 14 ye
39 prevalence of mutations in the MLH1 or MSH2 mismatch-repair genes among patients with colorectal can
41 ynch syndrome, is caused by mutations in the mismatch repair genes and confers an extraordinarily hig
42 ncers to result from the loss of function of mismatch repair genes and hence demonstrate microsatelli
43 incidence and of the impact of the specific mismatch-repair gene and genotype on cancer onset and su
44 BRCA2, ATM, PALB2, BRCA1, STK11, CDKN2A and mismatch-repair genes and low-penetrance loci are associ
45 mas are associated with somatic mutations of mismatch repair genes, and several genes with coding reg
46 Lynch syndrome, microsatellite instability, mismatch repair genes, and terms related to the biology
47 and NBN MRN complex genes; the MLH1 and PMS2 mismatch repair genes; and NF1 were not associated with
50 e the extent to which somatic alterations in mismatch repair genes are associated with this MI; and (
51 Some colon cancers with mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes are characterized by genomic insta
53 provide some evidence that mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes are early somatic events in colon
57 methylcytosine and the silencing of the MLH1 mismatch repair gene by DNA methylation in colorectal tu
63 colorectal cancer caused by mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes; colorectal cancer risk is high.
64 ARP) inhibitor or platinum chemotherapy, and mismatch repair gene defects and microsatellite instabil
66 hat somatic mutational inactivation of known mismatch repair genes does not account for the great maj
72 Although additional research is required, mismatch repair gene expression may have important biolo
75 MutS homolog 4) is a member of the mammalian mismatch repair gene family whose members are involved i
80 , the proportion of sporadic tumors in which mismatch repair genes have been inactivated has not been
82 human tumor cell lines with mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes have contributed to the understand
83 are deficient in either the Pms2 or Msh2 DNA mismatch repair genes have microsatellite instability an
84 S), who carry a pathogenic mutation in a DNA mismatch repair gene, have increased risks of colorectal
87 us of the tumor suppressor gene p16, the DNA mismatch repair gene hMLH1, and four CpG islands (MINT1,
90 Because the frequency of mutations in the mismatch repair genes (hMLH1 and hMSH2) is low in these
91 ozygous deletion region, adjacent to the DNA mismatch repair gene, hMLH1, and identified deletions in
92 expression and mutation in one of the major mismatch repair genes, hMLH1, and the methylation of CpG
93 ssociated with germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair gene hMSH2 [1], the human homologue of t
94 monoclonal antibodies to the prototype human mismatch repair gene hMSH2 and used them to detect an im
102 ve been identified through mutations in four mismatch repair genes (hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, and hPMS2) a
103 ygosity at microsatellites linked to the DNA mismatch repair genes, hMSH2 and/or hMLH1, was found in
105 tes that mutations in either one of four DNA mismatch repair gene homologues or the adenomatous polyp
106 n inherited mutation in one of several known mismatch repair genes; however, the role of microsatelli
107 extent and timing of allelic loss of two DNA mismatch repair genes, human Mut S homologue-2 (hMSH2) a
108 aused by germline pathogenic variants in DNA mismatch repair genes (ie, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) a
109 lelic and bi-allelic methylation of the MLH1 mismatch repair gene in human colorectal tumor specimens
110 duced DNA damage in yeast strains mutated in mismatch repair genes in an effort to confirm a defect i
111 t strains heterozygous for null mutations of mismatch repair genes in diploid strains in yeast confer
112 has been attributed to mutations in four DNA mismatch repair genes in hereditary nonpolyposis colorec
114 d (C)8 tracts within the hMSH3 and hMSH6 DNA mismatch repair genes in sporadic colon cancer of the MM
115 m such tumors implicating genetic defects of mismatch repair genes in the development of such tumors.
116 f four genes, APC, Cox-2, DCC/Smad4, and the mismatch repair genes, in colorectal carcinogenesis.
117 methylation is likely to be a common mode of mismatch repair gene inactivation in sporadic tumors.
119 Seventeen EOC cases carried a mutation in a mismatch repair gene, including 10 MSH6 mutation carrier
121 ata are emerging that pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes increase the risk of early-onset a
122 ased with combined heterozygosity of Msh2, a mismatch repair gene involved in oxidative DNA damage re
123 e study, a decreased expression level of DNA mismatch repair genes involved in SHM in older individua
124 ed somewhat expected modifiers, particularly mismatch repair genes involved in the CAG repeat instabi
125 ectal tumorigenesis, loss of function of the mismatch repair genes is closely associated with genomic
126 yndrome, caused by germline mutations in the mismatch repair genes, is associated with increased canc
127 bility (MSI) and promoter methylation of DNA mismatch repair genes, is common in individual glands of
128 those in some other members of the family of mismatch repair genes, lead to cancer susceptibility, an
130 n accumulation in organoids deficient in the mismatch repair gene MLH1 is driven by replication error
136 for MSI, and promoter methylation of the DNA mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MLH3, MSH6, PMS2, MGMT
138 yndrome caused by pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2, that ca
139 ple, lung samples with low expression of the mismatch-repair gene MLH1 show a mutation signature of d
141 was analyzed for mutations in LS-associated mismatch repair genes ( MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM).
142 that is caused by pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM).
145 l repair genes, RAD51 and BRCA1, and the DNA mismatch repair genes, MLH1 and MSH2, are decreased in e
149 everal mechanisms, including inactivation of mismatch repair genes (MMR) or induction of error-prone
151 Caenorhabditis elegans homologue of the MSH2 mismatch repair gene (msh-2), we isolated a strain of C.
156 n rates occurred in strains deficient in the mismatch repair gene MSH2 or the recombination gene RAD5
157 ozygosity for germ-line mutations in the DNA mismatch repair gene MSH2 predisposes humans to cancer.
158 ition, we determined the contribution of the mismatch repair gene MSH2 to transcription-coupled repai
165 tested these predictions by deleting the DNA mismatch repair genes MSH2 or MLH1 and analyzing the pro
166 tly reduced in strains with mutations in the mismatch repair genes MSH2 or MSH3, but unaffected by a
171 due primarily to inherited mutations in two mismatch repair genes, MSH2 and MLH1, whereas germ-line
176 CA, FANCG, ERCC4, FANCE and FANCI, while DNA mismatch repair genes MSH3 and PMS1 outranked known name
179 was detected for a variant rs1800932 in the mismatch repair gene MSH6 (P = 1.9 x 10(-9)), which was
185 tive cohort study included 1128 women with a mismatch repair gene mutation identified from the Colon
186 ed, these findings suggest that women with a mismatch repair gene mutation may be counseled like the
190 erential mutational burden downstream of DNA mismatch repair gene mutations and composite gene expres
191 ated, and that all hypermutated cancers have mismatch repair gene mutations and microsatellite instab
192 the importance of germline non-BRCA HRR and mismatch repair gene mutations for predicting familial r
193 al carcinoma, mismatch repair deficiency and mismatch repair gene mutations have been described in sp
196 Moreover, recent research suggests that DNA mismatch repair gene mutations may facilitate acquisitio
198 (HNPCC) do not have evidence of the germline mismatch repair gene mutations that define this syndrome
200 ime cancer risk associated with germline DNA mismatch repair gene mutations, irrespective of their fa
208 ng S. Enteritidis harbored a mutation in the mismatch repair gene mutS that accelerated the genomic m
209 g S. Enteritidis harboured a mutation in the mismatch repair gene mutS that accelerated the genomic m
210 nal regulators, lrhA, lrp, slyA, and papX; a mismatch repair gene, mutS; and one hypothetical gene, y
211 identification of germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes (n = 47) or biallelic MUTYH mutati
212 ases in mutation rates owing to mutations in mismatch-repair genes; no populations evolving in the ab
213 for therapeutic development, as unlike other mismatch repair genes, nullizygosity for MSH3 does not c
214 is known to be caused either by mutations in mismatch repair genes or by aberrant methylation of thes
215 xa is not commonly associated with a loss of mismatch repair genes or microsatellite instability.
216 in base-excision (P = 2.4 x 10(-4)) and DNA mismatch repair genes (P = 6.1 x 10(-4)) consistent with
218 ed the role that methylation of the MLH1 DNA mismatch repair gene plays in the genesis of MSI in a la
220 bserved in strains with mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes pms1, msh2 and msh3, indicating th
221 assay system to examine the effects of yeast mismatch repair genes (PMS1, MSH2, and MSH3) on crossove
222 ice homozygous for a disrupted allele of the mismatch repair gene Pms2 have a mutator phenotype.
226 somatic mutations in the DNA proofreading or mismatch repair genes POLE, MLH1, and MSH6 and the tumor
230 ation of the human mut-L homologue 1 (hMLH1) mismatch repair gene promoter and diminished hMLH1 expre
231 r microsatellite instability, and absence of mismatch repair genes provides an opportunity for diagno
233 petitive sequences, while mutations in human mismatch repair genes result in hereditary nonpolyposis
234 rmline mutation in either the hMSH2 or hMLH1 mismatch repair gene results in the hereditary nonpolypo
235 Genetic or epigenetic inactivation of DNA mismatch repair genes results in a strong mutator phenot
236 rabidopsis homologue of the prokaryotic MutL mismatch repair gene, reveals that it is expressed in re
237 n the distribution of mutations in different mismatch-repair genes seen in hereditary nonpolyposis co
238 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of one of the mismatch repair genes since both signify an abnormality
241 oncise contribution of each of the known DNA mismatch repair genes to the HNPCC phenotype remains unk
242 ns, c-MYC increases the vulnerability of key mismatch repair genes to treatment-induced mutagenesis,
243 with wild-type copies of either mutL or the mismatch repair gene uvrD rescued the wild-type mutation
246 omatous polyposis coli gene (Apc) and/or DNA mismatch repair genes, we have analyzed the genetic cont
248 ntire coding regions of the five known human mismatch repair genes were evaluated in 48 kindreds with
249 rcinomas maintained strong staining of the 4 mismatch repair genes, while tumor from the patient with
250 ll patients with identified mutations in the mismatch repair genes, whose tumors were available for a
251 disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM