ライフサイエンスコーパス: mock

1 LY, PPSV23, a mixture of PPSV23/PLY, or PBS (mock).

2 line transfected with the empty vector (A431-mock).

3 dly with the random fiber arrangement of ECM-mock.

4 xpression cells, HEK293-hOATP2B1 than HEK293-MOCK.

5 9 vs. 1.77 +/- 0.34; state 3, 1.00 +/- 0.29; Mock: 1.60 +/- 0.53; complex 2-3-4: 1.00 +/- 0.30 vs. 1.

6 SV23 = 9.19, PPSV23/PLY = 10.45, PLY = 8.71, Mock = 16.83; P = 0.0467).

7 iple pressures between 8 and 45 mm Hg, using mock AH +/-100 muM L-NAME.

8 Additional eyes (n = 3) were perfused with mock AH containing fluorescent tracer microspheres to co

9 0 decreased cell proliferation compared with mock and pSV (scrambled vector) treatments, as determine

10 We tested it on both mock and real metagenomic data and benchmarked the perfo

11 produced protein amounts were equivalent in mock and Ric-8A-immunodepleted rabbit reticulocyte lysat

12 After intravaginal HSV-2 challenge, the mock and UL19/UL47 adenovirus groups developed severe ac

13 pplication of MyTaxa on in silico generated (mock) and real metagenomes of varied read length (100-20

14 tion of eBD2 and -3 compared to that seen in mock- and influenza virus-infected EREC.

15 Comparing mock- and SAR-induced phloem exudate proteomes, 16 prote

16 no change in PD-L1 transcript levels between mock- and VZV-infected cells, indicating a posttranscrip

17 Mock- and VZV-infected primary human perineurial cells (

18 in, Abeta, and amyloid, was compared between mock- and VZV-infected quiescent primary human spinal as

19 techniques to analyze artificially generated mock aneuploid cells and cells with natural random aneup

20 otype-specific rabbit polyclonal antisera or mock antisera were passively administered to rabbits bef

21 we benchmarked metaFlye using simulated and mock bacterial communities and show that it consistently

22 ms present in their default databases from a mock bacterial community of 20 organisms, but only Centr

23 tforms for two primer pairs in a low density mock bacterial community.

24 ole (monatin plus monatin lactone/lactam) in mock beverage solutions, with an accompanying decrease i

25 rate TT, we created a calibration dataset of mock binary skeletonized mask images with increasing thi

26 ying five widely employed methodologies to a mock breast milk sample and four individual human breast

27 andard clinical methods were as follows: for mock BT DNA, 98.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval

28 parameter selection but could select between mock cases' residential and workplace addresses to local

29 Mock cataract surgery provides a unique ex vivo model fo

30 n was greater in these myotubes than that in mock cells (Mock vs. Mb-Flag::GFP: state 4, 1.00 +/- 0.0

31 nd bleomycin-induced apoptosis compared with mock cells (p < 0.01).

32 cellular calcium concentration compared with mock cells.

33 formed significantly more colonies than the mock cells.

34 in activities of secreted MMP2 and MMP9 from mock cells.

35 hile four negative-control animals underwent mock challenge.

36 us (10(3.5) TCID(50)/ml x 15 ml) (n = 12) or mock challenged with phosphate buffered saline (n = 6).

37 Next, mock clinical samples (infection-negative human sputum s

38 In a mock clinical trial, the sensor detects sGP-spiked human

39 introduction of a pediatric simulation-based mock code program.

40 proximately 4-10-fold) were stronger than in mock communities ( approximately 2-fold).

41 We evaluated marine samples and mock communities (containing 11 or 27 marine 16S clones)

42 Mock communities amplified with 515F-Y/926R yielded clos

43 ntibiotic susceptibility testing, as well as mock communities and clinical samples with known antimic

44 m shotgun metagenomic sequencing and profile mock communities and faecal samples from healthy and ill

45 hm performance was evaluated using simulated mock communities and fecal samples with spike-in pathoge

46 t beyond in silico predictions, testing with mock communities and field samples is important in prime

47 DNA was obtained from two low density mock communities of 11 diverse bacterial strains (with a

48 Moreover, sequencing of RNA mock communities revealed that, even though transcript a

49 of 25 environmental samples and three known "mock communities" at a depth averaging 3.1 million reads

50 In several mock communities, DADA2 identified more real variants an

51 ls of closely and distantly related nematode mock communities, of known intragenomic identity and ric

52 MTTTRAGTTT) yield more accurate estimates of mock community abundances, produce longer amplicons that

53 sequencing library preparations using a DNA mock community and a cell control of known concentration

54 re data, we reliably classified a 20-species mock community and captured the diversity of the immatur

55 t was able to amplify all the species in the mock community and to discriminate among them.

56 Shotgun metagenomic sequences of our mock community appear to be devoid of 16S chimeras, supp

57 Comparison of the diversity indices for the mock community data for the two primer pairs demonstrate

58 been designed that can reduce error rates in mock community data, but they change the sequence data i

59 When used to analyze a mock community dataset, FlowClus produced a lower error

60 Using a human-gut mock community dataset, we demonstrate that these method

61 We also develop a novel oral-specific mock community for pipeline validation.

62 The GSMs were first evaluated against mock community metagenomes, recently sequenced genomes a

63 ed and which was further benchmarked using a mock community of known composition.

64 Using mock community standards, we analyzed the amplification

65 sequences derived from the Human Microbiome Mock Community test sets and compared MetAmp and other t

66 f 14%, and the false discovery rate during a mock comparison was evaluated.

67 Nine CIB1 knockout and nine mock control clones were generated originating from a hu

68 All mock controls developed recurrent lesions through day 10

69 ed similar functional characteristics as the mock controls, but they had an impaired ability to pass

70 n in recurrent lesion days compared with the mock controls, had the highest reduction in days with re

71 Compared with mock controls, significantly increased m(6)A levels were

72 Laboratory-based mock crime studies have often been interpreted to mean t

73 o the right frontal cortex and perfused with mock CSF with 3% Dextran 500 at a flow rate of 1.0 muL/m

74 ex 50-species 210-genome 96-sample synthetic mock data set and then applied it to the Tara Oceans mic

75 After validation on mock datasets and comparison to existing methods, we app

76 was tested and validated on 20 synthetic and mock datasets ranging in community composition and compl

77 ing infection, in contrast to virus-infected mock-depleted mice that showed no clinical signs.

78 , Galphaq, Galpha13, and Galphas produced in mock-depleted RRL had characteristic resistance to limit

79 had been rapidly desensitized with 2.4G2 or mock-desensitized in mice in which monocyte/macrophages,

80 in the mock-immunized control group (pVAX-FI-Mock) developed primary lesions.

81 thylhexyl-tetrabromo-benzoate (EH-TBB)) in a mock-digestive fluid matrix.

82 including inpatients from 7 units during 196 mock disaster days distributed across the 1-year period

83 tients were assigned to receive placebo with mock dose adjustment.

84 L-thyroxine or matching placebo with mock dose titration.

85 her 15 kDa or 52 kDa, and fluorescein as the mock drug.

86 293T kidney cells; compared to expression of mock-edited cell lines, the homozygous enhancer deletion

87 Results from a "mock" field test, in which personal exposures to time-va

88 e and human mitochondrial and genomic DNA in mock forensic samples.

89 m) together with either formalin-inactivated mock HSV-2 (FI-Mock) or with FI-HSV2.

90 strengths (1.5, 3.0, and 7.0 T), including a mock imager with no magnetic field as a control conditio

91 cantly lowered clinical severity compared to mock immunization (PPSV23 = 9.19, PPSV23/PLY = 10.45, PL

92 y lower than scores of the rabbits that were mock immunized with PBS and Freund's adjuvant or with PP

93 Guinea pigs were either (i) mock immunized; (ii) immunized with gC2/gD2, with CpG an

94 lesions showed striking differences between mock-immunized and nHgbAI-immunized animals challenged w

95 d from Pneumocystis pneumonia, compared with mock-immunized animals (P= .047), following immunosuppre

96 shedding of HSV-2 DNA compared with that for mock-immunized animals.

97 , in the TG of ocularly challenged mice, and mock-immunized CD8alpha(-/-) mice had lower levels of PD

98 L30, and gD2t DNAs and all 10 animals in the mock-immunized control group (pVAX-FI-Mock) developed pr

99 the median peak and set point viral loads in mock-immunized controls (P < 0.01).

100 A third group of mock-immunized cows serve as challenge controls.

101 gK-immunized group than in both the gD- and mock-immunized groups.

102 Mock-immunized pigs were not protected from a challenge

103 r infection with WU2, when compared with the mock-immunized rabbits (P </= 0.007).

104 es in clinical scores compared with those in mock-immunized rabbits (P = 1.00) at 24 and 48 hours aft

105 r levels of PD-1 expression and latency than mock-immunized WT or CD8beta(-/-) mice.

106 pe, cultured primary rat AMs and LMVECs were mock infected or infected with SEOV and analyzed for vir

107 y infected with either WT or M virus or were mock infected.

108 y in apical surface media than in media with mock-infected airway epithelial cells (AECs).

109 cells were cocultured with SEOV-infected or mock-infected AMs or LMVECs and analyzed for helper T ce

110 Although the lipid composition of mock-infected and virus-infected fibroblasts was similar

111 trometry to quantify glycerophospholipids in mock-infected and virus-infected fibroblasts, as well as

112 s infected with M. gallisepticum Rlow and 20 mock-infected animals at days 1, 3, 5, and 7 postinocula

113 gen consumption rates and mROS expression in mock-infected bone marrow-derived macrophages but reduce

114 msters following extranasal inoculation with mock-infected brain homogenate, different strains of pri

115 (ligands and receptors) in TMEV-infected and mock-infected C57BL/6 mice both with and without seizure

116 cells were significantly lower than those in mock-infected cells after IFN-alpha treatment.

117 ur results show that amino acid depletion in mock-infected cells caused loss of mTORC1 activity and l

118 HLA-DR and CD40 in human B cells compared to mock-infected cells or cells treated with an inactivated

119 ecipitation assays of virus-infected but not mock-infected cells revealed a signaling complex includi

120 The transfected DNA from mock-infected cells yielded proteins associated with rep

121 ly increased glucose consumption compared to mock-infected cells, suggesting a possible alteration in

122 nt and remained lower than those measured in mock-infected cells.

123 L-28A, MCP-2, and IFN-alpha as compared with mock-infected cells.

124 tistically significant increases relative to mock-infected cells.

125 with proteinase K and samples prepared from mock-infected cells.

126 terferon-alpha production than the levels in mock-infected cells.

127 in infected cells but inhibited activity in mock-infected cells.

128 higher levels of MMP2 and MMP9 activity than mock-infected cells.

129 12 (IL-12) in HCMV-infected cells but not in mock-infected cells.

130 ls and adjacent uninfected cells compared to mock-infected cells.

131 s lipid accumulation compared to that in the mock-infected control.

132 V-infected hepatocytes compared to that in a mock-infected control.

133 d with severe clinical disease compared with mock-infected controls.

134 ompared with uninfected "bystander" cells or mock-infected controls.

135 SC of reovirus-infected animals compared to mock-infected controls.

136 ined elevated at 28 dpi compared to those of mock-infected controls.

137 ls in G(2)/M phase was observed, compared to mock-infected controls.

138 erations in development compared to those of mock-infected controls.

139 from RSV-infected cultures (>40%) than from mock-infected cultures (<5%) after 4 h.

140 PD-L1 expression in VZV-infected compared to mock-infected human brain vascular adventitial fibroblas

141 intracranial tumor xenografts, compared with mock-infected human GSCs.

142 Infected or mock-infected inoculum was identified within lymphatic v

143 TLR4 ligand (LPS) stimulation compared with mock-infected LPS-stimulated macrophages during a 6-d in

144 d TLR4 and TLR5, which declined over time in mock-infected macrophages, and enhanced both the intrace

145 nd compared their blood immune signatures to mock-infected mice before and after vaccination against

146 In mock-infected mice, by contrast, >95% of inocula up to 5

147 symptomatic JEV-infected mice, but not from mock-infected mice, induced significant permeability of

148 brains, measured by gelatin zymography, than mock-infected mice.

149 ate times is similar to that taking place in mock-infected or in DeltaVHS RNase mutant-virus-infected

150 sal and bronchial brushes, respectively, and mock-infected or infected with RSV BT2a.

151 In contrast, only 3% of mock-infected or mice infected at 4 weeks developed tumo

152 VZV-infected qHA-sps, but not mock-infected qHA-sps, contained intracellular amylin, A

153 We used mock-infected tissue as negative controls for ex-vivo ex

154 lionic neurons of latently infected, but not mock-infected, calves.

155 -sugar metabolites in HCMV-infected, but not mock-infected, cells.

156 y decreased 24 h postinfection compared with mock infection and thapsigargin treatment.

157 epticum R(low), compared to chickens given a mock infection followed by M. gallisepticum R(low) The t

158 e cell types caused higher MMP activity than mock infection, suggesting that they may contribute to t

159 d MMP activity levels equivalent to those in mock infection.

160 ected surface and concurrently experienced a mock infiltration procedure on another.

161 tocytes in the four species and, compared to mock-injected controls, improved the pathology in the ca

162 he mosquito midgut by over 70% compared with mock-injected mosquitoes.

163 RS allowed to discriminate mock inoculated (healthy) from virus-infected specimens,

164 Unlike 263K-inoculated animals, mock-inoculated animals show detectable skin/brain PrP(S

165 a 32% increase in trunk diameter compared to mock-inoculated control poplar trees.

166 veloped diarrhea whereas all the pigs in the mock-inoculated group had severe diarrhea, and 33% of th

167 omplish this, phloem exudates collected from mock-inoculated or SAR-induced leaves of wild-type Colum

168 lated with PC21A, 88% and 100% TC-PC177- and mock-inoculated piglets had diarrhea following challenge

169 ed 1 d post-inoculation with Pgt, but not in mock-inoculated plants.

170 attractive to aphids than those of J+ and J- mock-inoculated plants.

171 m, and after 2 wk, plants were inoculated or mock-inoculated with a phloem-restricted virus.

172 n exposed to a social-evaluative stressor (a mock job interview).

173 of offenders, judgements of moral wrongness, mock-legislated punishments and perpetrator shame-sugges

174 ced levels of Mcl-1 expression dissipated to mock levels by 72 h postinfection.

175 eiterative Recombination can construct large mock libraries of at least 10(4) biosynthetic pathways.

176 We validated our platform by first screening mock libraries of epidermal growth factor (EGF) for stim

177 rmate mice which received either the full or mock (LV-Mpz.Egfp) vector.

178 A mock manufacture was setup, and the impurities were intr

179 ed behavioral deficits in antibiotic-treated mock mice.

180 chmarked against gold-standard Ribo-Seq in a mock microbial community and applied to five different h

181 ethod validation by amplicon sequencing of a MOCK microbial community revealed the need to ascertain

182 our definition of an algebraic "regularized mock modular form." As an application, we consider the m

183 oving mice and modulated emotional behavior [Mock Nat Chem.

184 ed endothelium-dependent vasodilation versus mock-ND at 9 and 12 weeks and endothelium-independent ar

185 SNP-7/8a delivering in silico-designed mock neoantigens also induced CD8 T cells in nonhuman pr

186 response of human islets of Langerhans upon mock or CVB3 infection.

187 sed tumor size in pM treatment compared with mock or pSV treatments.

188 ly expressed depending on whether plants are mock or rhizobia inoculated.

189 pe-RV-infected mice that had received either mock or TriGAS PET treatment revealed that many of the h

190 control Mut3 mice perinatally infected with mock or with a different neurotropic virus.

191 3 and IL-17, respectively, or scrambled miR (mock) or inhibitors confirmed that these miRs specifical

192 h either formalin-inactivated mock HSV-2 (FI-Mock) or with FI-HSV2.

193 erse aortic constriction, when compared with mock- or dominant-negative CCN1-infected control subject

194 Mock- or HCMV-infected iPSCs were subjected to a cerebra

195 e performed a rapid-response exercise to the mock outbreak scenario using whole-genome sequencing, ge

196 h address selection-was able to localize the mock outbreak source to within a 500 m radius in almost

197 We simulated 30 mock outbreaks and compared 5 simple methods that do not

198 s with the taste control claim, although all mock packages were identical nutritionally.

199 Mock page cases (n = 16) were administered to 213 senior

200 pose of this study is to assess standardized mock page cases as a valid construct to assess clinical

201 A Mock Page program has been developed and adopted into a

202 Simulated mock pages demonstrate an innovative technique for train

203 as dramatically enhanced compared to that in mock-pretreated plants.

204 to transendocardial MPC injections (n=15) or mock procedures (n=5).

205 fibroblast-free ECMs, ECM-Sdc1, but not ECM-mock, promoted their attachment, invasion, and direction

206 distributions and contig sizes, and also on mock quasispecies sequencing data.

207 ing strategy to build a population-tailored "Mock Reference" from the same GBS data used for downstre

208 If rejection criteria were met, a committee mock-refused PCR unless the patient was clinically unsta

209 Only 1 of 110 mock-refused requests yielded a positive PCR result; thi

210 mammary fibroblasts (termed ECM-Sdc1 and ECM-mock, respectively).

211 Here we show that by using a mock scan protocol prior to a scan, in conjunction with

212 Using genuine and mock SCG metagenomes, we show that our approach corrects

213 lidated the capabilities of this system in a mock selection for the enrichment of a His-tagged DNA-sc

214 apsular infusion of Snx5-specific siRNA (vs. mock siRNA) decreases sodium excretion (Delta=-0.2+/-0.0

215 e, and delays receptor recycling compared to mock siRNA-transfected controls.

216 ctions of 200mug/g body weight of L-DOPS, or mock solution.

217 ere developed and prospectively applied in a mock stewardship program.

218 acy and control of instrument positioning in mock surgical trials involving 17 ophthalmic surgeons.

219 The results allow the (68)Ge activity of the mock syringe source to be expressed in terms of equivale

220 ive response ratios for a (68)Ge solid epoxy mock syringe source used in activity calibrators as a lo

221 study enabled NIST to calibrate epoxy-based mock syringe sources with a relative combined standard u

222 ously published methodology, solution-filled mock syringe sources, identical in geometry to the solid

223 e by -3.7%, allowing users of the commercial mock syringe surrogate source to calibrate their activit

224 several NIST-constructed epoxy-based (68)Ge mock syringes were then used as artifact standards to de

225 The assay was evaluated using mock test samples containing inactivated SARS-CoV-2 viri

226 letter, Ramanujan "defined" the notion of a mock theta function and offered some examples of functio

227 s paper shows that Ramanujan's definition of mock theta function is not equivalent to the modern defi

228 letter, Ramanujan introduced the notion of a mock theta function, and he offered some alleged example

229 This has led to an alternate definition of a mock theta function.

230 ablished for the first time that Ramanujan's mock theta functions actually satisfy his own definition

231 r Fourier series coefficients of Ramanujan's mock theta functions.

232 123 and 135 mum, respectively, and parental, mock-transduced (negative controls) and tumors expressin

233 antly greater inhibition compared to that in mock-transduced and parental cells.

234 hich became consistently more cytotoxic than mock-transduced cells against leukemia and solid tumor c

235 blood cells exhibited sickling compared with mock-transduced cells from sickle donors.

236 When compared with aged mock-transduced MSCs, aged MSCs overexpressing TERT, MYO

237 ing TERT and MYOCD were more clonogenic than mock-transduced MSCs.

238 Compared with mock transfectants, the HS6ST1 transfectants showed sign

239 However, for complex samples such as mock transfected cell culture fermentation, best results

240 SB's were significantly lower as compared to mock transfected cells.

241 positive C6 cells also grew more slowly than mock-transfected C6 cells in anchorage-dependent and anc

242 tenuated activation of ERK 1/2 compared with mock-transfected C6 cells, whereas focal adhesion kinase

243 e same treatment inhibited cell migration of mock-transfected C6 cells.

244 bly transfected with CD36 when compared with mock-transfected cells.

245 and spheroid formation compared to parental mock-transfected control.

246 alein, and PD146176) vs. vehicle-treated and mock-transfected controls.

247 r than tumors emerging from injection of the mock-transfected HNK-1-negative C6 cells.

248 ted and untreated cells, transfected or not (mock-transfected) with alpha4beta2 nAChRs.

249 evated FAK phosphorylation compared with the mock treated control.

250 f immune responses in the two vaccinated and mock treated groups, similar quantities of viral RNA wer

251 re detected on average, 4 days later than in mock treated plants.

252 nsfected biotinylated plasmid recovered from mock-treated and infected cells were identified using ma

253 Controls were mock-treated and killed after 24 h.

254 (p = 0.0178) at 6 months of age compared to mock-treated animals.

255 /(perimeter)(2)] from 0.47 +/- 0.06 units in mock-treated cells to 0.09 +/- 0.03 units in S6K-overexp

256 or p21(WAF1/CIP1) was increased over that in mock-treated cells, and this, again, was predicted to re

257 Compared with mock-treated cells, rapamycin-pretreated human ECs (rapa

258 or abrin cytotoxicity compared with control mock-treated cells.

259 ulated in IFN-treated IHH from the level for mock-treated cells.

260 ment had higher levels of Myt1 compared with mock-treated cells.

261 approximately fourfold less abundant than in mock-treated cells.

262 Compared to mock-treated controls, mo-br mice that received intraper

263 Unlike mock-treated DCs, DCs primed with the gamma(1)34.5 null

264 of infection, whereas the majority (7/10) of mock-treated HEV-infected pigs cleared fecal viral shedd

265 ter liver damage and mortality compared with mock-treated IL-4Ralpha(-/-) mice.

266 -fold-higher numbers than after infection of mock-treated macrophages, making it unlikely that reduce

267 that many of the host genes activated in the mock-treated mice represent type I interferon (IFN) resp

268 educed IFN-gamma levels compared to those of mock-treated mice, suggesting that reductions in IFN-gam

269 gamma and IL-2 levels in serum compared with mock-treated mice.

270 ce treated with TriGAS than in the brains of mock-treated mice.

271 ingle ratio relating phosphatase-treated and mock-treated samples.

272 Data from GAA- and mock-treated specimens generated by Aptima HPV were comp

273 e of Aptima HPV results from GAA-treated and mock-treated specimens was noted.

274 lloxan to destroy pancreatic islet cells, or mock-treated with vehicle, and maintained for 10 days be

275 ntravenously with 0.064-42 kBq of (211)At or mock-treated, and the kidneys, liver, lungs, and spleen

276 tment to remove EP-II-specific antibodies or mock treatment with a control peptide.

277 iglets with the three mutants, icPC22A, or a mock treatment.

278 users want even before you create the first mock-up of a system, the final product will provide a be

279 rified using either the test painting or the mock-up painting both measured with a table-top micro-XR

280 ould be extended to pandemic or pre-pandemic mock-up vaccines of H5 of group 1 and H7 virus of group

281 w around three-dimensional printed scaled-up mock-ups.

282 leared infection within 6-8 weeks, while all mock vaccinated controls became infected with high-level

283 We vaccinated and mock vaccinated donor macaques and then harvested betwee

284 Unprotected animals that were mock vaccinated or received empty vector developed inter

285 Thirty-nine of these macaques were mock vaccinated, 43 were vaccinated with either DNA-SIV/

286 etween vaccinated animal cell recipients and mock-vaccinated animal cell recipients did not reach sig

287 ly higher in comparison to those in VC2- and mock-vaccinated animals (P < 0.01 or P < 0.001).

288 nger time after HCV challenge, than those of mock-vaccinated chimpanzees.

289 mals that received cells from vaccinated and mock-vaccinated donor animals.

290 ed time to death compared to results for the mock-vaccinated group.

291 challenge, but the severity was greater for mock-vaccinated rabbits.

292 chimpanzees vaccinated using DNA/adenovirus, mock-vaccinated, and chimpanzees that had spontaneously

293 tests in treated Sh3tc2-/- mice compared to mock vector-treated animals.

294 with LV-Mpz.GJB1 compared with LV-Mpz.Egfp (mock) vector at the age of 6 months showed improved moto

295 On two Mock Virus Community datasets with ground truth, each se

296 r in these myotubes than that in mock cells (Mock vs. Mb-Flag::GFP: state 4, 1.00 +/- 0.09 vs. 1.77 +

297 and directly in the defined model matrix of mock wound fluid is demonstrated.

298 on is achieved in less than 1h straight from mock wound fluid without any extensive sample preparatio

299 A431-CCK2R/A431-mock xenografted athymic BALB/c nude mice were used for

300 after injection), whereas the uptake in A431-mock xenografts was negligible.