ライフサイエンスコーパス: mnemonic

1 These factors can be remembered using the mnemonic ABCDEF, representing A = age young, B = blood,

2 been studied in monkeys, whose cognitive and mnemonic abilities are akin to those of humans.

3 rophysiological basis for the variability in mnemonic ability that is present amongst healthy young a

4 nown, and treatments targeting this specific mnemonic abnormality have not been attempted.

5 tures in mental phenomena than does a purely mnemonic account of their function.

6 ergistically with synaptic input to regulate mnemonic activity in PFC.

7 tal cortex in exerting top-down control over mnemonic activity in the hippocampus and other brain str

8 cruit the noradrenergic system, modulate the mnemonic advantage conferred by Go-responses relative to

9 mpared delayed-response tasks with identical mnemonic and attentional demands but varying degrees of

10 ubtedly a much greater, disruptive effect on mnemonic and cognitive functions.

11 external context, the internal context, and mnemonic and cognitive information to control both appet

12 A model is proposed to account for greater mnemonic and contextual control over LHb-mediated respon

13 erior thalamus may represent a nexus between mnemonic and control functions, such as action or attent

14 Using fMRI, we found that regulation of both mnemonic and emotional content was driven by a shared fr

15 easant image triggers parallel inhibition of mnemonic and emotional content.

16 l interactions supporting the integration of mnemonic and emotional information.

17 Precise information flow during mnemonic and executive tasks requires the coactivation o

18 x 2 experimental design with fMRI to isolate mnemonic and navigational processes that accompany the c

19 viously reported to be important for sensory mnemonic and perceptual processing, the rhinal cortex (R

20 epresents information about objects for both mnemonic and perceptual purposes.

21 ation between discrete subregions supporting mnemonic and response operations.

22 ents in a smaller network encompassing visuo-mnemonic and reward areas.

23 r cortical syndrome (affecting visuospatial, mnemonic and semantic functions related to Lewy body pat

24 ocampal and neocortical networks involved in mnemonic and sensorimotor aspects of navigation.

25 tructures and led to enhanced flexibility in mnemonic and social behaviors.

26 reviously neutral stimuli and controlled for mnemonic and spatial processing demands, both important

27 erentiating nevi from MM, including clinical mnemonics and algorithms, optical imaging instruments, a

28 communication and handoff training, a verbal mnemonic, and a new team handoff structure.

29 s subcortical structures supporting emotive, mnemonic, and cognitive functions.

30 ve control during shifts between perceptual, mnemonic, and rule representations.

31 esponse and to mediate various cognitive and mnemonic aspects of stress-induced impairments, although

32 e fasciculus is to allow temporal lobe-based mnemonic associations (e.g. an individual's name + face

33 ngoing debate about the relationship between mnemonic awareness and hippocampal function.

34 lamus in higher-level cognition, notably, in mnemonic biasing of attention.

35 Specifically, mnemonic binding across sequential representations is mo

36 dure to investigate processes supporting the mnemonic binding of item and contextual information.

37 One week later, a mnemonic boost for emotionally arousing stimuli was evid

38 However, the mnemonic boost was absent in subjects who received 0.25%

39 Common examples include mnemonics, checklists, and algorithms.

40 rative imaging report through the use of the mnemonic "CLOSE": Cribriform plate, Lamina papyracea, On

41 l coding) and following their disappearance (mnemonic coding).

42 remembering, there is little evidence of how mnemonic competition is neurally represented.

43 lateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex) mnemonic competition.

44 sponse is believed to reflect the inhibitory mnemonic component of the task.

45 ng, and integrating episodic memories into a mnemonic compositional whole.

46 showed distinct selectivity for each of the mnemonic conditions; greater recruitment of the anterior

47 mporal lobe are involved in establishing the mnemonic consequences of externally triggered reactivati

48 orking memory as an example, we consider how mnemonic content is selected and represented for future

49 redominantly sensory signal modulated by the mnemonic context of the stimulus.

50 tion technique enabled us to investigate the mnemonic contributions of two direct hippocampal-medial

51 Mnemonic control engages a right frontoparietal network

52 Further, only those capable of mnemonic control exhibited tighter coupling during succe

53 d individual differences in the capacity for mnemonic control.

54 can be shaped by two opposite mechanisms of mnemonic control.

55 rations of hippocampal GABA predicted better mnemonic control.

56 ked interactions, the network reaches higher mnemonic convergence compared to when individuals first

57 The results show that mnemonic convergence, measured as the degree of overlap

58 ception and suggests that the MTL perceptual-mnemonic debate cannot be dismissed on the basis of anat

59 These results indicate that mnemonic decisions in an ambiguous novel context relate

60 accurate retrieval of newer memories, slower mnemonic decisions, and increased activity in anterior c

61 2, which demonstrated that mnemonic decoding is poor when memory is indirectly (imp

62 n life enabled us to determine which type of mnemonic deficit showed a correlation with extent of hip

63 ed episodic memory, the resulting pattern of mnemonic deficits was different: deactivation of the dCA

64 rns are experience dependent and reflect the mnemonic demands of a spatial memory task.

65 that shared features with tasks with limited mnemonic demands.

66 strumental in the retrieval and selection of mnemonic details.

67 This article describes a mnemonic device, "DISTANCE," to enable a systematic appr

68 These mnemonic differences within and between species raise th

69 3D World, naive video gamers showed improved mnemonic discrimination ability and improvements on a vi

70 ysical activity, is strongly associated with mnemonic discrimination at moderate interference levels.

71 ularly when mechanisms supporting fine-grain mnemonic discrimination fail.

72 t dysfunction of the alEC-hippocampus object mnemonic discrimination network might be a marker for ta

73 lution fMRI during a task selectively taxing mnemonic discrimination of object identity or spatial lo

74 -negative (n = 32) older adults showed lower mnemonic discrimination of object relative to scene imag

75 (alEC), have recently been implicated in the mnemonic discrimination of objects rather than scenes.

76 y as well as tau levels were associated with mnemonic discrimination of objects, but again not scenes

77 ow that activity in alEC was associated with mnemonic discrimination of similar objects but not scene

78 h increased hippocampal activity and reduced mnemonic discrimination of similar objects but not scene

79 ns for younger and older individuals between mnemonic discrimination performance and hippocampal subf

80 Impaired object mnemonic discrimination performance as well as aberrant

81 Here we used an object-scene mnemonic discrimination task in combination with fMRI re

82 This suggests that object mnemonic discrimination tasks could be promising markers

83 in the hippocampus and can be examined using mnemonic discrimination tasks.

84 older adults and therefore likely to affect mnemonic discrimination, even in healthy older individua

85 Mnemonic discrimination, the ability to distinguish simi

86 e hippocampus, such as relational memory and mnemonic discrimination.

87 adaptation and showed the same bistable and mnemonic dynamics as sensory perception.

88 iscovery of potential therapies to treat the mnemonic dysfunction characteristic of this disease.

89 A functional MRI analysis of this mnemonic effect revealed that, whereas OXT inhibited amy

90 hways from the avBST are responsible for the mnemonic effects of avBST inhibition versus stimulation

91 everal recent studies have failed to observe mnemonic encoding during working memory, raising the que

92 cially, we find that this difference between mnemonic encoding in PPC and PFC is associated with the

93 e tasks, in contrast with more task-specific mnemonic encoding in PPC.

94 rking memory, raising the question as to why mnemonic encoding is observed during some, but not all,

95 In this study, we show that mnemonic encoding occurs when a cortical area is organiz

96 ggest that functional clustering facilitates mnemonic encoding of sensory information.SIGNIFICANCE ST

97 t this coordination is related to successful mnemonic encoding of visual scenes.

98 plausible neuronal conditions that allow for mnemonic encoding, and gives us further understanding of

99 namic disorder, heterogeneity, hysteretic or mnemonic enzymes across these different fields, and has

100 tal verification of some theories, including mnemonic evidence accumulation, balance-of-evidence for

101 fic neural mechanisms that tracked competing mnemonic evidence.

102 ich implicates AnG involvement in subjective mnemonic experience (such as vividness or confidence).

103 subtle individual differences in subjective mnemonic experience can be accurately gauged from measur

104 Moreover, a participant's subjective mnemonic experiences could be reliably decoded even when

105 al spatial representations are influenced by mnemonic factors in a T-maze continuous alternation task

106 ogical protein synthesis blockage results in mnemonic failure in hippocampus-dependent memories.

107 activity - a single-cell based, multistable mnemonic firing mode experimentally observed in several

108 coding and retrieval mechanisms that support mnemonic flexibility, revealing a unique role for MTL re

109 support cross-episode binding in service of mnemonic flexibility.

110 We suggest a previously-developed mnemonic for an approach to RESPECT the patient: First,

111 tional area for an auditory signal serve the mnemonic function of enhancing memory strength for that

112 These results suggest that a core mnemonic function of the hippocampus is to bridge repres

113 suggest that the inhibition of MTL-dependent mnemonic function persists beyond the cessation of the 2

114 anding of cholinergic mechanisms involved in mnemonic function, there have been no ultrastructural st

115 r offline periods, and must therefore hold a mnemonic function.

116 its at center stage for normal executive and mnemonic functioning and provides compelling evidence th

117 esized to support cognitive, perceptual, and mnemonic functions by coordinating neuronal interactions

118 h episodic and spatial memory, however these mnemonic functions have been traditionally investigated

119 Here, we review these DG-dependent mnemonic functions in light of the new findings and expl

120 various physiological alterations and impair mnemonic functions in the rodent hippocampus.

121 using on these structures for these specific mnemonic functions may, however, be limiting progress in

122 Thus, mnemonic functions of cortical plasticity are determinab

123 The mnemonic functions of hippocampal sharp wave ripples (SP

124 these highly active cells contributes to the mnemonic functions of the DG is uncertain.

125 ibitory circuits supporting navigational and mnemonic functions of the hippocampus.

126 ear how their activity may contribute to the mnemonic functions of the hippocampus.

127 pletion functions of CA3, and 2) the loss of mnemonic functions specific to the dentate gyrus, namely

128 heavily influenced by hippocampal-dependent mnemonic functions, including episodic meal-related memo

129 air many, but not all, hippocampus-dependent mnemonic functions, indicating that the rest of the hipp

130 centered on the hippocampus, which supports mnemonic functions.

131 a cognitive map of space that supports these mnemonic functions.

132 ocampal regions potentially support separate mnemonic functions.

133 forming two tasks with conflicting long-term mnemonic goals and contrasting neural profiles within th

134 Interestingly, the long-term mnemonic goals associated with specific cognitive tasks

135 Our results indicate a mnemonic guidance of human decision making, beyond antic

136 developed a perturbation approach to measure mnemonic hidden states in an electroencephalogram.

137 and recalled scene-word associations using a mnemonic imagery strategy.

138 w that OXT can potentiate the protective and mnemonic impact of aversive social information despite r

139 tection and intervention of neurological and mnemonic impairment.

140 f the substrate based on the derived working mnemonics in a predictable manner.

141 Non-conscious mnemonic influences, such as repetition priming, are tho

142 istracted, this leads to both disruptions of mnemonic information in early visual cortex and decremen

143 ural dissociation across regions that deploy mnemonic information in fundamentally different ways to

144 e that there might be parallel processing of mnemonic information in rats and humans.

145 Mnemonic information is processed in the hippocampus thr

146 o reinstate neuronal assemblies representing mnemonic information is thought to require their consoli

147 tructive signals that assess the saliency of mnemonic information propagated through the hippocampal

148 l decision making requires that we integrate mnemonic information regarding previous decisions with v

149 f distinct and orthogonal representations of mnemonic information-and also undergoes neurogenesis thr

150 of direct experience, pattern completion and mnemonic integration mechanisms may allow CCD to be gene

151 e control demands can be generalized through mnemonic integration processes, enabling the spread of e

152 trated signals consistent with resolution of mnemonic interference across domains.

153 as a mechanism supporting the resolution of mnemonic interference.

154 ures to investigate hippocampal responses to mnemonic interference.

155 n the ability to overcome moderate levels of mnemonic interference.

156 unequivocally determined, and thus a general mnemonic is provided for the assignment of chirality.

157 and demonstrate that expectations about when mnemonic items are most relevant can dynamically and rev

158 mically and reversibly prioritize individual mnemonic items at specific times at which they are deeme

159 In the present study, we examine the mnemonic limits of contextual fear conditioning in the a

160 Computing mnemonic links in this manner may provide an important m

161 The mnemonic mechanism postulates the existence of one therm

162 Maturation of hippocampal mnemonic mechanisms has been hypothesized to underlie th

163 These results lead us to propose a modified mnemonic model to explain cooperativity in GK.

164 amlike, nor does their REM sleep differ from mnemonic-naive control subjects.

165 emporal system, which results in deficits in mnemonic object discrimination.

166 This interaction is a fundamental mnemonic operation that has thus far been largely overlo

167 prefrontal cortex (PFC) is activated during mnemonic operations such as working memory maintenance a

168 nd (10-12 Hz) systematically track different mnemonic outcomes in both time and space: Over left post

169 xtent of pattern reinstatement for different mnemonic outcomes.

170 dentate gyrus) correlated with this form of mnemonic pattern completion across participants.

171 Computational and animal models suggest that mnemonic pattern completion is accomplished in a specifi

172 s to a wider behavioral repertoire including mnemonic, perceptual, and linguistic processes.

173 dynamics that control neural spiking during mnemonic periods interact with activity-silent mechanism

174 gly, neuromodulators hypothesized to enhance mnemonic persistent activity affect COM and CPn neurons

175 Mnemonic persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex (P

176 in systems-level consolidation and to reveal mnemonic plasticity specific to spatial memory.

177 h between- and within-subject differences in mnemonic precision, showing that EEG-based CTFs provide

178 Our findings provide a mechanism by which mnemonic prediction errors may drive memory updating-by

179 We asked whether mnemonic prediction errors promote hippocampal encoding

180 m between features of REM sleep dreaming and mnemonic principles.

181 ation as an active and biologically separate mnemonic process has been established through posttraini

182 auditory objects may depend on this type of mnemonic process to create and differentiate representat

183 e., in working memory (WM)] or by the weaker mnemonic process we will call passive short-term memory,

184 m memory and show that hippocampus-dependent mnemonic processes are more rapid than previously believ

185 erved during wakefulness suggests that these mnemonic processes are specific to the sleep state.

186 These mnemonic processes are undoubtedly influenced by both ex

187 However, recent evidence suggests that mnemonic processes both affect, and are affected by, eye

188 sing on value-based decisions and argue that mnemonic processes can account for regularities in choic

189 dation such that "higher-level" semantic and mnemonic processes can be impaired at relatively low lev

190 theta oscillations are postulated to support mnemonic processes in humans and rodents.

191 norepinephrine is ineffective in modulating mnemonic processes in the absence of a functional amygda

192 ories but also can suppress the operation of mnemonic processes more broadly, triggering windows of a

193 By contrast, generalization may emerge from mnemonic processes occurring while premise events are en

194 rks that support attentional, executive, and mnemonic processes subserving memory function.

195 t is unknown whether monkeys rely on similar mnemonic processes to perform recognition memory tasks.

196 tion maxima associated with visuospatial and mnemonic processes were spatially segregated, providing

197 the gamma and alpha bands orchestrate these mnemonic processes.

198 ribed central roles in both visuospatial and mnemonic processes.

199 ry expression, suggesting their necessity in mnemonic processes.

200 suggest a possible role for TRPC channels in mnemonic processes.

201 substances, success in quitting smoking, and mnemonic processes.

202 tic plasticity and the hippocampus-dependent mnemonic processes.

203 to support complex navigational (and perhaps mnemonic) processes.

204 suospatial analysis of scenes and contextual mnemonic processing along the parahippocampal longitudin

205 icate reduced selectivity and specificity in mnemonic processing during memory formation.

206 c interactions point to distinct channels of mnemonic processing in the NAc, with the dH-NAc channel

207 these markers show promise to help elucidate mnemonic processing in TLE.

208 view that the ORE is additionally shaped by mnemonic processing mechanisms beyond perception and att

209 rent location during immobility, pointing to mnemonic processing specific to experience occurring in

210 n dynamically assigning different aspects of mnemonic processing to specialized, interconnected netwo

211 neurons specialized in either attentional or mnemonic processing, but about one-third of the cells sh

212 and the theta rhythm has been implicated in mnemonic processing, but the functional contribution of

213 ese data suggest that, rather than constrain mnemonic processing, potentiation of SST interneuron act

214 Classical conditioning that involves mnemonic processing, that is, a "trace" period between c

215 king task that controlled for perceptual and mnemonic processing, we found that the human hippocampus

216 ze that tonic REM sleep may support off-line mnemonic processing, whereas phasic bursts of activity d

217 of faces and vocalizations but also in their mnemonic processing.

218 t hippocampal decoupling and deficits during mnemonic processing.

219 he importance of representational content to mnemonic processing.

220 e lingering biases that influence subsequent mnemonic processing.

221 , suggesting that gamma may reflect enhanced mnemonic processing.

222 al-hippocampal projections are necessary for mnemonic processing.

223 hat could compromise synaptic plasticity and mnemonic processing.

224 rders by targeting brain regions involved in mnemonic processing.

225 fferentiated by a combination of perceptual, mnemonic, prospective, and motivational elements.

226 on that serial dependence is a phenomenon of mnemonic rather than perceptual processes.

227 erge out of microlevel local dynamics (i.e., mnemonic reinforcement and suppression effects).

228 ell (PC) assemblies provide the brain with a mnemonic representation of space.

229 neuronal assemblies is thought to provide a mnemonic representation of space.

230 ing past events are integrated into a linked mnemonic representation.

231 divergent frameworks is the capacity to bind mnemonic representations across spatial and temporal gap

232 rol over behavior by biasing the salience of mnemonic representations and adjudicating among competin

233 ocation for the crossover from perceptual to mnemonic representations and highlight a potential left-

234 sual memory implicitly assume that errors in mnemonic representations are linearly related to distanc

235 erformed by the hippocampus wherein existing mnemonic representations are retrieved from incomplete i

236 jects the tonal inputs and the corresponding mnemonic representations are tightly coupled in such a m

237 ponsible for the encoding and maintenance of mnemonic representations extends to the cerebellum.SIGNI

238 in experiments that target specific types of mnemonic representations has provided deep insights into

239 the release of cortical inhibition on neural mnemonic representations in the hippocampus and subseque

240 During systems-level consolidation, mnemonic representations initially reliant on the hippoc

241 In the hippocampus, cell assemblies forming mnemonic representations of space are thought to arise a

242 cells (PYRs) of the mammalian brain provide mnemonic representations of space.

243 te for discriminating between perceptual and mnemonic representations of visual features.

244 ociated with DLPFC and attention to internal mnemonic representations perhaps mediated via PPC may se

245 wever, in several cortical regions, degraded mnemonic representations recovered substantially followi

246 et al., 2016), but the content of entorhinal mnemonic representations remains unclear.

247 impaired behavioral performance and degraded mnemonic representations with elevated memory load.

248 gest that amygdala modulation of hippocampal mnemonic representations, during the time of misleading

249 tory to rapidly modulate temporal lobe-based mnemonic representations.

250 0, a tell-tale characteristic of all-or-none mnemonic representations.

251 of cerebellum actively encodes and maintains mnemonic representations.

252 ht a potential left-hemisphere advantage for mnemonic representations.

253 sential to optimally disambiguate multimodal mnemonic representations.

254 dentify a potential hemispheric asymmetry in mnemonic representations.

255 storage also predicted the set size at which mnemonic resolution reached a stable plateau for each ob

256 is correlated with within-subject changes in mnemonic resolution.

257 We tested directly perceptual and mnemonic responses in MPA and an anterior, connectivity-

258 ther the latter causes blunted emotional and mnemonic responses.

259 e trafficking controls basal and E2-enhanced mnemonic retention of temporal, but not contextual, asso

260 d (1) disrupted neural activity critical for mnemonic retrieval and mental simulation and (2) reduced

261 ent nonhuman primate research suggests a key mnemonic role of distinct prefrontal cells in supporting

262 le-cell recordings while monkeys performed a mnemonic rule-guided saccade task.

263 words according to nonmnemonic (phonemic) or mnemonic (semantic or episodic) cues.

264 based memory judgements are not based on non-mnemonic signals being attributed to memory.

265 cal studies reveal a multidimensional set of mnemonic signals that include stimulus familiarity, with

266 irrelevant features, but only task-relevant mnemonic signals were encoded congruently with choice si

267 DLPFC) encode a diverse array of sensory and mnemonic signals, but little is known about how this inf

268 In 2007, we designed the Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST), a modified object recogn

269 ries towards a few stable representations in mnemonic space, inducing a bias in memory representation

270 ge, recession, wheeze, asthma, and vomiting (mnemonic STARWAVe; AUROC 0.81, 0.76-0.85) distinguished

271 ory is generally considered a highly dynamic mnemonic store, popular laboratory tasks used to underst

272 d suggest that the hippocampus modulates the mnemonic strength of this reinstatement.

273 n be accomplished in an office setting using mnemonics, structured interview techniques, and brief sc

274 ic mechanisms may provide a more fundamental mnemonic substrate.

275 his approach to test the hypothesis that the mnemonic symptoms of post-traumatic amnesia are caused b

276 much wider neurodegeneration in an extended mnemonic system (Papez circuit), which critically involv

277 hen detail a model of a culturally saturated mnemonic system in which cultural elements constitute an

278 decisions are directly supported by the same mnemonic systems characterized for relational learning m

279 ombination of resting-state, perceptual, and mnemonic task data.

280 because they fail to isolate perceptual from mnemonic task demands.

281 characterized by individual differences in a mnemonic task.

282 nputs to the medial prefrontal cortex during mnemonic tasks and may also integrate series of function

283 First, across both mnemonic tasks, activity was greater mainly in the poste

284 familiarity memory or performance on two non-mnemonic tasks.

285 for regulating the firing of neurons during mnemonic tasks.

286 female) using fMRI with both perceptual and mnemonic tasks.

287 by the cognitive demands posed by different mnemonic tasks.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We offer new insig

288 aspects of both the memory and control (non-mnemonic) tasks, but only a small fraction of the varian

289 EM) dreams, because of their similarities to mnemonic techniques, have the function of elaboratively

290 d's most distinguished experts in the use of mnemonic techniques: the top participants of the World M

291 he features of the present stimulus versus a mnemonic template formed by the prior stimuli.

292 The intervention included a mnemonic to standardize oral and written handoffs, hando

293 They neither feel the use of mnemonics to be dreamlike, nor does their REM sleep diff

294 ulation of consolidation and reprocessing of mnemonic traces that encode fearful experiences might re

295 In conclusion, mnemonic training drives distributed rather than regiona

296 l connectivity changes induced by 6 weeks of mnemonic training were correlated with the network organ

297 By contrast, the factor score for mnemonics use significantly correlated with metabolic de

298 marker specifically for MD in boys and for a mnemonic vulnerability in both sexes.

299 A simple mnemonic was developed to determine the configuration.

300 Overall, mnemonic word fluency was found to elicit greater DMN ac